When to expect vapor purge with '165
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charles County, Maryland
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2000 BMW M5
When to expect vapor purge with '165
I have a '165 6E mask TPI swap running well and I can burn chips for it but I am finding one minor issue...every time I remove the fuel cap I have a TON of vapor pressure coming out. I am guessing that my purge valve is not working (I purchased a used TPI charcoal can and wired it up when I repinned my TBI harness to TPI). My plan of action is the following:
1. test that when voltage is applied the canister purge valve is actually passing vacuum (I have quite a few spare TPI canisters and valves if it's bad)
2. make sure I actually have continuity from the ecm pin for CCP to one of the pins @ the canister
3. make sure the pink/black lead at the other canister pin actually has IGN on power
Aside from checking those things, when can I expect to see the ECM sending a ground to the canister to purge it, so I can check it? Will it purge at startup or some other known condition that I will be able to check easily just to idiot proof this setup?
Thanks
Steve
1. test that when voltage is applied the canister purge valve is actually passing vacuum (I have quite a few spare TPI canisters and valves if it's bad)
2. make sure I actually have continuity from the ecm pin for CCP to one of the pins @ the canister
3. make sure the pink/black lead at the other canister pin actually has IGN on power
Aside from checking those things, when can I expect to see the ECM sending a ground to the canister to purge it, so I can check it? Will it purge at startup or some other known condition that I will be able to check easily just to idiot proof this setup?
Thanks
Steve
#2
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,405
Likes: 0
Received 216 Likes
on
202 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: When to expect vapor purge with '165
The CCP vapor control valve opens at a little under 1 psi (5 KPa). The tank pressure will build to that level before the fumes are sent tot he canister.
So it is normal for the tank to build up a lot of air/fumes, more so the more empty the tank is.
The canister is open to air, and air is pulled through when the ECM opens the purge solenoid.
RBob.
So it is normal for the tank to build up a lot of air/fumes, more so the more empty the tank is.
The canister is open to air, and air is pulled through when the ECM opens the purge solenoid.
RBob.
#3
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charles County, Maryland
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2000 BMW M5
Re: When to expect vapor purge with '165
Is this CCP vapor control valve the electric one on the canister or is it somewhere else? The vehicle in question was swapped (by me) so I wonder if I left something out towards the tank end?
#4
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,405
Likes: 0
Received 216 Likes
on
202 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: When to expect vapor purge with '165
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/tbi/...ter-lines.html
The round piece with the three lines is the vapor control valve. The CCP line at the tank has a small restriction in it. Found another reference that states it opens at 6 KPa. So it will open in the 5 to 6 KPa range...
There is a rollover valve on the tank sender, but I don't know if that is on the CCP line or the tank pressure/vacuum vent line.
RBob.
#5
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charles County, Maryland
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2000 BMW M5
Re: When to expect vapor purge with '165
Got it, yeah I used that valve and appear to have plumbed it correctly. Do you know under what conditions the ECM applies signal to the solenoid itself?
#6
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,405
Likes: 0
Received 216 Likes
on
202 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: When to expect vapor purge with '165
The purge DC% can be scaled back if the BLM drops too low.
RBob.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Camden, MI
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1985 IROC-Z28
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: When to expect vapor purge with '165
i don't know if this applies to the TPI motors(it's been far too long since i've had one in a road worthy vehicle), but on certain motors, where the CCP solenoid's tubing meets the throttle body, the throttle plate has to actually open so far(around 5% on a FWD3.1) before the port for the CCP is actually exposed to vacuum, otherwise, the vapors are only exposed to atmospheric pressure.
Trending Topics
#8
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,405
Likes: 0
Received 216 Likes
on
202 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: When to expect vapor purge with '165
i don't know if this applies to the TPI motors(it's been far too long since i've had one in a road worthy vehicle), but on certain motors, where the CCP solenoid's tubing meets the throttle body, the throttle plate has to actually open so far(around 5% on a FWD3.1) before the port for the CCP is actually exposed to vacuum, otherwise, the vapors are only exposed to atmospheric pressure.
The other thing to check is whether the solenoid is NO or NC. GM used both for a real mix-and-match. The calibration usually has an option flag for which solenoid is used.
RBob.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Camden, MI
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1985 IROC-Z28
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: When to expect vapor purge with '165
the port in the FWD 3.1 was just a tiny hole, maybe 1/8" diameter at most.
strangely enough, when GM went from the 3.1 to the 3100, they moved the port from the TB to a couple of inches behind it and integrated it with the PCV "suction" half. i guess they were more trusting of the electronics at that point? or it may be due to the all 3.1s using normally open solenoids and all 3100s using normally closed.
strangely enough, when GM went from the 3.1 to the 3100, they moved the port from the TB to a couple of inches behind it and integrated it with the PCV "suction" half. i guess they were more trusting of the electronics at that point? or it may be due to the all 3.1s using normally open solenoids and all 3100s using normally closed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sreZ28
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
10-22-2015 08:21 AM