Auto Detailing and Appearance Share tips and tricks on how to make your Third Gen shine! Get opinions on products or how something tasteful looks on your Chevrolet Camaro or Pontiac Firebird.

22s and up??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 02:17 AM
  #51  
Twin_Turbo's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 51
From: Enschede, Netherlands
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by Manic Z
Man, and here I was struggling on whether to go 17`s or 18`s (i ended up going 17`s).
1983 called, they want their rims back
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 02:22 AM
  #52  
Twin_Turbo's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 51
From: Enschede, Netherlands
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by JayBlack_HFC


^^ 22s with the exact stance I want to get out of mine. That's done right!!!
Both links you posted are awesome!!
still looks like **** and it really shows off those big brakes don't it???

it must be some kind of genetic disorder that people like this...I can not wrap my head around how this in any universe from any point of view is suppoed to be good looking.

that car would have been spot on with 18s on it.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 10:39 AM
  #53  
91 Droptop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: FL
Engine: 355 Super Charged
Transmission: B&M Streetfighter
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 342
Re: 22s and up??

Again I am not a fan of the 4X4 look, but I do like a larger set of rims that are tucked into the wheel wells, example below. I am having a hard time with all the crappy racial and stero type comments being put up here, I think people are entitled to do what they want to their own cars. This has become a mob mentality now (and I know whats comming). I have really thick skin since most cars I have built have been one offs or resto-rods. To me that blue RS looks ugly, but thats as far as I tend to go with the comments, i will not bash someone for being differant. I had an old rust bucket of a car that I could have restored her to her glory but for me there was no fun in that, so thats how my Uncle Tony got me into custom cars and rods. Look at this car 20s and above sit well on a car if done right, and that old rust bucket, some people thought it was ugly but one guy forked ove big dollars to own it; so to each his own I am no one elses judge. The Chevele is rolling on 20 and 22's and that pile of junk became a custom, not sure who owns this IROC but the stance is cool on 20s
Attached Thumbnails 22s and up??-chevele.jpg   22s and up??-blue502_030823_2.jpg  
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 10:43 AM
  #54  
yaj15's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 7
From: Northern California - Bay Area
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: L98 - full intake & exhaust boltons
Transmission: Bowtie 700r4, 2400 rpm stall
Axle/Gears: Borg-Warner 9bolt, 3.45 gears, posi
Re: 22s and up??

No need to start racial issues here. I am black and a mechanical engineer. I'm no expert when it comes to suspensions but I know enought about interia, rolling mass, suspension geometry to know the effects of wagon wheel size wheels on a car.

Lets also not forget that many people think our thirdgens are driven by white trailer trash folks. Check out the link below.

http://forums.speedarena.com/showthr...ro-Love-in-TCL



Originally Posted by Phenom-1
I think I'm gonna cry, I think I've seen that teal Camaro with those big *** wheels on YouTube I think its the same one, I mean there can't be two people on this earth that are equally stupid.... Or can there ?. To the video you go.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LXa-...e_gdata_player


Mostly its the "Black" population that does this to Our cars Note: The guy behind the wheel
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 10:50 AM
  #55  
Manic Z's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 904
Likes: 42
From: Hamilton Ontario Canada
Car: 1985 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350
Transmission: GForce T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73 posi
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by Twin_Turbo
1983 called, they want their rims back
Perhaps. But I'll take 17's or 18's on a thirdgen's body proportions over 19"+ wheels any day of the week.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 10:50 AM
  #56  
91 Droptop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: FL
Engine: 355 Super Charged
Transmission: B&M Streetfighter
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 342
Re: 22s and up??

That was not my intention at all, I was simply trying to point out all the negativity on here toward peoples ideas of what they like. You are right that is another good point, there was that post about a yellow firebird with a custom hood and spoiler, wonder if that guy ever came back to the site
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 03:02 PM
  #57  
Twin_Turbo's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 51
From: Enschede, Netherlands
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by Manic Z
Perhaps. But I'll take 17's or 18's on a thirdgen's body proportions over 19"+ wheels any day of the week.
19s are perfect, 18 is good too....17 too small.

Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 04:09 PM
  #58  
Manic Z's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 904
Likes: 42
From: Hamilton Ontario Canada
Car: 1985 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350
Transmission: GForce T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73 posi
Re: 22s and up??

Honestly, the sidewalls on those wheels are too small. looks like a rubber band
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 04:30 PM
  #59  
Lt1Chris's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 38
Likes: 1
From: memphis
Car: 01 Acura TL
Engine: 3.2 Vtec
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: ?
Re: 22s and up??

got damn why flip out over somebody else car. 15s-17s are way to small 18s-20s perfect IMO, and im pretty sure 24s or 26s are going to make any rotor look small. Let people do wtf they want without being judged
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 04:49 PM
  #60  
puma1552's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 27
From: Minneapolis
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by 91 Droptop
I am having a hard time with all the crappy racial and stero type comments
Not one person in this thread made any racial comments, except you with this post seeming to subconsciously connect the dots while telling us we are the ones making racial comments.

If you drew a parallel between drug dealers, ghetto trash, and race, it was you who made that connection/assumption--not us.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 04:58 PM
  #61  
The Project's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 8
From: West of Toronto
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI / ZZ4 cam
Transmission: Stage 2 700R4, LS1 driveshaft
Axle/Gears: Strange 3.42 w/ Auburn
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by Twin_Turbo
19s are perfect, 18 is good too....17 too small.
Just remember that in Canada, our pot holes are bigger.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 05:44 PM
  #62  
Twin_Turbo's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 51
From: Enschede, Netherlands
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27
Re: 22s and up??

No larger hole full of pot than the Netherlands

We have speed bumps the size of mt everest and dips in the roads that are terrible.

To the guy saying the sidewalls on my tires are too small, they are not rubber bands by any means. These are the most stable tires I have ever had, a lot better than the 17/18 combo on the C5 and the 18/19 on the C6. They are also Y speed rated, how do your 17s or smaller stack up? The car is so much more stable, predictable through hard cornering and also at speed (WOT on the German Autobahn)
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 05:52 PM
  #63  
91 Droptop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: FL
Engine: 355 Super Charged
Transmission: B&M Streetfighter
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 342
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by puma1552
Not one person in this thread made any racial comments, except you with this post seeming to subconsciously connect the dots while telling us we are the ones making racial comments.

If you drew a parallel between drug dealers, ghetto trash, and race, it was you who made that connection/assumption--not us.
Stero-typical remarks are racial that was what was implied, same thing about white trailer trash. I am not going to battle this out, all I wanted was for all the negative remarks to stop. Don't try to pycho analize me on your computer, I nevr drew the line you describe, but just so you know the term White Trash is racial.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 06:09 PM
  #64  
Manic Z's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 904
Likes: 42
From: Hamilton Ontario Canada
Car: 1985 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350
Transmission: GForce T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73 posi
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by Twin_Turbo
No larger hole full of pot than the Netherlands

We have speed bumps the size of mt everest and dips in the roads that are terrible.

To the guy saying the sidewalls on my tires are too small, they are not rubber bands by any means. These are the most stable tires I have ever had, a lot better than the 17/18 combo on the C5 and the 18/19 on the C6. They are also Y speed rated, how do your 17s or smaller stack up? The car is so much more stable, predictable through hard cornering and also at speed (WOT on the German Autobahn)
Mine are rated W (168 mph) which is more than i ever intend to reach. I will never reach those speeds road racing (which is what the car's built for). If you really need Y rated tires, that's cool. All the power to you. You must have a real nice engine to need tires rated for 186 mph.

Don't take my rubber band comment so personally. You started it with the '1983' comment. Tit for tat.

Last edited by Manic Z; Jun 10, 2012 at 06:19 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 06:52 PM
  #65  
micktroup2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: 22s and up??

91 Droptop: nothing said as far as I can see was racial! Certainly as far as I was concerned. Saying cars with giant wheels look like drug dealer cars isn't racist- I don't care if it is Ice-T or Vanilla Ice driving the damn thing! Welded chain steering wheels were typical of the low rider cult of the 60s and 70s, with dorky disproportionately SMALL wheels- emphasis on DISPROPORTIONATE.
I am all for doing what you want to your car- I took cheap Chinese 18 inch IROCS OFF my car when I bought it(still have tem in the garage WITH tires) and put refurbished 15 inch stockers on, because the 18s made it a look a bit like a Hot Wheels car. I may go to 17s, but not yet...
But when someone posts on here and asks 'whatcha think?' don't clutch your pearls and get the vapors when we tell ya WHAT WE THINK!
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 07:13 PM
  #66  
91 Droptop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: FL
Engine: 355 Super Charged
Transmission: B&M Streetfighter
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 342
Re: 22s and up??

Your right I am done take care
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 06:41 AM
  #67  
JayBlack_HFC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 19
Likes: 1
Re: 22s and up??

Well..... Seems like a few people got bent out of shape over this thread.....

I'm not going to lie here. I have seen a few offensive comments that are a little low in regards to race, or better put, culture. But I'm not surprised. I was prepared for that before I even posted it so I'm not bent over shape about it.

But back on topic, someone said earlier that 17s are too small. I agree, unless you're lowering your car. I would go with 19/20s if I were able to but I'm running duals and have maybe 3 inches of clearance so that's out of the question lol.

I'm not sure how much the sidewall is an issue if you know how to drive btw.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 07:32 AM
  #68  
bluegrassz's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 7
From: LONDON, KY
Car: Camaro
Engine: Carbed L98
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: 22s and up??

I'm not a fan of the "Donk" look either, but the stance on this car doesn't look too bad. I agree it could use some more side wall.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7Lul...eature=related
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 10:00 AM
  #69  
Sojer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Car: 1987 IROC-Z red t-top
Engine: Nothing much
Transmission: I wish t56
Axle/Gears: 9bolt 3.27 4sale
Re: 22s and up??

Wrong place to come to. But stock tire hight is 26" so im sure u can fit it under with no tires. They say the rims are worth more than the cars, well are cars arnt worth much. How many LSX cars with 15k under the hood, its a guy that put a ECOtec 4cyl and its ok. 10k paint jobs, 500hp 383 with a t5 on it. You buy a 3rd gen and modify it to your taste, because you are not getting your money back. We put bigger rims on are cars for more tire and bigger brakes. I say go ahead and put big rims on your car, you and your friends are the black sheep.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 02:04 PM
  #70  
87350IROC's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 8
From: Everett, WA
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by Phenom-1
Mostly its the "Black" population that does this to Our cars Note: The guy behind the wheel
Wow, way to keep it classy dude. Has anyone else noticed that aside from the wheels, all the cars shown here are nicer than 95% of the cars on this forum.

I personally think that 19's are the sweet spot for these cars. 18-20 works well. But even 22's can look ok (generally better than 15's) as proven by some of the cars here. They are big brake kit from looking pretty darn good.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 02:10 PM
  #71  
evilemokid94's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,670
Likes: 3
From: Elwood, IN
Car: 1986 camaro Sports Coupe
Engine: L31 350
Transmission: 89 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 gov lock
Re: 22s and up??

i some how knew this would turn into a racist thread....
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 07:13 PM
  #72  
micktroup2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: 22s and up??

Why is it racist to dislike giant wheels on our cars?? Every time I have seen a car done up like this, the owner has frankly been a little 'classless' and often too young to know any better- and they have been any and all races. It would seem to me that if you have an eye for aesthetics and any artistic talent AT ALL, then you know what 'too big' looks like.
But, there has been a market for **** carpet, velvet paintings of Elvis and Chrysler 'K'cars, so I guess there is a market for 22" wheels!
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2012 | 07:21 AM
  #73  
bluegrassz's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 7
From: LONDON, KY
Car: Camaro
Engine: Carbed L98
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: 22s and up??

Guys, Its not a "non-reversible" mod. How many times have you seen members swap wheels from month to month. I would say try it and see if you like it. No larger than the 22" iroc version, but that's my opinion. The 20" version would be the max I would go, just to have some sidewall.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2012 | 11:29 PM
  #74  
DethVenture's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Kennesaw, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Re: 22s and up??

.

Last edited by DethVenture; Jun 14, 2012 at 02:28 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 11:28 AM
  #75  
AmorgetRS's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,646
Likes: 1
From: Near Seattle, WA
Re: 22s and up??

Any chance this thread can go back to be about rims? If not, it'll be closed.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 12:32 PM
  #76  
micktroup2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: 22s and up??

My recommendation: close it. Those of us that like proportional wheels have had our say- those that like to see just how much wheel you can shoehorn under 3rd gens have had THEIR say. No one is convincing anyone to change their mind and it is teetering close to becoming something ugly...
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 02:21 PM
  #77  
DethVenture's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Kennesaw, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by micktroup2
My recommendation: close it. Those of us that like proportional wheels have had our say- those that like to see just how much wheel you can shoehorn under 3rd gens have had THEIR say. No one is convincing anyone to change their mind and it is teetering close to becoming something ugly...
I agree.

Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 02:22 PM
  #78  
JayBlack_HFC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 19
Likes: 1
Re: 22s and up??

Well, I wouldn't mind seeing a few pictures of 3rd gens with nice stance on 22s or higher. The thread should probably head that direction. Ill post a few when I get offf tonight.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 02:25 PM
  #79  
AmorgetRS's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,646
Likes: 1
From: Near Seattle, WA
Re: 22s and up??

Let me rephrase... this thread WILL go back to being about rims.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 02:28 PM
  #80  
keeslinger31's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 614
Likes: 3
From: Missouri
Car: Camaro RS
Engine: obd2 350 lt1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 22s and up??

How about 18's and 19's

I thought it was a good compromise between the hotwheels look and 17s
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 02:32 PM
  #81  
DethVenture's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Kennesaw, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by keeslinger31
How about 18's and 19's

I thought it was a good compromise between the hotwheels look and 17s
Those look perfect.

Anything above 20's seems to be pushing it for the wheel wells on these cars.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 02:35 PM
  #82  
DethVenture's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Kennesaw, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by JayBlack_HFC
Well, I wouldn't mind seeing a few pictures of 3rd gens with nice stance on 22s or higher. The thread should probably head that direction. Ill post a few when I get offf tonight.
This one is about as low as you can fit 22's



Doesn't look half bad, 22's just seems "donk" on these cars.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 02:42 PM
  #83  
keeslinger31's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 614
Likes: 3
From: Missouri
Car: Camaro RS
Engine: obd2 350 lt1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 22s and up??

They just takeover the body lines once your past 20"
And at 22" you are stuck with like a 20 sidewall way to thin for the comfort capabilities of this suspension setup.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 02:48 PM
  #84  
DethVenture's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Kennesaw, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by keeslinger31
They just takeover the body lines once your past 20"
And at 22" you are stuck with like a 20 sidewall way to thin for the comfort capabilities of this suspension setup.
I've never ridden in a car with rims, and I don't think I'd want to.

Now if you want to see 20's pulled off well, theswede did a great job there. 18's and 19's are my personal preference, but he did a good job.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 09:45 PM
  #85  
JayBlack_HFC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 19
Likes: 1
Re: 22s and up??

idk I'm just not a fan of wheel gap so bigger rims always have appealed to me. I've felt the same way about the ISO/hellaflush thing. 16s belong on Hondas.

I saw a mean looking 3rd gen Camaro on my way to work today on 22" irocs. Everytime I see em, it makes me want to go that route. I'm thinking 22" irocs.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 10:21 PM
  #86  
DethVenture's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Kennesaw, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by JayBlack_HFC
idk I'm just not a fan of wheel gap so bigger rims always have appealed to me. I've felt the same way about the ISO/hellaflush thing. 16s belong on Hondas.

I saw a mean looking 3rd gen Camaro on my way to work today on 22" irocs. Everytime I see em, it makes me want to go that route. I'm thinking 22" irocs.
See if you can find us some more pics of what you think looks good.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 10:26 PM
  #87  
tylercamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 8
From: Clinton Township, Michigan
Car: 91 GTA, 73 Z28
Engine: 355, 6.0L
Transmission: TH350, 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.73
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by JayBlack_HFC
Stock doesn't turn heads. And it doesn't win car shows. I want my car to stick out from the norm, as does everyone else with their mods. And for some reason, I haven't ever been a fan of GTA wheels. They look too similar to BBS RS rims that you'd see on a Volks.
beg to differ, what kind of car show are you attending should be the question theres.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 02:16 AM
  #88  
JayBlack_HFC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 19
Likes: 1
Re: 22s and up??

Honestly, I go to the car shows for the big rims and things like that more than anything.

Just a few people in my car club so you get where I'm coming from...:



I don't see anything wrong with big rims. I'd prefer to be able to drive my car more than they do though. I'm trying to find a nice balance between show car and the muscle car look.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 02:23 AM
  #89  
keeslinger31's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 614
Likes: 3
From: Missouri
Car: Camaro RS
Engine: obd2 350 lt1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by JayBlack_HFC
Honestly, I go to the car shows for the big rims and things like that more than anything.

I'm trying to find a nice balance between show car and the muscle car look.
Probably 20s
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 02:23 AM
  #90  
JayBlack_HFC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 19
Likes: 1
Re: 22s and up??

I did a little searching and found a few cars tastefully done, give or take.





I found these on my local craigslist today. Both owned by the same person. Thought that was cool.

And a few that aren't so good.......





26s = definition of OVERKILL

I think it only works with the Irocs. I'm sold on it ^____^

Last edited by JayBlack_HFC; Jun 15, 2012 at 02:40 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 05:55 AM
  #91  
Twin_Turbo's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 51
From: Enschede, Netherlands
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27
Re: 22s and up??

pics full of fail right here... damn!!
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 08:18 AM
  #92  
Drkhrse89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: Shakopee, Mn
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: T5
Re: 22s and up??

I feel like Le Chiffre from Casino Royale, I am weeping blood.

I think 19's strike a fine balance between large rims and good looks. Any more than that and it just doesn't look good. Of course everyone knows, opinions are like @$$holes.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 09:18 AM
  #93  
AmorgetRS's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,646
Likes: 1
From: Near Seattle, WA
Re: 22s and up??

Wow, those all look horrible...
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 09:28 AM
  #94  
tylercamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 8
From: Clinton Township, Michigan
Car: 91 GTA, 73 Z28
Engine: 355, 6.0L
Transmission: TH350, 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.73
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by JayBlack_HFC



off topic but that hockey stripe is horrible
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 09:28 AM
  #95  
DethVenture's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Kennesaw, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by AmorgetRS
Wow, those all look horrible...
Yes the Thunderbird gets me the most.

If you want a good balance between the rims and muscle car look, go 19's. If those are too small, go 20's. If THOSE are too small, well, you're not gonna get the muscle car look.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 12:27 PM
  #96  
cavazos31's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 273
Likes: 1
From: Fox Lake, IL
Car: 1988 camaro sports coupe
Engine: Fast Burn 385
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt w/ 3.27 gears
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by tylercamaro
off topic but that hockey stripe is horrible
goes well with the "IROC-24z" sticker.

If you put on wheels that actually LIFT the car, your wheels are too big. Even though they fill the fender gap, they increase the gap between the rockers and the ground. In every pic posted with 22"+ wheels, the cars sit noticably higher than stock ride height.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 12:41 PM
  #97  
tylercamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 8
From: Clinton Township, Michigan
Car: 91 GTA, 73 Z28
Engine: 355, 6.0L
Transmission: TH350, 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.73
Re: 22s and up??

sits about as high as my truck at stock height
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 06:00 PM
  #98  
DethVenture's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Kennesaw, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Re: 22s and up??

Originally Posted by tylercamaro
sits about as high as my truck at stock height
Yes, but that's a pickup truck. Not an 80's sports car.

Pickups are designed for utility and need ground clearance. Sports cars naturally sit low because they aren't meant to taken off a road.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 06:03 PM
  #99  
tylercamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 8
From: Clinton Township, Michigan
Car: 91 GTA, 73 Z28
Engine: 355, 6.0L
Transmission: TH350, 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.73
Re: 22s and up??

im very aware of what pickups are designed for
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 06:17 PM
  #100  
1SICK90RS's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Andalusia, AL
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 22s and up??

i'd rather see a thirdgen rotting, then sitting on 22's. but like a few others have said, your car, your opinion.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 AM.