The Weight Reduction Thread!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
I have always wondered about the exhaust myself. Especially after the wye and after the catalytic converters.
TGO Supporter


Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
I read in this thread maybe that 4thgen power seats are lighter than 3rd gen non-power.
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 2
From: Montreal, Canada
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
I've read that too... Probably by alot too. I just don't know by how much and if you need to use the 3rd gen seat tracks, with the 4th gen seats. I've heard that is the lightest seat combo.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 4
From: Central Texas
Car: GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Aussie 9-bolt/3.27 posi
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
I had cloth 4th gen manual seats in my car. I took them out & put in leather 4th gen power seats. The 4th gen power ones were a LOT heavier than the 4th gen manual seats. I ended up taking the power ones out & putting the manual ones back in.
I have a set of cloth 3rd gen manual sitting here & they felt heavier that the cloth 4th gen set of manual ones. But I never weighed any of them.
My understanding is that the 3rd gen seat tracks are taller than the 4th gen seat tracks & I certainly don't want my seats any taller than they have to be.
But in any case...The power 4th gen seats were heavier (me carrying) than my manual 3rd gen ones.
I have a set of cloth 3rd gen manual sitting here & they felt heavier that the cloth 4th gen set of manual ones. But I never weighed any of them.
My understanding is that the 3rd gen seat tracks are taller than the 4th gen seat tracks & I certainly don't want my seats any taller than they have to be.
But in any case...The power 4th gen seats were heavier (me carrying) than my manual 3rd gen ones.
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 2
From: Montreal, Canada
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
Interesting! In that case, Manual 4th gen seats with 4th gen seat track are probably the best ones to get (if my 200lbs body is lower, that lowers the CG in the car too, albeit only slightly). I'm still curious to know if the 4th gen seat tracks are heavier than the 3rd ones.
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 564
Likes: 11
From: Albuquerque NM
Car: 1985 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 LSX
Transmission: Performabuilt 4L60E
Axle/Gears: Strange 12-bolt 3.73
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
Im not too sure about 4th gen seat weights but I have been checking into summit racing seats. The brackets are 3lbs aluminum, the sliders are 4.5lbs steel, and the seats are 12lbs. Im assuming the cover is maybe a pound max. That 20 lbs a seat with that setup. I will be taking out my seats for the heck of it (because Im not ready to buy the new seats yet) and weigh them. My passenger is manual and my driver is full power. Both cloth. Im sure they are about 40 and 55 lbs respectively.
hellz_wings, I like where your head is man. You and I have the same ambitions, but I'm pretty sure Im going to be the lightest street legal, daily drivable car around here once Im done!
hellz_wings, I like where your head is man. You and I have the same ambitions, but I'm pretty sure Im going to be the lightest street legal, daily drivable car around here once Im done!
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 564
Likes: 11
From: Albuquerque NM
Car: 1985 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 LSX
Transmission: Performabuilt 4L60E
Axle/Gears: Strange 12-bolt 3.73
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
Got another question.... The s-10 steering box weighs 23lbs and the one stock weighs 29lbs. All the s-10 steering boxes I found were like 130 bucks and up! I only found one for 80 bucks. So heres my question, couldnt I just delete the power steering pump and all the hoses connected to it and all the brackets, yet keep my original steering box and just plug the holes where the hoses connected with bolts? (see the attached pic)
I would rather do this if it is possible and save the 80 or 130 bucks and shed that 6lbs somewhere else! So can I do this???
By the way, I spent like two hours with degreaser, a wire brush and a garden hose taking off 26 years of power steering fluid, grease, oil and dirt from these steering components so they look pretty clean in this pic!
I would rather do this if it is possible and save the 80 or 130 bucks and shed that 6lbs somewhere else! So can I do this???
By the way, I spent like two hours with degreaser, a wire brush and a garden hose taking off 26 years of power steering fluid, grease, oil and dirt from these steering components so they look pretty clean in this pic!
Member


Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 402
Likes: 29
From: milwaukee
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70 35 spline wavetrack
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
Yeah, but that just sucks. A power box without power is 10 times harder to turn stopped and at slow speeds than a non power unit.
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 2
From: Montreal, Canada
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
I would do it right and get a non-power box, actually I wouldn't remove power steering at all.. I would hate to drive the car in a low-speed area like a parking lot without PS..
Member


Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 402
Likes: 29
From: milwaukee
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70 35 spline wavetrack
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
It really is not very bad if you have the proper box. I drove my friends 69 camaro with manual steering close to the same time I was running without a power steering pump in my third gen, HUGE difference. The manual steering was very very manageable compared to the non functioning power unit. Not bad at all compared to the functioning power unit.
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 2
From: Montreal, Canada
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
My bad it's been awhile since i've driven a non-power gm steering box.. I'm sure if you do some pushups tho it might help hehe :P
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 564
Likes: 11
From: Albuquerque NM
Car: 1985 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 LSX
Transmission: Performabuilt 4L60E
Axle/Gears: Strange 12-bolt 3.73
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
I love push ups!
Anyways, does anyone know of differences in the boxes? I think I read something somewhere about the 84 and below having 3 bolts up top and not being ideal, and the 85 and above having 4 bolts and it is much better for what we are trying to do here.
Any idea? Also, what would be the highest year to go with?
Anyways, does anyone know of differences in the boxes? I think I read something somewhere about the 84 and below having 3 bolts up top and not being ideal, and the 85 and above having 4 bolts and it is much better for what we are trying to do here.
Any idea? Also, what would be the highest year to go with?
TGO Supporter


Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
I got mine in 2005 for $50 on ebay
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 564
Likes: 11
From: Albuquerque NM
Car: 1985 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 LSX
Transmission: Performabuilt 4L60E
Axle/Gears: Strange 12-bolt 3.73
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
Looks nice! I found some at a junkyard, but gotta go make sure thay are manual, for $40.00 and I get a $13.00 core charge. Then pick the best looking one. Not too bad.
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 564
Likes: 11
From: Albuquerque NM
Car: 1985 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 LSX
Transmission: Performabuilt 4L60E
Axle/Gears: Strange 12-bolt 3.73
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
Hey Blackenedbird, I took out both seats. Heres the numbers... 1985 Z28, driver seat, cloth, power, brackets and slider, 42lbs. Passenger seat, cloth, manual, sliders and brackets, 32lbs. Hope this helps.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 4
From: Central Texas
Car: GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Aussie 9-bolt/3.27 posi
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
Power & manual in the same car? I've never had power seats in a 3rd gen, didn't want it, but assumed both sides were power in a car.
I PM'd a Mod of this Forum & never got any response about putting up the Condensed list. Since I did not start this thread I cannot simply add it to the first post & if I were to add it here it would be buried 9 pages nine deep.
I think I'm just gonna start a new condensed thread referring to this one. But the Excel chart has gotten rather big for just a screen shot to show the whole thing. And I broke it up into sections to make finding items easier, in case anyone wanted to look for say....A seat weight. Just look in the Interior list. I did have to take a few liberties of defining certain parts to go in a list section rather than have 15 different lists of parts. So please....No complaints of "That doesn't fit in....." As I said, I took liberties & put it in the "best" list section that I could.
Anybody want this Excel file emailed directly? I could do that & people could ask for updated versions later whenever they wanted to check for an updated version, just not sure how fast it would really be changed much. I did just get a front pair of 89 GTA/TTA power seats today that I can weigh to add to the list.
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 564
Likes: 11
From: Albuquerque NM
Car: 1985 Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7 LSX
Transmission: Performabuilt 4L60E
Axle/Gears: Strange 12-bolt 3.73
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
ya power and manual. its the same in my 99 tahoe and my 03 aviator. I guess the driver gets to be spoiled!
anyways I would definately start a new thread and just title it something very similar.
I would like that doc emailed to me as well so I will PM you my email address...
thanks again for all the effort!
anyways I would definately start a new thread and just title it something very similar.
I would like that doc emailed to me as well so I will PM you my email address...
thanks again for all the effort!
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 536
Likes: 30
From: Texas
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: 454 RamJet
Transmission: LT1/T56
Axle/Gears: 8.8w/4.10
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
I finally got around to weighing my factory notchback and my original rear glass. The rear glass is 105lbs. and the factory notch w/spoiler is 85lbs.
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 2
From: Montreal, Canada
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 4
From: Central Texas
Car: GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Aussie 9-bolt/3.27 posi
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 6
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Car: 89' IROC-Z
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10-Bolt/2.73
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
WOW! thats huge ! alot of weight that sits high up.. Someone needs to make a street-able carbon fiber or fiberglass factory looking rear hatch.. I know speedglass exists right now but apparently it scratches easily.. although I never drive the thing in the rain... I wonder if it would be worth it 

Last edited by I H8 WWD; Apr 27, 2012 at 04:34 PM. Reason: Grammar
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,211
Likes: 1,135
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
I weighd my 3rdgen power leather seats one day for giggles, 60lbs driver seat 40lbs for pass seat both with tracks. If I remember stock manual cloth is half that total.
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 2
From: Montreal, Canada
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
Define easily. Percy's speedglass is very scratch resistant. I was given a few pieces of their speedglass that was coated, I had to vigorously rub on it with a an SOS/brillo pad to scratch it. Normal cleaning and driving with the glass wouldn't scratch it. I plan to replace my side and hatch windows with speedglass and immediately have it tinted 50% all around. I'm keeping stock glass up front though.
As for scratching, I guess it's not going to happen unless someone scratches it on purpose. Does anyone have pics of speedglass camaros?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 6
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Car: 89' IROC-Z
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10-Bolt/2.73
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
That makes sense though because the glass in the windshield is actually used for structural support as well. I would love to replace the door windows with speedglass.. I need to change them anyway, they are scratched and chipped. Although I am concerned with the glass vibrating or actually sealing up properly with the weatherstripping..
As for scratching, I guess it's not going to happen unless someone scratches it on purpose. Does anyone have pics of speedglass camaros?
As for scratching, I guess it's not going to happen unless someone scratches it on purpose. Does anyone have pics of speedglass camaros?
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 536
Likes: 30
From: Texas
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: 454 RamJet
Transmission: LT1/T56
Axle/Gears: 8.8w/4.10
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
The glass hatch weight was with the factory 3pc spoiler and the inside interior piece. The Notch weight was with the factory pedastal spoiler and 1/4" rear Lexan window installed.
Member

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 219
Likes: 1
From: Maryville, TN
Car: 1987 IROC Z/28
Engine: 5.0L TPI. Custom Tune
Transmission: 5 Speed/ Pro5.0 short /hurst stick
Axle/Gears: 1LE 10 bolt Rear/T2R 3.45 PBR/disc
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
I took out my STOCK 1987 IROC Z28 door bars last night and weighed them on a digital scale. 10.5 pounds EACH
TOTAL OF 21 pounds off the car (pretty high center of gravity too, so it will corner MUCH better)
TOTAL OF 21 pounds off the car (pretty high center of gravity too, so it will corner MUCH better)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 2
From: Montreal, Canada
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
You should replace those doors bars with aluminum ones if you drive it on the street just in case you get hit from the side..
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 6
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Car: 89' IROC-Z
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10-Bolt/2.73
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 2
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 1986 Irocz
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.25:1
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
What exactly are the doors bars. Since I plan to go to a dual door bar setup for my roll cage (Drift Spec) I'd be okay in removing these for street use. But I'm a little fuzzy on what they look like exactly. I haven't been inside my doors so I'm unsure which part these are. Thanks.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: p'cola FL
Car: 88 iroc-z/28
Engine: 408 lsx
Transmission: 5800 stall
Axle/Gears: 4.71
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
to make them similar in strength, they would have to be 3 times the thickness, which defeats the purpose. leave the stock ones in or cut them out. there is no inbetween, IMO.
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 2
From: Montreal, Canada
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
The weight savings may be negligeable, but I do believe that some weight savings could be had. This is probably only for the ultimate weight reduction third gen and as a last resort, but GM used aluminum front crash bumpers, which are 9lbs lighter than the steel versions. Why did they go to steel from aluminum? Probably a strength issue.. Although the steel one doesn't do much of anything anyway, so might as well put a lighter aluminum one just to have something in there. Aluminum will absorb some impact, although much less than steel. If you have a roll cage then a door crash bar is not necessary as the bar from the roll cage will protect the driver anyway.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: p'cola FL
Car: 88 iroc-z/28
Engine: 408 lsx
Transmission: 5800 stall
Axle/Gears: 4.71
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
The weight savings may be negligeable, but I do believe that some weight savings could be had. This is probably only for the ultimate weight reduction third gen and as a last resort, but GM used aluminum front crash bumpers, which are 9lbs lighter than the steel versions. Why did they go to steel from aluminum? Probably a strength issue.. Although the steel one doesn't do much of anything anyway, so might as well put a lighter aluminum one just to have something in there. Aluminum will absorb some impact, although much less than steel. If you have a roll cage then a door crash bar is not necessary as the bar from the roll cage will protect the driver anyway.
the aluminum supports were for the 4cyl cars. most of them also got 4.10's from the factory to help out off the line.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 2
From: Western WA
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: No
Transmission: No
Axle/Gears: No
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
by the time you cut the steel ones out, and figured out how to make brackets to bolt in the aluminum ones (cant weld aluminum to steel) youve wasted a whole weekend and cut up your car to save less than a pound. my car is a drag car and i havent cut my door bars out. a rollcage is primarily designed for rollovers. if you get t boned in a hard accident on the street, or plowed at the track in the door, it could get ugly if you just have a basic rollbar or 10pt cage in the car.
the aluminum supports were for the 4cyl cars. most of them also got 4.10's from the factory to help out off the line.
the aluminum supports were for the 4cyl cars. most of them also got 4.10's from the factory to help out off the line.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 4
From: Central Texas
Car: GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Aussie 9-bolt/3.27 posi
Member

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 219
Likes: 1
From: Maryville, TN
Car: 1987 IROC Z/28
Engine: 5.0L TPI. Custom Tune
Transmission: 5 Speed/ Pro5.0 short /hurst stick
Axle/Gears: 1LE 10 bolt Rear/T2R 3.45 PBR/disc
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
my car has a full roll cage and is a race-only car. If I am hit in the door, i put my backup door on and keep going.
Knock on wood...
Knock on wood...
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
my 87 iroc. weight was in 3204 without me.
full dash no rear carpet. no rear seats.
no heat or a/c box. only accesory is the alt.
electric wp
stock wheels
glass t tops
and this is with the heavy ford 9inch which is approx 100 lbs atleast heavier than a 7.5inch 10 bolt
gigantic truck enegizer battery ( minimum 60lbs)
eletric driver seat. and power everything still all functioning.
after 5 pages i couldnt read anymore.
what can i do to my dash.
engine bay
wheels?
im going to add sub frames and cage so im adding weight as well.
full dash no rear carpet. no rear seats.
no heat or a/c box. only accesory is the alt.
electric wp
stock wheels
glass t tops
and this is with the heavy ford 9inch which is approx 100 lbs atleast heavier than a 7.5inch 10 bolt
gigantic truck enegizer battery ( minimum 60lbs)
eletric driver seat. and power everything still all functioning.
after 5 pages i couldnt read anymore.
what can i do to my dash.
engine bay
wheels?
im going to add sub frames and cage so im adding weight as well.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
From: Cincinatti OH
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
If you can't read four more pages, you probably shouldn't be attempting to cut weight from your car.
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 2
From: Montreal, Canada
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
I purchased a front aluminum crash bar on Ebay and got it for 60$. It's in great shape. There are alot of benefits to having this IMO as the weight sits so far front, which is polar weight that sits outside the wheelbase... I relocated the battery as well but removed the spare and jack so in the rear the weight remained the same or less but in the front there is 40lbs less weight because of this). I can't wait to weigh this thing when it arrives and then weigh the stock steel one to see the difference.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,789
Likes: 94
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
I purchased a front aluminum crash bar on Ebay and got it for 60$. It's in great shape. There are alot of benefits to having this IMO as the weight sits so far front, which is polar weight that sits outside the wheelbase... I relocated the battery as well but removed the spare and jack so in the rear the weight remained the same or less but in the front there is 40lbs less weight because of this). I can't wait to weigh this thing when it arrives and then weigh the stock steel one to see the difference.
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 2
From: Montreal, Canada
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
The rubber part is interchangeable between steel or aluminum, and it's attached by rivets I believe. I think the steel stocker was 21lbs IIRC. I recall someone claiming it was 9 or 10 lbs lighter than the steel one.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 6
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Car: 89' IROC-Z
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10-Bolt/2.73
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
Would be nice if the original post was updated with all the parts that have been added and weighed for a clean, quick and simple way of checking this thread. Maybe section them off as well. Interior, Exterior, Exhaust, Engine, Accessory etc. Would be easier to figure out what needs weighing as well. I heard someone ask about the stock exhaust, I have my full exhaust still minus the air tubes. So manifolds, y-pipe all the way to exhaust tips can be weighed if needed.
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,211
Likes: 1,135
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 2
From: Montreal, Canada
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,211
Likes: 1,135
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
Yup, no "real" support at all. 1" square aluminum tubing with a slight curve bent in it for the lower bumper push pins to attach.
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 62
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Car: 1988 camaro "SS"/ 1991 305/T5
Engine: 383 LT1 in progress/LT1TBI 355 soon
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4 3600 stall/ T5
Axle/Gears: Moser axles, 3.42 Eaton Posi
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
I did basically the same thing to my 88. I replaced both the front AND rear crash bars with aluminum stock from the metal shop here in town. It took almost 65-70lbs off of the car. Although life will suck if I ever get in to an accident lol.
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,211
Likes: 1,135
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 260
Likes: 3
From: West Phoenix, AZ
Car: 01 Z28 / 85 TA
Engine: 346 /355 V8
Transmission: 4L60E /700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73 / 9bolt 3.27
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
Just weighed the OEM rear carpet for a 92 Firebird. 17lbs.
Dimensions are approximately 60" x 44". Ozite Black carpet at 18oz / square yard would weigh about 2.3 lbs.
Dimensions are approximately 60" x 44". Ozite Black carpet at 18oz / square yard would weigh about 2.3 lbs.
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 260
Likes: 3
From: West Phoenix, AZ
Car: 01 Z28 / 85 TA
Engine: 346 /355 V8
Transmission: 4L60E /700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73 / 9bolt 3.27
Re: The Weight Reduction Thread!
Also weighed the following wheel /tire combos (tire size 245/50R16).
88 Formula 16x8 w/ 50% tread Hankook Ventus HRII 50lbs
87 GTA "non-dimpled" 16x8 w/ new General Altimax HP 42lbs
88 Formula 16x8 w/ 50% tread Hankook Ventus HRII 50lbs
87 GTA "non-dimpled" 16x8 w/ new General Altimax HP 42lbs
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 4
From: Central Texas
Car: GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Aussie 9-bolt/3.27 posi
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 6
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Car: 89' IROC-Z
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10-Bolt/2.73






