Power Adders Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

4-valve head won't help with turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-24-2002, 05:52 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
pontiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Finland, Europe
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4-valve head won't help with turbo

i was getting a hair cut today and i was reading some magazines. highly respected magazine over here in finland said that 4-valve head wont help if engine is supercharged.

for me it said that all 3rd gen'ers shoud have turbo if it's not attached in the factory. no matter is engine 2 or 4-valve construction, benefits will be same. yihaa!!!

just my 2 cents (euro),


-P
Old 01-25-2002, 02:34 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member
 
89ProchargedROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: chi-town
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i dont know where you read that but that is pure moranic

think about it for a second?

you have 4 VALVES allowing TWICE the amount of AIR into the combustion chamber to make TWICE as much power with all else being equal and setup properly

why do you think those modular mustang motors FLY with a blower put on?

4 valve motor
Old 01-25-2002, 09:34 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member
 
ATOMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Indianapolis IN
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a little FYI. Intake valves on 4 valve heads are not as big as intake valves on 2 valve heads, so it's not twice the the flow, but 4 valve heads have been shown to breathe better. I also believe that everything should be turbo charged. Just like *** intended.
Old 01-25-2002, 10:05 AM
  #4  
Member
 
91-ZZ4-Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 89ProchargedROC
i dont know where you read that but that is pure moranic

think about it for a second?

you have 4 VALVES allowing TWICE the amount of AIR into the combustion chamber to make TWICE as much power with all else being equal and setup properly

why do you think those modular mustang motors FLY with a blower put on?

4 valve motor
You are assuming that the 4 valves are twice the size of the 2 valves. Depending on the displacement of the engine and combustion chamber size the benefit of a 4 valve motor is in the way it delivers the air and fuel not the volume, and under pressure (Turbo/Supercharger) those characteristics change and a single large valve can provide just as well. So it is correct in some ways but not all.
Old 01-25-2002, 10:28 AM
  #5  
Senior Member

 
JoBy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Timrå, Sweden
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 Corvette
Engine: Turbo 350
Transmission: 4L80E with TCI T-Com
A four valve head is actually much better with turbos.

Increased flow is not the main reson that these heads are better.

These heads have the spark plug in the middle, between all the four valves. The combustion will be from the center and out instead of from one side. This will allow a higer compression ratio at the same boost without knocking. It is usually possible to use 2 unit higher compression ratio, or use more boost.
Old 01-25-2002, 09:06 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
paul_huryk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ahead of you...
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 1984 LG4 Camaro
Engine: 350 Roller Motor
Transmission: Level 10 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Like others said, four valves do not allow twice as much air in the chamber. 4 valve heads do allow more air in at the same lift and duration as a two valve head, making it breathe better with a smaller cam.

The problem is the typical 4 valve motor is 4 liters or under (my TL's motor is 3.2L), making it torque deficient. Add in the typical intake tuning for higher RPM hp and you have a motor that begs to be super/turbo charged to move well. The top dog of that type of motor combo was the 1993 & up Supra: 3L motor. 24 valves with twin turbos at 320hp stock (at a high rpm). Of course the motors are powerful with mods, but putting 600hp through a 3 Liter 6 is not my idea of bulletproof; ditto for the race motors. I would rather have a 4 Liter with 25% less boost or 25% less revs to make the power (more TQ too).

The real advantage of a 4 valve motor over a OHV motor is the fact that the valvetrain is light (small lifters, no pushrods...), so it can take a lot of revs before valve float occurs. Adding that to the high flow with a small cam, you have a good high RPM motor. The LT5 Vette had a 405HP DOHC 350 that didn't have to rev much past 5600 to get the power, today's 2 valve 2002 L06 Vette makes the same at 6000RPM, only a slight RPM increase.

Typically the 4 valve motors run a higher compression ratio, but they require premium gas, so you gotta lower it to put forced induction on one.

Or get a rev kit to give some RPMs to your L98:
Attached Thumbnails 4-valve head won't help with turbo-revkit.jpg  
Old 01-26-2002, 12:45 PM
  #7  
Member

 
IrocZS383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Camaro
Engine: 357
Transmission: 700-R4
I have to agree with the others, 4 valve heads don't offer twice the airflow that a 2 valve head does but they offer more airflow at lower lift. They do allow you to raise the compression ratio because of the centrally located spark plug and they respond very well to supercharging because any kind of forced induction, super/turbocharging or nitrous, will amplify an already good intake head combo.

Go to www.araoengineering.com

They offer 32 valve heads for big and small block chevys that use stock pushrods. They are a little on the expensive side but they were dyno tested on a engine where 2 valve race heads were used and the 4 valve heads were put in their place and the engine made 129 more hp with every other variable being equal.
Old 01-26-2002, 01:26 PM
  #8  
Senior Member

 
JoBy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Timrå, Sweden
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 Corvette
Engine: Turbo 350
Transmission: 4L80E with TCI T-Com
Well said IrocZS383
Old 01-27-2002, 05:37 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member
 
ATOMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Indianapolis IN
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OHC heads also have bigger intake ports(for same displacement) because you don't have push rods going through the head. They breathe better because of that too. OHC also allows for higher cam ramp rates because they don't have to push a lifter up through a bore. OHC's with belt drives will also retard cam timing at high RPM because the belt streatches and as most people know retarded cam timing helps at the high end.
Old 01-27-2002, 05:43 PM
  #10  
COTM Editor

iTrader: (22)
 
QwkTrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,934
Likes: 0
Received 1,861 Likes on 1,275 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
You need to start reading new magazines. That one obviously is run by morons.
Old 01-28-2002, 12:51 PM
  #11  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
LIL QIK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston Tx USA
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think what I would like most about a 4 valver is the fact that I wouldn't have to run near the lift or duration that I do now. It makes for a much more streetable engine and obtaining the same HP or more. Just my 2 cents.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Derick15
Tech / General Engine
2
09-17-2016 05:28 PM
camaro71633
Tech / General Engine
39
09-01-2015 10:24 AM
theurge
TPI
7
08-21-2015 12:46 PM
86White_T/A305
LTX and LSX
0
08-17-2015 12:16 AM
ZsTransAm
Electronics
1
08-11-2015 07:30 PM



Quick Reply: 4-valve head won't help with turbo



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 AM.