Yessir!! C4 BRAKE UPGRADE INSTALLED!!!
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
Yessir!! C4 BRAKE UPGRADE INSTALLED!!!
I finally got it done today. Everything went pretty well except for reinstalling the stock springs...those things are a bugger to get back in the pocket, MUCH harder than the Eibachs I did last time. I haven't taken it out for a road test yet but I will tomorrow morning when I take it to get an alignment and I'll give a full report tomorrow night.
First off I must thank all the guys who did a LOT of footwork to get this thing going: Luke (89 Iroc Z), Dan (alloy/machinist), Todd (toddlsf), Colt, Scott, AJ, and others.
Luke, that bracket design was spot on...fits perfectly. Pics to follow and more will be posted on my webpage this weekend.
Ed, stoked....
First off I must thank all the guys who did a LOT of footwork to get this thing going: Luke (89 Iroc Z), Dan (alloy/machinist), Todd (toddlsf), Colt, Scott, AJ, and others.
Luke, that bracket design was spot on...fits perfectly. Pics to follow and more will be posted on my webpage this weekend.
Ed, stoked....
Last edited by ebmiller88; 08-01-2003 at 09:35 AM.
#2
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
Here's a shot of my only concern. I thought spacers may be needed but the caliper carrier does not touch the rim at all, it's a great fit.
Ed
Ed
#3
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
Finished product:
C4 REAR rotor, 3/8" stainless bracket, stainless hardware, braided lines, "new" KYB GR-2 struts...(Thanks Tom K!!). I have no idea what type the pads are, they came with the calipers I bought.
Ed
C4 REAR rotor, 3/8" stainless bracket, stainless hardware, braided lines, "new" KYB GR-2 struts...(Thanks Tom K!!). I have no idea what type the pads are, they came with the calipers I bought.
Ed
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
so how does she stop?
any diff in pedal feel?
what about the front to rear braking porportion? is it far off now?
does the pedal go down alot farther?
any diff in pedal feel?
what about the front to rear braking porportion? is it far off now?
does the pedal go down alot farther?
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Firebird Formula
Engine: For me to know.....
Transmission: and you to find out....
ebmiller88~ Congrates on the install! How hard was it to do? Also...how much $ did that set you back?
Dan
Dan
#7
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Another world, some other time
Posts: 3,838
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 86 LG4 & 92 TBI Firebird
Engine: The Mighty 305!
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by ebmiller88
I have no idea what type the pads are, they came with the calipers I bought.
I have no idea what type the pads are, they came with the calipers I bought.
Good Job
Trending Topics
#8
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Bloomington, MN
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 Z28
Engine: 396ci LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen rear with 4.10s/Eaton posi
So why the uproar over the C5 stuff that you directed towards me, if you had no intentions of doing such a swap?
Not only that, but where'd that thread go? I post pictures and it disappears. Hmmm...
Congrats on upgrading though...you'll like the C4 stuff a lot more than stock, no doubt.
Eric
Not only that, but where'd that thread go? I post pictures and it disappears. Hmmm...
Congrats on upgrading though...you'll like the C4 stuff a lot more than stock, no doubt.
Eric
#9
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
congrats ed
next weekend i am doing the c4 brakes, and few other upgrades i am actualy going to install my HMS mounts too, so it looks like you will be the very last person to install 'em
next weekend i am doing the c4 brakes, and few other upgrades i am actualy going to install my HMS mounts too, so it looks like you will be the very last person to install 'em
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 87 IROC-Z28
Engine: 305 TPI-New 355 on the engine stand
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Eaton posi-Soon a 9" Ford!
Originally posted by LT1Powered85Z
Not only that, but where'd that thread go? I post pictures and it disappears. Hmmm...
Not only that, but where'd that thread go? I post pictures and it disappears. Hmmm...
Last edited by alloy; 08-01-2003 at 02:03 AM.
#11
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
1. So how does she stop?
2. any diff in pedal feel?
3. what about the front to rear braking porportion? is it far off now?
4. does the pedal go down alot farther?
2. any diff in pedal feel?
3. what about the front to rear braking porportion? is it far off now?
4. does the pedal go down alot farther?
1. She stops great, much more responsive than the iron caliper system. I haven't done a panic stop yet but I know it will perform well.
2. Much firmer pedal feel. I don't know how to explain it, but it's different. I already had braided lines on it so that's not the factor...it's just firmer.
3. I don't know how to measure that without throwing it on a machine or doing a panic stop to see how the back brakes will do. Hopefully I'll learn more about the front/rear proportions and post more later.
4. No. It feels like it stops further up actually, but it's probably a combo of firmer feel and new calipers
Ed
#12
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
Congrates on the install! How hard was it to do? Also...how much $ did that set you back?
Here's my price breakdown, give or take $10 or so:
$150 shipped: C4 front AND rear rotors, front loaded calipers, caliper pins, caliper carriers, and carrier bolts (www.corvetteforum.com)
$50: inner and outer bearings and seals, Timken and Federal Mogul
$5: New brake line crush washers and new cotter pins (Auto Zone)
$15: Bolts at Lowe's, M12x1.75 (4) and M14x2.0 (4)
$25: ARP studs, P/N ARP-100-7708 (2 sets, 10 total)
$7: New GM banjo bolts for calipers, same as 1LE, P/N 10286122 (2)
FREE... I.E. I did them myself: spindles, hubs, and adapter plates
TOTAL: $252
Ed
#13
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
So why the uproar over the C5 stuff that you directed towards me, if you had no intentions of doing such a swap?
I do recommend the C5 or LS1 brakes for a great upgrade, they look swesome especially if you go with the red Z06 C5 calipers. But, as you can see, for the same brakes as a "Baer" style upgrade for MUCH less jack, go with the C4 upgrade.
FYI:
A Baer "Sport" system, using 12" x 1.1" rotors is $965 with a $150 core charge for your spindles so they can mod them. I spent $252...I can make 3.8 "Baer" kits for that amount money.
Ed
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Congrats man!!! I will be doing the same thing over the winter after the motor and tranny are done being rebuilt..I'll have the speed after that..I'll then need to stop
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 87 IROC-Z28
Engine: 305 TPI-New 355 on the engine stand
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Eaton posi-Soon a 9" Ford!
Originally posted by ebmiller88
Just got back from the alignment. What a difference:
2. Much firmer pedal feel. I don't know how to explain it, but it's different. I already had braided lines on it so that's not the factor...it's just firmer.
Ed
Just got back from the alignment. What a difference:
2. Much firmer pedal feel. I don't know how to explain it, but it's different. I already had braided lines on it so that's not the factor...it's just firmer.
Ed
#17
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Bloomington, MN
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 Z28
Engine: 396ci LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen rear with 4.10s/Eaton posi
Originally posted by ebmiller88
I hope you don't feel as if I steered you wrong or something. At first, I was VERY interested in the C5 upgrade but that almost definitely involves going to 17" wheels which I did not want to do at this time. I still think that's the way to go if you're already running 17"s or plan on going to 4th gen wheels. That's my first reason. Second, I already had the parts purchased and didn't want to go through having to sell mine and then turn around and buy more stuff, the hassle wasn't worth it.
I do recommend the C5 or LS1 brakes for a great upgrade, they look swesome especially if you go with the red Z06 C5 calipers. But, as you can see, for the same brakes as a "Baer" style upgrade for MUCH less jack, go with the C4 upgrade.
FYI:
A Baer "Sport" system, using 12" x 1.1" rotors is $965 with a $150 core charge for your spindles so they can mod them. I spent $252...I can make 3.8 "Baer" kits for that amount money.
Ed
I hope you don't feel as if I steered you wrong or something. At first, I was VERY interested in the C5 upgrade but that almost definitely involves going to 17" wheels which I did not want to do at this time. I still think that's the way to go if you're already running 17"s or plan on going to 4th gen wheels. That's my first reason. Second, I already had the parts purchased and didn't want to go through having to sell mine and then turn around and buy more stuff, the hassle wasn't worth it.
I do recommend the C5 or LS1 brakes for a great upgrade, they look swesome especially if you go with the red Z06 C5 calipers. But, as you can see, for the same brakes as a "Baer" style upgrade for MUCH less jack, go with the C4 upgrade.
FYI:
A Baer "Sport" system, using 12" x 1.1" rotors is $965 with a $150 core charge for your spindles so they can mod them. I spent $252...I can make 3.8 "Baer" kits for that amount money.
Ed
Remember me?
I posted pictures and the like and backed up everything I initially stated, and the thread magically disappeared.
You didn't steer me in any direction, well maybe a negative one in regards to how I think of you...but that's a different story.
Eric
#18
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: west coast
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey EB
where do you get the brakets? also do you do the same spindle mod as the 1LE?
Looks good, and just to confirm, will the C4 brakes fit under the GTA wheels, In additon the rotors look like stock 1LE are they?
Looks good, and just to confirm, will the C4 brakes fit under the GTA wheels, In additon the rotors look like stock 1LE are they?
#19
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 87 IROC-Z28
Engine: 305 TPI-New 355 on the engine stand
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Eaton posi-Soon a 9" Ford!
Re: Hey EB
Originally posted by SLP_GTA
where do you get the brakets? also do you do the same spindle mod as the 1LE?
Looks good, and just to confirm, will the C4 brakes fit under the GTA wheels, In additon the rotors look like stock 1LE are they?
where do you get the brakets? also do you do the same spindle mod as the 1LE?
Looks good, and just to confirm, will the C4 brakes fit under the GTA wheels, In additon the rotors look like stock 1LE are they?
Additionally, if you read the 1LE alternative/C4 thread, you will see that I tried a 1990 15" 5 spoke stock wheel over my C4 brakes and it cleared easily. There should be no reason the C4 brakes won't clear a GTA wheel.
#20
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
Remember me?
I'm usually a laid back, relaxed, easy going guy but you touched a nerve there. No hard feelings, and if you would, could you post another pic of your C5s?
Now, SLP_GTA:
As Alloy noted, reread what I posted and also check the "1LE alternative" thread. I listed what parts I used there also. I made the brackets "by hand", drilling the holes on a drill press and cutting the brackets on a band saw. The spindle mod is the same as the 1LE mod except you also cut off the lower part of the steering stop that sticks down from the spindle. The rotors are REAR C4 'Vette rotors, not the 1LE rotors. Here's a pic:
Ed
Last edited by ebmiller88; 08-04-2003 at 11:34 AM.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Firebird Formula
Engine: For me to know.....
Transmission: and you to find out....
I hate to ask but now that one brake thread has "disappeared" how does this C4 setup compare to the LS1/LE1/C5 setup? I am very interested in doing an upgraded brake system but Im still kinda bewildered by what setup I should go with...
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Firebird Formula
Engine: For me to know.....
Transmission: and you to find out....
Originally posted by ebmiller88
Finished product:
C4 REAR rotor, 3/8" stainless bracket, stainless hardware, braided lines, "new" KYB GR-2 struts...(Thanks Tom K!!). I have no idea what type the pads are, they came with the calipers I bought.
Ed
Finished product:
C4 REAR rotor, 3/8" stainless bracket, stainless hardware, braided lines, "new" KYB GR-2 struts...(Thanks Tom K!!). I have no idea what type the pads are, they came with the calipers I bought.
Ed
Dan
#23
UNBELIEVEABLE! C4 brakes on a Thirdgen. You guys are incredible, I applaude everyone involved in making this happen. You guys deserve a ton of credit!
Last edited by Project:IROC-Z; 08-02-2003 at 11:15 PM.
#24
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
now correct me if Im wrong but Eb but isnt that a picture of the front rotor???? can you post pics of the rear??? Im very interested in the parking brake set-up.
My decision to go with the C4s was wheel size...I wanted to keep my factory 16" wheels. If you have 17" wheels, go with the C5/LS1 front brakes.
Project: Contact Alloy off forum for the brackets, he may have a set. I don't have any 3/8" brackets ready at the moment.
(No advertising intended...)
Ed
#25
A couple of questions if I may. One the wheel studs you are using look very long do you think they might interfere with my 89 lug nut covers (you know the black plastic things that cover the lug nuts). Two I did not want to use braided brake lines so I wondered if thirdgen or C4 rubber brake lines would be an option(just want to keep a factory apperance). Thanx
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Firebird Formula
Engine: For me to know.....
Transmission: and you to find out....
Project:IROC-Z~ I dont think anyone can/could see what kinda brake lines you have when the wheels are on and the car is on the ground....
Dan
Dan
#27
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 87 IROC-Z28
Engine: 305 TPI-New 355 on the engine stand
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Eaton posi-Soon a 9" Ford!
Originally posted by Project:IROC-Z
A couple of questions if I may. One the wheel studs you are using look very long do you think they might interfere with my 89 lug nut covers (you know the black plastic things that cover the lug nuts). Two I did not want to use braided brake lines so I wondered if thirdgen or C4 rubber brake lines would be an option(just want to keep a factory apperance). Thanx
A couple of questions if I may. One the wheel studs you are using look very long do you think they might interfere with my 89 lug nut covers (you know the black plastic things that cover the lug nuts). Two I did not want to use braided brake lines so I wondered if thirdgen or C4 rubber brake lines would be an option(just want to keep a factory apperance). Thanx
You can use your standard brake lines with the C4 swap. But considering how much better and safer a braided line is over the 10 year old stock stuff, I'd forget about stock apprearences and go with what's the safest.
Read this thread about C4 brakes and it will answer all your questions on brake lines, hubs, rotors, etc.
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=142115
#30
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
Project, yes the ARP studs of that length will interfere with the black caps. I have the '91 16" alloys with the center caps so it's not a problem for me...no caps. Like Dan said, you'll have to trim the stud a little. Here's another thread where Luke was discussing stud sizes and there are more options out there besides the longer ARP studs:
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...ighlight=studs
Ed
PS- Factory rubber lines will work fine.
PROJECT: Look at the picture in the last post in the above thread. That's what the Motormite studs look like installed and still allow the caps to fit, I'd say go with those.
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...ighlight=studs
Ed
PS- Factory rubber lines will work fine.
PROJECT: Look at the picture in the last post in the above thread. That's what the Motormite studs look like installed and still allow the caps to fit, I'd say go with those.
Last edited by ebmiller88; 08-02-2003 at 06:25 PM.
#31
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
Parrydise, yep, I did the full 1LE upgrade on my Iroc last year about this time. This was easier since I didn't have to replace the master or prop valve on this car, and it looks like I won't have to. I drove the car about 80 miles yesterday and the brakes feel great, real good bite slowing down. I have yet to check the parts manual to see which prop valve is used for each system (disc/disc and disc/drum), but I will check and post what I find. Hopefully, I won't "have" to change it out. I already know the master is good...they are all the same '90 and up. I will be installing a 3.42 PBR disc rear sometime in the future and I may have to swap it then.
Ed
Ed
#32
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Costal Alabama
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350, ZZ4 equivalent
Transmission: Pro-Built Road Race 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Dana 44
Good job Ed,
Great idea of using C4 rear rotors, that sure solved the problem of bracket thickness. For everyone that is wondering about the bracket. The bracket with dimensions I posted in the 1LE alternative thread will only work with C4 rear rotors. I had alloy machine me a test bracket from my CAD file and it fits perfectly. For those of you who want to use C4 front rotors you need to use alloy’s bracket design.
Great idea of using C4 rear rotors, that sure solved the problem of bracket thickness. For everyone that is wondering about the bracket. The bracket with dimensions I posted in the 1LE alternative thread will only work with C4 rear rotors. I had alloy machine me a test bracket from my CAD file and it fits perfectly. For those of you who want to use C4 front rotors you need to use alloy’s bracket design.
Last edited by 89 Iroc Z; 08-02-2003 at 08:02 PM.
#34
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 87 IROC-Z28
Engine: 305 TPI-New 355 on the engine stand
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Eaton posi-Soon a 9" Ford!
Originally posted by robertg
which rotor setup is better, the rear? or the front?
opinions?
which rotor setup is better, the rear? or the front?
opinions?
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=142115
#35
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
I think people are getting confused here....
Luke, I don't follow you. Your bracket design is perfect for BOTH the front and rear rotor, it works with both rotors. The ONLY difference to consider with the front and rear rotors would be bracket thickness. The rotors are the same width (12") and brake surface thickness (.80 or so) so the only difference is the hat offset. The pic is below. If you use the "shorter" rear rotor, you can use a 3/8" bracket. If you use the "taller" front rotor, you have to either mill a little off the caliper carrier bolt bosses or mill a bit off the bracket. I made 1/4" thick brackets to use with the front rotor and they are just a bit too thick as-is, so I may try to shave a bit off the carrier bolt bosses and see what fits.
Robert, I see no difference in the two except for bracket thickness. I've tried both. IMO, 1/4" thick brackets are plenty thick, but the 3/8" bracket and the rear rotor simply bolt on without machining, and therefore it's easier.
Ed
Luke, I don't follow you. Your bracket design is perfect for BOTH the front and rear rotor, it works with both rotors. The ONLY difference to consider with the front and rear rotors would be bracket thickness. The rotors are the same width (12") and brake surface thickness (.80 or so) so the only difference is the hat offset. The pic is below. If you use the "shorter" rear rotor, you can use a 3/8" bracket. If you use the "taller" front rotor, you have to either mill a little off the caliper carrier bolt bosses or mill a bit off the bracket. I made 1/4" thick brackets to use with the front rotor and they are just a bit too thick as-is, so I may try to shave a bit off the carrier bolt bosses and see what fits.
Robert, I see no difference in the two except for bracket thickness. I've tried both. IMO, 1/4" thick brackets are plenty thick, but the 3/8" bracket and the rear rotor simply bolt on without machining, and therefore it's easier.
Ed
Last edited by ebmiller88; 08-03-2003 at 03:48 AM.
#36
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
Someone last week asked how long it takes to do the mods to the rotors, spindles and such. Since I have installed my C4 kit, I took the time tonight to to the mods to the parts I just took off. I did the spindles and made the rotors into hubs in a bit over 4 hours with a lathe, drill press, bandsaw, and DeWalt drill. Here's what I learned: Dan (Alloy) showed us how to drill the disc ring off, chuck it up and turn it down into a hub here:
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...0&pagenumber=2
What I learned tonight saved me a LOT of time, at least all the time spent drilling holes. Here's what you do: chuck the whole thing up in a lathe, disc surface to the left/motor side and studs sticking out to the right, and make the "ring" cut pictured below your FIRST cut. The whole disc ring will come right off and you won't have to drill all those blasted holes. Then just turn the hub down to 5.8-5.9" and you're done. Sorry I didn't get a pic (no camera) but the next time I do it I'll get one.
HTH...Ed
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...0&pagenumber=2
What I learned tonight saved me a LOT of time, at least all the time spent drilling holes. Here's what you do: chuck the whole thing up in a lathe, disc surface to the left/motor side and studs sticking out to the right, and make the "ring" cut pictured below your FIRST cut. The whole disc ring will come right off and you won't have to drill all those blasted holes. Then just turn the hub down to 5.8-5.9" and you're done. Sorry I didn't get a pic (no camera) but the next time I do it I'll get one.
HTH...Ed
Last edited by ebmiller88; 08-03-2003 at 03:42 AM.
#37
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
OMG thanks... thats fuggin brillant...
i should have thought of that
**puts drill away**
well, i know what i will be doing during lunch tomarrow.....
i should have thought of that
**puts drill away**
well, i know what i will be doing during lunch tomarrow.....
#38
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 87 IROC-Z28
Engine: 305 TPI-New 355 on the engine stand
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Eaton posi-Soon a 9" Ford!
I realized that I didn't need to do the chain drilling after my first rotor I did that way. But, and this is a big "but", unless you have a carbide insert parting tool to go in and drop the rotor section off, the drilling is the best way for a "back yard wanna be" machinist to get rid of the rotor section.
If you do have a carbide parting tool holder, then you have to be real carefull when that rotor section comes loose. It can get real ugly real fast. That spinning rotor has a lot of energy stored in it and when it comes loose can do some damage if you aren't carefull.
So just be carefull when doing this, OK?
If you do have a carbide parting tool holder, then you have to be real carefull when that rotor section comes loose. It can get real ugly real fast. That spinning rotor has a lot of energy stored in it and when it comes loose can do some damage if you aren't carefull.
So just be carefull when doing this, OK?
#39
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by alloy
I realized that I didn't need to do the chain drilling after my first rotor I did that way. But, and this is a big "but", unless you have a carbide insert parting tool to go in and drop the rotor section off, the drilling is the best way for a "back yard wanna be" machinist to get rid of the rotor section.
If you do have a carbide parting tool holder, then you have to be real carefull when that rotor section comes loose. It can get real ugly real fast. That spinning rotor has a lot of energy stored in it and when it comes loose can do some damage if you aren't carefull.
So just be carefull when doing this, OK?
I realized that I didn't need to do the chain drilling after my first rotor I did that way. But, and this is a big "but", unless you have a carbide insert parting tool to go in and drop the rotor section off, the drilling is the best way for a "back yard wanna be" machinist to get rid of the rotor section.
If you do have a carbide parting tool holder, then you have to be real carefull when that rotor section comes loose. It can get real ugly real fast. That spinning rotor has a lot of energy stored in it and when it comes loose can do some damage if you aren't carefull.
So just be carefull when doing this, OK?
mmk, so when the rotor part dropps off on the lathe, what do i have to do so it catches and doesnt fall and fly around everywhere???
or should i just do as planned and drop the rotor part, then take the ring off?
#40
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 87 IROC-Z28
Engine: 305 TPI-New 355 on the engine stand
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Eaton posi-Soon a 9" Ford!
The rotor is somewhat contained by the live center i nthe lathe chuck, and the tailstock. It shouldn't come out of the lathe completely, but can and will rattle around when it drops off. I broke a parting tool blade on one rotor when the ring came off and hit the tool holder support blade. $26 down the drain on that one. But luckily I have a modular parting tool holder, so I only lost the $26 support blade, and not the $145 holder. So basically You just drop the ring off and hope it doesn't get you or hurt the lathe.
For a novice, I still beleive it's best (and safer) to drop the rotor off with chain drilling. If you have a drill press, you are only talking 1/2 hour for both rotors to do this.
Either way, be carefull.
For a novice, I still beleive it's best (and safer) to drop the rotor off with chain drilling. If you have a drill press, you are only talking 1/2 hour for both rotors to do this.
Either way, be carefull.
#41
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by alloy
The rotor is somewhat contained by the live center i nthe lathe chuck, and the tailstock. It shouldn't come out of the lathe completely, but can and will rattle around when it drops off. I broke a parting tool blade on one rotor when the ring came off and hit the tool holder support blade. $26 down the drain on that one. But luckily I have a modular parting tool holder, so I only lost the $26 support blade, and not the $145 holder. So basically You just drop the ring off and hope it doesn't get you or hurt the lathe.
For a novice, I still beleive it's best (and safer) to drop the rotor off with chain drilling. If you have a drill press, you are only talking 1/2 hour for both rotors to do this.
Either way, be carefull.
The rotor is somewhat contained by the live center i nthe lathe chuck, and the tailstock. It shouldn't come out of the lathe completely, but can and will rattle around when it drops off. I broke a parting tool blade on one rotor when the ring came off and hit the tool holder support blade. $26 down the drain on that one. But luckily I have a modular parting tool holder, so I only lost the $26 support blade, and not the $145 holder. So basically You just drop the ring off and hope it doesn't get you or hurt the lathe.
For a novice, I still beleive it's best (and safer) to drop the rotor off with chain drilling. If you have a drill press, you are only talking 1/2 hour for both rotors to do this.
Either way, be carefull.
#42
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Bloomington, MN
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 Z28
Engine: 396ci LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen rear with 4.10s/Eaton posi
Originally posted by ebmiller88
Yeah, I went off on you, but that's how I felt. I ranted because you chose not to give input where (I felt) it could have been used well by the rest of us. And I stated the reasons I went with the C4 brakes.
I'm usually a laid back, relaxed, easy going guy but you touched a nerve there. No hard feelings, and if you would, could you post another pic of your C5s?
Yeah, I went off on you, but that's how I felt. I ranted because you chose not to give input where (I felt) it could have been used well by the rest of us. And I stated the reasons I went with the C4 brakes.
I'm usually a laid back, relaxed, easy going guy but you touched a nerve there. No hard feelings, and if you would, could you post another pic of your C5s?
I rarely check this board (have been more frequently as of this last week and due to being attacked) and I had never seen the thread in question before posting saying I had already been there done that. So when people started assuming that I had been watching it unfold and was "withholding" information proved that people are lame. First of all I'm not required to share ANY information that I have, anything people share is by their choice, so to tell me I was in the "wrong" is BS.
Anyway...
Here's what my set-up looks like. These was taken 1 week ago today, at my club's "Performance Driving Experience" hence the different wheels and the slicks.
Pic 1. For reference...
Pic 2. Disregard the chips in the paint...that's the result of running slicks that are too wide. I had the 18s in the rear and the 17s up front originally and the 17s are over an inch taller and they caught the fender and messed it up. Oh well...gotta get it fixed.
So yeah...there are my C5 brakes. Can't call BS now.
Eric
#43
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
Thanks Eric, nice ride you have there.
Public apology: I apologize for going off on you on the boards.
Ed
Public apology: I apologize for going off on you on the boards.
Ed
#44
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Bloomington, MN
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 Z28
Engine: 396ci LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen rear with 4.10s/Eaton posi
Originally posted by ebmiller88
Thanks Eric, nice ride you have there.
Public apology: I apologize for going off on you on the boards.
Ed
Thanks Eric, nice ride you have there.
Public apology: I apologize for going off on you on the boards.
Ed
Eric
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Firebird Formula
Engine: For me to know.....
Transmission: and you to find out....
so when does this thread and the other thread (LS1 brakes) become stickeys (again)????
Dan
Dan
#46
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
Hopefully a mod will hook us up again...
Here's the pic I forgot to attach to my post yesterday. The "taller" front rotor is on the left, the "shorter" rear rotor on the right. The difference is a hair more than 1/8" which is why the 1/4" bracket is still just a tick too thick with the caliper carriers not shaved down a bit..
Ed
Here's the pic I forgot to attach to my post yesterday. The "taller" front rotor is on the left, the "shorter" rear rotor on the right. The difference is a hair more than 1/8" which is why the 1/4" bracket is still just a tick too thick with the caliper carriers not shaved down a bit..
Ed
#47
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ocean, NJ
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: Check The Sig
Ed, very nice my friend, very nice!!! Never thought about putting vette brakes on... I plan on doing the Baer kit in a few years and maybe fabbing up a 4 piston/2 piston set up... we will see. Right now, trying to pour magic into the 305... ill worry about stopping later hehehe.
#48
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Monroe,NC
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
15 Posts
Car: 90 Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt/3.27
Looks good Ed. Appears to be a good alternative to the 1LE setup. A couple of quick questions: First,how does far does the rotor's additional thickness push out the front wheels? Also,is that why you put the stock springs back in instead of the Eibachs you had installed previously-for tire clearance?
#49
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
The wheels are only pushed out the thickness of the rotor hat, about 3/16" or so...I havent' taken the rotor hat thickness measurement but I will tomorrow. You can't tell at all by looking at the car and there are no rubbing issues with the wheelwells or GFX.
I kept the stock springs since the RS is my "driver" car and I really don't have that many mods to it...it's only a 305 and I want to keep it close to stock as possible so it's easier to sell when the time comes. Also, the car sits just about as low as my Iroc does with lowering springs so I didn't want any more drop. With the new KYBs I got from Tom K. and all new bushings up front, it rides beautifully.
Ed
I kept the stock springs since the RS is my "driver" car and I really don't have that many mods to it...it's only a 305 and I want to keep it close to stock as possible so it's easier to sell when the time comes. Also, the car sits just about as low as my Iroc does with lowering springs so I didn't want any more drop. With the new KYBs I got from Tom K. and all new bushings up front, it rides beautifully.
Ed