Jegster torque arm and transmission tunnel mount
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,494
Received 57 Likes
on
42 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Hawks 8.8
Jegster torque arm and transmission tunnel mount
I have a question about this product.
I currently have a 350/T-5 combo in my car. Right now, the stock torque arm mounts to the tailshaft of the transmission. Well the mount just broke so I have to either replace it, or go to a different setup. I was thinking about getting the jegster setup so I don't have to worry about it breaking again, plus it advertises another 50% of rear wheel downforce on launch which would be nice to.
My question is, I will be doing a LS1/T-56 swap in a little bit, and I need to know if I would still be able to use the jegster setup, or would I have to go back to the stock torque arm and use the special x-member for the t-56?
Can anyone clear any of this up for me, thanks in advance
I currently have a 350/T-5 combo in my car. Right now, the stock torque arm mounts to the tailshaft of the transmission. Well the mount just broke so I have to either replace it, or go to a different setup. I was thinking about getting the jegster setup so I don't have to worry about it breaking again, plus it advertises another 50% of rear wheel downforce on launch which would be nice to.
My question is, I will be doing a LS1/T-56 swap in a little bit, and I need to know if I would still be able to use the jegster setup, or would I have to go back to the stock torque arm and use the special x-member for the t-56?
Can anyone clear any of this up for me, thanks in advance
#4
Does the Jegs mount perform? I cannot use a Spohn, due to my Mufflex "Y" pipe. If it does mount in the tunnel, would it take the wasted motion from the tailshaft, and transfer it to the body effective like the Spohn arm?
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Loveland, OH, US
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
It mounts to the tunnel itself, which is just sheet metal. This doesn't seem entirely satisfactory.
A real torque arm & crossmember replacement, such as the Spohn, mounts to the "frame", such as it is, of the unibody.
I haven't ever used one, so I don't know if its suspension geometry change is enough to offset the fact that it's connected to a somewhat weak point of the car.
A real torque arm & crossmember replacement, such as the Spohn, mounts to the "frame", such as it is, of the unibody.
I haven't ever used one, so I don't know if its suspension geometry change is enough to offset the fact that it's connected to a somewhat weak point of the car.
#6
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,494
Received 57 Likes
on
42 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Hawks 8.8
Well as it is right now, its mounted to the tail of the transmission with a flimsy (in my opinion) peice of metal.
How could a big plate of metal bolted to about 2 square feet of underbody be less strong?
I need to go look at the spohn website and see how much that will cost me......
How could a big plate of metal bolted to about 2 square feet of underbody be less strong?
I need to go look at the spohn website and see how much that will cost me......
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: West Texas
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '82 Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: wc T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi
One of the locals out here in the middle of nowhere put the leaf springs out of a 2nd gen car under his 3rd gen so he could forget all this torque arm stuff. He runs in the 10's, says it wasn't that big of a hassle.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
04-25-2016 09:21 PM