1st off, I have a 1991 Plymouth Sundance, 2.2 liter 4 cyl non turbo, 3 spd auto.
0-60: 10.8 sec
1/4: 18.8 sec. I know this car is slow!
2nd: 1990 Dodge Shadow, 2.5 liter, 4 cyl turbo, 5 spd.
0-60: 7.6
1/4: 15.9, This is ok.
3rd: 1987 Ford Aerostar XLT. 3.0 V6 5 spd.
0-60: 10.1
1/4: 18.2. Good for a van.
4th: 1992 Chevy Camaro Z-28, 350 tpi. 4 spd auto
0-60: 5.9 sec
1/4: 14.2 sec, I was surprised it did this good
and last but not least:
1987 Camaro 2.8 V6 4 spd auto.
0-60: 6.8
1/4: 15.1 seconds. Good for a V6.


All my cars are stock cept for the V6 which has: Hooker headers, Dynomax catback, Hypertech powerchip, Performance Pulleys.
Email me or message me for more info

 

you sure about that?
I was under the impression that no aftermarket headers existed for the 60* v6...I know Camaro_Hunter_c has come custom ones he sells, but other than that, I didn't think they existed.

 

That's pretty impressive for your V6

 

I doubt that seriously. 15.1 from a 17 sec car with only that in mods. Also your sig says you run 16.xx with it, that sounds about right.

 

 

Too much BS for me to read, look on other posts. This is daddys car (the 350) and he is saying he would never lose to a Stang. I have a Stang with a cheapo converter, and I went quicker, and my dads 91 LX is in the mid 13s.

Oh ya a 2.8 in the 15s, almost 14s,

 

Go back to your Ford site, That 16 sec run was on a wet road and my timing was off, Advance Auto sells Hooker Headers for the 6.
Your the exact reason why I can't stand Mousestangs, Come into Camaro forums and talk ****, My posts are not BS, If they were BS, I wouldn't even bother jackass

 

cool. thanks for the info, I'll have to get me a set of those.

sorry for doubting you.

 

It's ok dude, Everyone here does so it don't matter, Your cool by me

 

It's not my place to lay down what your car can and cannot do. But I am interested it built 2.8s. So what do you have done?
Stock, you have 135 hp. 16.9-17.6 1/4 mile. So you can see how people are a bit confused by the 15.1 thing. But, like I said, that's your car. You drive it. I just curious about what things are done, because, in my opinion, you'll need around 200 hp for that run.

 

or some serious weight reduction.

 

which can easily be done for a 3rd gen f-body, but, at least around here, it isn't often done. Strange that it isn't. People make fun of the LTD being big and no one will make fun of a sharp 76 Trans Am. Why did I select 76 out of all years?
1985 Ford LTD Crown Victoria 4dr
approx 3750 curb weight
1976 Pontiac Trans Am
approx 3850 curb weight
How?
But an 87 weighs what, 3000 without the driver? One more question: Does curb weight mean with a driver or just the car? I guess you know which I'm hoping for.

 

 

An 87 S/E with a V6 and absolutely no options may weigh a little over 3000lbs.

Curb weight is the measurement without the driver and all the necessary fluids.

Can you supply a part number? I'm not doubting you in this case, but I just looked through my Hooker catalogue and I was unable to come up with a part number. The only 90* V6 headers are for 78-81 F-bodies (engine swap).

 

The part number I don't know but if I have time, I will go to Advance Auto and get the part # off them. I don't know what's with my car that it will go that fast

 

K cool, there's no rush. Just tell me when you find out.

 

I hate to admit this, but your 2.8 could beat my car??? No way.

Sure I did some stupid stuff not matching gears to my cam, and my tranny slips bad on the 1-2 shift, I'm buying a cam next week, so that will greatly drop my times.

But as it is now you'll beat me, I don't see it happening. No way your 2.8 with those little mods.

 

This is some funny stuff. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt. Maybe his 2.8L is a freak?

 

Yeah and maybe there is a turbo under the hood.

 

Maybe he's running NEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWS.

 

maybe those NOS stickers on the side of his car are actually giving him 50 horsepower......

 

:sillylol: Sorry I dont' mean to laugh at anyone but I can't help it.

 

Funny thing is he has more respect on these boards than you seem to do these days.

So you mean to tell me you went from a 16.xx to a 15.1 just by playing with timing? Damn, where's my timing light!

 

You sure that isnt an 1/8 mile time?

Seriously I have a 2.8 HO replacemtn in my camaro and it is a DOG. If a 2.8 can run in the low 15's modded like that, than my trans am must be in the high 11's as its more modded and its twice the motor right?

 

 

ok that's it, i am tired of this ****, i come on here to tell racing stories and right away it's i DON'T ****EN THINK SO, I love my 2.8 and yes the 15.55 time is the correct time cuz that's what I have ran the last 3 times, Well now since everyone wants to b a ****en smartass, I will no longer come to this site, I thought I would be nice and let you know how I actually got these times, But now that I think about it.......KISS MY ***, I am out forever, PEACE!

 

Sorry but I thought I would do something evil on my 666th post. Don't get your panties in a wad, I was just playn.

CrazyHawaiian
Senior Member

Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Aiea, Hawaii
Posts: 666

 

dude what mph did u run the 15.1 ??

with all my mods i barely made it into the 15's and its so damn inconsistent ..sometimes i do a 15.9 sometimes a 16.4~
(i believe its mainly due to TPS going bezerk)

but i find it hard to believe 15.1 that easy...i have most of the mods u have (actually ive done a lot of porting and polish as well only thing i dont have that u have is the headers ...)

are u talking about the 3.4 headers on the 2.8 (i dont think theyll fit)

i work with Camaro_hunter on the headerrs he makes ..we tried fitting the SO called hedmmans (the only v6 headers i know that were made for the Fbody v6)....it was a PITA

i dont think the s10 headers would fit in them either ...

here is a PIC of camaro_hunters headers.. in his car...show me some pics of your headers...

 

I know it's hard for ppl to believe me but I absolutley HATE IT when ppl make an *** outta me and call me a liar, I believe I ran the 1/4 at about 90 mph, I don't really recall. If u want pics, I can have them up in about 2 weeks, My gf won't get her digital camera back till then. And remember this **** all happened awhile ago cuz right now, My Camaro is sitting in my garage with a massive rod knock, I need an engine, So if you know somebody close to me with a excellent engien for cheap, Let me know

 

Camaro_1986_19

im not trying to flame ya or anyoen else here ..i just posted my opinion here ...

i mean i dont see it happening ....

i have everything u have including the "performance cam" whatever cam u have

its gonna be a 204-214 .423 .443 cant get anything else for cheap or without changing springs...(crower has some really agressive cams but i dont see anyone using them for the street)

im not saying 15.1 is NOT possible ...give me a list of mods and i can tell ya if its possible or not ...

ONE more thing i actually hate guys who say "ill beat ya when i get this viper or get this 500hp camaro" ..doesnt matter then....talk about what u have ...
sorry about that guys i had to vent .....

 

Originally posted by Camaro_1986_19
I don't know import's but 92's with the 350 TPI stock came with about 270 hp, I know this because my dad works at the Chevy dealer and he tells me everything bout Camaro's? Need any more info, Let me know
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Camaro_1986_19
92 Z's are one of the fastest third gen's.
250 hp stock,
I have a hypertech power chip, dynomax catback exhaust, hooker headers, performance pulleys.
I am guessing I have around 280-300 hp.
----------------------------------



Not only are these 2 quotes contradictory, but incorrect as well.

92 Zs didn't come stock with 250 or 270.
You say you took a stop watch for your 0-60 times. Did you use the same SCIENTIFIC method to run your 1/4?

 

Does this mean I don't get the Hooker header part number?

 

hey for once im not gunna yell at 5.0mustang... hes was the first to back me up in that stupid fight with that little prissy *** rsxtacy.... 5.0 im sorry we faught about the '03 cobra.... its a nice car..... and to all the other mustang boys on this web site....i still dont like mustangs... but u guys are ok in my book.... i just wish we had less of the "intake and fart tip" people on this web page... but hell if u can hit a 15.1 with ur 6.... thats pretty dam good.... more power to him....smoke that shizzt

 

that was basically the point of that post. I see alot of inconsistency with what this guy says. man that was an evil post for 666 eh?? hahahha

 

Shut up you. You yelled at me in another post. Just kiddin.

 

you guys shouldnt flame the v6 guys. we take a lot of time and money into are cars. hes prolly not lying about running a 15.5 with his 6. thats prolly about what im running with mine.

 

Well, first off, I don't know how much of these times I believe, but I'm not going to sit around like some sort of "motor ***" or know-it-all and say nay. Not that I'm calling anyone that.
Your times don't quite add up. Obviously. Grant us a little room for doubt.
The one I'm baffled about is the van. If not for the van, I could possibly talk myself into the rest, because it's not out of the question with enough mods.
An 86 Aerostar could not see 19s in the 1/4. Your looking at 16 seconds to 60 and over 20 on the 1/4 with the 2.8. If you have a 3.0 Vulcan, such as used in the Taurus/Sable, you have a little more hp. 140 at best. But the 86 Taurus already had that engine and could not pull out of the 18s. The van is at least 450 lbs heavier, in fact, I would guess more.
The 1st two are pretty easy to believe, the van I can't, the 92 sounds pretty good maybe a little quick, and the 2.8 would have to have 200 hp+.
I don't know what's going on here, but I'm not going to down you. I've been there.
Where did you run these vehicles?

 

That would be my guess!

 

ok, i have both an 8 and a 6 camaro

are those times possible? yes

likely? thats not for me to decide

is MY 6 fast? no its slow as *****

are the headers real? yes, i have a set in my garage

they have no EGR port, nor a fitting for an 02 sensor, so i'm wondering how he got them to work




he claims he has a Z28??? i've never heard him mention that b4..................


i believe this guy is rather young........how do you afford all these cars

something doesnt seem right

 

i dont see how those mods would have added the needed 70+ HP either


i'm not calling you out

please enlighten me on this

 

I'm trying to be patient, but I just read over all posts.
1---At one time, you menton owning a 94 Shadow 3.0 v6 5 speed, then a friend of yours has the same car. Now the car is gone or has become a 90 with a 2.5 4 cylinder turbo.
2---Your 92 also seems to be your dads and the hp keeps changing. Also, I can name twenty+ "mousestangs" off the top of my head that would destroy any car you have. You need to watch what you say to people. I don't agree with Slander or Harrassment because of people's personal life. The government does enogh of that. (You said "***". You listen to that little b!tch Eminem by any chance?)
3---The Aerostar's year is fluctuating and there is not way it's the fast.
4---You claim to have beaten a 00 SVT, which I don't believe, yet you are questioning about a Cavelier?!?!
5---Your v6 has somehow dropped at least 2 seconds from the factory 0-60, then dropped .4 seconds more.
6---You're fighting for the 15.55 time hard, forgetting the fact that your above time is 15.1.

I wouldn't have done this, but you have said and done some rude and bizarre things. Honesty is the best policy. Especially when you can be proven wrong. Here's my and my brother's running vehicles' estimated times:
1993 Topaz...10 seconds to 60, 17-18 1/4.
1985 LTDCV...9-10.5 seconds to 60, 17.5-18.0.
1990 Cutlass Ciera SL 3300 v6...8.7 to 60, 16.8+-.
1967 Dodge Dart 4dr 225...10-13 to 60, 17-18.
1978 F100...10-12 seconds to 60, 17-18.
Now, no rocket ships or miraculous events taking place. Just honesty. None of these are that fast, but they are good cars and that's what to be proud of. Sure, I can get made fun of all day, but I can't be called a liar or exaggerater. And I can always smile when people think any car is not a set speed to 60 or the 1/4, is crap. That's just shallow.

 

you are the kinda of person that will give domestics a bad name


look at the other ppl they are calling BS on your time. but what do you do but pick out the guy who drives a ford and say that he is the reason you do not like ford guys... why??? cause he doesn't believe your time.... I don't either... and I guess you should start hating these other domestic ppl here that like chevy and pontiac becuase ..... well they don't believe it either

 

you not talking about me now are you

 

check out the difference in mods though


MOTOR: 2.8 mpfi rebuilt, bored .040 over, mangnufluxed block, new shaved crankshaft , new polished rods, ported, polished, milled heads, 3 angle valve job, bigger valves, blue racer camshaft .420, .443 lift 204, 214 duration, double roller timing chain, hi per valve train, high flow water pump, advanced timing, accel 8.8mm plug wires, bosch platnum plugs, accel cap, rotor, coil, ported polished intake manifold, k&n air and oil filters
TRANY: stock 700R4, B&M shift kit, B&M trick shift fluid, energy suspension trany mount
TIRES: tire set # 1- cragar keystone classic rims 15x6 front 15x8 rear, goodyear eagle gt tires (raised yellow letters) 205-65-15 front, 255-60-15 rear, tire set # 2- 86 transam honeycomb rims (gold) 15x7, futura gts tires (raised white letters) 215-65-15 all
EXHAUST: no cat, full 2 1/2 exhaust, daytona 2 on the left exit turbo muffler
SUSPENSION: stock, monroe air shocks, energy suspension torque arm bushings


that is for you


and this is him

the V6 which has: Hooker headers, Dynomax catback, Hypertech powerchip, Performance Pulleys.
Email me or message me for more info




I think I see a little bit of a difference as to who is putting more time and effort into there car and as to who really would be faster

 

hehe I guess I better shut up now or he might call me rice and tell me to go visit the ***** boards and get away from here.....


just hope the rest of yo udon't feel like that

 

The Aerostar is a 3.0 not a 2.8!!! And it's a 5 spd!!!
The 15.55 time is what I am consistently running right now, The other 16 sec time was in the rain with 3 ppl in the car, I have 2 Shadows, 94 with the 3.0 and a 90 with the 2.5 turbo!!!
Sheesh!!!
*** if u ppl want a list of my mods, email me at Camaro_86@msn.com

 

this is fun, but i thought you were going away forever, DAMMIT!
click here and check out my post
you seem to change the story/lie/ and just generally BS a lot

 

I'll tell you what, you're not far from me. On the 27th we're having a 3rd GEn gathering in MD. Come on down, I'll pay for your gas, though that will be only one way cause you'll be walking home.

And we'll race for pink slips, no more modding allowed and what you listed can be your only mods.

Now I run a 15.32 1/4 so what do you have to lose.

cocky aren't I. I don't see him winning, do you guys?

 

hopefully this is the one thing that he says that is not
mark you are cocky, i see him beating you with the aerostar

 

From now on I will be scared of the 2.8s, I mean my cousins could spin the tires a little!