STS turbo for v6?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member




Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 313
From: Missouri
Car: 1985 Z28
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
STS turbo for v6?
Has anyone here looked at a universal remote mount STS turbo for our v6?
I was just looking at their website and it seems like an ingenious way to turbo a 3rd gen v6, or any vehicle for that matter.
http://www.ststurbo.com/home
I was just looking at their website and it seems like an ingenious way to turbo a 3rd gen v6, or any vehicle for that matter.
http://www.ststurbo.com/home
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
From: NJ UNION
Car: 1992 firebird
Engine: V6
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 open 3.42
Re: STS turbo for v6?
i seen this on the 4th gen firebirds and camaros but are cars i don't know all the piping under theses cars and the twin turbo lol alot of fab work if u ask me but for under 3000 better then a supercharger
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
From: Augusta, Ga
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 355ci L98 soon to be turbo'd
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi
Re: STS turbo for v6?
if you buy the parts separately, you can make a rear mount turbo system for half that. I'm currently doing a remote turbo system and all together parts costs was about $1200 from Turbo to piping to computer management...
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
Re: STS turbo for v6?
after i get my friends Formula back together... then put a clutch in my Vette... im finally gonna start tinkering around with my 86' 2.8 bird. a remote mount turbo setup is probably the way ill go
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma City
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L +bolt ons
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser forged, 3.73, SLP posi
Re: STS turbo for v6?
Eh.....
I'm just gonna go under hood. Remote mount became popular due to lack of space under the hood in modern cars. We have plenty of space.
Plus, remote mounts always seem to under perform compared to a more traditional setup running the same psi.
I'm just gonna go under hood. Remote mount became popular due to lack of space under the hood in modern cars. We have plenty of space.
Plus, remote mounts always seem to under perform compared to a more traditional setup running the same psi.
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
From: Augusta, Ga
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 355ci L98 soon to be turbo'd
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi
Re: STS turbo for v6?
no problem with that. the only reason I'm going remote is because I didn't want to mess with custom exhaust manifolds and such... Remote turbo's make as much HP as underhood. There are pro's and con's for both...
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA
Car: 1985 Camaro, 1986 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L carbed and 5.0L TPI
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 and 3.27 posi
Re: STS turbo for v6?
Fabricating turbo headers seems to be the biggest draw back to underhood mounting on our cars. The remote mount has the added advantages of not needing a muffler and the charge pipe acting as an intercooler.
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
From: NJ UNION
Car: 1992 firebird
Engine: V6
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 open 3.42
Re: STS turbo for v6?
mmm i wonder a twin turbo v6 remote mounted. because i took my muffler off today and OMG the space there is just crying for two turbos
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
From: Augusta, Ga
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 355ci L98 soon to be turbo'd
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi
Re: STS turbo for v6?
STS makes twin turbo kits for Corvettes and there is plenty of room...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
New2Chevy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Sep 28, 2015 12:35 AM






