gfx idea
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, RI
Car: 1986 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: LG4 305
Transmission: T5
gfx idea
my car... with 84 TA aero nose gfx.
91-92 TA skirts and rocker gfx
no gfx in the back
waht do you think... any suggestions?
91-92 TA skirts and rocker gfx
no gfx in the back
waht do you think... any suggestions?
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: North --RI
Car: 92 caddy PIMP
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: i dunno
Its up to you. But I like the lines of the earlier models. The ones with the curvy lines in the lower gfx look cheesy and dont belong. hows your holes in the floor going? IM me on aim about it.
Nate
Nate
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: The Wastelands of Minnesota
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 1991 305 TBI
Transmission: Th700-R4
I dont like. I don't like the swoosh ground effects for birds. The 91-92 Camaro gfx look alright though. The swooshes and the nose are why I won't buy a 91-92 'Bird.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, RI
Car: 1986 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: LG4 305
Transmission: T5
i like certain parts of all the firebird models.. the side gfx on 91-92 look awesome, but the nose and back bumper looks stupid. the 84 ta aero nose looks incredible.. i want to combine those two gfx schemes... can anyone do a good photoshop of what that looks like
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 1
From: Huber Heights, OH
Car: 00 TA, 91 Formula, 89 RS
Engine: LS1 / 305 / 2.8, respectively
Transmission: T-56 / auto / auto
That pic is kinda dark to photoshop a black car.
I don't really think what you are trying to do will work too well, as the 91-92 T/A GFX "stick out" whereas the ones you want on the nose will not, and with no GFX on the back? I'm thinking it would look abrupt and thrown-together like a LEGO set or something.
I don't really think what you are trying to do will work too well, as the 91-92 T/A GFX "stick out" whereas the ones you want on the nose will not, and with no GFX on the back? I'm thinking it would look abrupt and thrown-together like a LEGO set or something.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,227
Likes: 46
From: North East GA
Car: 1989 Firebird
Engine: 5.7 LS1
Transmission: T56
I would do 85 rear bumper and rear ground effects, you are going to probably have to work with some fiberglass to make it look right and flow right.
add a 91-92 rear wrap around spoiler on there also.
add a 91-92 rear wrap around spoiler on there also.
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, Ca.
Car: Base Firebird
Engine: TPI 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: D44
i dunno, i dont think it would flow too well.... the front of those aero 84's is very edgy and squared off, while the 91/2 side panels are more rounded off... plus, with no gfx in the back, i think the car might look like its missing something...
i would like to see a good photoshop, though...
i would like to see a good photoshop, though...
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 2
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 4.10 gears
it's an interesting idea... it'll give somewhat of a NASCAR look to have no rear GFX. 89Warbird used 91-92 side ground effects with 85-90 up front. Not exactly the same, but it'll give you an idea. Here's the post https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...8&goto=newpost
I think it may look even better with the 82-84 ground effects up front because the top of them will be lower and match more closely to the front edge of the side GFX.
I think it may look even better with the 82-84 ground effects up front because the top of them will be lower and match more closely to the front edge of the side GFX.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, RI
Car: 1986 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: LG4 305
Transmission: T5
here's a better idea of what it'd look like...
top car with 84 nose.
now, think of that nose in place of the 85-90 nose on the bottom car.
notice the thinness, compared to the 85-90 nose
man, i wish i could photoshop
top car with 84 nose.
now, think of that nose in place of the 85-90 nose on the bottom car.
notice the thinness, compared to the 85-90 nose
man, i wish i could photoshop
Last edited by Dingley; Jul 8, 2004 at 06:30 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: North --RI
Car: 92 caddy PIMP
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: i dunno
I still dislike it and I also agree the lines might not match up. As someone else said you might have to glass something up for it to line up perfectly. I think your car is fine as is.
Nate
Nate
Try this guy Matt from MI http://members.cardomain.com/browne22 or email or PM me for his email addy
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Car: 84 T/A,84 Bird,85 T/A Knight Automated Roving Robot
Engine: 305 HO many mods, 151C.I.D-stock,305 TPI stock for now
Transmission: 700-R4 Turbo Hydro-Matic
Who's 84 Aero is that? It takes my breath away. :hail:
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 2
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 4.10 gears
I'm not sure whose 84 TA that is, but it looks just like mine if you add 16" crosslace rims and t-tops
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





