Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Suspension / Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-26-2008, 08:28 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
2.8RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 1,517
Car: 89 V6 Camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open diff

Classifieds Rating: (5)
Suggestions for alignment specs?

I'll be getting some Tociko Illumina struts for the front soon and figured that I would get a better alignment for the car. What would be good specs for an AutoX car that is daily driven? The car is a 89 Camaro V6 with new Moog springs, 36/23 swaybars, wonderbar, and Bilsteins in the rear.
__________________
00 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP Daytona
2.8RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 09:14 PM   #2
Moderator
 
AlkyIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 13,970
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 582 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Suggestions for alignment specs?

Factory specs
AlkyIROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 10:10 PM   #3
Supreme Member
 
chevyracingrox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Amboy, IL
Posts: 1,029
Car: 88 IROC, 76 Malibu Classic
Engine: 350 TPI, 350
Transmission: 700R4, 4-speed
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt ????

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to chevyracingrox
Re: Suggestions for alignment specs?

not too far from stock, if you had just a little toe out you might get better turn in, but your sacraficing stability so, daily driving might get a little interesting.
chevyracingrox is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 11:09 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Tennesse
Posts: 2,820
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to 91_5.7_TPI
Re: Suggestions for alignment specs?

I drive with .5 negitive camber, can't remember the caster, and some toe out. You have to make sure you pay attention to keep from wondering out of your lane, but it's fine other than that. Cornering was improved and I haven't noticed increased tire wear.
__________________

KONIs I Eibach Pro-Kit I 36mm/24mm sway bars I Spohn: Adjustable PHB I Wonder Bar I SFCs
Custom LCAs I LCARBs I J&M Products Camber/Caster plates
I Hawk's Ceramic Pads I 4th Gen 3.23 Posi I LS1/LT1 Brakes
91_5.7_TPI is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 12:47 AM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: K.C.MO
Posts: 154
Car: 88 Formula
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Suggestions for alignment specs?

The stock alignment specs aren't good for ANY application-poor handling and poor tire wear.

.5 degree negative camber, 3/32" toe in, and +4L, +4.5R caster is a good compromise for your application. Some cars don't want to go that far on the caster or the camber-just get it as close as you can if that's the case.
RacerX13 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 11:35 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
SteelTownMadDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Port Colborne, ON CA
Posts: 324

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Suggestions for alignment specs?

I run the following for cruising:

-0.5* camber
+4 caster both sides
0 toe

When I go tracking or autox, I use the following:

-1.5* camber
+4 caster
toe out (this automatically happens when I drop the camber)

If you're asking how I do both, I have a Sharpie outline of my strut bearing at the "cruising" alignment, and when I get to the track/autox, I loosen the strut bolts to bring down my camber. I have a special little tool...well, I piece of wood and 2 ft level that's setup to give me about -1.5* camber when the level at 0.
__________________
Ray
SteelTownMadDog is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 12:00 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 26
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Stock open 2.73's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to dasferret Send a message via Yahoo to dasferret
Re: Suggestions for alignment specs?

I have a stock 92 and I run max caster on the stock mounts and about a -1 camber and zero toe. It has been setup this way for about 3yrs now and don't have any increased tire wear. The car handles very well, even with worn components and such. I also have the stock 16's with 225/60's on the front.
dasferret is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2008, 11:55 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 542
Car: 91 Z/28, 89 RS Race Car
Engine: 305 stock / ZZ4 AFR 195 9.7:1
Transmission: T5 / t10 / Jerico
Axle/Gears: 10blt w 3.42, 9 in w /3.80 DL

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Suggestions for alignment specs?

Max the camber
Max the caster

set toe to zero.

Hang on the wheel.
SDIF is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 10:28 AM   #9
Supreme Member
 
chevyracingrox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Amboy, IL
Posts: 1,029
Car: 88 IROC, 76 Malibu Classic
Engine: 350 TPI, 350
Transmission: 700R4, 4-speed
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt ????

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to chevyracingrox
Re: Suggestions for alignment specs?

for camber i've heard -.5 to be more than enough on a lot of cars. too much more could give you less traction. as for caster, it can help a lot, but too much could slow your steering inputs. usually i hear about autoxers running just a little toe out.
__________________
chevyracingrox is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 08:09 PM   #10
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: York, Pa
Posts: 178
Car: 84 olympic edition camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Suggestions for alignment specs?

Old thread. I'm going to get my car aligned this friday and will the -.5 camber, +4 caster, and 0 toe out cause to much extra wear on the tires? Also will this setup cause the car to wander on bad roads because Pa roads are horrible. I am looking for a decent street alignment that will keep the car from wandering and keep the tires good but will allow me to handle better through the twisties.
84olmpcboy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 09:29 PM   #11
Supreme Member
 
hellz_wings's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 1,426
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Suggestions for alignment specs?

I've read that because our roads are made a certain way (i think the term is "crown"?) that you have to compensate for this by having your right caster 0.5 higher then the left... So if your left is 4.0*, then your right should be 4.5*. Camber has to be equal...
-0.5* camber is what i'm going to be set at next summer. As for TOE, i'd rather be stable on the street (by setting at slightly negative) than to be wandering (tired of this) so I'm going to be setting my toe to slightly negative, but equal on both sides. There's a tech article on TGO you can view that has recommended specs... Plus tons of other alignment info (more recent posts are in the suspension forum on SAI and IA but I don't know if you want to even go there cuz it starts to hurt your head lol..)

Later
__________________
"An engine is like an orchestra. It's made up of wind, brass, percussion, and a whole range of other complimentary sections, all working to make that beautiful music that we call 'performance'..."

271FWHP - 354FWTQ --> (UN-TUNED... Tuning in progress! Will DYNO again soon...)
For mods go here --> http://1986irocz.tripod.com/
14.2 @ 96 on the 1/4 mile...
hellz_wings is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2009, 01:37 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,487

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Suggestions for alignment specs?

I would never run less than -3/32 toe in for freeway use. Going to zero or above will make the car darty and you will be constantly sawing at the steering wheel.

tire choice- width and brand, and bushing choice will have alot to do with just how much closer you can get towards zero from toe in specs. Road force causes setback of the front suspension as the wheels drag with friction. The weaker the bushings, the more toe in you will get the higher the speed you drive. As the tire is forced back from A-arm bushing deflection, The tierod is angled back shortening the lateral distance thus creating a toe in effect. An older bushing car can generally get away with slightly more towards zero toe.

The reason why you go zero to positive on a autox or road race car is they are hardly ever driven straight like you do on a freeway. Even when you come out of a corner and blast down a long straight, watch any racecar kindof arch tiowards the inside of the straight and then back out for setup to the next corner. That little zigzag is keeping the car stable with turning arch down a longer straight.

The lower the speeds, generally (but not always) the more positive the toe all for Ackerman assist in degrees.

basically, a car with about 70" track width when placed on turnplates and both wheels pointed straight towards 0*... are then turned so an outside wheel is at 10*, the inside wheel turnplate should read 12.5*.

Alot of people do not know that the inside front wheel is what turns the car. ackerman angles keep the wheels from scrubing againts eachother in arching path, and the outside wheel is badsically more about lateral grip. Increasing te toe makes the senerio above at 12.5* go more towards 13* or 13+ to promote a better turn in, but will also caause the wheels to drag and fight eachother at higher speed steady state cornering and promote heat & srcub thus sooner loss of traction.

Slower speeds will cause more wheel turn or more angle. An autox car can see ackerman on outside wheels go as high as 35* if the car where to be thought of on turn plates. The car losses ackerman gain as the wheel angle increases, so starting a little higher in tow out aids in keeping better low speed high angle grip when thinking of terms of ackerman and the front wheels tracking without fighting eachother.

How many of you get that weird lifting of the front suspension and skipping of the front wheels in a low speed u-turn in a parking lot?........Answer- the wider the tires, the more you notice this. Wider tires is generally more grip, thus it emphysies this effect of ackerman loss at full steering lock.

Dean
Vetruck is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2009, 08:04 PM   #13
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 351
Car: 83 z28

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Suggestions for alignment specs?

any tech that does alignments will tell you that for rwd cars should be set to 1/16" toed in on each side so 1/8" total toe in, only fwd cars are supposed to be 0
americanmuscle3 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2009, 08:04 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis

Tags
1985, 2004, 89, 99, alignment, camaro, grand, lcarbs, lowered, prix, set, spec, specifications, specs, toe, wheel, z28
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details