2.73's stock?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Yelm,WA
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 305 5.0 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Open Diff.
2.73's stock?
Ok so i have a 1990 firebird and i haven't took the diff cover off yet but i looked around and it seems that i have 2.73's?i don't know anything about gearing but i wanted to know if 2.73's are good or bad? i have noticed that it is pretty hard to burn off from a dead stop on dry pavement unless i really hammer on it but if i go around a corner it burns off pretty easy and its usually around 1600 rpms at 70 MPH.
#2
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Re: 2.73's stock?
2.73 is a fuel economy gear ratio, not a high-performance ratio. Typical performance gears for these cars are in the 3.42 to 4.10 range. A 2.73 rear end gear will make it harder to burn off the tires because there is less torque multiplication being made at the rear axle, so basically less power getting to the tires. The benefit though, is it keeps the RPMs way down at highway speeds, which helps fuel economy.
#5
Supreme Member
Re: 2.73's stock?
Or compromise with a a 3.27 or 3.23.
#6
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Yelm,WA
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 305 5.0 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Open Diff.
Re: 2.73's stock?
well im still looking to get good gas mileage as this is my daily driver. not sure how much gearing will effect that.
#9
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 2.73's stock?
Well for performance a 2.73 rear is close to useless. It all depends on what he wants out of the car. For highway driving my 2.77's were great, but they sucked off the line. 3.45 gears made a HUGE difference in pick up, and I still get decent highway. I say if you want a good daily driver go with 3.42's. 3.73's if you plan on hitting up the track. Or just keep the 2.73's. Your call.
#10
Supreme Member
Re: 2.73's stock?
Well for performance a 2.73 rear is close to useless. It all depends on what he wants out of the car. For highway driving my 2.77's were great, but they sucked off the line. 3.45 gears made a HUGE difference in pick up, and I still get decent highway. I say if you want a good daily driver go with 3.42's. 3.73's if you plan on hitting up the track. Or just keep the 2.73's. Your call.
Just sayin',
#11
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Yelm,WA
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 305 5.0 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Open Diff.
Re: 2.73's stock?
well i think il wait till i mod the engine a bit more . but hopefully gas goes down which it probably won't it is 4.08 for regular here lol
#12
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Re: 2.73's stock?
How good it is on gas really depends mostly on where you drive - if its mostly highway, then the 2.73s would be a good gear to keep. If its mostly around town or at low speeds, then 2.73s might actually be hurting gas mileage (engine has to work harder to push the car at low speeds with that gear).
If its mostly around town, changing to a 3.23 or 3.42 gearset would probably improve fuel economy noticeably, as well as performance, but the offset would be that highway fuel economy would suffer somewhat. It would not be a huge drop in highway mileage, but probably would be noticeable.
If its mostly around town, changing to a 3.23 or 3.42 gearset would probably improve fuel economy noticeably, as well as performance, but the offset would be that highway fuel economy would suffer somewhat. It would not be a huge drop in highway mileage, but probably would be noticeable.
#13
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Yelm,WA
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 305 5.0 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Open Diff.
Re: 2.73's stock?
so what kind of car would i be looking for to get 3.27's or 3.23's out of?or can i buy them? which is probably very expensive im guessing?lol
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Re: 2.73's stock?
I have a 350 TBI and I swapped from 2.73 to a 3.42 axle from a 2000 Camaro SS. Neither my city or highway mileage changed at all. My car gets 15-16 around town and 27-28 on the highway.
The performance increase was incredible. Felt a bigger difference with the gears than I felt with any other mod.
The performance increase was incredible. Felt a bigger difference with the gears than I felt with any other mod.
#15
Supreme Member
Re: 2.73's stock?
If its mostly around town, changing to a 3.23 or 3.42 gearset would probably improve fuel economy noticeably, as well as performance, but the offset would be that highway fuel economy would suffer somewhat. It would not be a huge drop in highway mileage, but probably would be noticeable.
Nine bolts can be found in a lot of cars but the best ones are supposed to be from the '89's: GTA, TA, some Z28's, IROC's (I think). RPO codes are the best way to tell. Ten bolt cars have the 3.23, 3.42's and 3.73's I think. Some none bolts apparently had a 3.45 too. There are a bunch out there. Avoid the Gov Lock rears. Diff expert to chime in here...
I have a 350 TBI and I swapped from 2.73 to a 3.42 axle from a 2000 Camaro SS. Neither my city or highway mileage changed at all. My car gets 15-16 around town and 27-28 on the highway.
The performance increase was incredible. Felt a bigger difference with the gears than I felt with any other mod.
The performance increase was incredible. Felt a bigger difference with the gears than I felt with any other mod.
#16
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Morganton, NC
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: '92 T/A WS6 Vert/1956 Chevy Nomad
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 w/ Transgo Kit
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD
Re: 2.73's stock?
I let a 3.27 nine-bolt from an 89 formy w/ rear disks sit in my basement for over a year before I sold it for $150.
Wish I had it back.
I'm putting a 350 in now and bought a set of 3.23 gears out of a 4th gen to swap in my old 10 bolt rear.
Can't wait to get rid of my 2.73, but I still want some highway-friendly gears. I think 3.23 is best all-around.
Wish I had it back.
I'm putting a 350 in now and bought a set of 3.23 gears out of a 4th gen to swap in my old 10 bolt rear.
Can't wait to get rid of my 2.73, but I still want some highway-friendly gears. I think 3.23 is best all-around.
#17
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 92RS
Engine: 305= boat anchor
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23
Re: 2.73's stock?
I went from 2.73 to 3.23 and didn't notice a big change in mpg on the street or highway,but I did see a nice change in acceleration,so I would have to agree with gcgarner,3.23s are the best all around.
#19
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Morganton, NC
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: '92 T/A WS6 Vert/1956 Chevy Nomad
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 w/ Transgo Kit
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD
Re: 2.73's stock?
I went from 2.73 to 3.23 and didn't notice a big change in mpg on the street or highway,but I did see a nice change in acceleration,so I would have to agree with gcgarner,3.23s are the best all around.
My gears aren't going in until my new motor is in (about 2 weeks). I was wondering what the cost of swapping from 2.73 to 3.23 is going to be. Is it anything more than labor & a rebuild kit?
#20
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: ludlow mass
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 02 Mustang
Engine: 3.8 about to be punched out to 4.3
Transmission: 4R70W
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Detroit true trac
Re: 2.73's stock?
i had 3.73s in my 92 and still got 21-22 on the highway, 3.42s would prob be well rounded for everything
and if you have an open diff your going to want to upgrade to a LSD like auburn or detroit true trac
and if you have an open diff your going to want to upgrade to a LSD like auburn or detroit true trac
#21
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Goldsboro, NC
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 82 camaro sc
Engine: 355 SBC
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: ford 8.8 3.73
Re: 2.73's stock?
i have a 2.93 posi. i dont know my fuel mileage. i thinks its gallons per mile not miles per gallon. i dont have a problem burning them off but i guess that 450hp is a part of it. hope to have 3.73 soon.
#22
Supreme Member
Re: 2.73's stock?
My ideal ratio for today's mileage concerns and balanced with performance would be the 3.08 posi (carrier II?) and now the 2.93. Seems a good gear. In the carrier III's, the 3.23 and 3.27.
#23
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 92RS
Engine: 305= boat anchor
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23
Re: 2.73's stock?
Actually I swapped the entire diff.My old one was really rusty and had a crack on the pan har mount so it was better to swap the whole thing.
#24
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Yelm,WA
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 305 5.0 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Open Diff.
Re: 2.73's stock?
so still wondering what i could get 3.23's out of?lol
#26
Supreme Member
#28
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 92RS
Engine: 305= boat anchor
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23
Re: 2.73's stock?
Any 3rd gen that is 90 and up will work,just make sure you check that the lsd still works before you take it apart.Have you thought about swapping in a 4th gen rear,you can get them with better brakes and less miles than a 3rd gen diff,and it will bolt in just fine.
#32
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 92RS
Engine: 305= boat anchor
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23
Re: 2.73's stock?
For a 3rd gen with an automatic 3.73s,and 4.10s are way to low.For nice performance and decent gas mileage go with 3.23s or even 3.42s,they are very close to one an other,you won't regret it.
#33
Supreme Member
iTrader: (45)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 3,970
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Pair of 92 Z28s
Re: 2.73's stock?
My gf's 2000 T/A auto had 2.73s, yes rare but it did, also has a steel ds. We just swaped to a 3.42 rear. Her mpg went from 27 highway to 22-23. City mpg stayed the same.
I would go with 3.23s if your concerned with mpg. You WILL notice a big difference in off the line acceleration. When i went from 3.23 to 3.73 i also noticed a big increase of acceleration.
2.73 to 3.23 is a perfect swap for a street car. Automatics of course.
I would go with 3.23s if your concerned with mpg. You WILL notice a big difference in off the line acceleration. When i went from 3.23 to 3.73 i also noticed a big increase of acceleration.
2.73 to 3.23 is a perfect swap for a street car. Automatics of course.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Genopsyde
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
10-07-2015 08:35 PM
knight72
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
0
08-10-2015 09:32 PM