88 iroc vs 2000 z28
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: anderson ,sc
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 formula/00 z28
Engine: carbed 350/ls1
Transmission: 700r4/ a4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi/ 3.73 posi
88 iroc vs 2000 z28
88 iroc vortec 350 700r4 4.10.. runs 1/4 in 13.7 vs 2000 z28 lid k&n cat back and 3.73 not had it to track to know times yet... who yall think will win?
#2
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bedford Tx
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 1LE
Engine: 370CID GenIII
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 4.33 Moser 9inch
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
The 2000 Z28.....Unless its a standard and the kid cant shift....He should be low 13s so it wont be a blow out...
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: anderson ,sc
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 formula/00 z28
Engine: carbed 350/ls1
Transmission: 700r4/ a4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi/ 3.73 posi
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
its a auto. and 2000 z28 is my car.. 88 is my brothers
#4
Senior Member
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
Everyone on here knows the L98 and Vortec SBC's are superior to the LSx. I heard the gen I SBC's "potential" for speed forced GM to discontinue production for public safety concerns. GM then developed a safer platform (ie LSx family).
But honestly make sure your brother doesn't have the might 305 that has the potential to run 9's.
But honestly make sure your brother doesn't have the might 305 that has the potential to run 9's.
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
Everyone on here knows the L98 and Vortec SBC's are superior to the LSx. I heard the gen I SBC's "potential" for speed forced GM to discontinue production for public safety concerns. GM then developed a safer platform (ie LSx family).
But honestly make sure your brother doesn't have the might 305 that has the potential to run 9's.
But honestly make sure your brother doesn't have the might 305 that has the potential to run 9's.
#6
Supreme Member
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
If both cars launch well it will be a close race down the track with the 00 z28 taking the w on the topend.
Trending Topics
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: anderson ,sc
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 formula/00 z28
Engine: carbed 350/ls1
Transmission: 700r4/ a4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi/ 3.73 posi
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
Everyone on here knows the L98 and Vortec SBC's are superior to the LSx. I heard the gen I SBC's "potential" for speed forced GM to discontinue production for public safety concerns. GM then developed a safer platform (ie LSx family).
But honestly make sure your brother doesn't have the might 305 that has the potential to run 9's.
But honestly make sure your brother doesn't have the might 305 that has the potential to run 9's.
#10
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
Everyone on here knows the L98 and Vortec SBC's are superior to the LSx. I heard the gen I SBC's "potential" for speed forced GM to discontinue production for public safety concerns. GM then developed a safer platform (ie LSx family).
But honestly make sure your brother doesn't have the might 305 that has the potential to run 9's.
But honestly make sure your brother doesn't have the might 305 that has the potential to run 9's.
#11
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
Because our engines make so much power, we spin the world in reverse when we hit wide open throttle.
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
Originally Posted by Manic Z
Man, what is it with you LS guys? Talk about annoying.
Originally Posted by zraffz
Seriously... I think someone is just jelly they spend a buttload of money on retrofitting a motor that could have been built using a SBC for less money.
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
A vortec 350 with all of the bolt-ons and 4.10's should be capable of 12's on the right tire. Stock L98's should be running 13.7's all day long with bolt-ons on street tires unless you live at some ungodly elevation.
My 260hp B-body LT1 knocked down 13.3's on POS 10yr old Kuhmo Ecsta Supra's. Race weight is 3750lbs in that run.
Stock LS1 4th gen vs bolt-on vortec 350 thirdgen should be VERY close. As in no winner determined.
I've shocked the hell out of stock LS1's with my car.
Bolt-on LS1 > Bolt-on LT1 > Bolt-on L98. Bolt-on LS1s can trap near 106-109mph. A Bolt-on L98 would be lucky to hit 100mph.
My 260hp B-body LT1 knocked down 13.3's on POS 10yr old Kuhmo Ecsta Supra's. Race weight is 3750lbs in that run.
Stock LS1 4th gen vs bolt-on vortec 350 thirdgen should be VERY close. As in no winner determined.
I've shocked the hell out of stock LS1's with my car.
Bolt-on LS1 > Bolt-on LT1 > Bolt-on L98. Bolt-on LS1s can trap near 106-109mph. A Bolt-on L98 would be lucky to hit 100mph.
#16
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
My L98 I had with 4.10s, performer rpm air gap, 1 3/4 headers, 750 carb, T5 Trans went 13.87 at 101 with a 1.8 60 foot. That was leaving soft. Was scared to leave hard, and the rear broke the next pass but you know there would have been more in it if the rear would have held for a hard launch. Engine had 150k miles.
#21
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
Originally Posted by Z28FAST1
I'm waiting to get called out from across the country...
Originally Posted by ZONES89RS
Lol, from jersey perhaps?
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: anderson ,sc
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 formula/00 z28
Engine: carbed 350/ls1
Transmission: 700r4/ a4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi/ 3.73 posi
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
iroc z28
r/t -.042 -.052
60 2.088 2.141
330 5.768 5.780
1/8 8.839 8.732
mph 80.45 83.56
1000 11.480 11.292
1/4 13.713 13.445
mph 100.30 105.14
r/t -.042 -.052
60 2.088 2.141
330 5.768 5.780
1/8 8.839 8.732
mph 80.45 83.56
1000 11.480 11.292
1/4 13.713 13.445
mph 100.30 105.14
#26
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
The real answer I figure was because street lethal comes down, commits homicide and runs back to jersey.
#28
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
Yea, 89 camaro 6.0 still runs and drives fine. Just has a busted fender and the door dent.
#29
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
STOCK LS1s should trap that. With boltons, 110mph - 114mph is easy. My X-pipe only FRC went 12.9 at 110mph in the July heat. Come Oct/Nov, I'm sure 111/112 mph is possible. Full boltons and a tune? Probably 115+
#30
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
The vettes are significantly LIGHTER.
By bolt-ons I'm referring to:
- CAI or Lid
- Throttlebody
- LS6 intake
- Headers
- Exhaust
- Tune
Not saying you won't find a LS1 F-body with bolt-ons trapping over 109mph, they are out there, they are the lighter cars or the factory freaks. But 109mph trap speeds are pretty much expected when talking about the average Bolt-on LS1 4th gen.
#31
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
Again, I'm gonna have to disagree. Maybe the auto cars do 109mph with boltons only, but its very easy for a bolton 6speed fbody to eclipse 110+mph.
My brothers 99' Z28 (fully loaded with all power options, Ttops, etc) went 12.9 at 109 with only a lid and a catback.
A friends 01' WS6 (another fully optioned car) went 13.1 at 109 with only a SLP loudmouth.
Imagine what either car would've done with headers, gears, intake mods (LS6 for the 99', bigger TBs and some sort of CAI scoop for both), tires, shifter, and tunes? 113/114mph I'd guess.
I'm just not seeing the subpar results you speak of out of the cars I've had personal experience with.
My brothers 99' Z28 (fully loaded with all power options, Ttops, etc) went 12.9 at 109 with only a lid and a catback.
A friends 01' WS6 (another fully optioned car) went 13.1 at 109 with only a SLP loudmouth.
Imagine what either car would've done with headers, gears, intake mods (LS6 for the 99', bigger TBs and some sort of CAI scoop for both), tires, shifter, and tunes? 113/114mph I'd guess.
I'm just not seeing the subpar results you speak of out of the cars I've had personal experience with.
#32
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
Again, I'm gonna have to disagree. Maybe the auto cars do 109mph with boltons only, but its very easy for a bolton 6speed fbody to eclipse 110+mph.
My brothers 99' Z28 (fully loaded with all power options, Ttops, etc) went 12.9 at 109 with only a lid and a catback.
A friends 01' WS6 (another fully optioned car) went 13.1 at 109 with only a SLP loudmouth.
Imagine what either car would've done with headers, gears, intake mods (LS6 for the 99', bigger TBs and some sort of CAI scoop for both), tires, shifter, and tunes? 113/114mph I'd guess.
I'm just not seeing the subpar results you speak of out of the cars I've had personal experience with.
My brothers 99' Z28 (fully loaded with all power options, Ttops, etc) went 12.9 at 109 with only a lid and a catback.
A friends 01' WS6 (another fully optioned car) went 13.1 at 109 with only a SLP loudmouth.
Imagine what either car would've done with headers, gears, intake mods (LS6 for the 99', bigger TBs and some sort of CAI scoop for both), tires, shifter, and tunes? 113/114mph I'd guess.
I'm just not seeing the subpar results you speak of out of the cars I've had personal experience with.
#33
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
Yes, EVERY bolton LS1 can hit the mph figures I claimed. However, it takes a driver who's familiar with the particular vehicle. You're not going to get good times by just heading down the the track once or twice with the car.
Also, you never claimed "averages" in your original post (even though I still think bolton 6speed LS1 fbodies should average a bit better than 106 - 109). You made it seem that a full bolton fbody was only capable of 109mph traps, and that just isn't true. I believe a vehicle should be measured on its best performance figures, not from a few inexperienced driver's youtube videos. I suppose our views differ in that respect, however.
Also, you never claimed "averages" in your original post (even though I still think bolton 6speed LS1 fbodies should average a bit better than 106 - 109). You made it seem that a full bolton fbody was only capable of 109mph traps, and that just isn't true. I believe a vehicle should be measured on its best performance figures, not from a few inexperienced driver's youtube videos. I suppose our views differ in that respect, however.
#34
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: 88 iroc vs 2000 z28
Hell, my carbed L98 350 trapped 101 mph with a 5 speed and only a 1.87 60 foot.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
04-25-2016 09:21 PM
mustangman65_79
Body
3
08-11-2015 03:17 PM