Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

L69 vs LG4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2016, 06:49 AM
  #1  
Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 19,282
Received 93 Likes on 68 Posts
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
L69 vs LG4

Out of curiosity, is the curb idle speed the same on both vehicles?

JamesC
Old 04-03-2016, 07:51 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,051
Received 1,672 Likes on 1,269 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: L69 vs LG4

AFAIK yes.
Old 04-03-2016, 08:45 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
DonW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 706
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: Carbed 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: L69 vs LG4

I saw the title to this and about spit my coffee! Retro Race! poor LG4
Old 04-13-2016, 01:52 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
MY87LT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,685
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro LT
Engine: LG4 w/ SLP headers & a 3" catback
Transmission: THM700R4 (Stock)
Axle/Gears: Stock 2.73 gears. No Posi
Re: L69 vs LG4

I know we all want our LG4'S to be L69's and I can say with a little tuning and some headers, it can be possible.
Old 04-13-2016, 04:45 PM
  #5  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Camaro86IrocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 270
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: '86 Iroc Z & '91 RS
Engine: 305 TPI & 305 Qjet - Future LC9
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: L69 vs LG4

L69's are reasonably priced these day's, There's one in my area listed on CR for $200 w/ just over 100k on it.. Bet they'd go much less to move it.. Also see a lot of Complete 305 TPI LB9 take outs, harness and all pop up for around the same price give or take,, Easy to find rollers.. Almost a business.. If i could only sell it all for more than I pay..
Old 04-13-2016, 05:07 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
dmccain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: South Ms
Posts: 4,422
Received 721 Likes on 490 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: L69 vs LG4

Originally Posted by MY87LT
I know we all want our LG4'S to be L69's and I can say with a little tuning and some headers, it can be possible.
Thats what i thought back when i had a Lg4 back in HS. Headers, carb, manifold, cam change, 3 in exhaust.. Still barely hit 14s. The 5spd L69 cars and TPI cars destroyed me
Old 04-15-2016, 11:50 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
86LG4Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Bird, 96 ImpalaSS, 98 C1500XCab
Engine: LG4, LT1, L31
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Tors, 4.88 spool, 3.73 Eaton
Re: L69 vs LG4

Originally Posted by MY87LT
I know we all want our LG4'S to be L69's and I can say with a little tuning and some headers, it can be possible.
Yep. Not all that much different. See top part of sig. No headers, no manifold change, no cam change. Just gearing and a very mild TC.
Old 04-16-2016, 06:49 AM
  #8  
On Probation

 
sonjaab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 1,588
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Car: 84 Z-28
Engine: 305 HO
Transmission: r-700
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Re: L69 vs LG4

Originally Posted by JamesC
Out of curiosity, is the curb idle speed the same on both vehicles?
For 86..... Both engine idle speeds should be:
manual 750
auto 550
http://www.iroczone.com/2009/10/1986...pecifications/
Old 04-16-2016, 06:58 AM
  #9  
Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 19,282
Received 93 Likes on 68 Posts
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: L69 vs LG4

I did a cam change, intake, complete L69 exhaust (from the manifolds back), and the dual snorkel set-up. Awoke the old LG4, I can assure you. But nothing says fun like a 350 swap .

JamesC
Old 04-18-2016, 09:01 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
DonW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 706
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: Carbed 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: L69 vs LG4

Yeah, my old LG4 has every bolt on imaginable. Headers, 3" exhaust all the way back with cat delete into flow masters. 65K dizzy, single plane performer, a well tuned Holley carb etc, etc
I can honestly say it woke it up enough to get to the mailbox before my wifes 6cyl Buick. Somehow she still gets the mail before me. Go figure

One of these days I will have this dust collectin 350 dropped in there!
Old 04-18-2016, 10:53 AM
  #11  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Re: L69 vs LG4

Originally Posted by MY87LT
I know we all want our LG4'S to be L69's and I can say with a little tuning and some headers, it can be possible.
There is a little more to it than that, depending upon year and some particulars.

'82-'84 LG4 had dished pistons for lower CR, '85-'86 was same CR as L69. All L69s had knock sensors, only '85-'87 LG4 did.

PROM tuning was slightly different for L69 vs. LG4. Obviously, that fits into the category of "tuning".

Carb tuning was, or could be, slightly different between them - many LG4s had the secondary air valve travel limited (my '86 didn't, however). Secondary rods were different. Again, that's tuning (or in the case of the secondary AV travel, modification - which could be called "tuning").

Cam & exhaust were the major differences. Heads, contrary to popular myth, were exactly the same.

I got my LG4 running pretty well with cam, exhaust, and tuning. But like James said, nothing like the ol' 4" bore mod...

Last edited by five7kid; 04-26-2016 at 01:31 PM.
Old 04-18-2016, 10:55 AM
  #12  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Re: L69 vs LG4

Originally Posted by DonW
...single plane performer...
I don't believe Edelbrock makes a Performer in a single plane model.
Old 04-18-2016, 11:05 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
DonW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 706
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: Carbed 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: L69 vs LG4

Originally Posted by five7kid
I don't believe Edelbrock makes a Performer in a single plane model.
Well there ya go. DUAL plane.....that two holed job
Old 04-18-2016, 11:25 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
DonW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 706
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: Carbed 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: L69 vs LG4

Last summer the pinion shaft set screw thing-a-ma-jig broke off in the carrier, and I ruined the carrier trying to drill it out so I went ahead and had it rebuilt with 3.42 gears and all new bearings. It was a 3.08, so you could imagine the stupid grin I got. I wish I would have went with 3.73....hindsight 20/20. All in all everything that was bought for it mod wise was mostly bought by the PO. I dont think I would have dropped a dime in the hacked up LG4 HEI conversion he did, but I did spend a little fixing it to run right. Can't wait for the time to drop in the other mouse motor though!
Old 04-18-2016, 11:46 AM
  #15  
Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 19,282
Received 93 Likes on 68 Posts
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: L69 vs LG4

Originally Posted by DonW
Can't wait for the time to drop in the other mouse motor though!
Don't blame you. I made my LG4 an L69 equal (or a bit more), and while I learned a lot and while I was happy with my efforts, there's nothing like the 350. Shoot, I went from 155hp to 200hp or so to 330—now there's a wake up!

BTW, I was always intrigued with 3.73's (even bought the drive and driven gears for the speedo), but I spoke with an L69 owner who complained that he was shifting out of first before he was through the intersection at a stoplight.

JamesC
Old 04-18-2016, 12:16 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
DonW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 706
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: Carbed 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: L69 vs LG4

Originally Posted by JamesC
Don't blame you. I made my LG4 an L69 equal (or a bit more), and while I learned a lot and while I was happy with my efforts, there's nothing like the 350. Shoot, I went from 155hp to 200hp or so to 330—now there's a wake up!

BTW, I was always intrigued with 3.73's (even bought the drive and driven gears for the speedo), but I spoke with an L69 owner who complained that he was shifting out of first before he was through the intersection at a stoplight.

JamesC
I have heard that the 700R4 responds to 3.73 pretty well, but I never thought of actually having to shift through that with a T-5. Kinda reminds me of an old 69 stepside I had with granny low..lol

155hp to 330hp
Old 04-18-2016, 12:48 PM
  #17  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Re: L69 vs LG4

Originally Posted by JamesC
Don't blame you. I made my LG4 an L69 equal (or a bit more), and while I learned a lot and while I was happy with my efforts, there's nothing like the 350. Shoot, I went from 155hp to 200hp or so to 330—now there's a wake up!

JamesC
In fairness, the 155 HP rating from the factory is a net flywheel rating, while the 330HP rating is gross flywheel. So the real gain wasn't quite that much.
Old 04-18-2016, 01:03 PM
  #18  
Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 19,282
Received 93 Likes on 68 Posts
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: L69 vs LG4

Originally Posted by five7kid
In fairness, the 155 HP rating from the factory is a net flywheel rating, while the 330HP rating is gross flywheel. So the real gain wasn't quite that much.
And yet...

JamesC
Old 04-18-2016, 03:59 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
DonW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 706
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: Carbed 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: L69 vs LG4

Originally Posted by JamesC
And yet...

JamesC
Just noticed where you two guys are from. I was all over Colorado last year, mainly Lakewood, right next to Denver. But I was in Littleton too along with several surrounding cities. Man that is some scary driving out there! One of my wheel cylinders on my truck popped a bad leak and I had next to zero brakes coming down 12000 feet of mountain from Winterpark CO In the SNOW!

Had to go right through Lawrence Kansas to get there. One of the nicest mechanic shops there gave me a free spare tire when I just inquired about one. I was making the long trip without a spare and stopped and asked if they by chance had one...and he did lol Nice guy! That however was the opposite of CO. That was the most boring drive from Kansas to CO I could have imagined. Ive never in my life seen such flat landscape!
Old 04-18-2016, 04:03 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
DonW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 706
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: Carbed 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: L69 vs LG4

James, I bet you get plenty of opportunity to open up all 330HP with the flat straight roads there. Im a little jealous! Five7kid, I dont see how hot-rodders stay alive for very long on your roads..LOL
Old 04-18-2016, 06:36 PM
  #21  
Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 19,282
Received 93 Likes on 68 Posts
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: L69 vs LG4

Originally Posted by DonW
...from Winterpark CO In the SNOW!

That was the most boring drive from Kansas to CO I could have imagined. Ive never in my life seen such flat landscape!
I've been to Winter Park many times—as a matter of fact, we have our family vacation in CO, generally the Frisco/Breckenridge area, every other year.

Boring? Yep. We used to leave for skiing after work so that we wouldn't have to see the flatlands.

JamesC
Old 04-19-2016, 09:57 AM
  #22  
Member

 
LG4TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Huber Heights (DAYTON), Ohio U.S.
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 83 T/A WS-6
Engine: LG4 305
Transmission: T-5 Manual Clutch
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Positraction
Re: L69 vs LG4

The compression difference and the larger exhaust manifolds are the game changers. Sooner or later I will rebuild the 305 to better than L-69 specs. Just to keep the 305 matched to the car.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pilotrick50
TPI
15
06-14-2016 10:08 AM
AmpleUnicorn88
Camaros for Sale
5
04-05-2016 11:05 AM
87zz28
Camaros for Sale
5
04-02-2016 04:29 PM
jjjosh
TBI
2
03-27-2016 07:53 PM



Quick Reply: L69 vs LG4



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 AM.