Aftermarket Product Review Provide questions and answers about aftermarket parts for the Third Generation F-Body.

Trickflow G1 versus Vortec

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2007, 10:57 PM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
wesilva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1966 El Camino Custom
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73 12 bolt with Brute Strength
Trickflow G1 versus Vortec

Anyone have any personal experience with both the Trickflow G1 and Vortec heads? I was curious if the older G1 design would hold it's own against the Vortec heads.
Old 10-05-2007, 07:28 AM
  #2  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
Kevin Vandevenne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: London ON Canada
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 87 IROC
Re: Trickflow G1 versus Vortec

I believe the older G1's were limited to amount of valve lift you could run before you got into geometry problems, i think the area of .520", which isnt much if plan to use a roller cam. Also I remember back in the day people who bought some the first ones that came out, had issues with the valve guides wearing out, might be something to look for.
Old 10-05-2007, 12:38 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
wesilva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1966 El Camino Custom
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73 12 bolt with Brute Strength
Re: Trickflow G1 versus Vortec

Your correct on the valve guide wearing. This is because the intakes need a longer pushrod to maintain geometry. I am planning to run a roller cam but a mild one. Well below .520. More in the order of .480. I have also run Vortecs but not in the same vehicle. I have run Vortecs on my third gens. And I have run the G1's in my Suburban. Not much of a comparison to go on. I was hoping someone has run both heads in similiar vehicles and what they thought.
Old 10-05-2007, 05:46 PM
  #4  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
iceman02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: waco, tx
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91Z28 L98
Engine: HSR 350
Transmission: Goebel 700R4
Re: Trickflow G1 versus Vortec

Are we talkin' the twisted wedge heads?
Old 10-05-2007, 05:49 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
89formula=happy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Trickflow G1 versus Vortec

vortec heads turn me off because of their price, and the possiblity of having to change out the intake manifold.
Old 10-05-2007, 05:49 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
89formula=happy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Trickflow G1 versus Vortec

which adds to the price even more
Old 10-06-2007, 11:44 AM
  #7  
Senior Member

 
91TPI5.7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pahrump, Nv
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 z28
Engine: l98
Transmission: 700r4
Re: Trickflow G1 versus Vortec

Vortecs+new intake=674.90
TFTW+Stock intake=1165.00
TFTW+ Avg. Aftermarket intake=1364.95

Prices from SDPC for Vortecs and intakes, vortecs have valve spring upgrade included. Performer RPM airgap used as sample. Prices for trickflow twisted wedge heads from summit racing. It all comes down to what you want. If you want to budget and get some good HP then you do the math. The TF's offer reduced weight, and improved heat dissapation, and you can run more compression with less chance of detonation.
Personally, I am on a budget and plan to use the vortec tpi setup, and a cam os some sort. If i had $$$ falling out my ***, def. an aluminum head setup. Remember now a days cast iron is still cheap. Aluminum is still going up.
Old 10-08-2007, 04:32 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
wesilva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1966 El Camino Custom
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73 12 bolt with Brute Strength
Re: Trickflow G1 versus Vortec

I wish I could see some G1 flow figures. I bet they are in line with the Vortecs on the intake and flow better on the exhaust. GM heads from day one have always been just fair on the exhaust side. Factory Vortecs have proved no better. Maybe the newest Bowtie Vortecs have addressed the issue.
Old 10-08-2007, 04:45 PM
  #9  
Member
iTrader: (6)
 
TransAM Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lake of the Ozarks, MO
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Trickflow G1 versus Vortec

I am running close to 400 rwhp on factory casting vortecs up to 5800 rpm, about what most aluminum heads at any price would produce for half the price, its all about the cam selection.
Old 10-08-2007, 05:45 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
1991CamaroRslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinatti OH
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s
Re: Trickflow G1 versus Vortec

What can did you use?
Old 10-08-2007, 05:53 PM
  #11  
Member
iTrader: (6)
 
TransAM Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lake of the Ozarks, MO
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Trickflow G1 versus Vortec

lt4 hot cam advanced 4*, but the big picture is the commander 950 and tunability.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
91 SrS
Tech / General Engine
10
07-23-2015 06:58 PM
robertfrank
TBI
22
11-14-2008 12:21 PM
gcgarner
Engine Swap
5
04-23-2008 12:16 PM
89formula383
TPI
3
12-04-2003 02:03 PM
330hp_91RS
Tech / General Engine
1
06-23-2003 11:12 PM



Quick Reply: Trickflow G1 versus Vortec



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 PM.