Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
I haven't been on here in quite a while... I've beat several v8s with my v6 camaro!
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: Automatic
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
ive beat a 1995 f150 5.0 with headers and msd. Both cars had straight pipes that nite down the main drag in a lil town. Man that was loud
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,416
Likes: 493
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
I doubt that you will from a stop, but from a roll its possible. The 305 has alot of torque on even the 3.1. 3.4 swap might be closer. I know my 3.4/3500 top-end swap in my S10 Blazer will turn it on and MOVE.
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: Wyoming
Car: 92 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
From a dead stop the V6 is usually faster then the TBI cars because of the gearing. From 45mph on up the V8 will have the edge. Nitrous does wonders for the V6.
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 917
Likes: 1
From: peterborough UK
Car: 88 T firebird
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: t5
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
i agree Drew the v8's arnt that great from a stand still, from what ive driven and seen they either bog down a little untill they get rolling/revs for torque to kickass or they spin up too much and just dont go anywhere, the v6 is alot easier to get going, would strugle in the mid part but once its screaming, byebye v8
;-)
;-)
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: unknown
Car: 1992 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3:23
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
A 16.9sec 1/4 mile time isnt gonna beat many v8's if any. from a 40mph roll i lost to my friends 4 door Pontiac G6 LOL true story.
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 917
Likes: 1
From: peterborough UK
Car: 88 T firebird
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: t5
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
here in the UK i know someone with an old 2.5v6 vauxhall (GM) cavalier that regulary beats there freinds 5.0 ho stang. i think these engines are a little underated and deserve a bit more respect...
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
Most stock 2.8/3.1 fbodies are lucky to run 16.5 - 17.0. Meanwhile pretty much any 86-93 Mustang 5.0 is a mid-14 - mid-15 second car. A convertible might be high 15's with an auto. Also all Mustang 5.0's are HO cars with full GT style suspension. Not saying it didn't happen, but it's the exception not the rule. The 2.8/3.1 deserves respect for being a good, solid, engine with decent around town power and decent mileage, etc... It's not some crazy fast underated race car engine.
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 917
Likes: 1
From: peterborough UK
Car: 88 T firebird
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: t5
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
it will be......... LOL
eyeing up some M3 (6cyl has 6 throttles) or 2 triumph 3cyl throttle bodies now ;-)
eyeing up some M3 (6cyl has 6 throttles) or 2 triumph 3cyl throttle bodies now ;-)
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
i agree Drew the v8's arnt that great from a stand still, from what ive driven and seen they either bog down a little untill they get rolling/revs for torque to kickass or they spin up too much and just dont go anywhere, the v6 is alot easier to get going, would strugle in the mid part but once its screaming, byebye v8
;-)
;-)
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
LOL.
My 89k mile 3.1 ran a 17 flat at 74.x MPH, and the only time I ever won a race was against a Dodge 1500 with a 318. Never got it to the track with the turbo, but it was much faster than my in-law's '85 305TBI Camaro.
Fastest N/A Cavilier I know of is Dave's z24 powered by a 291whp 3500 (posts sometimes as purple82ta here on TGO). He runs 13.7, and is an exception to the rule. N/A Cavi's aren't very fast unless it has a Gen3 60* in it.
My 89k mile 3.1 ran a 17 flat at 74.x MPH, and the only time I ever won a race was against a Dodge 1500 with a 318. Never got it to the track with the turbo, but it was much faster than my in-law's '85 305TBI Camaro.
Fastest N/A Cavilier I know of is Dave's z24 powered by a 291whp 3500 (posts sometimes as purple82ta here on TGO). He runs 13.7, and is an exception to the rule. N/A Cavi's aren't very fast unless it has a Gen3 60* in it.
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
LOL.
My 89k mile 3.1 ran a 17 flat at 74.x MPH, and the only time I ever won a race was against a Dodge 1500 with a 318. Never got it to the track with the turbo, but it was much faster than my in-law's '85 305TBI Camaro.
Fastest N/A Cavilier I know of is Dave's z24 powered by a 291whp 3500 (posts sometimes as purple82ta here on TGO). He runs 13.7, and is an exception to the rule. N/A Cavi's aren't very fast unless it has a Gen3 60* in it.
My 89k mile 3.1 ran a 17 flat at 74.x MPH, and the only time I ever won a race was against a Dodge 1500 with a 318. Never got it to the track with the turbo, but it was much faster than my in-law's '85 305TBI Camaro.
Fastest N/A Cavilier I know of is Dave's z24 powered by a 291whp 3500 (posts sometimes as purple82ta here on TGO). He runs 13.7, and is an exception to the rule. N/A Cavi's aren't very fast unless it has a Gen3 60* in it.
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
...https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/powe...html?highlight=
There wasn't room to fart in the Corssica. The battery had to move to the trunk, and the washer fluid tank was 86'd as well.
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Car: 2006 Ford Mustang
Engine: 4.0 V-6
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: not sure
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
Just do what I did my turbo on my 3.8 just sits on top of the engine. Yeah it's a 165hp dog but it can still give any of the early 305's a good hard run unless it throws a rod through the block. Not sure if it can beat a TPI car but it can run with crossfires and TBI's easily. Sometimes it can beat them sometimes not.
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Sunrise Fl
Car: 91 Camaro TBI 5.0
Transmission: Auto
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
LOL.
My 89k mile 3.1 ran a 17 flat at 74.x MPH, and the only time I ever won a race was against a Dodge 1500 with a 318. Never got it to the track with the turbo, but it was much faster than my in-law's '85 305TBI Camaro.
Fastest N/A Cavilier I know of is Dave's z24 powered by a 291whp 3500 (posts sometimes as purple82ta here on TGO). He runs 13.7, and is an exception to the rule. N/A Cavi's aren't very fast unless it has a Gen3 60* in it.
My 89k mile 3.1 ran a 17 flat at 74.x MPH, and the only time I ever won a race was against a Dodge 1500 with a 318. Never got it to the track with the turbo, but it was much faster than my in-law's '85 305TBI Camaro.
Fastest N/A Cavilier I know of is Dave's z24 powered by a 291whp 3500 (posts sometimes as purple82ta here on TGO). He runs 13.7, and is an exception to the rule. N/A Cavi's aren't very fast unless it has a Gen3 60* in it.
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Sunrise Fl
Car: 91 Camaro TBI 5.0
Transmission: Auto
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis, MN
Car: '86 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
I respect the hell out of any v6 boosted f-body because not only is it a pain to do, but they're sleepers in a major way, and still get the gas mileage. I've been looking for AGES to find a turbo or supercharger for my '02 3.8 but they just don't exist. So now, chances are I'll end up trading for an LS1 or dropping an LT1 in.
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Sunrise Fl
Car: 91 Camaro TBI 5.0
Transmission: Auto
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
It was nearly mission impossible to boost the 3.1l, thanks to BBS designs designing a turbo manifold. I installed a crane cam, a disk brake posi rear swap out of a 88 TA, and Im going to port and polished the heads. Im hoping after 15 psi boost and a centerforce, my lil v6 can do what my lt1 can do. I may have to explore NOS. I don't believe the 3.1l is completely hopeless against a v8, but if the v8 had anything done to it, the v6 will have to ask for the check.
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis, MN
Car: '86 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
Sounds like a pretty nice setup for the 3.1, I'd like to see the look on people's face as you hang with their v8's lol.
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Sunrise Fl
Car: 91 Camaro TBI 5.0
Transmission: Auto
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
Im looking forward to it myself, Im looking into every way to get hp out of it. We have the e3 spark plugs, MSD ignition box & coil, 3 rivers aluminum driveshaft from a LS1, Jet chip and underdrive pulleys. As soon as BBS finishes the manifold we will put in the heavier fuel injectors, the FMU, and the MSD high pressure fuel pump. We cut the spings to make the car 3 inches off the ground, My main goal is to drift the car. At Moroso in jupiter fl we do alot of drifting and there are nothing but imports. Im behind on the updates, but Im getting alot of pics and putting them on cardomain.com, search for excellegions.
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: Wyoming
Car: 92 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
It was nearly mission impossible to boost the 3.1l, thanks to BBS designs designing a turbo manifold. I installed a crane cam, a disk brake posi rear swap out of a 88 TA, and Im going to port and polished the heads. Im hoping after 15 psi boost and a centerforce, my lil v6 can do what my lt1 can do. I may have to explore NOS. I don't believe the 3.1l is completely hopeless against a v8, but if the v8 had anything done to it, the v6 will have to ask for the check.
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Sunrise Fl
Car: 91 Camaro TBI 5.0
Transmission: Auto
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
I dont have a pic of the turbo set up yet, BBS Designs hasn't shipped it to me yet, but to give you an idea; using the stock manifold on the drivers side, the exhaust goes down and under the oil pan just like stock but instead of joining into a y pipe, the exhaust comes up into the "E" manifold that bbs makes, it's called "E" manifold because its a 2"3/4 pipe with three 1"5/8 pipes welded to it to collect the exhaust on the passenger side. that same manifold collects the exhaust on the passenger side then the exhaust travels under the alternator into the turbo that is mounted infront of the engine. The exit pipe from the turbo turns hard 90 degrees and runs parallel to the feed pipe back down to were the y pipe would of met then continues as the stock would.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
From: Western PA
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1/3100 in progress...Turbo Soon
Transmission: 700r4
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
First, what did you use to glue your intake manifold? I would hate to see that blow apart when you get under boost.
I hope you are going to use an intercooler. If I remember correctly the BBS system routes the intake from the turbo straight to the TB...unless youre just getting the hot pipes. The IC is not a "must"...but its good to have IMO.
I hope you are going to use an intercooler. If I remember correctly the BBS system routes the intake from the turbo straight to the TB...unless youre just getting the hot pipes. The IC is not a "must"...but its good to have IMO.
Last edited by grimmcs; Mar 22, 2008 at 04:39 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 3
From: Windsor Ontario
Car: 1987 Firebird Formula
Engine: 2004 LQ4
Transmission: T-5 WC
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
Depending on the car, probably not. Now, if it was a big truck, like a chevy blazer, or something of the sort with a highway gear, probably off the line I'd have them, but as far as a V8 2 door sports car, definitely not. The power to weight ratio of my car is way, way off.. Maybe if I had some more money, and did a decent rebuild, then my odds would balance out, but as of now, it's a dog.
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
That turbo setup is awesome. I'm loving the modified Starion/Conquest intercooler. I've got one just like it in my garage, complete with red overspray. I gotta get the inlet/outlet changed from the 1.75" tubes then it's goin on the Mustang.
Stock for stock, if you line up a 3.1/automatic and a 305TBI/automatic at the stoplight, when that light turns green that LH0 is going to pull a car on the L03 and hold it up to about 25mph, and may even hold a nose till 45-50mph before the TBI car pulls ahead. It's all about gearing. The 3.23's paired with the 3.1 blows the 2.73's in the auto TBI cars out of the water at low speeds. I've been there and done that lining my stock 150,000+ mile bird up next to other birds and Camaros. Really the only advantage the L03 has at city speeds is that V8 feel and sound.
A L69, LB9, L98, etc is going to have no problem running away from stock or even mildly modified 2.8's and 3.1's. Couldn't tell you on the LG4 since I haven't seen a stock one in about 10 years now.
Nitrous REALLY makes a world of difference with the 3.1. I did everything wrong with my nitrous experiment, advanced timing, platinum plugs, too large a shot (125hp), etc and if anything the car ran BETTER after the nitrous use. On the squirt it was more then a match for the average V8 car. I'd put it up against a stock LS1, LT1, or a really strong L98. With three adults in the car we tore the hell out of a really nice Fox body GT. The only bad part was $50 to fill the bottle any night I was looking for trouble.
A buddy of mine bought a Fiero that ran 12's on the stock 2.8 with a 175hp shot. When we ran it without the nitrous it run mid 15's.
Stock for stock, if you line up a 3.1/automatic and a 305TBI/automatic at the stoplight, when that light turns green that LH0 is going to pull a car on the L03 and hold it up to about 25mph, and may even hold a nose till 45-50mph before the TBI car pulls ahead. It's all about gearing. The 3.23's paired with the 3.1 blows the 2.73's in the auto TBI cars out of the water at low speeds. I've been there and done that lining my stock 150,000+ mile bird up next to other birds and Camaros. Really the only advantage the L03 has at city speeds is that V8 feel and sound.
A L69, LB9, L98, etc is going to have no problem running away from stock or even mildly modified 2.8's and 3.1's. Couldn't tell you on the LG4 since I haven't seen a stock one in about 10 years now.
Nitrous REALLY makes a world of difference with the 3.1. I did everything wrong with my nitrous experiment, advanced timing, platinum plugs, too large a shot (125hp), etc and if anything the car ran BETTER after the nitrous use. On the squirt it was more then a match for the average V8 car. I'd put it up against a stock LS1, LT1, or a really strong L98. With three adults in the car we tore the hell out of a really nice Fox body GT. The only bad part was $50 to fill the bottle any night I was looking for trouble.
A buddy of mine bought a Fiero that ran 12's on the stock 2.8 with a 175hp shot. When we ran it without the nitrous it run mid 15's.
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
That turbo setup is awesome. I'm loving the modified Starion/Conquest intercooler. I've got one just like it in my garage, complete with red overspray. I gotta get the inlet/outlet changed from the 1.75" tubes then it's goin on the Mustang.
Stock for stock, if you line up a 3.1/automatic and a 305TBI/automatic at the stoplight, when that light turns green that LH0 is going to pull a car on the L03 and hold it up to about 25mph, and may even hold a nose till 45-50mph before the TBI car pulls ahead. It's all about gearing. The 3.23's paired with the 3.1 blows the 2.73's in the auto TBI cars out of the water at low speeds. I've been there and done that lining my stock 150,000+ mile bird up next to other birds and Camaros. Really the only advantage the L03 has at city speeds is that V8 feel and sound.
A L69, LB9, L98, etc is going to have no problem running away from stock or even mildly modified 2.8's and 3.1's. Couldn't tell you on the LG4 since I haven't seen a stock one in about 10 years now.
Nitrous REALLY makes a world of difference with the 3.1. I did everything wrong with my nitrous experiment, advanced timing, platinum plugs, too large a shot (125hp), etc and if anything the car ran BETTER after the nitrous use. On the squirt it was more then a match for the average V8 car. I'd put it up against a stock LS1, LT1, or a really strong L98. With three adults in the car we tore the hell out of a really nice Fox body GT. The only bad part was $50 to fill the bottle any night I was looking for trouble.
A buddy of mine bought a Fiero that ran 12's on the stock 2.8 with a 175hp shot. When we ran it without the nitrous it run mid 15's.

Stock for stock, if you line up a 3.1/automatic and a 305TBI/automatic at the stoplight, when that light turns green that LH0 is going to pull a car on the L03 and hold it up to about 25mph, and may even hold a nose till 45-50mph before the TBI car pulls ahead. It's all about gearing. The 3.23's paired with the 3.1 blows the 2.73's in the auto TBI cars out of the water at low speeds. I've been there and done that lining my stock 150,000+ mile bird up next to other birds and Camaros. Really the only advantage the L03 has at city speeds is that V8 feel and sound.
A L69, LB9, L98, etc is going to have no problem running away from stock or even mildly modified 2.8's and 3.1's. Couldn't tell you on the LG4 since I haven't seen a stock one in about 10 years now.
Nitrous REALLY makes a world of difference with the 3.1. I did everything wrong with my nitrous experiment, advanced timing, platinum plugs, too large a shot (125hp), etc and if anything the car ran BETTER after the nitrous use. On the squirt it was more then a match for the average V8 car. I'd put it up against a stock LS1, LT1, or a really strong L98. With three adults in the car we tore the hell out of a really nice Fox body GT. The only bad part was $50 to fill the bottle any night I was looking for trouble.
A buddy of mine bought a Fiero that ran 12's on the stock 2.8 with a 175hp shot. When we ran it without the nitrous it run mid 15's.

I now remember you. When I first signed up here, I was inquiring about putting a turbo on my car and you mentioned the N20. I liked the idea of spending a grand and never filling a bottle, lol
oh, the LHO came with 3.23's
Last edited by firstfirebird; Mar 22, 2008 at 11:54 PM.
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
That's why I've got a Mustang with a Turbocoupe 2.3L EFI Turbo now. After I get the intercooler on, I'll put the nitrous on the Mustang on top of the turbo.
Started out a 88hp carbed 2.3 with a 4spd manual. Now it's somewhere well north of 150hp, boosting 17psi with a 5spd and 8.8 posi rear. So much easier to work on and parts pretty much fall from the sky. It doesn't handle like the Firebird, even after swapping to the TC suspension, but it's faster in normal street trim.
Started out a 88hp carbed 2.3 with a 4spd manual. Now it's somewhere well north of 150hp, boosting 17psi with a 5spd and 8.8 posi rear. So much easier to work on and parts pretty much fall from the sky. It doesn't handle like the Firebird, even after swapping to the TC suspension, but it's faster in normal street trim.
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
88hp turbo 4cyl? Wow, I thought the 2.3 Thunderbird had more than that!
The 8.5 rear is strong in the Ford's. The SBC Mustang had it running 10's, never had a problem.
Should be faster than the fbod, weighs less and you have a little more power
The 8.5 rear is strong in the Ford's. The SBC Mustang had it running 10's, never had a problem.
Should be faster than the fbod, weighs less and you have a little more power
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
To 25mph I believe it. I have a few time slips and the 60' on a stock 3.1 wasn't bad for a 140hp, 3700lb car. It's a dog after that though, lol
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
I've beat my fair share of v8s. No, my 3.1 is nowhere near stock but, it IS n/a! 1/4 mile times are in my sig.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
What 1/4 mile times do you want, and why are they relevant when I'm talking about street performance, under 45mph? Can you not get up to 45mph in the 1/4?
Originally Posted by Drew
From a dead stop the V6 is usually faster then the TBI cars because of the gearing. From 45mph on up the V8 will have the edge.
FWIW I have a stack of timeslips but they aren't relevant to the conversation for all the reasons above, and since they were made with my Formula, they don't really apply to a discussion comparing a 3.1 to a 5.0 TBI.
Originally Posted by 871LEIroc
I never advocated the virtues of the 305 TBI--it really doesn't have any but low end torque. I have raced a 91 Trans Am TPI (305 auto)--which I beat to 20 mph from a stop. It then proceeded to rip past my car to 0.7 faster in the 1/4 and 6-7 mph faster.
Originally Posted by Moron
"there (is) no way in hell (,) a stock 3.1 (,) can take a 305 TBI off the line."
Maybe you're saying you were driving a 3.1? Maybe it would have been a good idea to explain that so your comment would be relevant. But then if your 3.1 held off a 305 TPI car, then why is it so hard to belive it'd take up to another 20mph for the TBI to catch up... hmm...
Originally Posted by 871LEIroc
But wait.....since you can take a 305 TBI off the line why stop at that---take on a 305 TPI!!


Originally Posted by 871LEIroc
The TPI then pulled hard on my and. Next your thinking that you can take my Formula!
If you're going to come in here and make a bunch of noise, at least read what's been posted and wait for the text to register in your brain before you click reply.
PS: Last I checked, 88 was the first year for the 1LE option... I don't know what you're smoking.
Last edited by Drew; Mar 23, 2008 at 03:40 PM.
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
i wantd to know what i can do to my 3.1 to run faster as in aftermarket parts and what kind of setups other people have
alos wanted a turbo kit and was wondering if anyone has one for sale or knows where to get it
alos wanted a turbo kit and was wondering if anyone has one for sale or knows where to get it
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
Topics have a habit of wandering. You asked the question and you're getting answers. The bickering comes from trolls and ignorants getting upset about the topic disturbing their blissful ignorance.
You want to know what it takes to beat a V8... Well if it's a slow V8, and the best V6, you don't have to do anything. There aren't really any bolt ons available marketed directly at the *60 V6 that are going to make it hang with an optomized V8. Nitrous is the quickest and easiest bolt on, that anyone can order up from any number of sources, that will actually make a sotp, real world, difference. A turbocharger can bring about the same result, but unless you have a little bit of knowledge, tools, and fabrication ability, it's not going to be easy. It's not something you can just buy from a reputable manufacturer.
The truth is that all the expensive bolt on's in the world will usually just make a 2.8 or 3.1 marginally faster. There's a reason the Fiero guys do SBC V8 swaps, Northstar swaps, SC 3800's, etc. It's not cause they just don't like the 60* V6.
You want to know what it takes to beat a V8... Well if it's a slow V8, and the best V6, you don't have to do anything. There aren't really any bolt ons available marketed directly at the *60 V6 that are going to make it hang with an optomized V8. Nitrous is the quickest and easiest bolt on, that anyone can order up from any number of sources, that will actually make a sotp, real world, difference. A turbocharger can bring about the same result, but unless you have a little bit of knowledge, tools, and fabrication ability, it's not going to be easy. It's not something you can just buy from a reputable manufacturer.
The truth is that all the expensive bolt on's in the world will usually just make a 2.8 or 3.1 marginally faster. There's a reason the Fiero guys do SBC V8 swaps, Northstar swaps, SC 3800's, etc. It's not cause they just don't like the 60* V6.
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: Wyoming
Car: 92 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
you have to admire drew, protecting the 60* what a guy
, only people have own a 60* knows what it can do. I have kept up with a 2JZ-GE in supra until i hit 50 and it took off.
, only people have own a 60* knows what it can do. I have kept up with a 2JZ-GE in supra until i hit 50 and it took off. Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
From: Western PA
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1/3100 in progress...Turbo Soon
Transmission: 700r4
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
You know what else is funny? Off the line I have pulled infront of a lot of cars...never held it for long on some, but I still beat them for a little bit. I even beat a BMW once...for about 15 feet
...than all I saw was tail lights. I remember once this Civic with a big wing and a "fart pipe" pulled up beside me at a light. He wanted to look all bad *** in front of his girlfriend...light turned green...I heard a really pissed off weed wacker...and than I was showing him my tail lights. But than again they say they usually race from 45mph rolls
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Car: 86 Turbo Camaro
Engine: 427LSX
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 9" 3:25
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
I don't have any problems with V8's now.... 
This thread didn't say anything about the V6 having to be the factory one did it?
3.8L Buick GN V6 with a few engineering tweaks (obviously)
Last year with tight converter poor launch went 11.16@123mph on 93oct. 18psi.
This year with stroker crank,6.3" rods.. Roller cam and converter re-stalled I should have no problems with 10.50's on 93oct. and all I want is 9.9999 on race fuel one time
~Scott

This thread didn't say anything about the V6 having to be the factory one did it?
3.8L Buick GN V6 with a few engineering tweaks (obviously)
Last year with tight converter poor launch went 11.16@123mph on 93oct. 18psi.
This year with stroker crank,6.3" rods.. Roller cam and converter re-stalled I should have no problems with 10.50's on 93oct. and all I want is 9.9999 on race fuel one time

~Scott
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Car: 89 V6 Camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open diff
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
That is a pretty slick setup you got there. How did you get the pipes molded on the front of the engine bay? It looks really good, well done.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Car: 86 Turbo Camaro
Engine: 427LSX
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 9" 3:25
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
I wanted to keep the stock hood so I cut the coresupport and welded the mandral bent pipes into the core support so I can use the stock latch/safty catch. The Intercooler is down below the pipes there.
The trans-cooler with fan is above the rear end. The oil cooler/fan is in the pass. side (front of wheel) Both have 8" fans/relays ect.
The only thing in the front is Intercooler and Radiator.
It's a 4"inlet pipe and 5" downpipe that flows into a splitter under the car to duel 3" exhaust with Dynomax ultraflow's. It's nice and quiet in the car and outside. It's my daily driver in the summer.
9" Rear end with 3:50gears/locker/35spline axels.
TH400trans with Brake/3700Stall.
It takes alot of extra time to set things up like this but working on it is a breese and it ends up looking alot cleaner.
Also run Sequential FAST EFI with wideband.
Cheers!
~Scott



The trans-cooler with fan is above the rear end. The oil cooler/fan is in the pass. side (front of wheel) Both have 8" fans/relays ect.
The only thing in the front is Intercooler and Radiator.
It's a 4"inlet pipe and 5" downpipe that flows into a splitter under the car to duel 3" exhaust with Dynomax ultraflow's. It's nice and quiet in the car and outside. It's my daily driver in the summer.
9" Rear end with 3:50gears/locker/35spline axels.
TH400trans with Brake/3700Stall.
It takes alot of extra time to set things up like this but working on it is a breese and it ends up looking alot cleaner.
Also run Sequential FAST EFI with wideband.
Cheers!
~Scott
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 3
From: Windsor Ontario
Car: 1987 Firebird Formula
Engine: 2004 LQ4
Transmission: T-5 WC
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Who's V-6's can beat a V-8??????
With the stock hood it looks like it would be a factory 305 or something, but really, it's that... Amazing..









