Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

adjustable 'v' non adjustable ?...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2008, 04:57 PM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
 
sid rs91's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver, B.C
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS TBI 91 Z28 TPI
Engine: 305
Transmission: wc T5
adjustable 'v' non adjustable ?...

So I need to replace some parts under my 91RS 305 TBI T-Top daily driver.
It's stock except for full exhaust and dropped with sportline springs.
Heres what I am planing to get-
3 point STB, wonder bar, panhard bar (Edelbrock)
subframe connectors (Edelbrock ??)
shocks/struts (tokicos.)

Now some guys are saying get adjustable pieces, with some of the parts, there is a price difference (in most cases higher).

My question: is there much point in getting the adjustable stuff over non adjustable for a daily driver?
Keep in mind trying to keep cost low, how would you do it?

SID.
Old 07-11-2008, 08:11 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,652
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 44 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: adjustable 'v' non adjustable ?...

its a good idea to get a adjustable panhard bar, so you can center the rear in the car after you lower it. Thats the only piece that can be adjustable in the list you have. The other piece that should be adjustable is the torque arm if you decide to get one. I didnt know edelbrock made SFC for a 3rd gen? my opinion, i would pass on anything made by edelbrock except intake manifolds and waterpumps. suspension parts, look at UMI, Spohn, or BMR.

Last edited by //<86TA>\\; 07-11-2008 at 08:24 PM.
Old 07-11-2008, 08:18 PM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: adjustable 'v' non adjustable ?...

Actually, I really like my Edelebrock 3-pt STB. Who else makes a 3-pt STB besides Edelbrock?

As for the BMR STB, I'm not very keen on that flat bar in the middle. There's just no way a flat bar can be as strong/stiff as a rectangular or round piece.

BTW, I don't see a Wnderbar listed by the OP. I'd suggest getting one.
Old 07-11-2008, 08:22 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,652
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 44 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: adjustable 'v' non adjustable ?...

Originally Posted by Stephen
Actually, I really like my Edelebrock 3-pt STB. Who else makes a 3-pt STB besides Edelbrock?

As for the BMR STB, I'm not very keen on that flat bar in the middle. There's just no way a flat bar can be as strong/stiff as a rectangular or round piece.
i have a 3pt edelbrock STB as well, it fit like sheet. I didnt like the pivot mounts either. I chopped it up and made rigid end mounts for it, now its good.

Originally Posted by Stephen
BTW, I don't see a Wnderbar listed by the OP. I'd suggest getting one.
Originally Posted by sid rs91
3 point STB, wonder bar, panhard bar (Edelbrock)
SID.
Old 07-11-2008, 08:43 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (9)
 
krisb410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 2,346
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 RS Camaro, 75 L82 Corvette
Engine: LO3, 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4, TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23 posi/LS1 discs, stock
Re: adjustable 'v' non adjustable ?...

The Edelbrock STB for TBI car is awesome!!! 3 point as well as a nice beefy piece. FYI, unless you have solid type strut mounts (ie. J&M or Spohn), don't bother with an STB, (unless you just want it for the look of it). The stock type strut mounts are rubber and will allow to much play for the STB to be effective.

I would think with sportlines without an adjustable panhard is screwing up the center thrust angle of your alignment. I would at least get an "on car" adjustable one, it's worth it over the plain adjustable unit because it's much easier to adjust it properly while it's on the car.

Since you have sportlines, you may want to consider LCA relocation brackets to correct the geometry of the LCAs.

It is really worth the money to get the right pieces. I saved money by buying everything from UMI during group purchases. I split all the parts into 2 different GPs, I did the rear 1st, then the front). I also traded parts I had for the STB and SFCs, from other members on here (did a couple of junk yard runs to get the parts).

I would buy the best parts you can and "save up" the parts until you have everything to do it once. It sux replacing one part at time, just take off all the old and install all the new at the same time.

Last edited by krisb410; 07-12-2008 at 06:01 PM. Reason: Fixed spelling errors
Old 07-12-2008, 05:20 PM
  #6  
Member

Thread Starter
 
sid rs91's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver, B.C
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS TBI 91 Z28 TPI
Engine: 305
Transmission: wc T5
Re: adjustable 'v' non adjustable ?...

Originally Posted by krisb410
The Edlebrock STB for TBI car is awesome!!! 3 point as well as a nice beefy piece. FYI, unless you have solid type strut mounts (ie. J&M or Spohn), don't bother with an STB, (unless you just want it for the look of it). The stock type strut mounts are rubber and will allow to much play for the STB to be effective.
did not know this ,but will get anyway and deal with mounts later.

Originally Posted by krisb410
I would think with sportlines without an adjustable panhard is screwing up the center thrust angle of your alignment. I would at least get an "on car" adjustable one, it's worth it over the plain adjustable unit because it's much easier to adjust it properly while it's on the car.
whats the difference? on-car/plain.
was going to get this part installed as i have no idea how adjust it to correct spot.

this is the one I was looking at
http://performanceparts.com/part.php?partID=135921

LCA's brackets will be coming later on.
Old 07-12-2008, 06:00 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (9)
 
krisb410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 2,346
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 RS Camaro, 75 L82 Corvette
Engine: LO3, 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4, TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23 posi/LS1 discs, stock
Re: adjustable 'v' non adjustable ?...

It looks like that bar is an on car adjustable. So your good, but you might want to call Edelbrock just to make sure.

With an on car adjustable panhard bar (sometimes called double adjustable), you dont have to unbolt it from the car to adjust it. It can be adjusted while it is still installed on the car. The "plain" type adjustable panhard bars (sometimes called single adjustable) must be unbolted from usually the axle side, adjusted, then re-installed. Only thing is, once it's adjusted, you really don't have to adjust it again unless you change the ride height. But it is really a lot easier to adjust it while it's on the car.

FWIW: I didn't have any issues with the fitment of my Edelbrock STB, and I had it installed quite some time before I had the solid strut mounts.
Old 07-12-2008, 06:17 PM
  #8  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
Abubaca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: JAMESTOWN, NC
Posts: 8,367
Received 348 Likes on 275 Posts
Car: 1988 Iroc
Engine: L98 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Hawks 8.8 - 3.73
Re: adjustable 'v' non adjustable ?...

unless you have solid type strut mounts (ie. J&M or Spohn), don't bother with an STB, (unless you just want it for the look of it). The stock type strut mounts are rubber and will allow to much play for the STB to be effective.
I disagree. I had a 3pt. BMR brace and the difference in sqeaks and rattles was undeniable.

With the sportlines, I'd highly suggest an adjustable torque arm. Since you DAILY DRIVE this car, I would get one that mounts to the transmission like the factory piece. I have the Spohn adjustable TA that mounts to the trans crossmember, and while it performs perfectly, the additional road noise is considerable, and in my case, I'm actually going back to a trans mounted TA.

....as mentioned, I'd also get a set of Lower control arm relocation brackets. This is actually more important than the new LCAs themselves. If you DO get the LCAs as well, no need for these to be adjustable.
Old 07-14-2008, 05:05 PM
  #9  
Member

Thread Starter
 
sid rs91's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver, B.C
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS TBI 91 Z28 TPI
Engine: 305
Transmission: wc T5
Re: adjustable 'v' non adjustable ?...

thanks for the input guys.
Will pick up some relocation brackets too, didn't think of using them with stock LCA's

Have one last Q about the adj panhard.
How do you adjust it for your car? Do i have to make some measurements? or do I just pull of the stock one and car shifts to its happy spot and I adjust panhard to fit?
Or just get it installed from some one who knows what they are doing? (my original plan.)

Last edited by sid rs91; 07-14-2008 at 05:10 PM.
Old 07-14-2008, 08:30 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (9)
 
krisb410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 2,346
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 RS Camaro, 75 L82 Corvette
Engine: LO3, 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4, TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23 posi/LS1 discs, stock
Re: adjustable 'v' non adjustable ?...

Install it, then take it to get an alignment. Or at least ask them to adjust the rear so the center thrust angle is 0*.
Old 07-14-2008, 11:00 PM
  #11  
Member

Thread Starter
 
sid rs91's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver, B.C
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS TBI 91 Z28 TPI
Engine: 305
Transmission: wc T5
Re: adjustable 'v' non adjustable ?...

ok. thanks for all the help.
will get alignment done after i get the shocks/struts, stb, and panhard put in.
Have to wait for the wonderbar, sfc's and LCA relocation brackets.Will have to order them.
or would it be better to install every thing and then get alignment?
Old 07-14-2008, 11:15 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (9)
 
krisb410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 2,346
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 RS Camaro, 75 L82 Corvette
Engine: LO3, 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4, TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23 posi/LS1 discs, stock
Re: adjustable 'v' non adjustable ?...

SFCs should be the aboslutely 1st thing you do. Shocks and struts, then the rest of the stuff. Get an alignment ASAP after working on any part of the suspension. So do it all at once so you only have to get it aligned once.
Old 07-15-2008, 10:00 AM
  #13  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: adjustable 'v' non adjustable ?...

...and as Kris has stated basically- It is absolutely useless to get a STB if you have factory original strut mounts.Get new strut mounts first, preferably solid bushing types like Spohn and Hotparts sell.A STB's entire job is to keep the strut towers from flexing towards eachother in hard cornering....WHY?....To help maintain the alignment camber and caster and keep the contact patch on the ground in hard braking and cornering loads. If you just have the factory rubber bushings in there?, then all the STB's in the world are doing absolutely NOTHING when the rubber bushing deflection is stil allowing the upper suspension mount points to close in on eachother and or head towards the front bumper (slamming back as the brakes are released)I preach that this is the best single upgrade to be done for handling imputs of a 3rd gen. Your front shocks are not dampering correctly if the factory original bushings are worn at all...things are really bafd if those strut mounts are original 20 year old units--get them out of there.
----------
Aftermarket parts shound not be sold "non-adjustable"Adjustments will help correct alignment, chassis fatigue, accidents, ride height alterations, suspension setup alterations to geometry......basically, every adjustment you can get is a useful tool in keeping the car in proper articulation geometry as things are changed, added, fatigued, or altered in any way.

Last edited by Vetruck; 07-15-2008 at 10:03 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 07-15-2008, 10:39 AM
  #14  
Member

Thread Starter
 
sid rs91's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver, B.C
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 RS TBI 91 Z28 TPI
Engine: 305
Transmission: wc T5
Re: adjustable 'v' non adjustable ?...

ok, so I should just gather all the parts and do it all at the same time.makes sense no need to do things twice if you don't have to.

I was going to replace the old rubber bushing with new stock type, may still have to due to budget.If it comes to that new solid type strut mounts will be the very next thing to do.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
05-17-2020 10:44 AM
Mark_ZZ3
TPI
15
05-24-2018 01:02 PM
383backinblack
Transmissions and Drivetrain
12
10-14-2015 08:50 PM
BrianChevy
Wheels and Tires
5
10-13-2015 12:33 PM
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
10-08-2015 08:34 PM



Quick Reply: adjustable 'v' non adjustable ?...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 PM.