Auto Detailing and Appearance Share tips and tricks on how to make your Third Gen shine! Get opinions on products or how something tasteful looks on your Chevrolet Camaro or Pontiac Firebird.

Finally some progress pics inside

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 06:46 PM
  #1  
MetalliCamaroRS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 1
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
Finally some progress pics inside

Hey everyone,
Today we had some good weather and I was off work, so I got some work done on the IROC. I drilled the holes for and loosely mounted the 91-92 ground effects. The gaps you can see are because they aren't bolted in yet, just the studs through the holes. I can't wait to get them painted. What do you guys think?







Reply
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 06:51 PM
  #2  
joshp14's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 0
From: Norwalk, Iowa
Looks good Andy, keep us updated.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 07:56 PM
  #3  
89cmrodriver's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
From: chesapeake va
Car: 08 Sierra, 08 Silverado, 91 z28
Engine: 5.3, 4.3, 5.7
Transmission: autos
looks good, cant wait to see it done. Still gonna not have it out till spring 05?
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 08:06 PM
  #4  
1986CamaroSC's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Axle/Gears: 3.42
was it hard to drill the holes in the exact proper location? cause i'm adding gfx to my SC soon, and i was wondering how you lined up the holes to drill out
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 08:22 PM
  #5  
nolanr0413's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 1
From: New York
Car: Trans am
it looked good the way it was , why change it. Their are gonna be more 91-92 camaro look a like than were ever produced.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 08:23 PM
  #6  
MetalliCamaroRS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 1
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
The current plan is to have it on the road for about a month this summer, from mid May til mid June. That way I can attend ThirdGen Fest '04 and the Midwest F-Body Meet. By then, I hope to have the ground effects painted, as well as have my TCI transmission cooler mounted and my three AutoMeter Phantom gauges mounted in the a-pillar (trans, water, and A/F ratio). I will also have new tires.

As for the holes, it wasn't hard at all. They were a little off, but I was able to use a file to correct it. Make some templates out of cardboard, it will help a lot.

I changed it because I always liked the 91-92 ground effects. As some of you may know, I started off with a 92 RS before the IROC. The only thing I miss about that car is the ground effects. I had always wanted to change to the 91-92 ones, but never had the chance since my IROC was my daily driver. But now that I have a second car, I have time to do longer project type things with the IROC. And since the nose needed to be repainted anyway, I thought it would be a good time to swap.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 08:24 PM
  #7  
easySPEEDcamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28 Anniversary Edition
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Borg Warner 5-Speed
my person opinion

you screwed everything up

not that i am anything of an original ****, because i hate originality...

but your car was sweet stock with the blue stripes... now you added the 91-92 gfx... which means that you need to get rid of the IROC-Z on the doors cuz it just looks ghetto with iroc-z on the doors and 91-92 graphics.

on top of that... now u gotta upgrade the rims, cuz you know... those rims don't suit the 91-92 gfx...

sooooooo yeah

:P
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 08:26 PM
  #8  
MetalliCamaroRS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 1
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
I don't need to get rid of the IROC decals, and I won't.

I also don't need to change the rims, and I won't (until I can afford some Firehawk's perhaps)
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 08:34 PM
  #9  
FLYNLOW92rs's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,169
Likes: 0
Looks 10x better in my opinion......
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 08:47 PM
  #10  
Orinackra's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Car: 06 SRM M6 GTO, 98 Grand Prix GTP
Looks pretty awesome so far.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 09:03 PM
  #11  
AaronIROCZ's Avatar
Moderator/TGO Supporter
25 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 6
From: Tomball Texas
It will look better when its all painted. I have been always toying with the idea of doing that with my IROC.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 09:19 PM
  #12  
LFN AT U's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
From: Crete, IL 60417
Car: 2004 Chevy Avalanche
Engine: Some that run, some that don't
Transmission: 700R4's, a T-5, and a Turbo 350
Andy, I say leave everything purple. It looks sweet. Also, the blue door ground effect really matches the blue stripe on the body. I'd leave it that way!!!
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 09:40 PM
  #13  
9D1BURD's Avatar
Moderator/TGO Supporter
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,481
Likes: 0
From: Bloomingdale, IL , United States
Car: 1997 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Blah, should of left it the way it was, it doesn't look like an iroc anymore.

Everyone and their brother changes the ground effects to the new style.

Sorry, not trying to be a stock ****, just dont like it.

and what are you going to put where the rs emblem is?

It does look like you have done a great job though

Heres a little tip for you, while the car is being worked on, take out your inner fenders and spray them black again, it helps restore that new car look.

Last edited by 9D1BURD; Mar 3, 2004 at 08:50 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 09:49 PM
  #14  
9D1Formula350's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: oak brook, illinois
Car: camaro...????
Engine: 305ci of mouse power
Transmission: 5 speeds of fury
dude your car was beautiful before you did that now its....yea, well i hope you at least put Z28 badges and the blue pinstripe back on...because those RS ones arent working out
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 10:09 PM
  #15  
BadBowtie88's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 970
Likes: 0
I'm not a huge fan of the gfx swap, but give the guy a break. His first thirdgen was an RS. I think it's gonna look pretty good myself once it's painted. I would get some different emblems IMO. That's just my .02 though. Doin a good job on the swap bro, looks good!
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 11:00 PM
  #16  
grngryoutmyway's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 3
From: Marietta, GA
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10 bolt
Kick @ss ...the RS emblems will have to go tho! personally I say shave the emblems all together and leave the IROC on the door wouldn't be hard at all since your paintin em anyways... and yes firehawks or some bigger iroc wheels would be rockin!

Oh and while your at it shave that indented strip in the rear bumper..

Last edited by grngryoutmyway; Mar 1, 2004 at 11:04 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 11:08 PM
  #17  
flrtin1's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Western Ky
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
I sorta like that black/purple combo..... looks good bro keep doing "what you want" hope to see it and meet you guys in may!
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 12:15 AM
  #18  
Cargasm's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Key Largo, FL.
Looks great, IMHO.... but regarding the RS emblems, I think I'd remove them and look into some way to fill and smooth the spots where they are.... it'll make for a cleaner overall look.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 12:17 AM
  #19  
xpndbl3's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,622
Likes: 5
From: Orland Park, IL
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
to all the haters.....just remember his "old" ground effects are now on my 84 camaro. so it has been recycled all around. now my car looks a million times better that i got rid of those uglyass 82-84 ground effects. now this thing looks more muscular and more modern for sure.

Last edited by xpndbl3; Mar 2, 2004 at 11:35 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 12:43 AM
  #20  
MattW's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: Vortec 355
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: GM Axles and GM 3.73
i always liked the GFX on the 91-92 camaros...so i think he did a good upgrade for his car...yes it looked sweet b4 but it will look even cooler now....tear it up man!

and yah i know what u mean by being afraid to do things to your daily driver...now that i have a saturn i wanna try to rebuild my q-jet and hopefully tune it for performance
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 02:44 AM
  #21  
theSteve's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Surrey, BC Wheels:KMC Clocker 17"
Car: 1985 Trans Am
Engine: upgrading...
Transmission: upgrading...
i think it looks great, mucho better. cant wait to see it painted!!
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 07:49 AM
  #22  
anubiscougar's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: Orlando Florida
i wish i could park my car in the garage... :'(

looks good, duno what it looked like b4(I guess w/o fx, duh, lol), but.. looks good. lol. gj.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 08:39 AM
  #23  
Jgolden314's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
From: Milan, MI
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: A4
Why is the car only going to be on the road for a month this year?
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 11:25 AM
  #24  
MattW's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: Vortec 355
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: GM Axles and GM 3.73
...his car DID come with gfx...they were the 89 iroc gfx but he likes the 91-92 camaro gfx better.....so thats why he changed them...



and he is having his car on the road for a month becuz he wants to go to the previously mentioned car events....and then he is probably gonna go back and work on modifying his car some more....
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 01:31 PM
  #25  
MetalliCamaroRS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 1
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
I guess I should have said this before, but the RS emblems came on the ground effects. They will not be on the finished car

I will have IROC badges there, just like I had before. I will be removing the blue stripe when I get the effects painted. Then when they are on the car I will decide on whether or not to put a new blue stripe on.

If you don't know what it looked like before, check my webpage and/or cardomain page, the links are in my sig. I have plenty of pics there.

Blah, should of left it the way it was, its not an iroc anymore.
What? So if someone has an IROC and they get, say, a new hood, its not an IROC anymore?

Its just an IROC with updated ground effects.

The car will only be on the road for about a month because thats all I can afford. I bought a winter beater this year because I drive 35 miles each way to and from school five days a week. I was using almost a half tank of gas a day in the IROC. School goes through the summer, so I will have to keep driving the Cavalier for school and I can't afford to insure both for the whole summer.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 03:14 PM
  #26  
LUVmy92's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: NC
Car: Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Its gonna look hot when its finished! I like them but I am biased
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 03:25 PM
  #27  
Jgolden314's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
From: Milan, MI
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: A4
Yeah i know what u mean about driving back and forth to class.........i am at class 5 days per week. I only used my camaro for daily driving for 6 months, then bought a beater, then that broke down so now i have a 96 cherokee for everyday. Sad thing is, my cherokee would beat my IROC in a drag race, but I like driving my camaro much more.

I like those GFX though, I wouldnt mind tossing a set on mine.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 03:35 PM
  #28  
9D1BURD's Avatar
Moderator/TGO Supporter
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,481
Likes: 0
From: Bloomingdale, IL , United States
Car: 1997 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
i think the hood analogy is not right for this particular situation.

For me anyways, those ground effects just scream 91-92(well, thats cause they are) And it seems to me that it will look busy with the new ground effects and the iroc decal on the door.

Before, nothing stood out on the side cept for the iroc decal, now there will be two identifying items almost in the same place.

I think it would look nice without the iroc decal on the door,

But its your car, and its a very nice car, i am just stating an opnion that everyone is entitled too.



:lala:
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 03:46 PM
  #29  
StngKlr's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 1
From: Paris, Tx. USA
Car: 89 RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: TH350
Guess I'll need to wait and see the final product before I know for sure. Probably not something I would do, but I admire the fact that your willing to do something that other people wouldnt, and doing the work on your own. Thats one of the best parts of modding,... doing it yourself.

Also, what about the chin spoiler?

Keep us updated, I know your not on the site everyday, but you know, stop in once and a while.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 03:49 PM
  #30  
BigMike1610's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Alton, Illinois, USA
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 tbi=LO3
Transmission: Automatic
very nice looking
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 04:18 PM
  #31  
Stevo's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,970
Likes: 1
From: Northern, VA
Car: Pair of 92 Z28s
i really like and think your doing a great job...i dont see what the big fuss is about...its gonna look the same as before just with little groves in the gfx...I dont see how you can like the look of iroc gfx compared to 91-92 gfx...they are just upgraded that made them look better is the way i see it...but i guess this is why there are such things as opinions heh

Anyway cant wait to see the finished product
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 05:05 PM
  #32  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 411
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
I like the 85-90 GFX better, but it still looks sweet.

Not sure why the hood analogy doesn't work. It's still most definetely an Iroc. It's funny how many people come outta the wordwork and say how Iroc and Z28 clones are an OK thing to do, yet change your GFX and now it's not an Iroc. I'd be willing to bet its still the same car, hmmmm maybe he can check the VIN....then we'll know for sure!

As for not liking the way it looks with the decal, well that's opinion, but has nothing to do with it being an "Iroc".

The wheels are the best wheels Chevy ever put on a car....I say keep 'em.

....the Stock **** has spoken.....

Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 05:12 PM
  #33  
camarokev400's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
From: Norwalk, Ohio
so everyone with a 91-92 high rise spoiler dosent have a z28, or an iroc anymore? SAME THING who cares it looks good, if you change a motor no one ever says anything bad, its just ground effects give him a break.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 06:13 PM
  #34  
IROCThe5.7L's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
Did you get a new front bumper gfx too? I'm pretty sure the 91-92 nose was a bit longer then the IROC.



Looks good, nice progress
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 08:44 PM
  #35  
myFirst-IROCz88's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Lowell, Arkansas
Car: 88 IROC
I am partial to all black ROCs. That is probably why mine is still red, that and a paint job that costs mucho dinaro!

Loved your car before and will after.

IROCthe5.7L, nice ride.

One day I will have a photosig!
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 09:07 PM
  #36  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 411
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
The 91-92 nose wasn't really any longer, but the license plate area is ever so slightly different, and of course, by the wheels it has the openings like the rockers.

....right?

*edit*
...same nose...diff GFX.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 01:19 AM
  #37  
85maroz28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
From: Olean NY USA
Car: 1985 Camaro Z28/1989 Pontiac Trans Am GTA
Engine: 305 tpi/350tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Seems to be coming together nicely! Keep up the good work!
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 07:30 AM
  #38  
ES87iroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Not an IROC anymore? *shrugs*
Attached Thumbnails Finally some progress pics inside-es1.jpg  
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 07:34 AM
  #39  
LUVmy92's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: NC
Car: Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Yup its not an IROC anymore...strip those IROC vinyls off NOW! You have been found guilty of pissing off the stock ****'s!

hahahaha... whatever! It looks good and if your happy screw what anybody says!
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 08:45 AM
  #40  
9D1BURD's Avatar
Moderator/TGO Supporter
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,481
Likes: 0
From: Bloomingdale, IL , United States
Car: 1997 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Not sure why the hood analogy doesn't work. It's still most definetely an Iroc. It's funny how many people come outta the wordwork and say how Iroc and Z28 clones are an OK thing to do, yet change your GFX and now it's not an Iroc. I'd be willing to bet its still the same car, hmmmm maybe he can check the VIN....then we'll know for sure!
I guess i should of said, it didn't work for me .

And i for one just think alot of people try to clone the 91-92 style, which i understand cause they are really nice.

I just wish more people would leave their cars like they were, they sure dont need any help looking better.

And let me say this again, i love andys car, i have seen it in person, very nice.
So no hate here, just an opnion, and i am sure he will do it right and make it look very nice.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 08:47 AM
  #41  
9D1BURD's Avatar
Moderator/TGO Supporter
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,481
Likes: 0
From: Bloomingdale, IL , United States
Car: 1997 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
LOL, i just realized i typed "it's not an iroc anymore"

I meant it wont look like an iroc anymore, sorry about that, now i understand why people got a tad heated.

Not an IROC anymore? *shrugs*
Really nice looking car there, but then it brings up another point, it looks like a 91-92z that someone slapped some iroc decals on.

Last edited by 9D1BURD; Mar 3, 2004 at 08:54 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 09:21 AM
  #42  
MattW's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: Vortec 355
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: GM Axles and GM 3.73
drools over ES87iroc's car!!!

that looks awesome!
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 12:18 PM
  #43  
LUVmy92's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: NC
Car: Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I do understand your point, it would at first glance look like ES87's car was a 91 92 Z that he put stickers on. Most people would assume that being its easier to install stickers then it is to change the body panels which is about what most lame *** people do (sticker upgrades). Everyone thinks my 92 RS is a Z since I added the spoiler and grill.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 12:27 PM
  #44  
CamaroRS385hp's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
From: Augusta/Valdosta, GA
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: auto
i say don't paint it...gotta love the turqoise and purple gfx...has that lost in the 80's look

haha yea right, get that thing painted quick....it's lookin nice, although i loved that blue stripe you had at the bottom of your car, just cause it made it stand out from every other black iroc out there...(i didnt read all the posts, so i didnt see if you said you're putting the stripe back on or not, but i'm guessing you're not)
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 01:36 PM
  #45  
MetalliCamaroRS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 1
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
I did get the front valence as well, but I just didn't put it on yet. The nose isn't any different, but the lower ground effect is.

My car won't look like a 91-92 Z28 with IROC stickers, it will look like a 91-92 Z28 with IROC stickers, an IROC 3-piece spoiler, IROC hood louvers, and IROC rims. Not to mention, the 89 interior.

Or it will just look like an IROC with 91-92 ground effects

I'm not getting heated, I asked for opinions and I totally understand that not everyone will like it. I always tell people "Its your car, do what you want", so now I plan to do the same

ES87's car is the one that inspired me to put these on actually. I love the look of that car. Did you get a new spoiler? I thought you had something different on there.

Last edited by MetalliCamaroRS; Mar 3, 2004 at 07:50 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 02:11 PM
  #46  
ES87iroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by MetalliCamaroRS
ES87's car is the one that inspired me to put these on actually. I love the look of that car. Did you get a new spoiler? I thought you had something different on there.
Geez, thanks man. (Where's the blush smilie?) I had a T/A wrap around wing, but it went deep south on me, and I had a couple spare 91/92 Z28 wings around at the time, which beat my warped up wraparound.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 02:22 PM
  #47  
ES87iroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by LUVmy92
Yup its not an IROC anymore...strip those IROC vinyls off NOW! You have been found guilty of pissing off the stock ****'s!

Ahh poop.

I guess I don't have any IROC style exterior stuff left on my car, but how is an IROC any different than a 85-87 Z28 externally save for the stickers/stripes/wheels and two tone?
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 03:52 PM
  #48  
LUVmy92's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: NC
Car: Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
It just is. Your still guilty hahahaha
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 04:07 PM
  #49  
ES87iroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by LUVmy92
It just is. Your still guilty hahahaha
Wait wait, I still have my IROC grille!


Seriously though, I can see where 9d1 is coming from, that was the main reason I kept the stock wheels for so long. (Does keeping them in the garage count? They are near the car at least... )
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 04:48 PM
  #50  
LUVmy92's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: NC
Car: Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Ok we will let it slide.....this time!
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 AM.