Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2012, 08:15 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
intex1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: anderson ,sc
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 formula/00 z28
Engine: carbed 350/ls1
Transmission: 700r4/ a4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi/ 3.73 posi
88 iroc vs 2000 z28

88 iroc vortec 350 700r4 4.10.. runs 1/4 in 13.7 vs 2000 z28 lid k&n cat back and 3.73 not had it to track to know times yet... who yall think will win?
Old 08-19-2012, 08:33 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
igotta355z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bedford Tx
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 1LE
Engine: 370CID GenIII
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 4.33 Moser 9inch
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

The 2000 Z28.....Unless its a standard and the kid cant shift....He should be low 13s so it wont be a blow out...
Old 08-19-2012, 09:12 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
intex1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: anderson ,sc
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 formula/00 z28
Engine: carbed 350/ls1
Transmission: 700r4/ a4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi/ 3.73 posi
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

its a auto. and 2000 z28 is my car.. 88 is my brothers
Old 08-19-2012, 05:58 PM
  #4  
Senior Member

 
Z28FAST1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baldwin Park
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Everyone on here knows the L98 and Vortec SBC's are superior to the LSx. I heard the gen I SBC's "potential" for speed forced GM to discontinue production for public safety concerns. GM then developed a safer platform (ie LSx family).

But honestly make sure your brother doesn't have the might 305 that has the potential to run 9's.

Old 08-19-2012, 08:53 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
InfernalVortex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Macon, GA
Posts: 6,485
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Originally Posted by Z28FAST1
Everyone on here knows the L98 and Vortec SBC's are superior to the LSx. I heard the gen I SBC's "potential" for speed forced GM to discontinue production for public safety concerns. GM then developed a safer platform (ie LSx family).

But honestly make sure your brother doesn't have the might 305 that has the potential to run 9's.

We're just all lucky that the camelhumps and RV cams went out of style or else we'd all be pushing the sound barrier by now.
Old 08-20-2012, 01:54 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
86White_T/A305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Canada,Ont
Posts: 2,210
Received 26 Likes on 20 Posts
Car: 1987 TransAm Ttop
Engine: 2005 LQ4
Transmission: Ls1 T56
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

If both cars launch well it will be a close race down the track with the 00 z28 taking the w on the topend.
Old 08-20-2012, 10:05 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member

 
paul_huryk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ahead of you...
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 1984 LG4 Camaro
Engine: 350 Roller Motor
Transmission: Level 10 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Originally Posted by InfernalVortex
We're just all lucky that the camelhumps and RV cams went out of style or else we'd all be pushing the sound barrier by now.
There are plenty of 14 second cars out there with that killer combination... Watch out! LOL
Old 08-20-2012, 01:40 PM
  #8  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
GTA1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 402
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1991 Trans Am
Engine: L31, LT4 hot cam
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:43 LSD
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Originally Posted by Z28FAST1
Everyone on here knows the L98 and Vortec SBC's are superior to the LSx. I heard the gen I SBC's "potential" for speed forced GM to discontinue production for public safety concerns. GM then developed a safer platform (ie LSx family).

good stuff, made me lol

I confess I'm one of those closet believers that the SBC has hundreds of locked up horses I'm just an exhaust and CAI away from time travel homi!
Old 08-20-2012, 08:15 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
intex1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: anderson ,sc
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 formula/00 z28
Engine: carbed 350/ls1
Transmission: 700r4/ a4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi/ 3.73 posi
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Originally Posted by Z28FAST1
Everyone on here knows the L98 and Vortec SBC's are superior to the LSx. I heard the gen I SBC's "potential" for speed forced GM to discontinue production for public safety concerns. GM then developed a safer platform (ie LSx family).

But honestly make sure your brother doesn't have the might 305 that has the potential to run 9's.

i helped put the motor in his car. was my motor at one point in time.. and last time he went to track i was there.. run a 13.7
Old 08-22-2012, 08:06 AM
  #10  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Manic Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hamilton Ontario Canada
Posts: 873
Received 33 Likes on 21 Posts
Car: 1985 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350
Transmission: GForce T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73 posi
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Originally Posted by Z28FAST1
Everyone on here knows the L98 and Vortec SBC's are superior to the LSx. I heard the gen I SBC's "potential" for speed forced GM to discontinue production for public safety concerns. GM then developed a safer platform (ie LSx family).

But honestly make sure your brother doesn't have the might 305 that has the potential to run 9's.

Man, what is it with you LS guys? Talk about annoying.
Old 08-22-2012, 03:01 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Because our engines make so much power, we spin the world in reverse when we hit wide open throttle.
Old 08-22-2012, 09:23 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member
 
zraffz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sussex County, NJ
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1994 Z28
Engine: 355 LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Originally Posted by Manic Z
Man, what is it with you LS guys? Talk about annoying.
Seriously... I think someone is just jelly they spend a buttload of money on retrofitting a motor that could have been built using a SBC for less money.
Old 08-23-2012, 06:16 AM
  #13  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Wanna bet otherwise?
Old 08-23-2012, 10:46 AM
  #14  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,464
Received 174 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Originally Posted by Manic Z
Man, what is it with you LS guys? Talk about annoying.
Aren't they? Not to mention having absolutely no lives whatsoever, having to lurk around the theoretical section of a non LS1 board because they have nothing better, not to mention nobody better, to do...

Originally Posted by zraffz
Seriously... I think someone is just jelly they spend a buttload of money on retrofitting a motor that could have been built using a SBC for less money.
Agreed. Funny thing is, these are the idiots that will sling that very word towards people, meanwhile they openly admit to "street racing" their LS1's and almost getting caught by the police in another thread. Doesn't say much for their credibility, does it...
Old 08-23-2012, 12:25 PM
  #15  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland Suburbs
Posts: 5,847
Received 213 Likes on 160 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

A vortec 350 with all of the bolt-ons and 4.10's should be capable of 12's on the right tire. Stock L98's should be running 13.7's all day long with bolt-ons on street tires unless you live at some ungodly elevation.

My 260hp B-body LT1 knocked down 13.3's on POS 10yr old Kuhmo Ecsta Supra's. Race weight is 3750lbs in that run.


Stock LS1 4th gen vs bolt-on vortec 350 thirdgen should be VERY close. As in no winner determined.

I've shocked the hell out of stock LS1's with my car.

Bolt-on LS1 > Bolt-on LT1 > Bolt-on L98. Bolt-on LS1s can trap near 106-109mph. A Bolt-on L98 would be lucky to hit 100mph.
Old 08-23-2012, 02:46 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

My L98 I had with 4.10s, performer rpm air gap, 1 3/4 headers, 750 carb, T5 Trans went 13.87 at 101 with a 1.8 60 foot. That was leaving soft. Was scared to leave hard, and the rear broke the next pass but you know there would have been more in it if the rear would have held for a hard launch. Engine had 150k miles.
Old 08-25-2012, 01:36 AM
  #17  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
ibmtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Glen Park, NY
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: TPIS II Supercharged w/Nitrous
Transmission: 700R4 Probuilt
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Richmond 12 Bolt
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Originally Posted by InfernalVortex
We're just all lucky that the camelhumps and RV cams went out of style or else we'd all be pushing the sound barrier by now.

LOL That is funny.

I am glad I put the summit racing sticker on my car, I dropped 8/10th of a second by doing that... LOL
Old 08-25-2012, 08:46 PM
  #18  
Supreme Member

 
vwdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: miami, florida
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Here we go again....
Old 08-25-2012, 11:48 PM
  #19  
Senior Member

 
Z28FAST1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baldwin Park
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

I'm waiting to get called out from across the country for a SBC vs. LSx challenge.

OP, get the race on video and post it
Old 08-26-2012, 08:23 AM
  #20  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Lol, from jersey perhaps?
Old 08-26-2012, 10:27 AM
  #21  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,464
Received 174 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Originally Posted by Z28FAST1
I'm waiting to get called out from across the country...
First get called out of dem dare diapers little boy...

Originally Posted by ZONES89RS
Lol, from jersey perhaps?
Question, why are there so many unsolved murders in Texas lmao...?
Old 08-26-2012, 01:07 PM
  #22  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Population if that is a legitimate question.
Old 08-26-2012, 01:34 PM
  #23  
Supreme Member

 
vwdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: miami, florida
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

High crime rate among the mexico/texas border with alot of organised crime involvement? Drug and human smuggling, etc etc etc.
Old 08-26-2012, 07:31 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
intex1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: anderson ,sc
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 formula/00 z28
Engine: carbed 350/ls1
Transmission: 700r4/ a4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi/ 3.73 posi
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

iroc z28
r/t -.042 -.052
60 2.088 2.141
330 5.768 5.780
1/8 8.839 8.732
mph 80.45 83.56
1000 11.480 11.292
1/4 13.713 13.445
mph 100.30 105.14
Old 08-26-2012, 08:25 PM
  #25  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,464
Received 174 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Originally Posted by ZONES89RS
Population if that is a legitimate question...
Wasn't legitimate, it was a joke, and I'll just leave the answer ambiguous because Jersey folk get it...
Old 08-26-2012, 09:27 PM
  #26  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

The real answer I figure was because street lethal comes down, commits homicide and runs back to jersey.
Old 09-05-2012, 05:50 PM
  #27  
Supreme Member
 
zraffz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sussex County, NJ
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1994 Z28
Engine: 355 LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Originally Posted by ZONES89RS
The real answer I figure was because street lethal comes down, commits homicide and runs back to jersey.
Got anything that is actually running at the moment?
Old 09-06-2012, 02:52 PM
  #28  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Yea, 89 camaro 6.0 still runs and drives fine. Just has a busted fender and the door dent.
Old 09-09-2012, 09:40 AM
  #29  
Supreme Member

 
tpivette89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Originally Posted by Thirdgen89GTA
Bolt-on LS1s can trap near 106-109mph. A Bolt-on L98 would be lucky to hit 100mph.
STOCK LS1s should trap that. With boltons, 110mph - 114mph is easy. My X-pipe only FRC went 12.9 at 110mph in the July heat. Come Oct/Nov, I'm sure 111/112 mph is possible. Full boltons and a tune? Probably 115+
Old 09-09-2012, 11:40 AM
  #30  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland Suburbs
Posts: 5,847
Received 213 Likes on 160 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Originally Posted by tpivette89
STOCK LS1s should trap that. With boltons, 110mph - 114mph is easy. My X-pipe only FRC went 12.9 at 110mph in the July heat. Come Oct/Nov, I'm sure 111/112 mph is possible. Full boltons and a tune? Probably 115+
LS1 Bolt-on F-bodies

The vettes are significantly LIGHTER.

By bolt-ons I'm referring to:
  • CAI or Lid
  • Throttlebody
  • LS6 intake
  • Headers
  • Exhaust
  • Tune

Not saying you won't find a LS1 F-body with bolt-ons trapping over 109mph, they are out there, they are the lighter cars or the factory freaks. But 109mph trap speeds are pretty much expected when talking about the average Bolt-on LS1 4th gen.
Old 09-09-2012, 11:56 AM
  #31  
Supreme Member

 
tpivette89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Again, I'm gonna have to disagree. Maybe the auto cars do 109mph with boltons only, but its very easy for a bolton 6speed fbody to eclipse 110+mph.

My brothers 99' Z28 (fully loaded with all power options, Ttops, etc) went 12.9 at 109 with only a lid and a catback.

A friends 01' WS6 (another fully optioned car) went 13.1 at 109 with only a SLP loudmouth.

Imagine what either car would've done with headers, gears, intake mods (LS6 for the 99', bigger TBs and some sort of CAI scoop for both), tires, shifter, and tunes? 113/114mph I'd guess.

I'm just not seeing the subpar results you speak of out of the cars I've had personal experience with.
Old 09-09-2012, 12:40 PM
  #32  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland Suburbs
Posts: 5,847
Received 213 Likes on 160 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Originally Posted by tpivette89
Again, I'm gonna have to disagree. Maybe the auto cars do 109mph with boltons only, but its very easy for a bolton 6speed fbody to eclipse 110+mph.

My brothers 99' Z28 (fully loaded with all power options, Ttops, etc) went 12.9 at 109 with only a lid and a catback.

A friends 01' WS6 (another fully optioned car) went 13.1 at 109 with only a SLP loudmouth.

Imagine what either car would've done with headers, gears, intake mods (LS6 for the 99', bigger TBs and some sort of CAI scoop for both), tires, shifter, and tunes? 113/114mph I'd guess.

I'm just not seeing the subpar results you speak of out of the cars I've had personal experience with.
It's not subpar, it's averages. The average bolt on ls1 doesn't really trap 110+. That's not to say they don't exist, but most of them won't. You are saying every bolt-on ls1 does and that is not the case. A search of YouTube will more that don't, and a few that do.
Old 09-09-2012, 01:09 PM
  #33  
Supreme Member

 
tpivette89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Yes, EVERY bolton LS1 can hit the mph figures I claimed. However, it takes a driver who's familiar with the particular vehicle. You're not going to get good times by just heading down the the track once or twice with the car.

Also, you never claimed "averages" in your original post (even though I still think bolton 6speed LS1 fbodies should average a bit better than 106 - 109). You made it seem that a full bolton fbody was only capable of 109mph traps, and that just isn't true. I believe a vehicle should be measured on its best performance figures, not from a few inexperienced driver's youtube videos. I suppose our views differ in that respect, however.
Old 09-09-2012, 03:07 PM
  #34  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

Hell, my carbed L98 350 trapped 101 mph with a 5 speed and only a 1.87 60 foot.
Old 09-11-2012, 01:05 AM
  #35  
Supreme Member

 
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28

ls1 should eventually pull away.

Last edited by 89IrocZ350TPI; 09-11-2012 at 01:11 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frozer!!!
Camaros for Sale
35
01-19-2024 04:55 PM
ChaseDale3and8
Mid-West Region
12
08-25-2015 06:34 PM
Burnt.Clutch
Camaros Wanted
1
08-21-2015 11:11 PM
mustangman65_79
Body
3
08-11-2015 03:17 PM



Quick Reply: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 AM.