Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

carb vs fi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2007 | 09:07 AM
  #1  
n36ryder05's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
carb vs fi

whats the pros and cons of fuel injected and carbureted. I heard that carbs doesnt work well in cold and rainy weather.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2007 | 10:31 PM
  #2  
JohnTN's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, Tenn
Car: 1939 Olds street rod
Engine: Olds Rocket 350 (1971 w/143K mi)
Transmission: GM TH2004R
Axle/Gears: 3:42 Eaton posi
From my limited experience I would say FI is more efficient but more expensive and complex to work on.

Other than cost, the main advantage of a carb is it is easier to work on with no electronics. Not much can go wrong with a carb if you keep it clean. A carb disadvantage would be getting it set up and tuned for a specific application other than the original one. Getting the last 10% of performance out of a carb takes patient tuning.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 12:15 AM
  #3  
91greenbird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
From: southern maryland
Car: 2012 Ram express
Engine: 5.7 hemi
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 3.55
fi gets better fuel mileage and is more reliable carb will make more power for alot less money and is easier to tune and has been proved to make great power since the 50's
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 08:33 PM
  #4  
Fullsizewagon's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Oslo, Norway
Engine: '85 Monte SS L69 305
Transmission: TH 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Carbs is what's been in use since the previous turn of the century, in all places and climates of the world.. FI's only been around for 20-30 or so years, and only became common because of emission demands.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 10:44 PM
  #5  
Berlinetta00's Avatar
Member
Veteran: Marine Corp
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 472
Likes: 15
From: Washington State
Car: '84 Berlinetta
Engine: ZZ4
Transmission: BTOD stage 3
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi disc
I have had several of both, all kinds of carb set ups, and different FI types. I would take a carb and worse fuel economy any day over poor throttle response and engine trouble codes.

A carb deposits fuel down the intake as soon as you press that go pedal, regardless of what the engine is doing. I have always experienced that a stock carb vs. stock FI has been more crisp on throttle response. Another thing is tune-ability- if I am racing at the strip, I can change the rods and seats, be done with it, and not pay more than 16.95 for the carb tuning kit. With FI, you pay for chips, programmers, computers, and it takes longer (in my opinion) to set up pulse dwell, timing, and pressure than a carb ever has. More power is just the start of the advantages for the home mech, less out of pocket expense, as well as easier set-up. I have yet to see a FIPK $200 kit for a carb
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 07:36 PM
  #6  
Swim500in5's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: NY
Car: 83 Z-28
Engine: 305 Qjet
Transmission: 700r-4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
CARB!!!

I had a crossfire car, ran like junk i rebuilt it, twice, still didnt run right, i switched it to a 91 TBI setup, it ran better made more power, but i spent the whole summer 10 weeks, waiting on hcips to be modified and sent back from a friend of mine 2 states over, with all the effort i got poor power, to much fuel and i could nt spin the tires. only correct part was the spark curve. i switched to carb, this week, I smoked my first set of rubbers this afternoon with a Q-Jet. it took me 2 days to switch from TBI to a CARB I spent $18 on a rebuild kit and I got the carb for free from another rusted up 1970's truck

CARB

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2410120
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 12:53 AM
  #7  
DENN_SHAH's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 1
From: houston
Car: 83 POS monte carlo 2015 chevy P/U
Engine: 92 5.7 tpi 5.3
Transmission: 700r4 6L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.42 too high
carb disadvantages, can be temperamental with changes in the weather, has limits on how close it can be tuned, to be tuned you must get under the hood.

carb advantages, easier to work on for most people, good power, good fuel mileage if set up right, cheaper on initial install.



fuel injection disadvantages, expensive on initial install & setup, more to go wrong, steep learning curve to learn how to tune, intimidating to most people.

fuel injection advantages, can be tuned for all running conditions, better overall driveablity & fuel mileage than a carb, can be tuned with out opening the hood, cleaner exhaust emissions than a carb.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2007 | 04:08 PM
  #8  
Ian'sTA's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: North East
Car: 1982 Trans Am
Engine: Chevy 350
Transmission: Turbo 350
Axle/Gears: Stock 2.93
FI is easier to tune & find problems that may occur down the road. Carb is the way to go if your planning on adding serious HP or you just want that "old school" engine-look & power. You can do so much more with a carb than FI, but if you plan to store this car for 5-7 months out of the year more preventative maintenance is required with a carb.

My opinion...go with the traditional, musclecar carb & leave the FI for the cruiser-luxury cars.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedLeader289
Tech / General Engine
10
May 28, 2019 01:47 PM
mcfastestZ28
Tech / General Engine
1
Oct 1, 2015 11:23 AM
IROC ZELLER
Engine Swap
6
Sep 29, 2015 03:00 PM
efiguy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 27, 2015 01:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 AM.