3 piece, 1 piece or no piece?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Axle/Gears: 3.42
3 piece, 1 piece or no piece?
ok i have a 3 piece spoiler off an 83Z, a T/A wing off an 82 i think, and i'm putting on a hatch from a 90, without the hatch brake light,
just wondering your opinions on what spoiler wouid suit best.
T/A Wing
3 piece, (not my car)
No spoiler
just wondering your opinions on what spoiler wouid suit best.
T/A Wing
3 piece, (not my car)
No spoiler
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 49
From: Naperville, IL
Car: 89 Iroc Hardtop
Engine: LB9 w/G92 Pkg
Transmission: T5 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt, 3.45
I kinda like the T/A spoiler in the 1st pic- mainly because every other Camaro doesn't already have the same one.
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
From: logan co. wv
Car: 86 camaro
Engine: 2.8 multiport cross fire injection
Transmission: 5 speed
ok at 1st glance i thought yur hatch glass was broke guess somethign layon across it under bowtie or just the shadow or maybe broke?
anyways i think id go w/ 3 piece
for one they factory 2 they look good i think better then just 1 piece deck lid types
but they do need to be taller i think
but thats cuz i love the old tas and camaros fomr the late 70s n 80 n 81 s
but id go w/ 3
were to u get thoose dark smoke licsense plate covers to match the taillight blackouts?
and thoose cant b stret legal can they?
unless ya licsense plates in frotn but stil kinda hard see taillights thru thoose aint it?
anyways i think id go w/ 3 piece
for one they factory 2 they look good i think better then just 1 piece deck lid types
but they do need to be taller i think
but thats cuz i love the old tas and camaros fomr the late 70s n 80 n 81 s
but id go w/ 3
were to u get thoose dark smoke licsense plate covers to match the taillight blackouts?
and thoose cant b stret legal can they?
unless ya licsense plates in frotn but stil kinda hard see taillights thru thoose aint it?
Last edited by benoit454; Jan 21, 2004 at 12:30 PM.
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
From: logan co. wv
Car: 86 camaro
Engine: 2.8 multiport cross fire injection
Transmission: 5 speed
no the taillight blackouts on the pic of no wing and the center section were the licsense plate goes and drops down to let u get in the hatch that cover
ive seen them but never knew were to get em
and i didnt figure the blackouts were legal driving use because they cover tailights up and be hard see any lights show thru turns brakes park any of em wouldnt it?
ive seen them but never knew were to get em
and i didnt figure the blackouts were legal driving use because they cover tailights up and be hard see any lights show thru turns brakes park any of em wouldnt it?
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 276
Likes: 1
From: Long Beach, CA
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3: 305 TBI
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 1997 Trans Am rear w/ posi -3.23
Originally posted by MetalliCamaroRS
Three piece, Camaros don't look too good without a spoiler IMO.
Three piece, Camaros don't look too good without a spoiler IMO.
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
From: logan co. wv
Car: 86 camaro
Engine: 2.8 multiport cross fire injection
Transmission: 5 speed
Originally posted by SpeedDemon383
I agree with MetalliCamaroRS
I agree with MetalliCamaroRS
me 3 i agree they dont seem right w/o one
sorry for syaing this but kinda like grandmas car to go store in just doesnt look really sport or muscle liek its supposed to but if ya like em w/o then thats cool
i preffer 3 piece only higher like hawks new 5 incher
if i could blow 500 on spoiler alone id already have one on
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
From: St. John's, NL, Canada
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
3 peice! Those T/A wings don't even look good on T/A's, nevermind Camaro's. And I'm not a fan of the "no spoiler" look either. JMO
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 411
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
I like no spoiler. Less can be more. If it looks good on the Cali-Roc, then why not every Iroc? Now I'm not saying everyone should do it, but I think it looks classy.
I agree, the 3 pc. looks more "muscle" than with no spoiler. Depends on what you're lookin' for.
I agree, the 3 pc. looks more "muscle" than with no spoiler. Depends on what you're lookin' for.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 1
From: Paris, Tx. USA
Car: 89 RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: TH350
How about 1 piece like mine. It only has the drivers side piece on it right now, a bad wreck tore up the other two.
I'm kinda in the same dillema you are in, but I'll more than likely put the 3 piece back on it.
I'm kinda in the same dillema you are in, but I'll more than likely put the 3 piece back on it. Supreme Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
3 piece. The firebird flat spoiler is too wide for a camaro, the firebird rear end is a little over 2" wider overall. It looks a little silly with the spoiler hanging over the car on both sides.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by Ryknow86
hey, i think i have 2 different taillights. for the 11 months ive owned the car i have never noticed that.
hey, i think i have 2 different taillights. for the 11 months ive owned the car i have never noticed that.
That does not look as off as I remember it. It looks like you have one 82-84 Z28/89-90 RS taillamp and one 82-88 base camaro taillamp.
(You could always just paint the center strip black on the base lamp, that's the only difference...)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








