22s and up??
#101
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 305 Bone Stock
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi-Trac
Re: 22s and up??
I personally am going with either 19's back 18's front or 20s back 19s front.. Still have'nt decided.
I would never go bigger then 20's, I care for aestetics but going bigger then 20's sacrafices to much performance for my taste. But thats just me.
You probably will be classified as a duma$$/drug-dealer (Synonymous) but who cares what others think as long as your happy.
To the guy that said it's mostly black people that do this to "OUR" cars your ignorant and should jump in front of a bus, your polluting the rest of the population with something we need to get rid of to progress.(racism)
I know thats harsh but so was the comment made by that aforementioned person.
Twin turbo your cars badass, one of my favorites on here
OP,
JUST DO WHAT WILL MAKE YOU HAPPY! FTW!
I would never go bigger then 20's, I care for aestetics but going bigger then 20's sacrafices to much performance for my taste. But thats just me.
You probably will be classified as a duma$$/drug-dealer (Synonymous) but who cares what others think as long as your happy.
To the guy that said it's mostly black people that do this to "OUR" cars your ignorant and should jump in front of a bus, your polluting the rest of the population with something we need to get rid of to progress.(racism)
I know thats harsh but so was the comment made by that aforementioned person.
Twin turbo your cars badass, one of my favorites on here
OP,
JUST DO WHAT WILL MAKE YOU HAPPY! FTW!
#103
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 305 Bone Stock
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi-Trac
#104
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Re: 22s and up??
#106
Re: 22s and up??
ugggghhh just terrible. i hate this fad with big rims and now the worse thing is "stretching" tires. take those 22's and fit a 205, 35,22 on them and put -6 degrees camber on your car...
#108
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 305 Bone Stock
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi-Trac
#109
Re: 22s and up??
(she just happens to be my 95 Volvo that I could probably take half of y'all with when it comes to Auto X)
#110
Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Fox Lake, IL
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1988 camaro sports coupe
Engine: Fast Burn 385
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt w/ 3.27 gears
Re: 22s and up??
there is your biggest disconnect from many on the site. Lots here value function just as much, if not more, that form. There used to be a time when people didn't care how flashy their cars were, so long as they could blow your doors off, stoplight to stoplight.
#111
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 22s and up??
For me, no. For you, if it floats your boat. I'm no one to tell you what to do to your car and only you can be happy with the looks of it. Now, tub the car, tuck them under the rear and go with a smaller but matching wheel up front that allows you to turn and drop the car? That would be sick.
#112
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: 22s and up??
dropping a car with 20s+ is like putting it back to somewhat stock height, or at least trying to. you cant tub the front to tuck them. u have no steering radius, rides like utter crap, looks like crap. why do something thatll not be beneficial to your vehicle is what i dont get. why do you want the extra weight and drag because your car is now gonna be slower than hell. if youve ever watched those videos on youtube with the people trying to turn and the take up every lane possible to do so, how can you find that intriguing?
#113
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Re: 22s and up??
#114
Re: 22s and up??
For me, no. For you, if it floats your boat. I'm no one to tell you what to do to your car and only you can be happy with the looks of it. Now, tub the car, tuck them under the rear and go with a smaller but matching wheel up front that allows you to turn and drop the car? That would be sick.
#115
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chicagoland area
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 Z28
Engine: ZZ3
#116
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: FL
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Engine: 355 Super Charged
Transmission: B&M Streetfighter
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 342
Re: 22s and up??
If done right they do look better, a mini tub and Boze wheels tucked in quite nicely, large doesnt always mean guady, just depends how you set it up. Its not just lowering springs, you can fab the car to take a drop with 2 inch spindles or an air bag system.
#117
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: 22s and up??
the one thing that pops in my mind when i see those cars is hood rich. somebody been slingin dope and stealin' rims. i sometimes have to work in the ghetto areas, and i see it every time im out there. wonder how its possible for a bunch of donks to be parked in a yard at noon on a wednesday with everyone on the porch having a party? come back a week later... same thing.
but its your car, do with it as you wish.
but its your car, do with it as you wish.
#120
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: cemetary in NY
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 z28,01 sonoma,05 envoy
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: 22s and up??
Box chevy caprices, creepin on chrome D's...
just kidding, all joking aside, big rims only look good on trucks and suvs some times, sports cars having big rims defeat the purpose. just my 2cents
i think anything over 19's will look redicolous on any 3rd gen
just kidding, all joking aside, big rims only look good on trucks and suvs some times, sports cars having big rims defeat the purpose. just my 2cents
i think anything over 19's will look redicolous on any 3rd gen
#121
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Girard,IL
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC Z28
Engine: 5.0 L ( 305 C.I.)
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: GU5-3.23 Ratio
Re: 22s and up??
I agree. Also the suspension can't go through a full compression cycle. I can't tell you how many of the old 80's -90's Buicks I have seen with 24'' wheels where I live. On the high way I stay away from them. Many times when the suspension cycles through, the body hits the top of the tire. Thats a blow out and a total loss of control waiting to happen. They also use blocks to lift up the body of the car to fit those huge wheels and tires. That throws all the suspension geometry out of specification.
It just amazes me sometimes that people modify their car and don't understand whats really going on. When you start trying to modify things you have to go to school and do your homework. In many ways you have to become a design engineer.
#122
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Middletown, PA
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/3.73
Re: 22s and up??
To each his own, I guess. I'm not going to slam anyone that turns their vision into a reality. I just hope they get their vision checked before it happens. There seems to be a point where rediculous comes into play. I would be interested in seeing how many clowns get out when it rolls into the circus tent.
#123
Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: 22s and up??
There is a point of diminishing returns, 17-19's really are the best as far as tire variety and working with the lines of the car, especially if it's lowered properly. Anything over 26" in diameter with the tire on it that will have the same stance as a truck, or be lowered to be near stock height from the ground. The average third gen owner will do this with springs, thereby screwing the roll center up so then you have a higher (or the same) center of gravity as stock with a much lower roll center. Combine this with more unsprung weight and less sidewall give (which means you will never hook if you have any power at all and breakaway warning will be nonexistent if you ever plan on taking a corner hard or drifting the car) and you will have one really bad handling car. Not to mention that the car will probably not have a high enough spring rate to stay off the bump stops, and that the larger rotating mass will eat power and gas mileage and will cook the transmission and diffy faster too, especially if the car ISN'T lowered. AND,,, don't expect the car to ride well. You are now riding on rubber bands with heavy wheels that will need a lot of additional weight stuck on to balance them out properly so that the car doesn't vibrate itself apart. If the car has steering or suspension troubles they will be magnified, and parts will wear quicker too.
To each his own, but anyone with a basic technical understanding of how an automobile works should understand that the above situation is pretty terrible- spending one to two grand in REEEIMMZ and tacking on additional money for tires to make a pretty damn well designed car drive like that is ridiculous. It's like lowering and stretching tires... larger wheels are good because if they are designed to be light weight, keep the same aspect ratio (tire diameter) as stock, and run a wider tire, they provide a better selection of performance street tire compounds and they run a smaller sidewall which enhances response and actually improve performance. Lowering a McPherson strut car a little lowers the center of gravity but at a certain point the geometry is so messed up the car is worthless, and stretching tires helps turn in but when you go too far it's unsafe as the beads aren't even seated properly. It's easy to see where these trends start- they actually are based off of function, they just get taken too far for the sake of form and throw function right out the window. Whatever, do your thing and it's just a car, but there are obvious drawbacks and no trend should be taken so far such that safety is a concern. (Though they have been and will be)
To each his own, but anyone with a basic technical understanding of how an automobile works should understand that the above situation is pretty terrible- spending one to two grand in REEEIMMZ and tacking on additional money for tires to make a pretty damn well designed car drive like that is ridiculous. It's like lowering and stretching tires... larger wheels are good because if they are designed to be light weight, keep the same aspect ratio (tire diameter) as stock, and run a wider tire, they provide a better selection of performance street tire compounds and they run a smaller sidewall which enhances response and actually improve performance. Lowering a McPherson strut car a little lowers the center of gravity but at a certain point the geometry is so messed up the car is worthless, and stretching tires helps turn in but when you go too far it's unsafe as the beads aren't even seated properly. It's easy to see where these trends start- they actually are based off of function, they just get taken too far for the sake of form and throw function right out the window. Whatever, do your thing and it's just a car, but there are obvious drawbacks and no trend should be taken so far such that safety is a concern. (Though they have been and will be)
Last edited by midnightfirews6; 06-20-2012 at 12:31 AM.
#124
Re: 22s and up??
You guys are getting repetitive -___- Okay, how about this... Rotational mass? 24" Irocs weigh about the same as my stock tires. No side wall? We aren't on an auto x course so taking a corner at those speeds wont make sense. Distance from the ground? The reason I want to go bigger is so I don't have to worry about my duals hitting the ground. Center of gravity? Again, we aren't taking 90mph corners at VIR. And if your tranny can't pull 40 extra pounds then it was shot from the beginning.
There are positives and negatives to anything you do to your car. And most of y'all are just a little bit biased (a lot). But with that being said, y'all can go ahead and lock or delete this thread. I'm not going to try to change anyone's mind. That'd be beating a dead horse up here. One thing, I hope that everyone will be able to throw out those stereotypes of people with rims on their car. We aren't all drug dealers because our cars are "flashy" ................
There are positives and negatives to anything you do to your car. And most of y'all are just a little bit biased (a lot). But with that being said, y'all can go ahead and lock or delete this thread. I'm not going to try to change anyone's mind. That'd be beating a dead horse up here. One thing, I hope that everyone will be able to throw out those stereotypes of people with rims on their car. We aren't all drug dealers because our cars are "flashy" ................
#125
Supreme Member
iTrader: (25)
Re: 22s and up??
Where is the bulk of the mass in yours 24s compared to oh say.. an 18? A 10 ft rope with a 24" rim on the end weighs about the same too, the rope weighs next to nothing, do you think there is a difference????
Please stop the puting that someone called you a drug dealer, you know it's not true. How sad..
Maybe you should trade for 1 horse power, you can go all out on rims with rubber band tires
Please stop the puting that someone called you a drug dealer, you know it's not true. How sad..
Maybe you should trade for 1 horse power, you can go all out on rims with rubber band tires
#126
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: 22s and up??
your last comment about not wanting your duals to hit was the funniest thing ive probably ever read on this site, that comment is completely absurd. if your worried about them hitting keep it stock height and tuck them nicely, the only reason the wouldnt clear is if you decided to be laze and hang them lower and not tuck them up nicely.
no ones sterotyping so stop bringing that up. and you arent gonna change our minds becuase we all have a certain level of respect for our cars, and 20s+ just sorta takes from all that respect because your hoping something will go bad. its a sports car, its meant to be driving over the speed limit, no jacked up on 4x4 mode thinking your going the speed limit but your speedo is 15mph off
no ones sterotyping so stop bringing that up. and you arent gonna change our minds becuase we all have a certain level of respect for our cars, and 20s+ just sorta takes from all that respect because your hoping something will go bad. its a sports car, its meant to be driving over the speed limit, no jacked up on 4x4 mode thinking your going the speed limit but your speedo is 15mph off
#127
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Re: 22s and up??
Where is the bulk of the mass in yours 24s compared to oh say.. an 18? A 10 ft rope with a 24" rim on the end weighs about the same too, the rope weighs next to nothing, do you think there is a difference????
Please stop the puting that someone called you a drug dealer, you know it's not true. How sad..
Maybe you should trade for 1 horse power, you can go all out on rims with rubber band tires
Please stop the puting that someone called you a drug dealer, you know it's not true. How sad..
Maybe you should trade for 1 horse power, you can go all out on rims with rubber band tires
#128
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Re: 22s and up??
idk I'm just not a fan of wheel gap so bigger rims always have appealed to me. I've felt the same way about the ISO/hellaflush thing. 16s belong on Hondas.
I saw a mean looking 3rd gen Camaro on my way to work today on 22" irocs. Everytime I see em, it makes me want to go that route. I'm thinking 22" irocs.
I saw a mean looking 3rd gen Camaro on my way to work today on 22" irocs. Everytime I see em, it makes me want to go that route. I'm thinking 22" irocs.
These are pony cars. Cheap, light sports cars oriented towards performance. Even purely aesthetic mods that people do are generally borrowing styling cues from race-oriented inspirations. Cowl hoods, larger wheels (17,18,19), spoilers, splitters, diffusers, stripes, hood scoops, wider tires, exhaust tips, etc etc are all borrowed from race cars. And most of the time, that stuff is done without any regard to taste and is no better than the giant wheel crowd, but people can always find the cars that are well done, with taste, and respect that.
The original reason wheels got bigger was to get better performance due to less sidewall flex and to fit larger brake discs.
But then you have groups who want to copy cat what the performance car crowd does, and that's fine, but they dont understand the motivation behind the trends. They just know some of us started putting 17's or 18's... then 19's... So they(not a racial separator) started putting 20's, then 22's, then 26's on their cars to get more attention. Because if bigger is better, more bigger is more better. But that's just not how it works, and that's why most of us stop at 19's, sometimes 20's. I personally wouldn't put anything past an 18 on our cars.
But at this point it has a mind of its own and a crowd of its own. We are not it.
Last edited by InfernalVortex; 06-21-2012 at 01:29 AM.
#132
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
#133
Supreme Member
Re: 22s and up??
I agree. Also the suspension can't go through a full compression cycle. I can't tell you how many of the old 80's -90's Buicks I have seen with 24'' wheels where I live. On the high way I stay away from them. Many times when the suspension cycles through, the body hits the top of the tire. Thats a blow out and a total loss of control waiting to happen. They also use blocks to lift up the body of the car to fit those huge wheels and tires. That throws all the suspension geometry out of specification.
It just amazes me sometimes that people modify their car and don't understand whats really going on. When you start trying to modify things you have to go to school and do your homework. In many ways you have to become a design engineer.
Pssst...
You guys want to see something REALLY depressing?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_kukEt7UGA
This is NOT a reversible mod! He had to cut the wheel wells to make those fit!
The sad part is, if wasn't for the wheels, monstrosity of an air cleaner and the (WTF?) yoshi, the car would be straight legit. I'm not too big on the flamboyant green paint but there's nothing wrong with that.
#134
Supreme Member
iTrader: (25)
Re: 22s and up??
Hey...
Pssst...
You guys want to see something REALLY depressing?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_kukEt7UGA
This is NOT a reversible mod! He had to cut the wheel wells to make those fit!
The sad part is, if wasn't for the wheels, monstrosity of an air cleaner and the (WTF?) yoshi, the car would be straight legit. I'm not too big on the flamboyant green paint but there's nothing wrong with that.
Pssst...
You guys want to see something REALLY depressing?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_kukEt7UGA
This is NOT a reversible mod! He had to cut the wheel wells to make those fit!
The sad part is, if wasn't for the wheels, monstrosity of an air cleaner and the (WTF?) yoshi, the car would be straight legit. I'm not too big on the flamboyant green paint but there's nothing wrong with that.
There's no such thing as factory corvette aluminum open chamber heads, the L98 vette heads, D and non D port are all closed chambers.
love the painted exhaust tips
Last edited by Twin_Turbo; 06-20-2012 at 04:13 PM.
#135
Supreme Member
Re: 22s and up??
You can immediately tell that this is a very intelligent individual who has thoroughly thought through and went over this modification and has all the reasearch data to back it up. This modification significantly imrpvoes the safety, braking and handling of that car and as such the guy should be applauded.
There's no such thing as factory corvette aluminum open chamber heads, the L98 vette heads, D and non D port are all closed chambers.
There's no such thing as factory corvette aluminum open chamber heads, the L98 vette heads, D and non D port are all closed chambers.
Not trying to resurrect the racial issue, but I think the deal with all the "black people" comments comes from the fact that cars with modifications such as "this" are PREDOMINANTLY owned by...well, you know.
Just the same as every 8 if not 9 out of 10 thirdgens that you see with the exception of maybe TGO are run down, ******* trash looking cars and are owned by, you guessed it, white people (Often fitting the ******* profile)!
I don't think It's so much that people are being racial about it, It's simply a stereotype that fits the profile. Now, to be fair I HAVE seen a few white people who drive cars with giant wheels on it, but It's kinda difficult to stumble across that combination.
Then again, what do I know. I probably just made an *** out of myself to all the black people on here without even intending to.
Last edited by FireDemonSiC; 06-20-2012 at 04:19 PM.
#136
Supreme Member
iTrader: (25)
Re: 22s and up??
Where's the good? I don't see it. Looks like a painted green POS with rediculous wheels, shitty "gucci" interior, an old 350 banger with some crappy performance mods and more junk. Must be the rocker rollers or the shift kit. That thing was laying down rubber...insane!!
#137
Supreme Member
Re: 22s and up??
Where's the good? I don't see it. Looks like a painted green POS with rediculous wheels, shitty "gucci" interior, an old 350 banger with some crappy performance mods and more junk. Must be the rocker rollers or the shift kit. That thing was laying down rubber...insane!!
Interior - Not impressed at all. FAIL!
Transmission - Not impressed bragging about just a shift kit. Then again, I have a fully built 700 so pay no mind to me.
Wheels - FAIL
Paint - FAIL in my opinion but paint is just one of those gray "whatever" areas (Although lately oddly colored flamboyant paint jobs have been going hand and hand with ridiculously oversized wheels lately).
Sorry but this car is something straight out of a hotwheels collection with a bunch of silly stickers all over it.
#138
Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: 22s and up??
You guys are getting repetitive -___- Okay, how about this... Rotational mass? 24" Irocs weigh about the same as my stock tires. No side wall? We aren't on an auto x course so taking a corner at those speeds wont make sense. Distance from the ground? The reason I want to go bigger is so I don't have to worry about my duals hitting the ground. Center of gravity? Again, we aren't taking 90mph corners at VIR. And if your tranny can't pull 40 extra pounds then it was shot from the beginning.
There are positives and negatives to anything you do to your car. And most of y'all are just a little bit biased (a lot). But with that being said, y'all can go ahead and lock or delete this thread. I'm not going to try to change anyone's mind. That'd be beating a dead horse up here. One thing, I hope that everyone will be able to throw out those stereotypes of people with rims on their car. We aren't all drug dealers because our cars are "flashy" ................
There are positives and negatives to anything you do to your car. And most of y'all are just a little bit biased (a lot). But with that being said, y'all can go ahead and lock or delete this thread. I'm not going to try to change anyone's mind. That'd be beating a dead horse up here. One thing, I hope that everyone will be able to throw out those stereotypes of people with rims on their car. We aren't all drug dealers because our cars are "flashy" ................
There are no mechanical benefits from running anything larger than a 20", and the case may be made for even 19"s being a little frivolous if they aren't needed to clear big brakes. That said, it's your car. Most performance enthusiasts or auto history/ restoration buffs cringe at big wheels and probably won't have many kind words about them, and the car will not perform, ride or handle better with them at all, but if you like the look or it impresses your friends and that makes you feel good and helps you sleep at night then that's what matters.
#140
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: 22s and up??
#141
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Re: 22s and up??
The floating effect is pretty darn cool, I have to admit. Little big for the wheels, but they're not half bad.
#143
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: FL
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Engine: 355 Super Charged
Transmission: B&M Streetfighter
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 342
Re: 22s and up??
Where is the bulk of the mass in yours 24s compared to oh say.. an 18? A 10 ft rope with a 24" rim on the end weighs about the same too, the rope weighs next to nothing, do you think there is a difference????
Please stop the puting that someone called you a drug dealer, you know it's not true. How sad..
Maybe you should trade for 1 horse power, you can go all out on rims with rubber band tires
Please stop the puting that someone called you a drug dealer, you know it's not true. How sad..
Maybe you should trade for 1 horse power, you can go all out on rims with rubber band tires
#144
Supreme Member
#146
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
#147
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 89 IROC Z28
Engine: 357 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Re: 22s and up??
I would love to get bigger rims for my camaro 17" maybe 18" but no bigger. If I had 17" rims I could clear c4 brakes, but I don't have that kind of money at the moment.
Anything bigger than that looks trashy especially the ones that look like chrome plated doilies.
Anything bigger than that looks trashy especially the ones that look like chrome plated doilies.
#150
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 89 IROC Z28
Engine: 357 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Re: 22s and up??
I did a little searching and found a few cars tastefully done, give or take.
I found these on my local craigslist today. Both owned by the same person. Thought that was cool.
And a few that aren't so good.......
[IMG]http://a2.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/images01
/83/e154b150561056a3148d71d58bdebeec/l.jpg[/IMG]
26s = definition of OVERKILL
I think it only works with the Irocs. I'm sold on it ^____^
I found these on my local craigslist today. Both owned by the same person. Thought that was cool.
And a few that aren't so good.......
[IMG]http://a2.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/images01
/83/e154b150561056a3148d71d58bdebeec/l.jpg[/IMG]
26s = definition of OVERKILL
I think it only works with the Irocs. I'm sold on it ^____^