L69 vs LG4
#5
Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: L69 vs LG4
L69's are reasonably priced these day's, There's one in my area listed on CR for $200 w/ just over 100k on it.. Bet they'd go much less to move it.. Also see a lot of Complete 305 TPI LB9 take outs, harness and all pop up for around the same price give or take,, Easy to find rollers.. Almost a business.. If i could only sell it all for more than I pay..
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: South Ms
Posts: 4,422
Received 721 Likes
on
490 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: L69 vs LG4
Thats what i thought back when i had a Lg4 back in HS. Headers, carb, manifold, cam change, 3 in exhaust.. Still barely hit 14s. The 5spd L69 cars and TPI cars destroyed me
Trending Topics
#8
On Probation
Re: L69 vs LG4
For 86..... Both engine idle speeds should be:
manual 750
auto 550
http://www.iroczone.com/2009/10/1986...pecifications/
manual 750
auto 550
http://www.iroczone.com/2009/10/1986...pecifications/
#10
Senior Member
Re: L69 vs LG4
Yeah, my old LG4 has every bolt on imaginable. Headers, 3" exhaust all the way back with cat delete into flow masters. 65K dizzy, single plane performer, a well tuned Holley carb etc, etc
I can honestly say it woke it up enough to get to the mailbox before my wifes 6cyl Buick. Somehow she still gets the mail before me. Go figure
One of these days I will have this dust collectin 350 dropped in there!
I can honestly say it woke it up enough to get to the mailbox before my wifes 6cyl Buick. Somehow she still gets the mail before me. Go figure
One of these days I will have this dust collectin 350 dropped in there!
#11
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Re: L69 vs LG4
'82-'84 LG4 had dished pistons for lower CR, '85-'86 was same CR as L69. All L69s had knock sensors, only '85-'87 LG4 did.
PROM tuning was slightly different for L69 vs. LG4. Obviously, that fits into the category of "tuning".
Carb tuning was, or could be, slightly different between them - many LG4s had the secondary air valve travel limited (my '86 didn't, however). Secondary rods were different. Again, that's tuning (or in the case of the secondary AV travel, modification - which could be called "tuning").
Cam & exhaust were the major differences. Heads, contrary to popular myth, were exactly the same.
I got my LG4 running pretty well with cam, exhaust, and tuning. But like James said, nothing like the ol' 4" bore mod...
Last edited by five7kid; 04-26-2016 at 01:31 PM.
#13
Senior Member
#14
Senior Member
Re: L69 vs LG4
Last summer the pinion shaft set screw thing-a-ma-jig broke off in the carrier, and I ruined the carrier trying to drill it out so I went ahead and had it rebuilt with 3.42 gears and all new bearings. It was a 3.08, so you could imagine the stupid grin I got. I wish I would have went with 3.73....hindsight 20/20. All in all everything that was bought for it mod wise was mostly bought by the PO. I dont think I would have dropped a dime in the hacked up LG4 HEI conversion he did, but I did spend a little fixing it to run right. Can't wait for the time to drop in the other mouse motor though!
#15
Re: L69 vs LG4
Don't blame you. I made my LG4 an L69 equal (or a bit more), and while I learned a lot and while I was happy with my efforts, there's nothing like the 350. Shoot, I went from 155hp to 200hp or so to 330—now there's a wake up!
BTW, I was always intrigued with 3.73's (even bought the drive and driven gears for the speedo), but I spoke with an L69 owner who complained that he was shifting out of first before he was through the intersection at a stoplight.
JamesC
BTW, I was always intrigued with 3.73's (even bought the drive and driven gears for the speedo), but I spoke with an L69 owner who complained that he was shifting out of first before he was through the intersection at a stoplight.
JamesC
#16
Senior Member
Re: L69 vs LG4
Don't blame you. I made my LG4 an L69 equal (or a bit more), and while I learned a lot and while I was happy with my efforts, there's nothing like the 350. Shoot, I went from 155hp to 200hp or so to 330—now there's a wake up!
BTW, I was always intrigued with 3.73's (even bought the drive and driven gears for the speedo), but I spoke with an L69 owner who complained that he was shifting out of first before he was through the intersection at a stoplight.
JamesC
BTW, I was always intrigued with 3.73's (even bought the drive and driven gears for the speedo), but I spoke with an L69 owner who complained that he was shifting out of first before he was through the intersection at a stoplight.
JamesC
155hp to 330hp
#17
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Re: L69 vs LG4
In fairness, the 155 HP rating from the factory is a net flywheel rating, while the 330HP rating is gross flywheel. So the real gain wasn't quite that much.
#19
Senior Member
Re: L69 vs LG4
Just noticed where you two guys are from. I was all over Colorado last year, mainly Lakewood, right next to Denver. But I was in Littleton too along with several surrounding cities. Man that is some scary driving out there! One of my wheel cylinders on my truck popped a bad leak and I had next to zero brakes coming down 12000 feet of mountain from Winterpark CO In the SNOW!
Had to go right through Lawrence Kansas to get there. One of the nicest mechanic shops there gave me a free spare tire when I just inquired about one. I was making the long trip without a spare and stopped and asked if they by chance had one...and he did lol Nice guy! That however was the opposite of CO. That was the most boring drive from Kansas to CO I could have imagined. Ive never in my life seen such flat landscape!
Had to go right through Lawrence Kansas to get there. One of the nicest mechanic shops there gave me a free spare tire when I just inquired about one. I was making the long trip without a spare and stopped and asked if they by chance had one...and he did lol Nice guy! That however was the opposite of CO. That was the most boring drive from Kansas to CO I could have imagined. Ive never in my life seen such flat landscape!
#20
Senior Member
Re: L69 vs LG4
James, I bet you get plenty of opportunity to open up all 330HP with the flat straight roads there. Im a little jealous! Five7kid, I dont see how hot-rodders stay alive for very long on your roads..LOL
#21
Re: L69 vs LG4
Boring? Yep. We used to leave for skiing after work so that we wouldn't have to see the flatlands.
JamesC
#22
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Huber Heights (DAYTON), Ohio U.S.
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 83 T/A WS-6
Engine: LG4 305
Transmission: T-5 Manual Clutch
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Positraction
Re: L69 vs LG4
The compression difference and the larger exhaust manifolds are the game changers. Sooner or later I will rebuild the 305 to better than L-69 specs. Just to keep the 305 matched to the car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
darren8642
V6
1
04-01-2016 10:02 AM