ci on a 3.1??
02-17-2008, 10:55 AM
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 camaro
Engine: 3.1 v6, CAI
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: eaton posi
ci on a 3.1??
ok i have a quick question. How come everywhere i look i see that the 3.1L engine is either a 192ci, 189ci or like 175ci or something? My chiltons book says 192ci but on the history/rest forum it says that the 92' camaro RS had like a 175ci or something like that. I dont understand why theres huge diff. in all the places ive looked. so if someone could tell me the real CI on my 3.1L that would be a great help. Thanks
02-17-2008, 11:07 AM
#2
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: ci on a 3.1??
ok i have a quick question. How come everywhere i look i see that the 3.1L engine is either a 192ci, 189ci or like 175ci or something? My chiltons book says 192ci but on the history/rest forum it says that the 92' camaro RS had like a 175ci or something like that. I dont understand why theres huge diff. in all the places ive looked. so if someone could tell me the real CI on my 3.1L that would be a great help. Thanks
02-17-2008, 12:52 PM
#5
Re: ci on a 3.1??
Most accurate way is to calculate the volume of the cyls yourself using the stroke and bore.
GM says that the 3.4/3400 is 207ci, but it's actually 204. I think someone at GM must have rounded the liters up to 3.4, then converted it back to in.
GM says that the 3.4/3400 is 207ci, but it's actually 204. I think someone at GM must have rounded the liters up to 3.4, then converted it back to in.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
