Auto Detailing and Appearance Share tips and tricks on how to make your Third Gen shine! Get opinions on products or how something tasteful looks on your Chevrolet Camaro or Pontiac Firebird.

56 iroc

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-2009, 05:36 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
andrewmp6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
56 iroc

I found this site http://members.***.net/56iroc/index.shtml thought you all might like it.
Old 09-29-2009, 03:49 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
RS Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pasadena, TX
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 1991 RS
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 56 iroc

Seems like a waste of perfectly good iroc. Why?
Old 09-29-2009, 03:56 PM
  #3  
Member

iTrader: (22)
 
Kevinfirebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Firebird KITT
Engine: 305 TBI
Re: 56 iroc

They destroyed a perfectly good camaro for that
Old 09-29-2009, 04:02 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
BigBadGTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:27
Re: 56 iroc

Waste of a Iroc..
Old 09-29-2009, 04:26 PM
  #5  
Member
 
hedberg667's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Needham MA-Bristol RI
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 5.7 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 56 iroc

Waste, at least he kept the TPI
Old 09-29-2009, 04:47 PM
  #6  
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
weaz4200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: near chicago illinois
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: have a 92 camaro rs...in pieces
Engine: none now...probably 383 stroker
Transmission: none yet
Axle/Gears: none
Re: 56 iroc

The chevy letterin looks pretty sweet on the firewall.... Tis true though... Camaro wasted.... Ain't that a B****.
Old 09-29-2009, 04:55 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

 
camaronewbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cary, North Carolina
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: Carbed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Re: 56 iroc

Kinda does suck, but then again, a Camaro chassis probably cheaper overall than getting a new Belair chassis. Like the rest of us, guess he worked with what he had.

Five7Kid may appreciate - doesn't he have a Belair? Then again, maybe we shouldn't give him any ideas
Old 09-29-2009, 04:59 PM
  #8  
Member

iTrader: (5)
 
strc09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Displaced Texan living in NC
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird Trans AM GTA
Engine: Tune-port Injected 6.3L
Transmission: Borg-Warner T56 six-speed
Axle/Gears: Borg/Warner 9-bolt with 3.70:1
Re: 56 iroc

I'm going to say that it's different and obviously well thought out. They did a good job with the transformation and shows the passion of hot rodding. On the flip side to that I agree with destroying what appears to be a perfectly good IROC. If you're going to do something like this I would have used a rolling chassis or parts car instead of one that could be restored. This rates up there with turning a GenIV Camaro into a GenI Camaro.
Old 09-29-2009, 05:08 PM
  #9  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
Sonymaster20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Rs
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: 56 iroc

Wow What a waste of a true yellow iroc-z. Idiots.
Old 09-29-2009, 05:59 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,650
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 42 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: 56 iroc

i think its pretty neat.
Old 09-29-2009, 06:52 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
gregsz-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: No
Transmission: No
Axle/Gears: No
Re: 56 iroc

02-18-2008, 11:27 AM
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/fabr...ee-1956-a.html
Old 09-29-2009, 07:01 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member

 
92RS(real slow)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Osceola Indiana
Posts: 2,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 RS(sold) 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: ones that turn
Re: 56 iroc

cool but pointless considering you can buy modified vette frames that are made purposely for the shoeboxes, and would easily ride, and handle better than our thirdgen chassis
Old 09-29-2009, 08:30 PM
  #13  
Member

 
Fords88Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SO CAL
Posts: 497
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Car: '88 Firebird Z20
Engine: 305 TBI w/TBI mods
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 56 iroc

Nice idea and execution, lots more 3rd gen solid chassis available than 50's chassis that's for sure. There's nothing wrong with updating a more modern chassis with a classic body. If I had a 50's Nomad I'd do it. Later.
Old 09-30-2009, 03:10 AM
  #14  
Member
Thread Starter
 
andrewmp6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 56 iroc

I didn't know it was posted before.A 3rd gen is what about 3 grand or less a art morrison frame bare is about that much.I like the idea but i wouldn't used a unibody but the car looks great done.
Old 09-30-2009, 08:26 AM
  #15  
Supreme Member

 
camaronewbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cary, North Carolina
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: Carbed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Re: 56 iroc

Originally Posted by andrewmp6
.A 3rd gen is what about 3 grand or less .
I would hope way less - guess it depends on where you're at. Here in NC, I wouldn't pay more than $600 for a 3rd gen that I intended to take only the chassis from - I've had 3 that were running with no major body damage and the most expensive one was $900.
Old 10-05-2009, 08:35 PM
  #16  
Member
 
usamuscle892's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Augusta,GA
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 Z03 RS
Engine: (L03) 305TBI
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: bone stock
Re: 56 iroc

Originally Posted by gregsz-28
Yeah, I saw this build website a long time ago. He should have done more junkyard digging, before frankensteining a WHOLE IROC. And at the end of the day what does he have? A 56 chevy with a small block and (what the naked eye sees) IROC rims. Just seems like WAAAAAAAY too much work for a very mediocre finished product. That entire IROC body got crushed somewhere....lame idea. If he wanted a Domestic coupe, V8 powered, and awesome modern handling that he could put together himself there are alot of kit cars out there.
Old 10-05-2009, 08:40 PM
  #17  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: 56 iroc

What an a-hole.
Old 10-05-2009, 08:45 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
radical82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Madison, SD
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '82 Camaro
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 31 spline 9" with 4.56:1
Re: 56 iroc

The whole basis of Hot Rodding... Why did he do it??? Because he could!!!!! Why not? Some very good fabricating, and when it's all done he's built the car that he wants.... Isn't that what we all do?????
Old 10-05-2009, 09:00 PM
  #19  
Member
 
usamuscle892's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Augusta,GA
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 Z03 RS
Engine: (L03) 305TBI
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: bone stock
Re: 56 iroc

He frankensteined a IROC dude. He took two cars that were already bad @ss and bred them. Issue is he should have used a donor car that maybe didn't have doors, a hatch, a hood, both fenders, taillights, an engine and trans, full interior, etc etc. I can see where this might be hard to wrap around someones head but, don't tell me he couldn't have found a uni body and suspension pieces somewhere. And if he needed a TPI donor all he had to do was lift a rock and look under it to find one of those laying around.
Old 10-05-2009, 09:21 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
radical82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Madison, SD
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '82 Camaro
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 31 spline 9" with 4.56:1
Re: 56 iroc

He could have done a lot of things differently.... It would appear he did exactly what he wanted to do with little regard for what others would think or say. For many of us, it's important to build something that is totally unique and doesn't conform to what the style or fad of the week happens to be... Cut up an IROC??? No big deal, lots of them around.

I guess I just don't understand putting a guy down because he built something different and unique using the parts he chose to use... Looks to me like he built a car to suit him without a lot of regard for what others thought about it. One of the best things about being a Hot Rodder is being able to take what you have and build what you want....in a manner that others haven't done....

Eventually people get tired of seeing the same old thing done in the same old way....and building a car totally different from what everyone else builds is just another way around it. Heck, there's probably a bunch of folks on some Tri-Five site somewhere launching the same complaints about how could he do that to a '56 Chevy... My answer would be the same... He built what he wanted to build the way he wanted to build it....
Old 10-05-2009, 09:46 PM
  #21  
Member
 
usamuscle892's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Augusta,GA
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 Z03 RS
Engine: (L03) 305TBI
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: bone stock
Re: 56 iroc

I guess I'll patronize your point. He did what he wanted to and took the risk of getting the Unpopular vote (which Im sure he wins) with Camaro guys. Still, I say, for example, you don't see ppl taking a perfectly fine Nissan Skyline and raping it to pieces to only put the engine and suspension in a old Nissan 240. No, what sensible ppl do, like my friend Tommy, they take a donor Skyline motor and put it in their 240, they dont destroy a perfectly fine sports car just because they feel like welding a red headed step child together on the weekend.
Old 10-05-2009, 09:57 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
radical82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Madison, SD
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '82 Camaro
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 31 spline 9" with 4.56:1
Re: 56 iroc

Well, one man's red headed stepchild is another man's pride and joy..... As for the Nissan's, they should all be fed to a crusher!!!!! Imported cars and other such junk are some of the main reasons this country is in such a terrible condition!!!! Sorry, I'm just not much on ricers... They all have way too loud fart cans and wake me up at night!!!!!
Old 10-05-2009, 10:39 PM
  #23  
Member
 
usamuscle892's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Augusta,GA
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 Z03 RS
Engine: (L03) 305TBI
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: bone stock
Re: 56 iroc

I agree with you on the import/domestic thing. As an individual I would not own an import. However, I don't discriminate their drivers. I have friends in Muscle cars, 4x4's, Drag cars, Boats, Imports, Exotics, Bikes, sport trucks, you name it. It's all just a fashion statement. The basic theory behind all of them is a common denominator: performance. And regardless of what anyone says, we all have something to contribute to one another, even if we wouldnt be caught dead in our buddy's car.
Old 10-05-2009, 10:45 PM
  #24  
Member

 
Fords88Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SO CAL
Posts: 497
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Car: '88 Firebird Z20
Engine: 305 TBI w/TBI mods
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 56 iroc

Originally Posted by radical82
He could have done a lot of things differently.... It would appear he did exactly what he wanted to do with little regard for what others would think or say. For many of us, it's important to build something that is totally unique and doesn't conform to what the style or fad of the week happens to be... Cut up an IROC??? No big deal, lots of them around.

I guess I just don't understand putting a guy down because he built something different and unique using the parts he chose to use... Looks to me like he built a car to suit him without a lot of regard for what others thought about it. One of the best things about being a Hot Rodder is being able to take what you have and build what you want....in a manner that others haven't done....

Eventually people get tired of seeing the same old thing done in the same old way....and building a car totally different from what everyone else builds is just another way around it. Heck, there's probably a bunch of folks on some Tri-Five site somewhere launching the same complaints about how could he do that to a '56 Chevy... My answer would be the same... He built what he wanted to build the way he wanted to build it....
.
Old 10-05-2009, 10:56 PM
  #25  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Mr. IROC-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: san jose, ca
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1990 IROC-Z (De-Badged-Carbon Hood)
Engine: Superram 383
Transmission: T-56 w/upgraded Viper Internals
Axle/Gears: 3.73 18x8 and 18x11 irocs
Re: 56 iroc

Lol...all those guys that are pissed he used an IROC....get over it! It's not like our cars are made of gold. That was a very cool project he did.
I bet most of your cars are not even show quality tuners, so there should not be any resentment towards this guy.
Old 07-26-2010, 09:03 PM
  #26  
Junior Member
 
hozona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mesa,AZ
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1956 Belair 2dr Sedan
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt limited slip 3:24
Re: 56 iroc

Originally Posted by Mr. IROC-Z
Lol...all those guys that are pissed he used an IROC....get over it! It's not like our cars are made of gold. That was a very cool project he did.
I bet most of your cars are not even show quality tuners, so there should not be any resentment towards this guy.
First of all I want to thank ALL of the people who support what we did with the iroc/56! Most purists hate what we did to the iroc, but at the same time the tri-five people support it understanding that we all do what we do for a reason, If you ever drove a tri-five you KNOW how the handle???? The two cars combined cost me a LOT less than what a Morrison chassis cost by several thousand dollars. It handles like the iroc with the classy look of the 56. Since the car was built we have installed a larger GM performance cam and upgraded the 700R4 with all new insides and a shift kit. Would I do it this way again? This took a lot longer than what most people want to put in a build, so probably not. I am sorry if my project ruffled some feathers, but hotrodders have been ruffling feathers for years! ;-)

Last edited by hozona; 08-03-2010 at 02:45 PM.
Old 07-26-2010, 09:23 PM
  #27  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
t-top havoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Mid West
Posts: 2,350
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: '87 Camaro
Engine: '92 Carb'd 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: factory stock
Re: 56 iroc

IMO--

The metal work & fab is realy good!!
I hope you sold the parts to help with the project! LOL.

But I agree with an earlier Q- why a subframe?? Wouldn't a Chevelle, Impalla, or Biscayne work better?

So at least you have no bump=steer..?..!! HA HA
Old 07-26-2010, 09:46 PM
  #28  
Member
 
ThreeOhFive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southern Wisconsin.
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: BMW 330i ///M Sport
Engine: M54 DOHC I6
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 56 iroc

I think that car is ugly. Waste of a very nice Iroc. It sounds as if you are dissing the Iroc's styling, the Iroc-z in my eyes is a very classy car, especially if they are in nice shape, like the one destroyed was. Seeing such a nice car, all chopped up, is disheartening. I'm very biast, of course, but you should have found a different car to hack up then a nice and RARE yellow Iroc-z. There are a ton of POS Sport Coupes and Berlinetta's that nobody wants anymore, go hack one of those up next time.

Last edited by ThreeOhFive; 07-26-2010 at 09:51 PM.
Old 07-26-2010, 10:19 PM
  #29  
Junior Member
 
hozona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mesa,AZ
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1956 Belair 2dr Sedan
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt limited slip 3:24
Re: 56 iroc

Originally Posted by t-top havoc
IMO--

The metal work & fab is realy good!!
I hope you sold the parts to help with the project! LOL.

But I agree with an earlier Q- why a subframe?? Wouldn't a Chevelle, Impalla, or Biscayne work better?

So at least you have no bump=steer..?..!! HA HA
Yes I sold the hatch, doors, fenders, hood, the original wiring harness, etc. No subframe here....the whole chassis lengthened to the tri-five wheel base. Again, the entire build is at www.56iroc.com
And no, those frames DON'T handle like an IROC!! If you own one, you know what I'm saying. I had bought a used up Trans-Am to put under it, but on closer inspection that chassis was trash...bad rockers..bent up front suspension and I knew what I had with the iroc so......
Old 07-26-2010, 10:39 PM
  #30  
Member
 
Roc THIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Plainfield IL
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 Yellow Iroc-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: BW 9 bolt
Re: 56 iroc

Mad props to that guy for a hell of a build . I could only imagine how much fun it is to drive . Amazing work . I hope I develop half the fabrication skills that guy has before I croak.

BUT as a so called third gen purist , my heart sank a little when I seen it was an original yellow car only because yellow Rocs have a special spot in my heart (obviously) . I would have done the same thing but used a different donor car.

Color aside , awesome build !

Last edited by Roc THIS; 07-26-2010 at 10:44 PM.
Old 07-26-2010, 10:57 PM
  #31  
Junior Member
 
hozona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mesa,AZ
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1956 Belair 2dr Sedan
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt limited slip 3:24
Re: 56 iroc

Originally Posted by Roc THIS
Mad props to that guy for a hell of a build . I could only imagine how much fun it is to drive . Amazing work . I hope I develop half the fabrication skills that guy has before I croak.

BUT as a so called third gen purist , my heart sank a little when I seen it was an original yellow car only because yellow Rocs have a special spot in my heart (obviously) . I would have done the same thing but used a different donor car.

Color aside , awesome build !
My heart sank when I had to use the iroc after buying a Trans-Am to use as the donor, but alas..... the rockers had been beat up too much and the front suspension was also an issue. Since I already knew what I had with the iroc I bit the bullet and we used it! Thanks for your comments
Old 07-26-2010, 11:02 PM
  #32  
Junior Member
 
hozona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mesa,AZ
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1956 Belair 2dr Sedan
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt limited slip 3:24
Re: 56 iroc

NOT FOR SALE I'm having too much fun driving it!
Old 07-26-2010, 11:03 PM
  #33  
Junior Member
 
hozona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mesa,AZ
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1956 Belair 2dr Sedan
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt limited slip 3:24
Re: 56 iroc

Thanks!
Old 07-26-2010, 11:09 PM
  #34  
Supreme Member

 
itsMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 GTA/93 S13/91 Si
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 56 iroc

Originally Posted by 92RS(real slow)
cool but pointless considering you can buy modified vette frames that are made purposely for the shoeboxes, and would easily ride, and handle better than our thirdgen chassis
Old 07-26-2010, 11:18 PM
  #35  
Junior Member
 
hozona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mesa,AZ
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1956 Belair 2dr Sedan
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt limited slip 3:24
Re: 56 iroc

Originally Posted by ThreeOhFive
I think that car is ugly. Waste of a very nice Iroc. It sounds as if you are dissing the Iroc's styling, the Iroc-z in my eyes is a very classy car, especially if they are in nice shape, like the one destroyed was. Seeing such a nice car, all chopped up, is disheartening. I'm very biast, of course, but you should have found a different car to hack up then a nice and RARE yellow Iroc-z. There are a ton of POS Sport Coupes and Berlinetta's that nobody wants anymore, go hack one of those up next time.
UGLY???? I don't think they are calling IROCs classics yet, but you don't get it do you? I loved my IROC ....the ride, performance I didn't like the way it baked with all that glass here in AZ...I had it, it was a SOLID platform to build on, and it is different! I had bought a Trans-Am, but upon closer inspection the rockers had been damaged and the front suspension had some issues. I KNEW what I had with my Camaro...I had driven it for 5 years and replaced all the brakes, suspension, and short block (upgraded from a 305 to 350) so I am really sorry, but to call my car UGLY???
Old 07-26-2010, 11:27 PM
  #36  
Member
 
Roc THIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Plainfield IL
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 Yellow Iroc-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: BW 9 bolt
Re: 56 iroc

I did disagree with using the yellow car as a donor but there is NO way the 56 is even close to being ugly . Its a very classic / classy looking car to begin with then to back it up with the handling and performance of an Iroc makes it even better .
Old 07-26-2010, 11:33 PM
  #37  
Member

 
ROCFATHER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Los Angeles (310)
Posts: 496
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 IROC-VERT
Engine: TPI 305
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: 2.77
Re: 56 iroc

I love the old "50's" classic cars. It is hard seeing a nice IROC getting chopped up like that, but it was for a good cause. Thats an awesome car!

My dad bought a 1978 Camaro so it could be hacked up for his 1950 panel truck. It turned out really nice in the end. Every now and then I kind of wish I would have stopped him and kept the car. It was really nice too, black in color, 350 motor,,, dayumm! Oh well that was along time ago.
Old 07-27-2010, 12:41 AM
  #38  
Junior Member
 
hozona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mesa,AZ
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1956 Belair 2dr Sedan
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt limited slip 3:24
Re: 56 iroc

Thanks!!!
Old 08-02-2010, 11:28 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
19CAMARO85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1979 Z28 / 1990 RS
Engine: Matching 350 / 305 TBI
Transmission: Built TH350, 3000 Stall / 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: 56 iroc

Damn, they wasted a YELLOW iroc on what ever that would be called now. Give the the IROC. Then again im not a big 50s fan. So how is it titled? Iroc or 56 Bel Air? My dad would love to have a 55-56 chevy. Car looked great in the end. But i would have considered the vette frame idea. Nice fab work and paint.

Last edited by 19CAMARO85; 08-02-2010 at 11:39 PM.
Old 08-03-2010, 01:04 PM
  #40  
Junior Member
 
hozona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mesa,AZ
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1956 Belair 2dr Sedan
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt limited slip 3:24
Re: 56 iroc

Originally Posted by 19CAMARO85
Damn, they wasted a YELLOW iroc on what ever that would be called now. Give the the IROC. Then again im not a big 50s fan. So how is it titled? Iroc or 56 Bel Air? My dad would love to have a 55-56 chevy. Car looked great in the end. But i would have considered the vette frame idea. Nice fab work and paint.
It is titled as a 56....no emission testing and no power robbing catalytic converter and exhuast flows through SLP headers and 3" tube to the back...and again I only had $10,000 in both cars to start ($6500 for the 56 and $3500 in the iroc) which included the complete drive train and suspension; a Morrison frame with 'vett suspension is more than that without the running gear. My budget wouldn't allow me to go with that, so we built it with what we had!

Last edited by hozona; 08-03-2010 at 01:13 PM.
Old 08-03-2010, 02:27 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
19CAMARO85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1979 Z28 / 1990 RS
Engine: Matching 350 / 305 TBI
Transmission: Built TH350, 3000 Stall / 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: 56 iroc

Originally Posted by hozona
It is titled as a 56....no emission testing and no power robbing catalytic converter and exhuast flows through SLP headers and 3" tube to the back...and again I only had $10,000 in both cars to start ($6500 for the 56 and $3500 in the iroc) which included the complete drive train and suspension; a Morrison frame with 'vett suspension is more than that without the running gear. My budget wouldn't allow me to go with that, so we built it with what we had!
Never thought about it that way. Thats a smart plan. With none of that emissions crap and all of the hassles. That thing must be wicked. Sad loss of a yellow IROC-Z but one sweet 56
Old 08-03-2010, 02:43 PM
  #42  
Junior Member
 
hozona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mesa,AZ
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1956 Belair 2dr Sedan
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt limited slip 3:24
Re: 56 iroc

Originally Posted by 19CAMARO85
Never thought about it that way. Thats a smart plan. With none of that emissions crap and all of the hassles. That thing must be wicked. Sad loss of a yellow IROC-Z but one sweet 56
THANKS!
Old 08-03-2010, 02:49 PM
  #43  
Junior Member
 
hozona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mesa,AZ
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1956 Belair 2dr Sedan
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt limited slip 3:24
Re: 56 iroc

Originally Posted by ThreeOhFive
I think that car is ugly. Waste of a very nice Iroc. It sounds as if you are dissing the Iroc's styling, the Iroc-z in my eyes is a very classy car, especially if they are in nice shape, like the one destroyed was. Seeing such a nice car, all chopped up, is disheartening. I'm very biast, of course, but you should have found a different car to hack up then a nice and RARE yellow Iroc-z. There are a ton of POS Sport Coupes and Berlinetta's that nobody wants anymore, go hack one of those up next time.
By seeing your picture, YOU ARE A GOOD JUDGE of UGLY .....it looks back at you in the mirror every morning!
Old 08-03-2010, 03:10 PM
  #44  
Member

 
slowmaro87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: medina oh
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1982 z28
Engine: 400
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:23
Re: 56 iroc

i have to say tri fives have a special place in my heart because thats been my dads dream since i was little but has always been out of his reach ....one day i will buy him a tri five chevy even if it means selling my beloved iroc

that said yes it was a rare yellow 3gen but its reasons like this that our cars are getting more and more rare and the value on our cars is going up along with the appreciation for the nice ones i say NO HARM NO FOAL !!

lol i think you should bring it to thirdgenfest and take away the modified camaro trophy with noooo problem at all ...i would absolutely looove to see that car and it would without a doubt have my vote for modified camaro!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

KEEP ON HOTRODDIN!!!
Old 08-03-2010, 03:20 PM
  #45  
Junior Member
 
hozona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mesa,AZ
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1956 Belair 2dr Sedan
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt limited slip 3:24
Re: 56 iroc

Originally Posted by slowmaro87
i have to say tri fives have a special place in my heart because thats been my dads dream since i was little but has always been out of his reach ....one day i will buy him a tri five chevy even if it means selling my beloved iroc

that said yes it was a rare yellow 3gen but its reasons like this that our cars are getting more and more rare and the value on our cars is going up along with the appreciation for the nice ones i say NO HARM NO FOAL !!

lol i think you should bring it to thirdgenfest and take away the modified camaro trophy with noooo problem at all ...i would absolutely looove to see that car and it would without a doubt have my vote for modified camaro!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

KEEP ON HOTRODDIN!!!
When and where is the thirdgenfest??? My buddy, retired from the GM concept studio and whose idea this was, had two. He has a 53 Ford Sedan Delivery (Courier) and a 1966 Ranchero...BOTH with iroc chassis and running gear. http://www.ronboatmanfabrications.com We'd love to come to the thirdgenfest!
Old 08-03-2010, 03:34 PM
  #46  
Member

 
slowmaro87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: medina oh
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1982 z28
Engine: 400
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:23
Re: 56 iroc

Originally Posted by hozona
When and where is the thirdgenfest??? My buddy, retired from the GM concept studio and whose idea this was, had two. He has a 53 Ford Sedan Delivery (Courier) and a 1966 Ranchero...BOTH with iroc chassis and running gear. http://www.ronboatmanfabrications.com We'd love to come to the thirdgenfest!
its in crete ill
on memorial day weekend..i know its a long drive for you guys lol but man would it be cool ..there was a rear engine exotic car wannabe that was made out of a 1982 firebird it took modified firebird class last year but i think people would go NUTS over seeing your 57 ill find some more info on thirdgenfest and send it to you ...2011 is going to be the 10th anniv and should be fantastic!!!
Old 08-03-2010, 03:39 PM
  #47  
Member

 
slowmaro87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: medina oh
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1982 z28
Engine: 400
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:23
Re: 56 iroc

Originally Posted by hozona
When and where is the thirdgenfest??? My buddy, retired from the GM concept studio and whose idea this was, had two. He has a 53 Ford Sedan Delivery (Courier) and a 1966 Ranchero...BOTH with iroc chassis and running gear. http://www.ronboatmanfabrications.com We'd love to come to the thirdgenfest!
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/thir...formation.html

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/thir...re-thread.html

let me know if these links work for you
Old 08-03-2010, 03:40 PM
  #48  
Member

 
GICATA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Grand Junction, Co
Posts: 318
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '83 WS6 T/A 65,000 miles
Engine: 5.0L vin H stock, 406SBC right now
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Corp. 3.73
Re: 56 iroc

Can you say squeeks and rattles? Why kill an IROC for that?
Old 08-03-2010, 03:47 PM
  #49  
Junior Member
 
hozona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mesa,AZ
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1956 Belair 2dr Sedan
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt limited slip 3:24
Re: 56 iroc

The links worked! If you get more info you can e-mail me at 56iroc@***.net
Geoff
Old 08-03-2010, 03:51 PM
  #50  
Junior Member
 
hozona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mesa,AZ
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1956 Belair 2dr Sedan
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt limited slip 3:24
Re: 56 iroc

Originally Posted by GICATA
Can you say squeeks and rattles? Why kill an IROC for that?
?????Squeeks and rattles???? Not so with the Sedan, the hardtops were a lot noisier....Read the threads BEFORE you criticize.... Go look at the build....IT IS A UNITBODY 56 now.....NO FRAME....Less to squeek and rattle.


Quick Reply: 56 iroc



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 AM.