DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Quick Diddy about cams-Final Answer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 25, 2001 | 11:10 PM
  #1  
Grumpy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Quick Diddy about cams-Final Answer



I've had dealings with many folks with many different cam head exhaust intake valve changes, and have really noticed first hand how some seemingly minor changes take lots of work to recalibrate. Hence my stand about to get things right means testing and doing your own chips.

Well, in my Black Car, I knocked the lobes of a cam, and replaced it will a cam of the same specs. Lift and duration were exactly the same, and just the overlap changed a few degrees. I caught the problem very early, so no bearings or any internal parts were changed other then the cam.

What an unbelieveable change.
While my last chip was about perfect for the old cam, it's way off on the new one. So far so that I'm going to starting with a virgin bin, rather then trying to get the old bin to work.

Reply
Old Jun 26, 2001 | 10:51 AM
  #2  
MonteCarSlow's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Eh?
Car: 1988 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Bruce,

When you get your new chip roughed in for your new cam - could you summarize what changes were required? I'm just curious what effect lope seperation has on timing and fuel curves.

Thanks,
Ernst
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2001 | 11:01 AM
  #3  
FastBroker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
That's what happened to me when I went from a mellow Edelbrock 3702 cam (194/214) to the roller Hot Cam. It was so bad that I actually put a cam in that was in between the two, or so, to make the PROM learning process easier for me.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2001 | 03:50 PM
  #4  
DM91RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Bruce. I did what you suggested in "Tuning Tips" and went very conservative using the stock LT4 cam to learn with. The cam that I would like to end up running is the LT4 HOT version. Am I correct in understanding that after I get my present cam tuned that I should consider it a learning experience and return to my stock bin and start over after moving up to a hotter cam and intake? Thanks and take care!

------------------
91 RS 350TBI VORTEC HEADS EDELBROCK PERFORMER INTAKE LT4 CAM 1.6 ROLLERS EDELBROCK HEADERS 3' EXHAUST 5SPD 3.08 GEARS
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2001 | 04:01 PM
  #5  
Damon's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 13
From: Philly, PA
Interesting. So you basically either tightened or spread the lobe sep angle with the new cam and there were bigtime changes needed in the programming. Interesting. <scribbling notes furiously>.

I have always been aware of differences lobe sep. has on how and engine behaves, jsut from general expereience. But it sounds like tunign for FI is hyper-sensitive to stuff like this.

I GOTTA start burnin' my own!
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2001 | 11:45 AM
  #6  
MonteCarSlow's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Eh?
Car: 1988 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Grumpy:


I've had dealings with many folks with many different cam head exhaust intake valve changes, and have really noticed first hand how some seemingly minor changes take lots of work to recalibrate. Hence my stand about to get things right means testing and doing your own chips.

Well, in my Black Car, I knocked the lobes of a cam, and replaced it will a cam of the same specs. Lift and duration were exactly the same, and just the overlap changed a few degrees. I caught the problem very early, so no bearings or any internal parts were changed other then the cam.

What an unbelieveable change.
While my last chip was about perfect for the old cam, it's way off on the new one. So far so that I'm going to starting with a virgin bin, rather then trying to get the old bin to work.
</font>
Bruce,

Any theories on why the '730 TPI 305 A4 and M5 bins are so identical even though the cams are very different? The VE tables are identical (at least in the bins I looked).

Ernst
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2001 | 12:36 PM
  #7  
Grumpy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by MonteCarSlow:
Bruce,
Any theories on why the '730 TPI 305 A4 and M5 bins are so identical even though the cams are very different? The VE tables are identical (at least in the bins I looked).
Ernst
</font>
If you look at the injectors sizes for the HP level that makes for a very forgiving set up. Doesn't take much of a BL change to correct.

As you raise the HP level and still use the stock injectors things get much less forgiving. That's why I say the .5 BMFC is get for aftermarket ecms, but falls apart when using oem ecms.

I'd say 90% of the people doing hop up work on their cars should have changed injectors, but it will take time again for this message to get out. If you had 20% more HP to your engine you should be running an injector 20% larger then the oem one.

I had run 40#ers on the GN, and went to the 55 on a lark, only to find the 55 were sooo much better drivibility wise. WOT is exactly the same, idle the same, MPG the same. Hot or cold humid or dry thou, the car runs really close to the same, and response is just that much better. Even after changing all the fuel stuff to being the same ratio wise as things were with the 40s. just the BLs can more easily compensate.
HTH
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2001 | 01:02 PM
  #8  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
I remember when lots of people said I was crazy for switching from 22lb GM injectors to the SVO 30lb injectors. I got a bunch of crap from everywhere and almost everyone saying that the injectors were too big and that I would have a worse idle. I proved them all wrong. The 30lb injectors are perfect for my setup when you consider the power I am making at WOT and injector Duty Cycle at 6500rpms.

Tim

------------------
TRAXION's 1990 IROC-Z
Best Time = 12.244 @ 112.51mph (1.778 60' / 7.819@88.32mph in the 1/8)
All Natural. No Force. No Drugs. Stock Bottom End. Stock Body Panels.
Gunning for NA 11's with bigger cam, bigger stall, and bigger exhaust.
-=ICON Motorsports=-
Moderator: PROM board at thirdgen.org
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2001 | 03:46 PM
  #9  
branz28's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Red Bud, Illinois
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383
Transmission: Pro-Built 700R4 2400 ACT Stall
Axle/Gears: 2.77 Borg Warner 9-Bolt
Funny traxion, i get the same responses when i say i burn my own eproms.

------------------
89 IROC-Z 350 TPI

-Flowmaster Catback
-Performance Resource Chip
-700R4 (Rebuilt) Too much done to actually list
-K&N Airfilters
-Ported Plenum
-2.77 Gears (not much to brag about but eh, its there)
-MSD 8.5 mm plug wires
-Gutted cat
-!AIR
-Gutted Air Boxes
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2001 | 04:21 PM
  #10  
MonteCarSlow's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Eh?
Car: 1988 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I can atest to the same results. I run 4.3tbi injectors in my 2.8tbi 4x4 truck with no loss in idle or driveability. I just scaled back the BPW till the BLM's lined up again.

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cheesehomer
Power Adders
91
Dec 31, 2015 08:48 AM
HoosierinWA
Tech / General Engine
5
Oct 7, 2015 10:15 AM
Galaxie500XL
Suspension and Chassis
2
Oct 1, 2015 01:05 PM
kkirch15
Interior
2
Sep 30, 2015 04:44 PM
92projectcamaro
Engine Swap
4
Sep 29, 2015 07:07 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38 AM.