Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

retro lifters vs standard

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2013, 11:46 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Sojer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z red t-top
Engine: Nothing much
Transmission: I wish t56
Axle/Gears: 9bolt 3.27 4sale
retro lifters vs standard

Inform me every time I see a high hp street build they use retros on a already roller block. Why not use the spider (stock style lifters?
Old 10-03-2013, 12:26 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
vetteoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Not in Kansas anymore
Posts: 7,732
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: retro lifters vs standard

Originally Posted by Sojer
every time I see a high hp street build they use retros on a already roller block.
Why not use the stock style lifters?
In a magazine engine build writeup?
They are probably promoting their advertisers products

GMMP LS7 lifters are good to 7K @ $135
Link bar lifters start @ $350

I know what I would use in a factory roller block.
Old 10-03-2013, 12:58 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Sojer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z red t-top
Engine: Nothing much
Transmission: I wish t56
Axle/Gears: 9bolt 3.27 4sale
Re: retro lifters vs standard

Thats another thing ls7 lifters I knew they were cheap but 7k rpm that's sweet.
Old 10-03-2013, 01:22 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member

 
novaderrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Howard Lake, MN
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: 355- hopefully a 5.3 this summer
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: retro lifters vs standard

i don't know about the newer LS engine lifters, but the gen 1 roller lifters were only good for about valve .530 lift before the oil holes got covered. there is also an issue with the dogbone retainers in the gen 1 engines above that much lift, but i think they took care of that when they came out with the retrofit LS style lifter retainers for the gen 1 blocks.
Old 10-03-2013, 01:24 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
vetteoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Not in Kansas anymore
Posts: 7,732
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: retro lifters vs standard

Originally Posted by Sojer
Thats another thing ls7 lifters I knew they were cheap but 7k rpm that's sweet.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/1579707959-post17.html
Old 10-03-2013, 07:01 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,115
Received 1,688 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: retro lifters vs standard

THIMK about how a cam works:

To make a cam "bigger", they don't make the lobes TALLER. The peak of the lobe of a peanut cam is basically already as tall as it can be, and the cam still be able to be installed.

"Lift" is THE DIFFERENCE IN HEIGHT BETWEEN the peak of the lobe and the "heel". Remember that: DIFFERENCE IN HEIGHT.

So since the peak of the lobe is always already about as tall as it can be and it still slide through the bearings, then to make a cam "bigger", the zero lift side of the lobe is made progressively SMALLER. Which is why it's EASY to grind material off of a cam and make it "bigger", as is commonly done in racing.

Therefore as cam lift gets HIGHER, the lifters retract farther and farther into their bore at zero lift; and eventually they slide below the surface and come out of the figure-8 retainer. VERY BAD things happen when they do that. This becomes a potential problem at around .550" or so of lift, typically; sooner for a small base circle cam.

The original roller system isn't subject to that problem.

It does however have a different problem that comes into play. Since the block in the late model system is taller around the lifter bores, then eventually as you make the cam bigger, the original style lifter eventually sinks so far down in the bore that the link bars come to rest on top of the bores and keep the lifter from following the cam. They make "special" extra tall ones for that situation.
Old 10-03-2013, 07:30 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member

 
FRMULA88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 1,592
Received 31 Likes on 26 Posts
Car: 1988 Formula
Engine: 421 Little M block
Transmission: TH400 w/brake
Axle/Gears: 9" 4.30s, Wilwood discs, 28X10.5-15
Re: retro lifters vs standard

Stock parts are just fine for stock aka street applications especially when you are within the design parameters of those stock parts.


The instant you cross those parameters it is no longer a stock application.

Hi-performance aftermarket parts exist for this reason; they pick up where the OEM parts leave off.

My engine has a Dart block, roller cam with solid lifters, shaft mounted rockers. 18 degree heads & JE 18 degree forged piston. These are hardly parts that would have come or even been necessary on a stock 225 hp 350.


BUT a max effort drag strip 421 SBC making 680 HP NA is another matter.

stock parts would have a VERY short life in such an application.

So take articles for what they are, they are meant to show what the aftermarket has to offer.

As with any project if you are unsure, rely on the experience of a reputable engine builder in your area, and NOT some magazine article.


If you plan to build a motor get to know a builder... you will be far better off in the long run.
Old 10-03-2013, 08:14 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Sojer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z red t-top
Engine: Nothing much
Transmission: I wish t56
Axle/Gears: 9bolt 3.27 4sale
Re: retro lifters vs standard

I have a flat tap motor so I would have to use retros. I know they make aftmk roller lifters (stock style) but to much cam and they may fall in the bore.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gixxer92
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
9
05-18-2017 11:20 AM
Gunner242
Electronics
7
12-25-2015 04:49 PM
skinny z
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
10-05-2015 06:23 PM
Bigold4x4
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
09-28-2015 05:21 PM
dimented24x7
Tech / General Engine
4
09-06-2015 03:51 PM



Quick Reply: retro lifters vs standard



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 AM.