TPI Throttle body
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Car: 2005 Lincoln LS, 83' Z28
Engine: 242 DOHC and an empty engine bay.
Transmission: 5R55S, T5 soon to be auto
Axle/Gears: 3.58s and soon to be 4.10s
TPI Throttle body
Gonna be doing a turbo setup real soon along with a custom intake plenum. Was wondering if I could use the twin 48mm(think thats right) Instead of the stocker?? I figured that Im gonna be pushing alot of air threw it anyways so why should CFM matter at that point. Im probably wrong but its on my mind and need help/opinions. Thank you, Baron
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: 2.8 soon to be 3.1 Twin turbo
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: No idea ATM
with a custom plenum its possible, i was thinking of doing the samething but with a aftermarket tb with bigger intake bores
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Jerriko did one like that already (welded a section of a TPI intake into the stocker). I did a search, but all the links are dead.
Why not use a monoblade? Thats what I did on Redraif's Trueleo intake. Hopefully we'll be able to post pics (and dyno #s) soon...going tomorrow night!
Why not use a monoblade? Thats what I did on Redraif's Trueleo intake. Hopefully we'll be able to post pics (and dyno #s) soon...going tomorrow night!
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Originally posted by LT1guy
. Hopefully we'll be able to post pics (and dyno #s) soon...going tomorrow night!
. Hopefully we'll be able to post pics (and dyno #s) soon...going tomorrow night!
Good luck tommorow
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Car: 2005 Lincoln LS, 83' Z28
Engine: 242 DOHC and an empty engine bay.
Transmission: 5R55S, T5 soon to be auto
Axle/Gears: 3.58s and soon to be 4.10s
Well I can get a TPI one cheaper. But will all the hookups work?? TPS and IAC??? Thats all I need right?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
The GM IAC and TPS work the same for both throttle bodies, so at the most you might have to change the connectors...not sure since I don't have a TPI style throttle body handy, and my LT1 one probably has a different connector.
Using the Ford one didn't require too much change regarding wiring (we're using the Ford TPS and the original GM style IAC, with an adapter), though the TPS voltage range is different so the closed reading is higher than it should be...it seems to be ok that way, though.
Dale, pics are coming sometime this weekend...it looks like a coated Alien "face hugger"! It seems a lot healthier, but we'll see for sure in about 3 hours.
Using the Ford one didn't require too much change regarding wiring (we're using the Ford TPS and the original GM style IAC, with an adapter), though the TPS voltage range is different so the closed reading is higher than it should be...it seems to be ok that way, though.
Dale, pics are coming sometime this weekend...it looks like a coated Alien "face hugger"! It seems a lot healthier, but we'll see for sure in about 3 hours.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Car: 2005 Lincoln LS, 83' Z28
Engine: 242 DOHC and an empty engine bay.
Transmission: 5R55S, T5 soon to be auto
Axle/Gears: 3.58s and soon to be 4.10s
Where would I get differant connectors?? Or could I use the ones off of the V6 TB??
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
Jerriko used the whole tpi center section & welded the v6 runners to it.
http://www.angelfire.com/crazy3/jims...d/34intake.htm
Tiago go this 3.4 intake neck modified to accept the tpi tb.
http://www.force-fed-fabrications.co...P10100264.html
http://www.angelfire.com/crazy3/jims...d/34intake.htm
Tiago go this 3.4 intake neck modified to accept the tpi tb.
http://www.force-fed-fabrications.co...P10100264.html
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Car: 2005 Lincoln LS, 83' Z28
Engine: 242 DOHC and an empty engine bay.
Transmission: 5R55S, T5 soon to be auto
Axle/Gears: 3.58s and soon to be 4.10s
What would I use so that my CAI fits onto the twin twin 48??
http://www.angelfire.com/crazy3/jims...d/34intake.htm
thats pretty neat , thinksomething liek that would work good on a cammed high compression 2.8 or would it end up being to big
thats pretty neat , thinksomething liek that would work good on a cammed high compression 2.8 or would it end up being to big
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
The stock throttle body isn't going to hold back the 2.8 under boost. Better to spend money doing high quality exhaust work. If you're absolutely convinced the throttle body is going to be a problem, I'd suggest a custom plenum with a new flange long before throttle body replacement on the stock plenum since most of the 2.8/3.1's intake problems occur at the tight bend in the upper/middle plenum transition.
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: 2.8 soon to be 3.1 Twin turbo
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: No idea ATM
Originally posted by daves89rs
what is the stock throttle body blade diam on a 2.8 and also on a 350 tpi setup
what is the stock throttle body blade diam on a 2.8 and also on a 350 tpi setup
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Car: 2005 Lincoln LS, 83' Z28
Engine: 242 DOHC and an empty engine bay.
Transmission: 5R55S, T5 soon to be auto
Axle/Gears: 3.58s and soon to be 4.10s
Well TechSmurf in my first post that started this thread I stated that I am making a new plenum. I wanna know is it worth it to use the twin TB off a TPI setup or should I just use the stock one? I mean under boost I shouldnt have to worry about cfm flow but would it be wiser to run the larger TB so that its less of a bottleneck?
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Chico, CA
Car: 89 Firebird, 92 RS
Engine: 2.8L MPFI, 355 TPI
Transmission: t-5, t-5
Axle/Gears: open 3.42, posi 3.42
the only thing you should worry about maybe is excessive airflow velocities causing lots of drag, which probably wont be an issue as the air is entering the plenum anyway, which(especially on a stock plenum) is the end of the road.
if you're making a new plenum anyway it may be worth it to get a new tb, but remember that when you change to a bigger tb it throws off your idle because each % opening TPS opening is letting it more air than stock. if your tuning with a turbo though, that shouldnt be a problem, so id say whatever floats your boat.
if you're making a new plenum anyway it may be worth it to get a new tb, but remember that when you change to a bigger tb it throws off your idle because each % opening TPS opening is letting it more air than stock. if your tuning with a turbo though, that shouldnt be a problem, so id say whatever floats your boat.
hmm thats my fualt i looke dat that page so fast i missed that info on the bottom anyways 2 48mm throttle blades would be way to much opening for the lil 2.8, my idea was going to do something simalar to what he did but not use the uper 2.8 manifold,and just make new runners to connect to the 2.8 ones , or directly to the 2.8 base plate to get rid of that bend were the 2 halfs meet.ill have to think of something else
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: 2.8 soon to be 3.1 Twin turbo
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: No idea ATM
but if your turbo or supercharged wouldnt using a twinblade be better? basicly adding air for a full 2 extra cylinders and then dividing it amongst the 6, which if you look at it like that, really isnt that much more air per cylinder
yeah i knew that already the biggest problem is going to be at say with a stock computer/tunning at 15% throttle blade opening it will be letting in X amount much more air. then i t would witht he stock single tb unit. now will the stock computer be able to adjust the fuel mixture to compensate. if not i already came up with an idea to shrink down the 48 mm throttle blades to an apporiate size. im gonna attempt this on a 2.8 na motor high comp and cam headers etc, my biggest thing for doing this is to get rid of the factory runners,mainly the sharp bend were the uper and lowers meet,and 2 for the "wtf" when ppl look under the hood and see the 350tpi upper plenum sitting there
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
the computer will compensate for the airflow at part throttle. the 02 sensor is there for that job.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Car: 2005 Lincoln LS, 83' Z28
Engine: 242 DOHC and an empty engine bay.
Transmission: 5R55S, T5 soon to be auto
Axle/Gears: 3.58s and soon to be 4.10s
Well I should be getting a call next week about my flange and then after that it should be much more than a couple weeks to finish it. Ill post pics when its done.
any of u guys know the volume of the stock runners and length, and if at possible what the stock 2.8 heads flow?? ive looked around and havent been able to find any info, reason i ask cause if i decide to try out that uper tpi plenum/tb i want to take it one further and make all new runners (prolly longer runners for high rpm power)
infact here u go
...................Valve lift .100" .200" .300" .400" .500"
no intake-head CFM 64.295 116.9 133.6 146.96 146.96
and with stock manifold
stock intake CFM 55.945 106.88 124.415 131.93 139.445
...................Valve lift .100" .200" .300" .400" .500"
no intake-head CFM 64.295 116.9 133.6 146.96 146.96
and with stock manifold
stock intake CFM 55.945 106.88 124.415 131.93 139.445
Last edited by daves12secV6; Jan 2, 2006 at 09:16 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Chico, CA
Car: 89 Firebird, 92 RS
Engine: 2.8L MPFI, 355 TPI
Transmission: t-5, t-5
Axle/Gears: open 3.42, posi 3.42
a quick search yields a variety of results from 128 cfm to your 145, so somewhere in there i guess.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Car: 2005 Lincoln LS, 83' Z28
Engine: 242 DOHC and an empty engine bay.
Transmission: 5R55S, T5 soon to be auto
Axle/Gears: 3.58s and soon to be 4.10s
Nothing yet.. The CNC that was gonna be used for my flange broke down. I should get it by middle next week. After that it shouldnt be long till its done..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mdtoren
Tech / General Engine
0
Aug 16, 2015 05:45 PM




