8.8 with UMI adjustable torque arm problems
#1
8.8 with UMI adjustable torque arm problems
I am having issues when trying to finish my 8.8 install that the UMI adjustable torque arm is hitting the trans tunnel and doesn't allow the rear to completely go to ride height. I am considering cutting the rear
mount to be able to use the second set of holes pre drilled from UMI to bring it inboard some. Has anyone else had issues when combining an aftermarket rear with an aftermarket torque arm
mount to be able to use the second set of holes pre drilled from UMI to bring it inboard some. Has anyone else had issues when combining an aftermarket rear with an aftermarket torque arm
#3
Re: 8.8 with UMI adjustable torque arm problems
Finally is that with the outer holes machined off and contour matching original it fits tight and perfectly. Shout out to UMI for there quick reply and great parts. Guess other than the obvious would be to include the details of the extra bolt holes in the brochure they send in the kit but still kind of
obvious when you really look at it compared to the factory arm
obvious when you really look at it compared to the factory arm
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,652
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes
on
44 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: 8.8 with UMI adjustable torque arm problems
When dealing with aftermarket parts, modification is common. The 8.8 is a recent offering and I'm sure wasnt tested during development like the more common 9", 12 bolt and s60.
#5
Supreme Member
Re: 8.8 with UMI adjustable torque arm problems
Was your rear end centered and do you have an adjustable panhard bar? Chances are thats your problem
I am having issues when trying to finish my 8.8 install that the UMI adjustable torque arm is hitting the trans tunnel and doesn't allow the rear to completely go to ride height. I am considering cutting the rear
mount to be able to use the second set of holes pre drilled from UMI to bring it inboard some. Has anyone else had issues when combining an aftermarket rear with an aftermarket torque arm
mount to be able to use the second set of holes pre drilled from UMI to bring it inboard some. Has anyone else had issues when combining an aftermarket rear with an aftermarket torque arm
#6
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1982 Camaro
Engine: LTX Carb
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Re: 8.8 with UMI adjustable torque arm problems
If you measure the distance from center line of the pinion to the center of the bolt holes this can tell you how far the TQ has shifted to the drivers side. I can provide this measurement if need be. This is a common issue with most aftermarket rear differentials. I had similar issues when I installed the 8.8 I built with a modified Hiltsy mount. I did however adapt it to fit an SN95 housing since it was the correct width and the pinion was centered. I did end up masaging the floor some on my car since the TQ i had was rubbing with the factory rear. I have the Global West Track Link.
Trending Topics
#8
Re: 8.8 with UMI adjustable torque arm problems
Most everyone I talked to with aftermarket rear ends have had to cut the mount to clear as UMI recommended. Once I did this and adjusted my panhard bar to center the rear again I didn't have any more fitment issues
Last edited by 85Z28NOS; 05-09-2020 at 09:22 AM. Reason: spelling correction
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
3833rdGen
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
03-10-2010 02:52 AM
paulmoore
Suspension and Chassis
4
10-06-2004 04:57 PM