Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Carb VS Fuel Injection

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 09:00 PM
  #1  
freddog23's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Carb VS Fuel Injection

I just wanna read people opinions. everyone state ur opinion on which is the way to go.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 09:10 PM
  #2  
BASSETT IROC 85's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Heart of Dixie
Car: 1987 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 7.5 inch 342
Re: Carb VS Fuel Injection

What you want to do with the engine? I like FI for everyday driving and carb. for all out power. There are guys that are making real power with FI.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 09:15 PM
  #3  
skinny z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,920
Likes: 885
From: 53.0907° N, 113.4695° W
Re: Carb VS Fuel Injection

For the power levels I was looking for, I found FI was going to be expensive compared to a carb. Things have changed a little in the last 10 years when I made my choice although I believe carburetors are still cheaper.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 09:21 PM
  #4  
Rolling Thunder's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,549
Likes: 1
From: CT
Car: 86 T/A, 83 Z/28
Engine: 5.0 TPI, 350 2 X 4 bbl
Transmission: 4 speed auto, 5 speed manual
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi, 3.73 std
Re: Carb VS Fuel Injection

Fuel injection
The bad:
expencive complicated not as easy to mod the motor as carbed many fairly expencive sensors to go bad troubleshooting can be interesting when so much is involved each part effecting everyother part

The Good:
Can be fined tuned to run perfectly in theory great for dialy driving more efficient

Carb
The bad:
Require seasonal tuneing not as efficient as FI like all mechanical things prone to wear and tear

The Good:
Cheap easy to work with and lear the basics modern carberators very reliable very simple system overall trouble shooting is limited to basically the carb itself and fuel system

Im sure someone can add to this but thats what i got off the top of my head after running a TPI 305 trans am, 4 barrel carbed 305 and a dual 4 barrel 350.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 09:40 PM
  #5  
ROCFATHER's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 496
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles (310)
Car: 89 IROC-VERT
Engine: TPI 305
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: 2.77
Re: Carb VS Fuel Injection

Go carb... FI = BS. Sensors suck! I like my 350 TPI but it can get complicated sometimes. Computers running cars just sucks to me.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 10:44 PM
  #6  
BASSETT IROC 85's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Heart of Dixie
Car: 1987 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 7.5 inch 342
Re: Carb VS Fuel Injection

I went with a carb. because of cost and tunablity. My engine made 462 hp on the dyno the other day with a holley 3310 I baught off ebay for $25.00. I don't think I could get my tune port to run as well with out spending alot of money.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2009 | 01:08 AM
  #7  
Guro 305's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird S/E
Engine: 305 carb'd V8
Transmission: 4-speed auto
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: Carb VS Fuel Injection

Originally Posted by rocdriver
Go carb... FI = BS. Sensors suck! I like my 350 TPI but it can get complicated sometimes. Computers running cars just sucks to me.
I agree. The only downside I can think of with carbs is when gas is $4+ a gallon (and keep your fingers crossed we don't see it again for a long time) you'll probably wish you had the FI back.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2009 | 04:23 AM
  #8  
Air_Adam's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Re: Carb VS Fuel Injection

I have an LT1 in my '97 Z28 and carb'd 350 in my '83. Both are reliable and make good power if they are maintained properly. Carbs are not necessarily easier to tune than EFI... most people just 'ball park' a carb tuning job and leave it at that. Real fine tuning of a carb can be just as complicated and time consuming as EFI tuning - except a carb can't adapt to changing conditions like EFI can. A carb also can't tell you what its doing and why like EFI can.

EFI is more expensive to tune though...carb requires a few cheap hand tools and some time. EFI requires expensive tuning software and a laptop in many cases. It also requires knowing what certain numbers or graph lines mean. Its complicated, but is quite a bit more precise.

I like both setups... I have a stock OBD2 LT1 on one car, and a 350 with a Holley 4150 in the other. Both are about equally reliable and both are fairly close in fuel economy around town (which is a pretty big deal... 400hp carb'd 350 getting almost the same mileage as a stock 285hp LT1.. around 15mpg).

Its all in the upkeep of whatever you use. One isn't necessarily better than the other for power, mileage, reliability, etc. The only area where EFI has a clear advantage over a carb is with emissions controls, as its a self monitoring and self adjusting system. Thats why all the OEMs use it, really. Its all in your ability to tune it up and maintain the engine properly.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
midge54
LTX and LSX
21
Dec 27, 2019 04:14 PM
9192camaro
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
Feb 3, 2019 12:21 AM
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
Aug 20, 2017 12:16 AM
86Base
TPI
0
Aug 13, 2015 05:06 PM
84z96L31vortec
North East Region
1
Aug 10, 2015 08:27 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 AM.