Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-24-2009, 01:20 PM   #1
Member
 
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 139
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

I just ran across this on youtube. Figured i'd post it and get feedback. I personally run ac delcoes and probably will continue to do so since 25 bucks is a whole set vs 1 pulstar lol. Anyways http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYh_qiMKZ3k Seems interesting enough.
Ivelostcontact is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 01:30 PM   #2
Member
 
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 139
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

Ivelostcontact is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 02:03 PM   #3
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Adrian, Mi, USA
Posts: 1,093
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

Interesting. It appears to have a great deal more spark energy.... of course, appearances are not everything. Would love to see some dyno tests, changing only the plugs between runs. Maybe even some long term tests with a look at fuel economy? (yeah, I know, not what most folks on this board are mostly concerned with....)
ploegi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 02:28 PM   #4
Member
 
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 139
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

Agreed, the more hp would be nice, but i'm more looking along the lines of a MPG increase.
Ivelostcontact is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 02:31 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
yevgenievich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: college station, texas
Posts: 536
Car: 89 T/A,67 Camaro,92 Stealth
Engine: ls1, 468, 183
Transmission: 4l60e, th350, 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi 7.625",3.08 8.2", FWD

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to yevgenievich
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcZppUq5foY
they claim hp increase but it's posted by them
__________________

67 project Camaro, 468 bbc, th350
89 Trans Am, ls1, 4l60e
91 z28 Camaro - sold
92 base stealth
84 Datsun wagon
95 Jeep Cherokee
yevgenievich is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 02:37 PM   #6
Member
 
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 139
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

Yeah, I saw that but I figured it being posted by them it's also extremely biased.
Ivelostcontact is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 02:39 PM   #7
Banned
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,214
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

JC Whitney sells them for $25 each, with a 90-day, 100% satifaction, no questions asked, guarantee.

Who's gonna be the TGO "guinea pig"?

BTW....I want MPG increase too. I live way out in the country & it's a 40-minute drive ONE WAY to Wal Mart, which seems to be on every corner in the cities.
Stephen is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 02:44 PM   #8
Member
 
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 139
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

Well I'm at work for another 16 days. After that I may fork over the dough and try them out . I can always return them. I suppose 200$ is worth a mpg and hp increase. The mpg increase in it's self at this point would pay for them in no time. Maybe i'll try one out in my Ninja assuming they make them for motorcycles too.
Ivelostcontact is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 02:49 PM   #9
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Adrian, Mi, USA
Posts: 1,093
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

Quote:
Originally Posted by yevgenievich View Post
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcZppUq5foY
they claim hp increase but it's posted by them
This video doesn't seem to be about the pulsar plugs, but, some black box between the distributor, and the spark plugs, I think it noted that they were just using resistor plugs?

Interesting though. Wonder what it is REALLY doing.......
ploegi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 02:52 PM   #10
Member
 
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 139
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

I think those are plasma plugs and need that box to power them where as The actual pulstar plug has the plasma thing built into them, hence the 25$ a plug. I remember seeing the in popular mechanics I believe it was and it indeed was an interesting design.
Ivelostcontact is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 02:58 PM   #11
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Adrian, Mi, USA
Posts: 1,093
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

At 25 bucks a pop, they would have to give a DRAMATIC increase in power/economy for them to be even remotely worthwhile.... Wonder how long they last, that would be a major consideration as well....... 200 bucks for PLUGS?!?!?!! I generally don't spend that much on a complete tuneup.... (doing all the work myself though.)
ploegi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 03:06 PM   #12
Member
 
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 139
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

Well the advanceautoparts site says they come with a 4 year replacement warrenty. Apparently the version for our cars is gapped at .35 also instead of the usual .45
Ivelostcontact is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 03:08 PM   #13
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 927
Car: 1990 Trans Am
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: factory T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to 300hpse
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

So at an extra $175 for a set of plugs for an 8 cylinder, in order to regain the cost in gas milage saved, lets see how much you would need to drive.

Say a standard plug gets you 15/25 and the pulstar gives you a very optimistic 10% increase in economy to 16.5/27.5. Lets pretend you drive half city, half highway. Regular plug gives you 20 mpg on your 16 gallon tank, you will 320 miles out of that tank. Pulstar gives you 22 mpgs on the same tank, giving you 352 miles. On one tank of gas, you saved 32 miles worth of gas, or 1.6 gallons of gas. At an average of $2.50 per gallon, that's $4 savings in gas youve saved by time you fill up. The average use of a car being considered 12k miles per year, you would use 600 gallons of gas, or $1500 on regular plugs, or 545 gallons and $1363 on pulstars. Pulstars would save you $137 over the course of the year compared to the extra $175 you spent on them. This is all assuming a 10% increase in fuel efficiency, which lets face it, is totally unrealistic.

Lets shorten up the calculations and see what other efficieny increases give us. A 5% increase (still a bit unrealistic) gives us a yearly savings of $72, a 3% increase gives us a savings of $43 and a most realistic 2% (imo) gives us a savings of $29 yearly.

So in order to break even, the plugs would need a lifespan (lifespan being operational life span maintaining 100% of their original power in this example to simplify) of 1.3 years at 10% efficiency, 2.6 at 5%, 4 years at 3% and a whopping 6 years at 2%.

I would wonder too if the extra energy these put out is wasted, eventually you reach a point where adding more spark energy has absolutely no effect on efficiency.

Anyway, I was just bored and thought Id throw out some math to pass some time lol. I dont claim to know what Im talking about .

To me personally, Id spend that 175 extra bucks about 10000 other places than sparkier spark plugs.
300hpse is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 03:17 PM   #14
Member
 
Ivelostcontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington WV
Posts: 139
Car: 1984 z28 H.O.
Engine: 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Interesting Pulstar vs ngk Bench test

Lmao, Nice. I'll probably try one in my bike for shits n giggles. Then go from there. Considering it's a single cylinder 250, I'm assuming if there are to be any noticeable gains i'll see it there.
Ivelostcontact is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 03:17 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
68, firebird, generation, mechanics, ngk, plug, plugs, popular, pulstar, pulstars, test, tested, tests, vs, walmart
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details