Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Really Starting to Tick me OFF, Lack of EGR Equipped Hi-Performance Intake!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 08:14 AM
  #1  
nosajwols's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 262
Likes: 5
From: Toronto
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH350 for now
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Really Starting to Tick me OFF, Lack of EGR Equipped Hi-Performance Intake!

Like the title says. I am in the market for an intake "like" the Edelbrock Performer RPM. Something dual plane, Q-Jet, Higher "Performance" than the regular Performer, Z28, ZZ4, Etc. Yet I cannot find in any way shape or form something like that with a EGR!

Now the rub, with many jurisdictions cracking down on emissions equipment and spot visual inspections becoming more common place why the heck don't these guys get it together and actually support our hobby (and it is only going to get worse!). Instead, you decide lower performance OR failed visuals and maybe road side fines! Just tells me they are out of touch with today's realities.

Now this is not a debate about having the damn thing working or even if it does any good. The simple matter is the car will fail a visual inspection if it is not there FULL STOP. The manufactures don't even give us the option. Yes some areas like California will require actual CARB certification, but that is not the case for most others (they may say they require it but it is just a visual that all emissions equipment is there). The inspectors do not care about cam overlap, etc. It is simple, is it there and maybe is it working.

Just a rant.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 12:44 PM
  #2  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
No argument. Your options are: 1) limiting the cam powerband to 5500 RPMs; or 2) swapping to an EGR intake at inspection time. If you're subject to roadside inspections, then Door #1 is your only option.

Of course, if you do a full emissions-compliant LS1 swap, you'll never miss the Performer RPM. Ask me how I know...
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 03:55 PM
  #3  
nosajwols's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 262
Likes: 5
From: Toronto
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH350 for now
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Really Starting to Tick me OFF, Lack of EGR Equipped Hi-Performance Intake!

No doubt an LS would be a good option for a clean slate today. My issue is my gen1 was built and installed before LS motors were even sold (late 80s). I am not motivated to change it at the moment and it runs fine...

The motor was also built for more than 5500 RPM and has a wieand xcelerator (no EGR either) single plane and a Holley 750/780. I want to switch these out back to the Q-Jet and to a dual plane with an RPM lean to it, with an EGR for today's realities, dual plane to help the bottom end a bit, Q-jet for some better mileage. The cam and heads want the RPM as well. Thing is the motor was also built prior to emissions being the issue it is today. In the end I want to update my trusted motor...

But it is not my situation that really has me up in arms, it is the fact the aftermarket is so totally disconnected on this front. Maybe I just expect too much.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 05:30 PM
  #4  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
One of the assumptions is, if you have enough cam duration to warrant a 6500 RPM-capable intake, the cam will have too much overlap to pass the sniffer. It's pretty much a valid assumption.

There is this: http://www.summitracing.com/parts/edl-8053/overview/ But, I don't know of a spreadbore version. I suppose you could put a spreadbore to squarebore adapter on top of it...
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 06:09 PM
  #5  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,993
Likes: 2,485
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Really Starting to Tick me OFF, Lack of EGR Equipped Hi-Performance Intake!

these guys
Kwitcherbitchin and cast one yerself. Sell em and see what happens. Don't expect "everybody" (or even "somebody") else to spoon-feed you every little thing you happen to want.

If there's a market, you'll make plenty o $$$ off of it. You'll find out soon enough either why "they" don't make one, or why "they" should have.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 09:15 PM
  #6  
nosajwols's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 262
Likes: 5
From: Toronto
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH350 for now
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Really Starting to Tick me OFF, Lack of EGR Equipped Hi-Performance Intake!

Originally Posted by sofakingdom
Kwitcherbitchin and cast one yerself. Sell em and see what happens. Don't expect "everybody" (or even "somebody") else to spoon-feed you every little thing you happen to want.

If there's a market, you'll make plenty o $$$ off of it. You'll find out soon enough either why "they" don't make one, or why "they" should have.
You have a solid plan except for one catch. To make it work you have to steal the current manufacture's IP or you need to spend serious money to develop your own. Anyone can cast an intake, but can you do one with decades of trial and error regarding flow etc.... Now for them to do it, it is thousands in design for the new egr port and a new casting form design and off they go.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 09:48 PM
  #7  
nosajwols's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 262
Likes: 5
From: Toronto
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH350 for now
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Really Starting to Tick me OFF, Lack of EGR Equipped Hi-Performance Intake!

I should add that the old Holley intake I had (really old) was high rise single plane spread bore, much higher RPM range than 6500 and it had an EGR port!

So at one point maybe one manufacturer had a clue (egr port). BTW switched to the wieand back in the day so I could close the hood... The motor was originally in another car.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 10:51 PM
  #8  
Manic Z's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 906
Likes: 42
From: Hamilton Ontario Canada
Car: 1985 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350
Transmission: GForce T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73 posi
Re: Really Starting to Tick me OFF, Lack of EGR Equipped Hi-Performance Intake!

I run the weiand 8000 and really like it.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2013 | 07:25 AM
  #9  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,993
Likes: 2,485
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Really Starting to Tick me OFF, Lack of EGR Equipped Hi-Performance Intake!

you have to steal the current manufacture's IP
How so?

If this is such a large market with so many people clamoring for it to be sold to them, developing your own IP shouldn't be the least slightest obstacle to you, but in fact should become a barrier to entry for YOUR FUTURE COMPETITORS. After all, there's nothing about a "car" that's like rocket science or something, that's so esoteric that only a few gifted brainiacs can figure it out.

I say, go for it. Kwitcherbitchin about "everybody else" and DO SOMETHING about it. Go make yourself some money.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2013 | 07:05 PM
  #10  
nosajwols's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 262
Likes: 5
From: Toronto
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH350 for now
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Really Starting to Tick me OFF, Lack of EGR Equipped Hi-Performance Intake!

Originally Posted by five7kid
One of the assumptions is, if you have enough cam duration to warrant a 6500 RPM-capable intake, the cam will have too much overlap to pass the sniffer. It's pretty much a valid assumption.

There is this: http://www.summitracing.com/parts/edl-8053/overview/ But, I don't know of a spreadbore version. I suppose you could put a spreadbore to squarebore adapter on top of it...
That is a valid point but I do not have to pass a sniffer (only 88 up here). I am more worried about the road side visual (in Canada). Other than a few US states that are cali like I do not think my situation is all that unusual.

Originally Posted by Manic Z
I run the weiand 8000 and really like it.
THANKS! That is actually a really good lead, I did not know about that intake. Downside is Holley pretty much discontinued this entire line but I will keep an eye on the used market. I have been really happy with Weiand in the past so I would be really happy going back to the well.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2013 | 08:38 PM
  #11  
Damon's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 13
From: Philly, PA
Re: Really Starting to Tick me OFF, Lack of EGR Equipped Hi-Performance Intake!

Yeah, since the Weiand 8000 went out of production the base model Performer EGR intake is the only option (new). The 8000 was a GREAT manifold, especially on larger engines. The runners are BIG and only taper down near the ports where they meet the heads. I ran 13.0s @ 107 with a "tow package" 400 small block in my previous 79 Malibu (QJet carb) with it.

I'll let you know that even the base model Performer intake is NOT the same as it's been forever. Sometime in the 80s or early 90s they changed the design (for the better). There was an extended discussion about this on another board that ended with pics of the old-style Performer and current Performer laid side-by-side. The newer one CLEARLY has better, strighter runner design than the old one. Personally, I've gone as fast as 12s (N/A, mediocre traction) with the lowly Performer intake, and the combo wasn't even very aggressive. It's not like you're going to give up 50HP to the big-brother Performer RPM with it. It's not that bad an intake and it sure fits under a stock 3rd gen hood a whole lot better than a Performer RPM.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2013 | 07:41 PM
  #12  
Manic Z's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 906
Likes: 42
From: Hamilton Ontario Canada
Car: 1985 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350
Transmission: GForce T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73 posi
Re: Really Starting to Tick me OFF, Lack of EGR Equipped Hi-Performance Intake!

Yeah, I remember when I first got the manifold, I looked at it and realized it had more in common with the Stealth 8016 than it did with the Action Plus 8004. It is a great manifold.

nosajwols, there's one on ebay:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/SMALL-BLOCK-CHEVY-WEIAND-8000-ACTION-PLUS-INTAKE-MANIFOLD-/190781752212?pt=Vintage_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item2c6b7a8394&vxp=mtr
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mdtoren
TPI
12
Aug 23, 2015 12:52 PM
mdtoren
Tech / General Engine
0
Aug 16, 2015 05:45 PM
mustangman65_79
Tech / General Engine
4
Aug 8, 2015 12:07 PM
drathaar907
TPI
0
Aug 6, 2015 04:20 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 PM.