Car Audio Car audio related questions and helpful hints for building the best sound system for your car or getting the most out of what you have.

Ported box? or unported? help.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 25, 2003 | 06:27 PM
  #1  
84Z28_5.7ltr_V8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver B.C. Canada
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
Ported box? or unported? help.

what would give me a better sound? and more thump for the bump? (if that makes sense.. )

i have a box thats ported that sort of fits in the well, im going to make a new one and i havent decided if i should port it or not.

i have 2 ten inch PG's
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2003 | 08:02 PM
  #2  
joshp14's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 0
From: Norwalk, Iowa
sealed

ported :nono:

IMHO
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2003 | 11:45 PM
  #3  
underdave's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 349
Likes: 7
From: KS
Car: '91 Firebird vert
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: auto
sealed boxes give you punchier, louder bass.
ported boxes give you deeper, cleaner bass.

personally, i like sealed boxes better.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 02:07 AM
  #4  
TrueBlue91RS's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Originally posted by underdave
sealed boxes give you punchier, louder bass.
ported boxes give you deeper, cleaner bass.

personally, i like sealed boxes better.
Za? I think the general rule of thumb is that sealed boxes are more conducive to sound quality while ported boxes can squeeze out some extra thump; especially if they are tuned properly. It really varies from sub to sub (Orion's HCCA subs perform much better in ported enclosures rather than sealed for both SQ and SPL), so it would be worth looking at what the manufacturer recommends. For most versatile subs, they'll usually provide specs for both sealed and vented enclosures along with a basic idea of what results to expect from each set-up.

But I have to agree: I prefer sealed boxes for several reasons... not the least of which being their edge in sound quality and generally much smaller volume requirements.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 11:34 AM
  #5  
T/A_SXracer's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: belleville, KS
Car: '85 T/A
Engine: 385 full roller
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
try this

http://justwoofers.com/Tech/Enclosures/Main.htm
if that link doesn't work, just goe to Justwoofers.com and look for the tech link. Its allso an awsome sight, great prices
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 01:51 PM
  #6  
underdave's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 349
Likes: 7
From: KS
Car: '91 Firebird vert
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: auto
http://www.crutchfield.com/infocente...nclosures.html

this will help.

and maybe "punchier" wasn't the best word, but you get the point.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 03:15 PM
  #7  
AJ_92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
Re: try this

Originally posted by T/A_SXracer
http://justwoofers.com/Tech/Enclosures/Main.htm
if that link doesn't work, just goe to Justwoofers.com and look for the tech link. Its allso an awsome sight, great prices
Just so everyone knows.......

This example in their "Wiring Subwoofers" section is wrong.


To figure Impedance:
(Ohms of subwoofer x #
of subwoofers (per set in series)) /
# of sets paralleled = Load

ex. (4 ohms x 2 subs)/2 = 8 ohms


They're using the correct formula, however their math is wrong. The total load would equal 4 ohms.

I emailed them about this so they can correct it, and possibly have fewer customers complaining they wired their subs that way, and it sounds like POOP!!!!!!

Just wanted to inform anyone who may go to that sight and think it's correct.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 06:38 PM
  #8  
84Z28_5.7ltr_V8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver B.C. Canada
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
hmm, thanks for the tips, now ill have to make a new friggin BOX!!! >

Reply
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 06:41 PM
  #9  
REZN8R's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
From: Enumclaw, WA USA
Car: '96 M3
Engine: 3.2L V-6
Transmission: 5-sp
If you're relatively new to box making, I'd recommend the sealed. There's a lot more room for error with regards to airspace. Couple that with the fact that there isn't a lot of room in a 3rd gen anyway and common sense would tell you that sealed is the better way to go (ported boxes need more air).
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 07:03 PM
  #10  
84Z28_5.7ltr_V8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver B.C. Canada
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
im pretty much going to copy my design i have now, but lower it more so i can put my ttops in and use those snap things... also will 10 inch subs fit in there? hopefully because i have 2
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2003 | 01:06 PM
  #11  
JohnnyIROC-Z's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: Cheyenne, WY
Car: 1991 T-Top RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Ya 10"s will fit easy. I made a custom box to fit in the rear well and it sits flush with the top of the hump. The t-tops mount perfectly and I'm running 2 12" Fosgate Punch XLC's. My amp is mounted in the spare tire area. An 800W American Legacy. Sounds pretty damn good.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mrestrictrplate
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
3
Sep 21, 2015 11:24 AM
ericjon262
Engine Swap
7
Sep 11, 2015 06:07 PM
toronto formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
Sep 10, 2015 07:31 AM
hdis2002
Exhaust
2
Sep 8, 2015 02:52 PM
83 Crossfire TA
Suspension and Chassis
0
Sep 8, 2015 12:06 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:35 AM.