Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-03-2006, 08:48 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Fast92RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 596
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 383 SuperRam
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3:23 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (2)
AFR 180 or 195 heads?

Im building a new 350 for my 92 Camaro and I have a ZZ4 short block, TPIS ZZ9 Cam, TPIS big mouth base and the Accel Superram. I been back and forth with head choice between Edelbrock, Trickflow or AFR. I decided after alot of reading that AFR would be the best choice, but now here is the final choice. 180 cc or the 195 cc street eliminator head?
__________________
2004 Chevy Avalanche
1992 Camaro RS conv. 305 TBI All Stock
1992 Camaro RS 383 SuperRam TPI

Check out my ride
New Jersey F-Body Owners Association
Fast92RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 10:02 PM   #2
Supreme Member
 
IROCZZ3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,054
Car: 87 Buick GN
Engine: 3.8L (231 cid) V6
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt G80/ 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
195
__________________
87 Buick Grand National - 10.79 @ 123.24 (1.57 60')...daily driven
My old 89 IROC - 12.10 @ 113.40 mph (1.77 60')...all motor
IROCZZ3 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 10:12 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Fast92RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 596
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 383 SuperRam
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3:23 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Thats what I thought as well but I wanted to see what others thought would be better. Thanks
Fast92RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 11:36 PM   #4
Supreme Member
 
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 6,324
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Latest design 195.
1989GTATransAm is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 11:45 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Macedonia ,OH
Posts: 3,938
Car: Formula
Engine: 6.0 LSX
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 3:27

Classifieds Rating: (8)
Send a message via AIM to Mkos1980
I'd go 180's with that setup,
Mkos1980 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 12:10 AM   #6
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Other side of the paper fence
Posts: 10,199
Car: Race car
Engine: Internal Combustion
Transmission: Static

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Definitely 195's.
madmax is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 12:23 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
3rdgenZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: south Louisiana
Posts: 557
Car: 1985 Z28
Engine: 85 L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock 10 bolt-3.73 eaten posi

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via Yahoo to 3rdgenZ
thats something of a small cam for a super ram. that cam will make power below 6000rpms witch tells me that the 180cc would be better. so you dont lose any low end power. but to be honest with a super ram id look for a bigger cam than that. the zz409 or a bigger cam would do that super ram good. the zz9 cam is for a stock style TPI not a super ram.

so in short, if you stay with that cam 180cc if you get a bigger cam 195cc.
180cc will be good for a 350 to 6000 rpms, any more rpms than that and the 195s will get it done.
3rdgenZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 12:30 AM   #8
Supreme Member
 
norcalz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Francisco Ca
Posts: 1,731
Car: 1989 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: ZZZ# 0607 of 1200 produced
Transmission: Pro-Built 700R4/Vig.2400
Axle/Gears: 3.27 BW 9 Bolt PBR Disc

Classifieds Rating: (10)
Send a message via AIM to norcalz28 Send a message via Yahoo to norcalz28
Another vote for the 180's. I've got a pair of comp ported 180's waiting to go on a similar setup, and they are really overlooked and I think under rated. They are great heads.
norcalz28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 08:17 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Fast92RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 596
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 383 SuperRam
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3:23 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (2)
so 3 for 180 and 3 for 195
Fast92RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 09:04 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Hawk92z-TDZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Arthur, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,256
Car: 92Z28x2, 99&00Z28, 87Roc & 86Clone
Engine: 412&421, LS1x2, 383 & 305
Transmission: T-56x2 & 4L60Ex2, T5 & 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4:10x2 & 3:42/2:73 & 3:27 & 3:73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to Hawk92z-TDZ
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3rdgenZ View Post
180cc will be good for a 350 to 6000 rpms, any more rpms than that and the 195s will get it done.
Say's it all, in my opinion
Hawk92z-TDZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 09:46 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Fast92RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 596
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 383 SuperRam
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3:23 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Yeah Im reading TPIS insider hints book and about 6000 is all I would get out of that cam. So the 180cc heads would be best.
Fast92RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 09:57 AM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 84

Classifieds Rating: (0)
As you can see the 180's would probaly be optimum for your setup, however the 195's allow you to grow. Changing cams would be alot less hassle than heads, cheaper to.
Slayre is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 10:16 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 388
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L98 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to Gunner823 Send a message via Yahoo to Gunner823
Honestly, the new AFR 180cc heads flow better than the old 195s up to at least .500 lift (with the base port job) so it's not really that simple anymore.

I went with the 180cc heads, and I'm still sitting the fence between a 355, 383, supercharged, N/A, etc. etc but I do know I'm not building a high-revving high RPM screamer.
Gunner823 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 10:47 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Fast92RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 596
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 383 SuperRam
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3:23 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (2)
I dont plan on changing my set up in the furture as of now but you never know what might happen. If I go with the 180 cc it will be better now but if I decide in the future to go with the miniram and the ZZ409 cam the 195 heads will be better, but I probably will not want to change anything for a long time.
Fast92RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 12:40 PM   #15
Supreme Member
 
IROCZZ3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,054
Car: 87 Buick GN
Engine: 3.8L (231 cid) V6
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt G80/ 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Low end torque loss between the 2 would probably be minimal, if any. If you cam, gear, and tune it correctly you will not miss any of it. It's all about a matched combo! 180s would be great for a LTR setup. With a Superram you gotta let it breathe. If you want to outrun LS1s on the highway 195s are a better choice. I used to have the old AFR 190s and wish I went slightly bigger (like 195 or 200cc).
__________________
87 Buick Grand National - 10.79 @ 123.24 (1.57 60')...daily driven
My old 89 IROC - 12.10 @ 113.40 mph (1.77 60')...all motor
IROCZZ3 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 12:46 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Fast92RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 596
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 383 SuperRam
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3:23 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by IROCZZ3 View Post
Low end torque loss between the 2 would probably be minimal, if any. If you cam, gear, and tune it correctly you will not miss any of it. It's all about a matched combo! 180s would be great for a LTR setup. With a Superram you gotta let it breathe. If you want to outrun LS1s on the highway 195s are a better choice. I used to have the old AFR 190s and wish I went slightly bigger (like 195 or 200cc).
Basically thats want I want. I want a good streetable car that will get me throught emissions and still have plenty of power to be able to hold its own.
Honeslty my goal is to make as close to 350hp as I can. If this set up makes more thats great.

Last edited by Fast92RS; 11-04-2006 at 12:51 PM.
Fast92RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 01:00 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
3rdgenZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: south Louisiana
Posts: 557
Car: 1985 Z28
Engine: 85 L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock 10 bolt-3.73 eaten posi

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via Yahoo to 3rdgenZ
there are two factors here that tell me that you should get the 180cc. the fact that you have a 350ci motor and your cam. now like i said before IF you did go with a bigger cam the 195cc would be your best bet. i will also add, that the diff between the two will be minumal, like iroczz3 stated, i mean were not talking about 10hp its more like 5hp peak hp. but head size will affect your power curv drasticly. with a 195 head and TOO small of a motor you will lose lots of bottom end and break even up top. just remeber anything to 6k =180cc,and >6k = 195cc on your 350.
3rdgenZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 02:03 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 949

Classifieds Rating: (0)
There is a slight velocity difference between the 180 and 195s, but considering the 195s have much more velocity than a set of stock 165cc heads,,,, it's hard not to go with the flow difference and the extra potential of the 195s. I know you didn't ask,,, but you would be better off going with more duration on the intake and less duration on the split,, along with .530 or so lift on the intake side on the cam - using the SuperRam and the 195s. You would see no difference in idle or cruise response and could pick up 25 horses or so,,, on top of the difference you would see between the 180s and 195s.
BadSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 03:57 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Fast92RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 596
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 383 SuperRam
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3:23 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Thanks everyone for there responses.
Fast92RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 09:30 PM   #20
Supreme Member
 
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 6,324
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
By the way I'm running 195cc Trickflow heads with the exact same cam you want to run. At least for the moment. I have a new combination waiting to be installed. Horsepower and specs are in my signature.

By the way the new AFR 195 heads are pretty darn good. Run as much compression as you can.
__________________
Best of 11.57 and 115.73 mph(1811DA). Motor: Dart SHP block 368ci, AFR Comp 195cc heads, 11.1:1 comp, highly modified TPI 1st style SLP runners, moded GM plenum and First Injection TPI intake manifold, Mike Jones 3/4 race cam, Yank PT4000 converter, Dyno Don 1 3/4" shorty headers, Dyno Don custom exhaust, custom cold air intake, AS&M monoblade throttle body. Meziere electric water pump. Mufflex 3.5" exhaust catback. Magnaflow 3.5" muffler#12909. Kevin91Z Tune. 4L60E installed. Now 420RWHP, 417RWTQ with new motor.
1989GTATransAm is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 09:30 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI

Tags
180, 180cc, 195, 383, afr, competition, craigslist, dyno, flow, heads, hp, intake, numbers, rating, thirdgen
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details