TPS Throttle Enhancer
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: TH-700-R4
TPS Throttle Enhancer
Yes I've seen the post about it and off the shelf chips...But no one bothers to explain why they are useless..All they say is "dont waste your money" or "it doesnt work" Anyone actully have one and not just say what everybody else is saying?
#2
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Moorpark
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 CAMARO 1968 FIREBIRD
Engine: CAMARO 3.1L FIREBIRD 455
Transmission: CAMARO 700R4 FIREBIRD TH-400
I have a chip i noticed a little better throtle response and it got rid of my govener but thats about it i paid 40 dollars for the chip its a FAST CHIP stage 2 but personaly if it was not 40 bucks but 200 like they sell for i would say its not worth it.
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Slayer isn't referring to a chip, he's referring to a little useless junk gadget that tells the ECU your throttle is further open than it really is. The benefits of such a device include:
a larger (oversized) pump shot, which can cause bogging
a little extra part throttle spark advancement
quicker entry into PE mode, degrading fuel milage...
Regardless of how they may make your car 'feel' faster in partial throttle, their benefits are utterly worthless. If you want more performance from that route, save yourself some cash, press the pedal more, and get the benefit of extra air at the same time
a larger (oversized) pump shot, which can cause bogging
a little extra part throttle spark advancement
quicker entry into PE mode, degrading fuel milage...
Regardless of how they may make your car 'feel' faster in partial throttle, their benefits are utterly worthless. If you want more performance from that route, save yourself some cash, press the pedal more, and get the benefit of extra air at the same time
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: TH-700-R4
Well I already have a modified intake (K&N Filter) and modified exhaust (Dynomax catback,catco cat) I dont think the extra fuel will rwally hurt it.I think i might buy it.
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Moorpark
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 CAMARO 1968 FIREBIRD
Engine: CAMARO 3.1L FIREBIRD 455
Transmission: CAMARO 700R4 FIREBIRD TH-400
The extra fuel will kill your CAT i had my IAT set to think it was awalys about 28 degrees out side so it would put out more fuel and it ended up killing my new cat the thing was destroyed inside after a year. Also didnt notice much of a difference in power.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: TH-700-R4
But if thats the case you can say,if its cold outside dont drive your car because it will kill the cat...or dont modify the cars computer because the extra fuel will kill the cat.
#7
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Moorpark
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 CAMARO 1968 FIREBIRD
Engine: CAMARO 3.1L FIREBIRD 455
Transmission: CAMARO 700R4 FIREBIRD TH-400
True im just sayin what happend it could of been a defective cat but the problem occured after i did that. I changed it back to the stock sensor and put a new cat in and have not had any problems in 3 years.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Or-eh-gun
Posts: 2,724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans-Am GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: WC-T5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.27
if a chip is $200 and does not do that much, why not just spend $300 to get the supplies to do your own prom burning?
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: TH-700-R4
Originally posted by Xophertony
if a chip is $200 and does not do that much, why not just spend $300 to get the supplies to do your own prom burning?
if a chip is $200 and does not do that much, why not just spend $300 to get the supplies to do your own prom burning?
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
I'd continue, but the ignorance overwhelms me. It's not worth it. If you're gonna do it, get it over with so I can laugh, shake my head, and resume wondering why I bother in the first place.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: TH-700-R4
Originally posted by TechSmurf
I'd continue, but the ignorance overwhelms me. It's not worth it. If you're gonna do it, get it over with so I can laugh, shake my head, and resume wondering why I bother in the first place.
I'd continue, but the ignorance overwhelms me. It's not worth it. If you're gonna do it, get it over with so I can laugh, shake my head, and resume wondering why I bother in the first place.
#12
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 83' Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: T5
Originally posted by V8 Slayer
But if thats the case you can say,if its cold outside dont drive your car because it will kill the cat...or dont modify the cars computer because the extra fuel will kill the cat.
But if thats the case you can say,if its cold outside dont drive your car because it will kill the cat...or dont modify the cars computer because the extra fuel will kill the cat.
When it's actually colder, then more fuel will be fed to the engine. BUT, when it's actually colder then the air will also be more dense, there fore the extra fuel will be burned -> The cat is not affected because the mixture is not overly rich and a load of unburned fuel does not reach the cat.
#13
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Re: TPS Throttle Enhancer
Originally posted by V8 Slayer
Yes I've seen the post about it and off the shelf chips...But no one bothers to explain why they are useless..All they say is "dont waste your money" or "it doesnt work" Anyone actully have one and not just say what everybody else is saying?
Yes I've seen the post about it and off the shelf chips...But no one bothers to explain why they are useless..All they say is "dont waste your money" or "it doesnt work" Anyone actully have one and not just say what everybody else is saying?
#14
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Xophertony
if a chip is $200 and does not do that much, why not just spend $300 to get the supplies to do your own prom burning?
if a chip is $200 and does not do that much, why not just spend $300 to get the supplies to do your own prom burning?
I had an ADS Superchip in my car; took it out, noticed NO difference. The car even seemed a little stronger with the factory chip back in.
I wonder if you have a speed shop nearby that would burn a custom chip for you... and how much it might cost. Couldn't hurt to call around.
#15
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by TechSmurf
Slayer isn't referring to a chip, he's referring to a little useless junk gadget that tells the ECU your throttle is further open than it really is. The benefits of such a device include:
a larger (oversized) pump shot, which can cause bogging
a little extra part throttle spark advancement
quicker entry into PE mode, degrading fuel milage...
Regardless of how they may make your car 'feel' faster in partial throttle, their benefits are utterly worthless. If you want more performance from that route, save yourself some cash, press the pedal more, and get the benefit of extra air at the same time
Slayer isn't referring to a chip, he's referring to a little useless junk gadget that tells the ECU your throttle is further open than it really is. The benefits of such a device include:
a larger (oversized) pump shot, which can cause bogging
a little extra part throttle spark advancement
quicker entry into PE mode, degrading fuel milage...
Regardless of how they may make your car 'feel' faster in partial throttle, their benefits are utterly worthless. If you want more performance from that route, save yourself some cash, press the pedal more, and get the benefit of extra air at the same time
would tricking the computer into thinking the throttle was open more retard the timing?
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Or-eh-gun
Posts: 2,724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans-Am GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: WC-T5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.27
i have never heard anyone say anything good about over the counter chips, i told my dad i might be getting into prom burning and he asked why i don't go buy a chip. i was thinking "for a v6, does anyone even sell them?"
besides, then everytime i wanted to change somthing i would need to spend another $100.
besides, then everytime i wanted to change somthing i would need to spend another $100.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MikkoV
TPI
2
09-09-2015 04:25 PM