Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

4th Gen plastic tank swap.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 09:33 AM
  #1  
Johnny Blaze's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 5
From: Charlestown, IN
Car: 1971 Camaro
Engine: 427
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.73
4th Gen plastic tank swap.

What is required? 3rd gen sending unit? What is the weight savings?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 11:31 PM
  #2  
Spdfrk1990's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
I want to know the same I just took out my metal tank today would love to use a plastic one.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 11:39 PM
  #3  
RTFC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
From: Yes I'm Dean
Car: Agood2.8,
Engine: V6rsr,
Transmission: Afrikingoodtime
Through research I have read in the past I "second hand" have been told they are identical and bolt right in and hookup just like the stock metal tank does to the stock sending unit assembly.

Also have been told that every 4th gen plastic tank is baffled also. There was no unbaffled options so all of them are good.

Last edited by RTFC; Jan 20, 2005 at 11:41 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 11:57 PM
  #4  
Spdfrk1990's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
I want to know if you buy the thirdgen sending unit and put in it or do you have to use the 4thgen just I heard some of the connections were different.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 12:32 AM
  #5  
DuronClocker's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Originally posted by RTFC
Also have been told that every 4th gen plastic tank is baffled also. There was no unbaffled options so all of them are good.
I've heard this as well.
I've heard there is 18lb difference between the two.
I've heard the plastic tanks store an extra gallon or gallon and a half.
I've heard the 3rd gen sending unit can be used, or drill a hole in the 4th gen one. The charcoal canister is on top of these, so some modification may be necessary in terms of fuel/vacuum lines.

I like the idea of the baffles and the thought of it being plastic instead of metal and possibly rusting (though galvanized) etc. 18 lbs weight savings isn't A LOT, but hey, its 18lbs.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 12:38 AM
  #6  
Spdfrk1990's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Hmm the charcoal canister is on top insteresting i wonder if i could get rid of the stock one then. I wonder if anyone has pictures.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 11:25 AM
  #7  
MurcoRS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 690
Likes: 2
From: Minneapolis, MN
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: ZZ4 350
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt w/3.73
18 lbs and a bit safer too. I'd love to see details on this swap.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 04:45 PM
  #8  
Rage13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 901
Likes: 1
From: Pembroke Pines, FL
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
from what i've heard the tank will bolt up in place but the connections are different, also the plastic tanks don't have the baffles that most people think of.. what it is is that the pump has basicly a cup on top that holds some fuel and will pull the fuel from there when the pickup runs dry

i have a plastic tank from an ls1 camaro sitting on my floor, so just name the pics you want and i'll get em for ya
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 04:48 PM
  #9  
Rage13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 901
Likes: 1
From: Pembroke Pines, FL
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
pic of all the crap on top of this thing...
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 05:58 PM
  #10  
pskel350's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: SW Michigan
plastic is the same weight as steel......

Last edited by pskel350; Jan 22, 2005 at 07:20 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 06:06 PM
  #11  
12secformula's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
Car: 94 Z-28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
I have trouble believing that the LS1 tank is 18 lbs lighter, i Just removed my tank and it hardly weighs anything. Maybe 20-25 lbs, if that. So what does a plastic tank weigh......5-6lbs?
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 06:12 PM
  #12  
soulbounder's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 20
From: Tomball, TX
Car: 89 TTA
Engine: Turbo 3.8
Transmission: 200R4
I agree with 12secformula. I pulled the tank of my 91 and it was ridiculously light compared to what I was expecting. Is 18lbs really enough to raise the back of our cars? I wouldn't think it possible to notice any difference at all, although I could be wrong.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 07:49 PM
  #13  
pskel350's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: SW Michigan
.

Last edited by pskel350; Jan 22, 2005 at 07:19 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 09:57 PM
  #14  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Empty theres only a 3 lb diff, just weighed em.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 10:33 PM
  #15  
pskel350's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: SW Michigan
.

Last edited by pskel350; Jan 22, 2005 at 07:18 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 11:02 PM
  #16  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Originally posted by pskel350
not a chance in hell, atleast not mine......
Pass the crack pipe.

Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 12:16 AM
  #17  
12secformula's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
Car: 94 Z-28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Pass it this way, I want some of what he's got!!! J/K man
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 12:26 AM
  #18  
pskel350's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: SW Michigan
.

Last edited by pskel350; Jan 22, 2005 at 07:18 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 12:37 AM
  #19  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Originally posted by pskel350
nice

i just looked at the shipping tag, 8 lbs. go weigh your steel tank and tell me it wieghs 11 lbs
Someones scale was REALLY REALLY REALLY broken.

Better have your Arm-Scale recalibrated.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 12:49 AM
  #20  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Sorry, make that 1.5 lbs difference, got a 3rd gen tank that was completely empty, the last one had a tiny tiny bit of fuel in it.











I suppose you could argue that the fuel sending unit is Negative 12 pounds, yup thats what it is, space age anti gravity sending unit.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 12:59 AM
  #21  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Now heres where i have to question you again, you post that it just plugs right up etc.

The fuel sending unit here in the one i have is roughly 40 ohms empty and 240 full, about what you'll find online if you do a little research. The stock sender on a thirdgen is 0 Empty and 90 Full.

So when that LS1 tank is empty your gauge should read about half full, and about 1/4 tank or so, you'll have a magical full tank.

Care to explain how you got around this one and actually be of some help ?

P.S. this wont be for me, i've already got my own route around this issue, this would be for those with stock gauges like yourself.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 01:13 AM
  #22  
Spdfrk1990's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Hell if its a lb difference im not even changing it.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 02:04 AM
  #23  
12secformula's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
Car: 94 Z-28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
My thoughts exactly, I was curious about the plastic tank also......then I researched alittle and found very little difference in weight, and more work than it was worth. Then I pulled out the stocker to put a new pump in it, and much to my surprise, it was quite light. I'll keep it!
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 09:38 AM
  #24  
drain89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 802
Likes: 6
From: Chesapeake, Ohio
Car: 02 WS6 White/Ebony
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock 3.42
I'm glad this is resolved! I can get the racetronix fuel pump kit for my baffled 91 tank much cheaper than the 99-02 kit from them.
My tank is in really good shape anyways.

Now if I could only find the truth about the 90-92 TBI vs. TPI vs. 1LE sending units.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 10:02 AM
  #25  
Spdfrk1990's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Whats this fuel pump kit your getting drain have any info im redoing my whole car buying all new parts and i need a nice fuel pump for the 383 and i need a new sending unit.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 11:04 AM
  #26  
pskel350's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: SW Michigan
.

Last edited by pskel350; Jan 22, 2005 at 07:17 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 12:24 PM
  #27  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Originally posted by pskel350
you should really get your facts strait before you post.......

im done, i've done this swap, i know the difference. if you want to come to my shop, i will tank back out the plastick tank and you can see them side by side
The facts are straight, do the research, the sender is 240-40, the bs in here is so deep from you we all need waders, you want to argue with me on the weight and I've even posted pictures of them on the scale, im sorry i guess my scale is completely haywire.

Apparently you have a magical sender i suppose. Yes i'll be right over so you can show me the exact same two tanks i have here, and posted pictures of, and on a scale.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 12:32 PM
  #28  
anesthes's Avatar
TGO Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,093
Likes: 126
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Originally posted by pskel350
You sure that hand isn't smacking the wrong part of your body? I"m thinking it needs to move down about 12"

-- Joe
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 06:44 PM
  #29  
pskel350's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: SW Michigan
the fact i dont have stock gauges


its funny how people dont think on this site
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 07:55 PM
  #30  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Originally posted by pskel350
the fact i dont have stock gauges


its funny how people dont think on this site
Says the one claiming a 20 pound fuel tank weighs 8 lbs.....
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 10:31 PM
  #31  
drain89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 802
Likes: 6
From: Chesapeake, Ohio
Car: 02 WS6 White/Ebony
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock 3.42
I didn't know anyone made a fuel gauge that'll read a 40-240 ohm sender yet?

spdfrk1990 - here ya go!
http://www.racetronix.com/product/RX..._Pump_Kit.html
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 10:39 PM
  #32  
Spdfrk1990's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Are you getting the 307 or 340 Im not sure which 1 I should get I might get a SC later on would I need the 340.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 10:49 PM
  #33  
drain89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 802
Likes: 6
From: Chesapeake, Ohio
Car: 02 WS6 White/Ebony
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock 3.42
The 307 kit. Thunder Racing has them also, but I doubt there cheaper than direct. Sometimes he has them on ebay also. I doubt you'd need one for over 60 psi. LS1's run at high pressures like that but if your injectors are sized right for your blower application your pressure should be lower. These may even have the plug and play wiring connections to add a kenne bell or msd boost-a-pump kit. I know that used to be an option. At that point though your fuel lines are gonna be the bottle neck, not the pump. I talked to the owner of racetronix for a good while one time and he is VERY knowledgeable. Rest assured that it is a good product.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 09:19 AM
  #34  
drain89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 802
Likes: 6
From: Chesapeake, Ohio
Car: 02 WS6 White/Ebony
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock 3.42
You can use either one actually. You're regulator can adjust your fuel pressure down to whatever your car prefers. My buddy (89irocn2o) uses the high pressure walbro pump on his car and it's worked fine for years.
I'd email racetronix and tell him what you have and what your plans are and see what he recommends. Also ask him if those include the series 2 harness. That has the provisions for the pump booster. I can see that being necessary if you would add a descent blower!
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 02:16 PM
  #35  
anesthes's Avatar
TGO Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,093
Likes: 126
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Originally posted by drain89
I doubt you'd need one for over 60 psi. LS1's run at high pressures like that but if your injectors are sized right for your blower application your pressure should be lower.
ahh wha?? No!

You need to step 1:1 with boost. Most people tune at 50psi with vac disconnected. At 10psi boost, that should raise to 60psi with the 1:1 regulator. 15psi 65, and so on.

If its a boosted car, and you get anything less than a high pressure version walbro, then you just wasted your money.

The only thing you want to be LOW is your injector pulse widths, and thats about injector sizing.
-- Joe
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 08:28 PM
  #36  
drain89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 802
Likes: 6
From: Chesapeake, Ohio
Car: 02 WS6 White/Ebony
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock 3.42
Thanks for clearing that up Joe. I'm yet to use a blower, so I wasn't aware of that, but I did advise him to check with racetronix first to be sure.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2005 | 03:50 PM
  #37  
FullSendRacing's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 294
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Car: '85 Trans Am FAILBIRD
Engine: 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4th gen torsen 3.42
Can someone who has one of these tanks sitting around please verify that it is indeed baffled? I've read conflicting comments.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2005 | 07:43 PM
  #38  
drain89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 802
Likes: 6
From: Chesapeake, Ohio
Car: 02 WS6 White/Ebony
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock 3.42
No the 99-02 plastic tanks are not baffled. The tank isn't designed to work that way. The sending unit is designed so that the pump is constantly submerged in fuel. If you want a baffled tank, just get any from a 90-92 f-body. If it's the original tank...it's baffled. G92 cars from 88-89 supposedly had them...but I'd verify it first.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2005 | 09:07 PM
  #39  
Rage13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 901
Likes: 1
From: Pembroke Pines, FL
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
this is the "baffle" in the LS1 tanks, fuel pump sits inside and the cup stays full of fuel. when you go around a turn and fuel is no longer covering the pick up, the pump pulls fuel from the cup.


get it now?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2005 | 09:16 PM
  #40  
91Z28-350's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
What's the resolution for the stock fuel gauge and the 4th gen sending unit?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 09:19 AM
  #41  
super_kev's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
From: N. CA
Car: '85 TA
Engine: Aluminum Fuelie
Transmission: Mother of All Manuals
I'm wanting to know this as well... can we use the stock fuel gauge w/the 4th gen tank?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Orr89RocZ
Power Adders
206
Apr 25, 2016 08:28 AM
Warlocksirix
Suspension and Chassis
27
Sep 3, 2015 12:26 PM
AkDrifted
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
6
Aug 17, 2015 07:45 PM
sreZ28
Engine Swap
4
Aug 14, 2015 07:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:36 AM.