Body General body information and techniques for restoration, repairs, and modifications.

"Rhino" Truck bed liner in engine compartment?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2003 | 02:07 AM
  #1  
12 Sec GTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
From: orlando
Car: 98 Camaro SS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: M6
"Rhino" Truck bed liner in engine compartment?

I've been hearing some locals talking about spraying the engine compartment with Rhino Liner instead of normal paint..

Since the GTA is going to be getting sprayed soon, I was thinking about this.

This has me thinking about the heat retaining properties of the compound.

Any experiences/thoughts/opinions?
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2003 | 06:56 AM
  #2  
scauffiel's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA, USA
I thought about doing that for underneath the body and some of the suspension, but not for the engine compartment. I s'pose if you could make it smooth instead of that bumpity bumpity texture that it'd be pretty cool - easy to wipe stuff off of anyway. I dunno about any problems with heat you'd have to ask the Rhino guys questions about that.


S.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2003 | 03:14 PM
  #3  
nolanr0413's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 1
From: New York
Car: Trans am
do the engine bay , it would be cool and unique. maybe if you did it others would start to do it. you could start a rhino linings craze.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2003 | 04:10 PM
  #4  
camarokev400's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
From: Norwalk, Ohio
i dont have a rhino liner but i did use ruberized undercoating and then sprayed over it with a high heat engine paint...... came out allright and has held up so far.
Attached Thumbnails "Rhino" Truck bed liner in engine compartment?-mvc-031s.jpg  
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2003 | 04:11 PM
  #5  
89RSOwner's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
While it's true that it would look good and be easy to care for, the down side is that that stuff goes on thick, about 1/4 inch. That would add about, oh 50 pounds at least to the body weight and make the front half of the car heavier to brake. The steering performance would be shot to $hit. Although if you put a thin,thin layer on, it might be lighter but look like A$$.

-David
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2003 | 04:12 PM
  #6  
spartyon's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,308
Likes: 2
From: winthrop harbor, il & plymouth, il
Car: 1986 camaro
Engine: 383 sbc
Transmission: th-400
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 10 bolt/Detroit TrueTrac 4.
i am sure it looks better in person but man something just doesnt look right to me in that pic.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2003 | 04:29 PM
  #7  
PhilM's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: KCMO
Car: Accepting applications...
I saw an entire Jeep coated with the stuff once. the weight is the biggest issue...there is a lot of extra poundage there. i bet there is a lot of work involved, you can't cover every inch of the engine bay. still need bolt holes and stuff...
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2003 | 04:31 PM
  #8  
camarokev400's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
From: Norwalk, Ohio
yeah... its prob just the bright orange motor sitting int he middle of all that flat black... here is another angle with it all put together.
Attached Thumbnails "Rhino" Truck bed liner in engine compartment?-mvc-016s.jpg  
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2003 | 05:21 PM
  #9  
BTS88IROC's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Originally posted by 89RSOwner
While it's true that it would look good and be easy to care for, the down side is that that stuff goes on thick, about 1/4 inch. That would add about, oh 50 pounds at least to the body weight and make the front half of the car heavier to brake. The steering performance would be shot to $hit. Although if you put a thin,thin layer on, it might be lighter but look like A$$.

-David
Seriously people, only 50 more pounds on the front or on the whole car in general isn't going to make much of a difference, its not like your going to ruin your car by adding 50lbs to it. Even if you added 100 pounds of rhino lining, who cares. 100 lbs is approx. 1/10th in the quarter IIRC. Unless its a pure drag, stripped race car I can't see why it would be that bad. I think the extra 100 lbs or so that is put on would far outway the problems of rust that could occur if left alone, I'm mostly talking about the underbody here. I eventually want to coat my underbody, I don't think I'd do it to the engine bay though.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 12:28 AM
  #10  
12 Sec GTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
From: orlando
Car: 98 Camaro SS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: M6
The weight issue completely crosses it off the list.

Thanks


Any other suggestions?
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 07:28 AM
  #11  
FSTFBDY's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 1
From: Boosted Land
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Boosted LSX
Originally posted by 12 Sec GTA
The weight issue completely crosses it off the list.

Thanks

Any other suggestions?
www.por15.com
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 10:15 AM
  #12  
Big Jon's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 111
Likes: 1
From: Richardson, TX
DupliColor also makes a spray in bedliner product. I used it in the inside of a Blazer, and it worked well. It is not near as thick as a Rhino liner, either. It looks a lot like the undercoating, but it dries completely, unlike undercoating. I found the stuff I used at Wal-Mart. Is comes as a roll in, or in spray cans. I would use the spray cans for what you are doing
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 11:45 AM
  #13  
pskel350's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: SW Michigan
your having the same troubles i was

i talked to my painter in detail of what we should do with the engine bay. normally for everyday street cars he will use a spatter paint that will stand up to heat and oil better. he also said that he can normally can get the spatter paint to match the body color pretty well. the spatter paint wont be as shiny or as smooth as regular paint....in the end i decided to go with the regular body paint for my engine bay. Since my car isnt driven in bad weather or anything a bedliner product was way over kill for what i needed.

the new primers that paint shops use are a lot more advanced then they use to be. talk to your painter and see what options you have for primer that will protect against corroision(sp?). I know my painter is going to use one of the best primers on the market for my car to protect the car from rust

hope this helps
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 12:20 PM
  #14  
okfoz's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,298
Likes: 197
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
I would never do it just because of the extra texture would cause it to retain dirt & dust, and would not be albe to wash it off easily without re-painting it.

IMO Undercoating does nothing for me unless its in my wheel wells.

John
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jhawkeye
Engine Swap
5
May 25, 2022 06:33 PM
junkcltr
Tech / General Engine
6
Aug 2, 2019 11:12 PM
BlueIroc-Z
Camaros for Sale
7
Jun 9, 2019 03:22 AM
ezobens
DIY PROM
8
Aug 19, 2015 10:29 PM
bradleydeanuhl
DFI and ECM
4
Aug 12, 2015 11:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 PM.