Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

2.02's on a 305

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2004 | 04:31 PM
  #1  
flrtin1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Western Ky
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
2.02's on a 305

Okay here it is,
I have seen posts about 2.02's not working on 305's without cyl.wall work and couldnt understand because I have been running them for 4yrs in a standard bore 305. Here's the info,
casting # 3998993
(mortec description ....72-73...307/350......75cc chambers
....current..350.........Goodwrench crate motors,"Hecho en Mexico",75cc chambers)
I am using them on a blown motor so the 75cc is good for me. I bought them used and with the machine work already done but this is what I know they are opened up to 2.02/1.60 ported and pinned and they work in a standard bore 305 with no machining to the block
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2004 | 05:04 PM
  #2  
ME Leigh's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 1
From: Valley of the Sun
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
How much lift are you running. If your running low enough lift there is no potential for interference because the valve never reaches past the deck.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2004 | 05:10 PM
  #3  
flrtin1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Western Ky
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
I dont have the exact specs for the cam, I installed it in 1986 and it was the B&M blower cam for over 7lbs of boost, I do know it was around 500/500. I also checked the valves before I installed the heads and without the spring installed you could push the valve in well past any coil bind

Last edited by flrtin1; Jan 30, 2004 at 05:34 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2004 | 05:31 PM
  #4  
ede's Avatar
ede
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 14,811
Likes: 1
From: Jackson County
lift and squish would be two big parts of the equation you're
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2004 | 10:03 PM
  #5  
steve8586iroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
From: clinton,tn
ede, care to finish the rest of your thought on the matter?

Steve
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2004 | 10:18 PM
  #6  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,748
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Even if you get he vavles to work you will have major shrouding problems. A Smaller 1.94" valve will work better and probably male more power.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2004 | 10:40 PM
  #7  
flrtin1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Western Ky
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
Ok I will try to make this more clear, it isn't if they will work, they have been on the car for 4 yrs and I agree about the shrouding but I had a pair of (3927186....69-70...302/350......Camel hump,64cc chambers,accessory holes) 1.94/1.50 that had manley s/s valves, on it before the 2.02's and it is making much more power now even though I went from 64cc to 75cc must be pushing more volume past the larger valve

by the way I was waiting for ede to finish too, figured he must of needed a nap lol

Last edited by flrtin1; Feb 2, 2004 at 08:06 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2004 | 05:07 PM
  #8  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,651
Likes: 309
Two words - Perimeter Shrouding.

Not to even try to put words in ede's mouth, but I believe what he was trying to convey was that if the chambers are large you may be able to operate the larger valves in a smaller bore engine, since the valves ar maximum lift are not interfering with the block deck. A 76cc head just might make it on that engine. If the engine was built for blower duty, you would likely want larger chambers to control ultimate compresion pressure.

With smaller chambres, provided the deck has been relieved properly to prevent interference, you could run the larger valves but would likely suffer serious shrouding.

To answer your question more thoroughly would require more information from you. Head castings? Peak valve lift? Chamber modifications? Valve installed height?
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2004 | 05:43 PM
  #9  
AJ_92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
ede is talking like Yoda again.

"Not if lift the valve is too much engine for your"
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 05:07 AM
  #10  
yugi-master's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Seymour, Indiana
Car: 1987 Trans-Am
Engine: LG4
Transmission: 700R4
2.02 valves

I have a head shop 4 doors down and have been over this with him a few times in the past, here is what i have learned from his 30+ yrs of doing heads.


350 heads any valve size (i didnt ask about larger than 2.02) will work on a 305 as long as the max lift isnt over .490 ish (cant remember exact number offhand) or the valve will hit the deck since the 350 chambers are setup for a 4 in bore and you have a 3.75 basicly.

305 heads can handle max 2.02 intake valves and he has installed them into 305 heads , but he says it weakens the head in his opinion and he would prefer not to go over 194/160.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 10:25 AM
  #11  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away...

Somebody posted a picture looking up the bore of a 305 with 2.02/1.60 heads bolted onto it (no crank/pistons installed, obviously). You could see the entire valve of both the intake and exhaust.

However...

The shrouding of which Mr. Darkside spoke was certain perceptable.

Now, on the other side of the coin...

Back in the old days, our good friend the General notched the top of 396 cylinders so 2.19" intake valves wouldn't wack the cylinder wall. Somehow, nobody worried about "shrouding".

I'm sure there's a technical explaination why BBC valves aren't affected by shrouding, but SBC are.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 10:29 AM
  #12  
MrDude_1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
i have a junk 305 block with some junk castings on them.... i donno the valve size (this is just a mockup block/heads) but the heads are assembled.

the valve smacks the cyl bore...

i should take some pics to show.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 10:38 AM
  #13  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
You should.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
db057
TBI
14
Apr 28, 2019 07:45 AM
383cam
Electronics
5
Sep 9, 2015 06:01 AM
Formula_88AE
Engine Swap
1
Sep 3, 2015 01:47 PM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 07:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 PM.