Let's decide this once and for all...
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 L03
Transmission: Borg-Warner WC T-5
Let's decide this once and for all...
Stock suspension on a 1992 RS with 16" wheels and F41 RPO code. What size sway bars does it have? I have searched and have seen everything from 32-36 solid/hollow front, and 22-24 solid/hollow rear. Which is it? Do they have the fast ratio steering box or not? My '92 has the 16" wheels and F41, but the steering feels awfully loose. It does look like it has a pretty big sway bar up front though.
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Never made hollow rear swaybars. Your car probably has either a 34 or 36mm from what I've been hearing lately.
My car had the 36/24 combo, but still felt somewhat loose. Replace your swaybar endlinks and mount bushings with poly stuff, and you'll notice a HUGE difference. Also, buy a wonderbar, another nice addition. Shocks/springs don't hurt either, and neither does a strut tower brace.
My car had the 36/24 combo, but still felt somewhat loose. Replace your swaybar endlinks and mount bushings with poly stuff, and you'll notice a HUGE difference. Also, buy a wonderbar, another nice addition. Shocks/springs don't hurt either, and neither does a strut tower brace.
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Loveland, OH, US
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Nothing that people "decide" here will have any effect on the size of your sway bars.
Go measure them. A Crescent wrench right next to the bushings, and a measuring tape with mm, is all you need.
Go measure them. A Crescent wrench right next to the bushings, and a measuring tape with mm, is all you need.
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
I got so caught up in my poly bushings rant, I forgot to tell him to measure!
Undersizing your bushings 2mm or so doesn't hurt anything by the way. For example, I'm running 22mm bushings on 24mm rear bar and 34mm bushings on 36mm front bar. I actually think that's the better option
Undersizing your bushings 2mm or so doesn't hurt anything by the way. For example, I'm running 22mm bushings on 24mm rear bar and 34mm bushings on 36mm front bar. I actually think that's the better option
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gladstone, Missouri
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0L TBI (ebl inside)
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 lsd 10 bolt
Originally posted by 305q_ta86
Holy crap, I saw a car with 'f41' on the bumper at the JY.. What does f41 mean, exactly?
Holy crap, I saw a car with 'f41' on the bumper at the JY.. What does f41 mean, exactly?
And a search would yield everything.
Also my 91 f41 has 34 solid front and 21 solid rear.
Last edited by Gladstoneiroc; 05-14-2005 at 09:02 PM.
#7
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Chesapeake, Ohio
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 02 WS6 White/Ebony
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock 3.42
Actually, I'd size the bushings to match the bar. You want a snug fit...but not binding. Also, pay the extra for geasable ones....poly bushings are noisy unless you keep them lubed.
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Pontiac ta 5.0l 2005 pontiac gxp 5.3l ls4 dod 2003 GMC Envoy 4.2l
My 91 ta with f41 susp and I just replaced bushing and endlinks the front was 34 and rear was 24. But I think gm used what ever they had over the years so the sizes very in the 80's. Not sure if they stayed consistent during the 90's. Maybe others will chime in with what they have on 90's cars to see of there is any consistency. But the only true way to know is measure with calipers or mic's.
#9
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Originally posted by drain89
Actually, I'd size the bushings to match the bar. You want a snug fit...but not binding. Also, pay the extra for geasable ones....poly bushings are noisy unless you keep them lubed.
Actually, I'd size the bushings to match the bar. You want a snug fit...but not binding. Also, pay the extra for geasable ones....poly bushings are noisy unless you keep them lubed.
#11
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
[Edited for content] N/M, no need to rant...
It should be a 34/21 like mine..Does this help:
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...threadid=59687
Ed
It should be a 34/21 like mine..Does this help:
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...threadid=59687
Ed
Last edited by ebmiller88; 05-19-2005 at 08:07 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post