my engine so far and a few questions
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: Eden, NY
Car: 89 Trans am
Engine: TBI 350 HO Vortec heads
Transmission: 700R4
my engine so far and a few questions
5.7L 350
9.1:1 Compression Ratio
Cast Iron 4-Bolt Block with One-Piece Rear Main Seal
64cc Chamber Vortec Cylinder Heads with 1.94'' Intake and 1.50 Exhaust Valves
Camshaft- Lift: .435'' Int. / .460'' Exh.
Duration @ .050: 212° Int. / 222° Exh.
1.5 Ratio Rocker Arms
454 TBI unit 2 inch bores
55 PPH injectors
injector spacer
TBI spacer
Autolite platinum spark plaugs
Accel 8.8 wires
custom burnt eprom chip
hooker ceramic coated shorty headers
B&M holeshot converter 2500 stall speed
holley 255 LPH fuel pump (needs to be installed)
18 psi fuel pressure
160 thermostat

im having a problem finding the right temp sensor unit, the new intake is alot bigger then the old one. any suggestions?
and does anyone have the article to remove the heater control vavle?
it should be dropping in this tuesday, then i gotta get it all running right, new fuel pump and then break it in.
any comments or suggestions?
9.1:1 Compression Ratio
Cast Iron 4-Bolt Block with One-Piece Rear Main Seal
64cc Chamber Vortec Cylinder Heads with 1.94'' Intake and 1.50 Exhaust Valves
Camshaft- Lift: .435'' Int. / .460'' Exh.
Duration @ .050: 212° Int. / 222° Exh.
1.5 Ratio Rocker Arms
454 TBI unit 2 inch bores
55 PPH injectors
injector spacer
TBI spacer
Autolite platinum spark plaugs
Accel 8.8 wires
custom burnt eprom chip
hooker ceramic coated shorty headers
B&M holeshot converter 2500 stall speed
holley 255 LPH fuel pump (needs to be installed)
18 psi fuel pressure
160 thermostat

im having a problem finding the right temp sensor unit, the new intake is alot bigger then the old one. any suggestions?
and does anyone have the article to remove the heater control vavle?
it should be dropping in this tuesday, then i gotta get it all running right, new fuel pump and then break it in.
any comments or suggestions?
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 1
From: Greenville, SC
Car: 1991 Chevy Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Looks good. 
Easiest thing to do would probably be to go to the local hardware store (Lowes, Home Depot, etc.) and look through the plumbing section. They carry a ton of different types of NPT fittings, and I'm almost positive that you can find what your looking for. Just bring your CTS with you, figure out what size the threads are on your CTS, and they try and find a female-to-male adapter that threads into the intake.
I hope that made sense. That was just off the top of my head, I'm sure there's probably an easier way.
Here you go: https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=242747
im having a problem finding the right temp sensor unit, the new intake is alot bigger then the old one. any suggestions?
I hope that made sense. That was just off the top of my head, I'm sure there's probably an easier way.
and does anyone have the article to remove the heater control vavle?
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,168
Likes: 3
From: Marietta, GA
Car: '91 Firebird Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI (LO3)
Transmission: 700r4, Vette Servo
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt, PBR disks
Borsty... may I say, that engine looks pretty sweet to me. Did you put that together or have it shipped? The plastic around it makes me think the latter but it's still a nice piece of hardware.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,405
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
My guess is because it is a 330 HP 350 HO crate engine with the TBI intake and accessories bolted onto it. Those specs are straight off the Ramjet/HO 350 crate.
Trending Topics
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,749
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Looks like a nice set-up. Get ready for some healtyh chip work. Your list indicated a custom chip and I hope this means someone will have your car in hand to burn the chips.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,749
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Borsty
brian @ tbichips.com burnt it for me, hes a great guy.
brian @ tbichips.com burnt it for me, hes a great guy.
He is good at getting your car to run but you may want to look into the chip work to get the best use out of your new motor. You would hate to leave 10mpg and possibly 15 or more hp out of the mix. Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 9
From: Buckhannon, WV
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
lol 15hp
, shifty your just being nice. Seriously everyone on the boards that has even aproached the 300 hp level has had to do extensive DIY chip work to get their vehicles to even idle decently let alone make power.
The nature of FI is that you have infinate control over everything, which is great except for the fact that just a few key strokes can have you so far out of wack you give up 50 hp. Granted Brian has some experience, but it is very very hard, if not impossible to get your fueling within 10-20% on your first try. That could be so rich is blows smoke to so lean it blows piston chunks. Getting your pump shot (AE) close is one of those things thats darn near impossible with the data logging rates that these ecm's have. So he'll just have to guess with what your telling him.
That chip will get you running enough to start datalogging and either do the mail back the chip routine for a few months or get the equipment and learn for yourself.
I know, I know broken record
, shifty your just being nice. Seriously everyone on the boards that has even aproached the 300 hp level has had to do extensive DIY chip work to get their vehicles to even idle decently let alone make power. The nature of FI is that you have infinate control over everything, which is great except for the fact that just a few key strokes can have you so far out of wack you give up 50 hp. Granted Brian has some experience, but it is very very hard, if not impossible to get your fueling within 10-20% on your first try. That could be so rich is blows smoke to so lean it blows piston chunks. Getting your pump shot (AE) close is one of those things thats darn near impossible with the data logging rates that these ecm's have. So he'll just have to guess with what your telling him.
That chip will get you running enough to start datalogging and either do the mail back the chip routine for a few months or get the equipment and learn for yourself.
I know, I know broken record
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 849
Likes: 2
From: MA
Car: 93 GM300 platforms
Engine: LO3, LO5
Transmission: MD8 x2
Consider:
330 fwhp crate motor using the head/cam provided, and assuming that you have an exhaust system up to the task.
55 lb/hr injectors are what's stock on the 180 fwhp non-police LO5 TBI engine. i.e for reasonable duty cycle on the injectors, the 55 lb/hr injectors are adequate to support 180 fwhp. I know you're going to run higher fuel pressure but the fuel delivery is still only going to be around 40% more than stock via sqrt(18/10).. which is close enough to sqrt(2), so you're injectors will be able to supply around 40% more than 180 fwhp worth of fuel at the same duty cycle and VE as the LO5 would, so that's 72+180 = 252 fwhp. 252 is MUCH less than the 330 rating on that crate motor.
See the problem? So it's not going to be JUST tuning.
The 454 TBI can flow enough air, the crate motor can pump the air, but per the above you will need a LOT MORE FUEL, and no ECM tuning can provide the miracle fuel to suit the demand from that engine. And you will want it to run well at part throttle, in addition to WOT, so that's exactly why several people here are hinting at an extensive tuning cycle, and I'm more than hinting at inadequate fuel because you don't have enough fuel injector. FWIW.
330 fwhp crate motor using the head/cam provided, and assuming that you have an exhaust system up to the task.
55 lb/hr injectors are what's stock on the 180 fwhp non-police LO5 TBI engine. i.e for reasonable duty cycle on the injectors, the 55 lb/hr injectors are adequate to support 180 fwhp. I know you're going to run higher fuel pressure but the fuel delivery is still only going to be around 40% more than stock via sqrt(18/10).. which is close enough to sqrt(2), so you're injectors will be able to supply around 40% more than 180 fwhp worth of fuel at the same duty cycle and VE as the LO5 would, so that's 72+180 = 252 fwhp. 252 is MUCH less than the 330 rating on that crate motor.
See the problem? So it's not going to be JUST tuning.
The 454 TBI can flow enough air, the crate motor can pump the air, but per the above you will need a LOT MORE FUEL, and no ECM tuning can provide the miracle fuel to suit the demand from that engine. And you will want it to run well at part throttle, in addition to WOT, so that's exactly why several people here are hinting at an extensive tuning cycle, and I'm more than hinting at inadequate fuel because you don't have enough fuel injector. FWIW.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,405
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
55 lb/hr injectors will feed the engine if run at 32 psi. I would use an external vacuum adjustable EFI fuel pressure regulator.
68 lb injectors will support 375 hp easily if they are run at 32 psi. In effect I could feed an early model LT1 350 with 68 lb/hr injectors running in a late model 454 TBI regulator/injector pod with the right tuning.
Here are some calculations. All calculations are based on a BSFC of .5 lb/hp/hr and a 80% duty cycle as well as stock fuel pressure. I have also added the potential for you VAFPR fans.
40 lb/hr 4.3 injectors = 128 HP
40 lb/hr 4.3 injectors (with VAFPR @ 20 psi) = 172 HP
55 lb/hr 5.0 injectors = 176 HP
55 lb/hr 5.0 injectors (with VAFPR @ 20 psi) = 237 HP
61 lb/hr 5.7 injectors = 195 HP
61 lb/hr 5.7 injectors (with VAFPR @ 20 psi) = 263 HP
68 lb/hr 5.7 injectors = 217 HP
68 lb/hr 5.7 injectors (with VAFPR @ 20 psi) = 293 HP
68 lb/hr 5.7 injectors (with VAFPR @ 20 psi) = 293 HP
90 lb/hr 7.4 injectors = 288 HP
90 lb/hr 7.4 injectors (with VAFPR @ 20 psi) = 388 HP
68 lb injectors will support 375 hp easily if they are run at 32 psi. In effect I could feed an early model LT1 350 with 68 lb/hr injectors running in a late model 454 TBI regulator/injector pod with the right tuning.
Here are some calculations. All calculations are based on a BSFC of .5 lb/hp/hr and a 80% duty cycle as well as stock fuel pressure. I have also added the potential for you VAFPR fans.
40 lb/hr 4.3 injectors = 128 HP
40 lb/hr 4.3 injectors (with VAFPR @ 20 psi) = 172 HP
55 lb/hr 5.0 injectors = 176 HP
55 lb/hr 5.0 injectors (with VAFPR @ 20 psi) = 237 HP
61 lb/hr 5.7 injectors = 195 HP
61 lb/hr 5.7 injectors (with VAFPR @ 20 psi) = 263 HP
68 lb/hr 5.7 injectors = 217 HP
68 lb/hr 5.7 injectors (with VAFPR @ 20 psi) = 293 HP
68 lb/hr 5.7 injectors (with VAFPR @ 20 psi) = 293 HP
90 lb/hr 7.4 injectors = 288 HP
90 lb/hr 7.4 injectors (with VAFPR @ 20 psi) = 388 HP
Last edited by Fast355; Jun 6, 2005 at 08:23 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,168
Likes: 3
From: Marietta, GA
Car: '91 Firebird Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI (LO3)
Transmission: 700r4, Vette Servo
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt, PBR disks
Here's my deal about Brian. He sells me a chip for a decent price to illustrate to me that there is indeed untapped potential in my car. He is a nice guy with service after the sale above and beyond everyone (well, except Summit). I read on this forum and all the DIY forum that there is even more of that potential to be had. This piques my curiousity and eventually (soon perhaps) I'll begin to datalog. After that, I'll be looking to burn some PROM's (or start begging BIN's via PM. hehe).
For someone at my experience level he's the right guy, with the right product, for the right price. I'll always concede that doing it yourself for your own car will produce better results in the long run. Broken record be damned.
For someone at my experience level he's the right guy, with the right product, for the right price. I'll always concede that doing it yourself for your own car will produce better results in the long run. Broken record be damned.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Id get 80 pphs and see where it all falls when you start tuning. Basically youll have to balance the WOT and idling fueling. You can add alot more fuel at WOT, but then youll be doing the PW limbo at idle.
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 9
From: Buckhannon, WV
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
oops, I didn't catch the 55 pphr injectors, yeah that ain't gonna work ( insert hillbilly acent here)
Cadillac, I completely understand where your coming from, and I agree for some people (or most) a mail order chip from brian is going to be the way to go, because either 1 they don't want to or can't learn chip burning, or 2 their combo just doesn't warrant the time and effort and money it takes to get into DIY tuning. With that said, you have to trust the guys that have taken the time to learn chip tuning and get a feel for what these ecm's can handle mod wise and still run decently or run at all.
If we say a certain combo is going to take xx injectors, and lots of chip tuning then we say that because we have several years of research and over 500 chip burns that have tought us that. At least thats the experience that I have, quite frankly I'm a slow learner. It took me 6 months to get my car to run anywhere near as well as it did with the carb, and I'm still improving things today 2 years after I got started. Even guys like Grumpy and Rbob couldn't burn you a chip from a list of mods that would get you the 80 to 90% that Brian is claiming. Keep in mind that those guys are the guys that worked on making DIY tuning a reality for the rest of us.
Cadillac, I completely understand where your coming from, and I agree for some people (or most) a mail order chip from brian is going to be the way to go, because either 1 they don't want to or can't learn chip burning, or 2 their combo just doesn't warrant the time and effort and money it takes to get into DIY tuning. With that said, you have to trust the guys that have taken the time to learn chip tuning and get a feel for what these ecm's can handle mod wise and still run decently or run at all.
If we say a certain combo is going to take xx injectors, and lots of chip tuning then we say that because we have several years of research and over 500 chip burns that have tought us that. At least thats the experience that I have, quite frankly I'm a slow learner. It took me 6 months to get my car to run anywhere near as well as it did with the carb, and I'm still improving things today 2 years after I got started. Even guys like Grumpy and Rbob couldn't burn you a chip from a list of mods that would get you the 80 to 90% that Brian is claiming. Keep in mind that those guys are the guys that worked on making DIY tuning a reality for the rest of us.
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,521
Likes: 204
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by BMmonteSS.Even guys like Grumpy and Rbob couldn't burn you a chip from a list of mods that would get you the 80 to 90% that Brian is claiming.
But I agree though. Borsty, take full advantage of the knowledge that Grumpy, Rbob and the rest of the DIY tuners are sharing. They don't have to be doing this, and when someone profits off of their hard work... it's literally like a slap in the face to them.
I know, I know, some of us don't have the time to invest. Well, neither do I, but that didn't stop me.....
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: south texas
Engine: 355 6"rod tbi - in the works
Transmission: 4L60E
they probably have a 330hp 350HO chip in walmart by now
:don't hit me JP
( when is the next road trip? )
well tbichips.com is kinda like a walmart, everyone goes there to buy cra.....
:don't hit me JP
( when is the next road trip? )well tbichips.com is kinda like a walmart, everyone goes there to buy cra.....
Quote by Dim: Id get 80 pphs and see where it all falls when you start tuning. Basically youll have to balance the WOT and idling fueling. You can add alot more fuel at WOT, but then youll be doing the PW limbo at idle.
i upped my FP from 13 to 16 to 20 and my idle went to crap. seems surginging and erratic A/F (on WB) resulted. i just upped by idle speed to 900 from 700 and that seemed to help a little. i think i am going back to 17 and see if that helps. that means reapprocahing VE/AE again. dam.. may run OL and try that first.
i upped my FP from 13 to 16 to 20 and my idle went to crap. seems surginging and erratic A/F (on WB) resulted. i just upped by idle speed to 900 from 700 and that seemed to help a little. i think i am going back to 17 and see if that helps. that means reapprocahing VE/AE again. dam.. may run OL and try that first.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
Aug 20, 2017 12:16 AM
84z96L31vortec
North East Region
1
Aug 10, 2015 08:27 PM










