V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

I think my v6 build up could beat some older 8's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 22, 2001 | 10:28 PM
  #1  
Sweet_85_Bird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Memphis,Tn
I think my v6 build up could beat some older 8's


Im thinking if i get a 3.4 shortblock and put a cam in it some headers,port the intake and the heads i figure i can get about 230 hp from that.

3.4=160 hp
cam= about 15?
headers= about 15?
port intake and heads good= at least 20
FIPK=about 5 or 10

If you dont think this could run with SOME 8's please tell me what i could do!

------------------


1985 Firechicken
2.8 v6
Mods:
TB Coolant Bypass
My own kik @$$ dual intake
Freshly Painted(bright metallic blue)
Mods to come:
Either an 80 series flows or super turbo dynomax.Cant decide!
An engine is like a person,to scream it has to exhale hard -Flowmaster
Reply
Old May 22, 2001 | 11:52 PM
  #2  
Graeme'sFirebird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
From: First one out of liberty city, burn it to the ground
230? I personally have to say dreaming....060 overbore, cam, 1.6 rockers, afpr, upgraded injectors, headers, fully ported heads (not just mild but fully) raise compression, free flowing intake and exhaust (intake fully ported all the way) then well talk.

------------------
1989 Firebird
2.8 v6, t5 swapped in

Ram Hi-po clutch, Cold Air, 1.6 rockers,Lakewood LCA's, Lakewood Lift bars, Wonder Bar, 3" y-pipe, Random Tech Cat, 3" I-pipe, Flowmasters, MSd 6a, MSD Coil (Fireball in future) Accel 8.8 wires, MSD Ignition Module, Auto Meter Gauges (Water, Clock (needed one) Fuel Pressure, and 5" monster tach) 4th Gen Seats


" I'd rather run last in a full out race, than to NOT run at all ".
Reply
Old May 23, 2001 | 08:59 AM
  #3  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
That'll definately be able to run with and take some older 8's... a 2.8 or 3.1 can do that if it's in top running shape.


------------------
-Tom P (Hot rodded 1986 Firebird 2.8l) from http://www.f-body.net/mailbag/3rd/3rd_mailbag.html message boards
---Think your car could be pic of the week? Visit http://www.f-body.net for details!
Reply
Old May 23, 2001 | 10:36 AM
  #4  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
What you really need, is rear gears-3:73.
Start there, practice surprising the competion, then slip in the 3.4.
No one can tell!!

------------------
Chat Soon,
KED85
Karl
1985 Firebird 2.8 to 3.4 swap project for Smog Happy LA, CA
Reply
Old May 23, 2001 | 10:40 AM
  #5  
Kyle F's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 0
From: Columbus,OH
Yea some of the 350's from like 78 only had 160hp and would be pushing more weight than your V6. Though I think your guesses on HP are a little high. V6's do not respond to mods the way a V8 does. A cam will probably only net you about 10hp over the stock cam. Doing a full head job including decking to make more compression should net you about 15, the intake should give you about 5, then the other odds and ends may give you another 10. I would say a 3.4 is capable of making around 200hp with out forced induction. Remember the new 3.8 (231 cu.") is only making 200 so I doubt that you will be able to make much more than that because they are a much better design that a 3.4. Plus their exhaust manifolds are like headers.
Good luck though

------------------
89 Trans Am Turbo 3.8L All stock 43,000 miles #1053 of 1555

Past Thirdgen:
86 Trans Am w/ built 355TPI with SLP goodies and too much other stuff to List. One sweet *** car, wish I would have had a good enough Job to pay insurance on three cars so I could keep it, but for a 89 Turbo Trans Am w/ Low miles, I think I made the right choice!
Reply
Old May 23, 2001 | 11:43 AM
  #6  
FAST RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
From: Moorpark
Car: 1991 CAMARO 1968 FIREBIRD
Engine: CAMARO 3.1L FIREBIRD 455
Transmission: CAMARO 700R4 FIREBIRD TH-400
My moms 79 TA only had 180 HP and it had a 403 Bigblock n it but DAMN it had torque
Reply
Old May 23, 2001 | 04:00 PM
  #7  
Red91Bird's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth TX, USA
230hp - dreaming? Hardly :P


A 3.1L running 9.1:1 compression, bored .030 over, ported and polished heads, matched intake, worked over TB with a good custom cam and chip WILL make 200 to 230hp...

A 12 valve OHC 3.4 with shaved heads, that has been race preped will go 230hp pretty easy. Side note... the fiero 2.8L racers make 270+ hp - commonly.....


BTW.... saw a interesting website..

www.bmwmovies.com


Anyways goto the bmw site and checkout some of the cars... You will notice the ones making about 200hp and 215 ft/tq... the cars weigh 3200 to 3500 pounds, they doing 0 to 60 in 6 to 7 seconds.... Afew are making it in 5.8.

Here to tell ya guys a 3.1L WILL make 225 to 245 hp and around 225 to 235 ft/tq -- add NOS and you are dipping into the high side of the 13's..... been there done that. The only way to do it is to try it and to make sure EVERYTHING you do works with (not against) everything else.

David

[This message has been edited by Red91Bird (edited May 23, 2001).]
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Galaxie500XL
History / Originality
42
Feb 1, 2020 04:53 AM
armybyrd
Engine Swap
57
Oct 24, 2015 06:59 AM
beltran89
Theoretical and Street Racing
46
Oct 7, 2015 07:36 PM
Magman
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Sep 14, 2015 01:30 AM
J.C. Denton
Body
0
Sep 8, 2015 05:35 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 AM.