this it a thirdgen..right?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH350
this it a thirdgen..right?
looking through a mag at my friends car audio shop and came across this add. i am 99.9% sure its a thirdgen firebird, is it??? how can they do this!!
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, Ca.
Car: Base Firebird
Engine: TPI 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: D44
yep definitly was a bird... i'm having trouble identifying what exactly it is, though...
its got what appears to be a squirter for a rear window wiper, no spoiler, and 91/2 t/a taillights (looks like the reflector is on the top).... so i'd guess its an older one that had a hatch swapped on and those tails swapped on as well.....
damn, if i knew where that car was, i'd do some underwater taillight salvaging and make a killing on ebay!!! jk
its got what appears to be a squirter for a rear window wiper, no spoiler, and 91/2 t/a taillights (looks like the reflector is on the top).... so i'd guess its an older one that had a hatch swapped on and those tails swapped on as well.....
damn, if i knew where that car was, i'd do some underwater taillight salvaging and make a killing on ebay!!! jk
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 2
From: El Paso, Texas
Car: 1987 IROC Z
Engine: 350 TPI L98 block
Transmission: 700R4
It pisses me off to no end how hollywood will use our thirdgens as though the were expendable and there was an infinite number left. At this rate, these things will become classic prematurely. That would suck.
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: United States
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by TraviZ
maybe it could have been a photochop?
maybe it could have been a photochop?
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 2
From: Muskego, WI
Car: 1985 Trans Am
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70
At this rate, these things will become classic prematurely. That would suck.
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Car: 91' Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r-4
ya, cuz i know that in movies where they wreck cars and stuff, they make replica's, kinda like a kit car i guess, and wreck those so they don't have to do it to the originals. I mean, do you really think they trashed that bad *** Charger in the fast and the furious?
I'm sure there are laws againist throwing a car into a lake for a no reason, other then to get a picture....
Environmental Concerns to say the least......And I believe throwing a car into a river can constitute "Littering"....
That's a photoshop
Environmental Concerns to say the least......And I believe throwing a car into a river can constitute "Littering"....
That's a photoshop
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Vineland, NJ
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Wi$h
ya, cuz i know that in movies where they wreck cars and stuff, they make replica's, kinda like a kit car i guess, and wreck those so they don't have to do it to the originals. I mean, do you really think they trashed that bad *** Charger in the fast and the furious?
ya, cuz i know that in movies where they wreck cars and stuff, they make replica's, kinda like a kit car i guess, and wreck those so they don't have to do it to the originals. I mean, do you really think they trashed that bad *** Charger in the fast and the furious?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH350
i know the guy who owns that camaro to use in Godsend, they were looken for a camaro and basicaly paid him for the car then gave it back all done, he still has it now they were maken this movie for acouple year.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (45)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,970
Likes: 1
From: Northern, VA
Car: Pair of 92 Z28s
Originally posted by IROCZ28dan
they still use our cars to kill little kids in hollywood...if any1 has seen Godsend, you know what i mean. I think its an 91-92 RS but im not sure beings i didn see the gfx. i was the only one in the theater saying "it had to be a camaro" when everyone else was gasping becasue the kid got hit.
they still use our cars to kill little kids in hollywood...if any1 has seen Godsend, you know what i mean. I think its an 91-92 RS but im not sure beings i didn see the gfx. i was the only one in the theater saying "it had to be a camaro" when everyone else was gasping becasue the kid got hit.
everyone looks at me weird or my freinds will be like "so what"....ya it hurts inside
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: HOULKA MISSISSIPPI
Car: 1989 pontiac firebird formula
Engine: Currently building a 355
Transmission: 700r4
about the hollywood thing
just look at gone in 60 seconds they destroyed a perfectly good thirdgen firebird in that movie. still cant believe i still fast forward through that part of the movie.
thomas
thomas
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Littleton Colorado
Car: 84 T/A 70 Chevelle SS 78 T/A
Engine: chevy 383 Chevy 496 Pontiac 462
Transmission: built THM700r4 Richmond 6 built TH400
anyone else notice that it seemed to be a different bird? there was what appeared to be a nice one and the color seemed different (too quick in the beggining to tell though.
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 2
From: El Paso, Texas
Car: 1987 IROC Z
Engine: 350 TPI L98 block
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by IROCZ28dan
they still use our cars to kill little kids in hollywood...if any1 has seen Godsend, you know what i mean. I think its an 91-92 RS but im not sure beings i didn see the gfx. i was the only one in the theater saying "it had to be a camaro" when everyone else was gasping becasue the kid got hit.
they still use our cars to kill little kids in hollywood...if any1 has seen Godsend, you know what i mean. I think its an 91-92 RS but im not sure beings i didn see the gfx. i was the only one in the theater saying "it had to be a camaro" when everyone else was gasping becasue the kid got hit.
hahaha I said the same thing when I saw that preview... TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 2
From: El Paso, Texas
Car: 1987 IROC Z
Engine: 350 TPI L98 block
Transmission: 700R4
Re: about the hollywood thing
Originally posted by firebird89355
just look at gone in 60 seconds they destroyed a perfectly good thirdgen firebird in that movie. still cant believe i still fast forward through that part of the movie.
thomas
just look at gone in 60 seconds they destroyed a perfectly good thirdgen firebird in that movie. still cant believe i still fast forward through that part of the movie.
thomas
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Re: about the hollywood thing
Originally posted by firebird89355
just look at gone in 60 seconds they destroyed a perfectly good thirdgen firebird in that movie. still cant believe i still fast forward through that part of the movie.
thomas
just look at gone in 60 seconds they destroyed a perfectly good thirdgen firebird in that movie. still cant believe i still fast forward through that part of the movie.
thomas
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 663
Likes: 1
From: Runnin' from the Reaper
Car: 91 B4C/91 RS 305
Engine: L98 and L03
Transmission: 2xTH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 LSD/2.73 Open
What about fear factor? Whenever they want to do a car stunt it's a camaro. I wanna go on Fear Factor just so I can do some crazy crap in a Camaro.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Why not sink a thirdgen firebird? The car probably cost them 1000$.
I get more mad when I see movies like the fast and the furious destroying 1st gens... movies always destroy classics because they are cheaper and "cooler". I get angry. Like in 2 fast 2 furious I got mad when the "yenko" was destroyed but I could have cared less about the new corvette, viper, and mustang that was destroyed.
Did you notice EVERY american car in that stupid movie was destroyed but the ricers were untouched.
I get more mad when I see movies like the fast and the furious destroying 1st gens... movies always destroy classics because they are cheaper and "cooler". I get angry. Like in 2 fast 2 furious I got mad when the "yenko" was destroyed but I could have cared less about the new corvette, viper, and mustang that was destroyed.
Did you notice EVERY american car in that stupid movie was destroyed but the ricers were untouched.
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Car: 91' Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r-4
its cuz otherwise they would all have whooped the ricers in a race, i mean c'mon, a viper, corvette, yenko, charger, and yes even the mustang would smoke all of those cars unless the ricers had some serious upgrades.
Originally posted by 88Camaro350
Why not sink a thirdgen firebird? The car probably cost them 1000$.
Why not sink a thirdgen firebird? The car probably cost them 1000$.
The EPA would be all over in a matter of minutes...
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 803
Likes: 2
From: Los Angeles, CA/San Diego
Car: 1982 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: Stock carbed 305
Transmission: Stock 200C
People are too quick to call photoshop....Not that I don't love my third gen, but these cars are a dime a dozen...and they could of very well picked up a junked one painted it too look pretty for a photo and dumped in somewhere...could be in Universal's back lot in an artificial movie lake...or a real lake...doesn't mean they didn't remove the car. If its a photoshop its a pretty good one, but I don't think it is.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
well of coarse its a good one. thats why they get paid the big bux 
and im sure photoshop isnt the only program that assisted them.
are the taillights on?
ya i doubt its real.

and im sure photoshop isnt the only program that assisted them.
are the taillights on?
ya i doubt its real.
Last edited by TraviZ; May 13, 2004 at 01:30 AM.




