Convertibles Discussed here are problems and solutions to convertible specific questions, including difficult to find part numbers and other convertible tech help.

how bad should it be?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 09:28 PM
  #1  
kymission's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
how bad should it be?

As I continue to restore this 92 firebird vert. I get frustrated at the quality of the ride. When I first got it. It was so scary to drive. I have toned it down replacing the ball joints, new idler arm, new struts (monroe) new rear shocks. The ride was very bumpy. The rear stock wheel had a chunk out of the metal. so I got new rims, new tires. I have not had it aligned yet waiting for a few more upgrades.

The car continues to ride bumpy almost like a bouncy feeling to it. I also have a 95 Camaro coupe so I am use to a bumpy ride or feeling everything because my daily driver the 95 is so very tight.

Is this normal. Am I looking for gremlins that don't exists? Is this 92 vert ride that bad that it would seem unsafe? Could this he the springs? IT seem to bounce as slow as 5 mph. I had a shop check out the tie rod ends both inner and outer and they are fine. what effects do older springs have?

Thanks
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 09:57 PM
  #2  
Cadillac's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,168
Likes: 3
From: Marietta, GA
Car: '91 Firebird Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI (LO3)
Transmission: 700r4, Vette Servo
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt, PBR disks
Re: how bad should it be?

I hear ya brother. Where I live the roads are God awful for the most part but a smooth peice of highway is where I love to drive it. I spent a lot of coin on the suspension inlcuding new shocks and struts on all corners, sub-frame connectors, energy suspension bushings, wheels and tires, wonder bar, and it's still not over. I figure I need an idler arm eventually and then maybe even a new steering box. Who knows?

With 185K miles on the chasis I gues I should plan on replacing or servicing everything in the suspension sooner or later.

Keep the faith!
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 07:00 AM
  #3  
Jaysz28's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 18
From: Fort Myers, FL
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 6.0
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: how bad should it be?

So have you driven it since installing the new struts and shocks? Kinda hard to tell based on your post.

The 92 cars should be the most stable out of all the 3rd gen verts, since they are glued and welded together.

My 88 was scary to drive, even after all the work to it. Ended up being a bad rag joint. Once I got that replaced, the steering was nice and tight and the handling was what I would expect with eibach springs and KYB Struts/shocks.

Now I just need some WS6 sway bars and steering box!

-jason
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 07:05 AM
  #4  
kymission's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Re: how bad should it be?

Yes I have driven it.

for example, last night I moved it about 40 feet and I could feel it move up and down as if the wheel was oval. Hard to explain. Since the wheels are brand new with like 20 miles on them. I don't think this is the case.

thanks

shawn
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 12:00 PM
  #5  
LowRyder's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, Ontario
Car: 92 RS Vert
Engine: 355
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 342
Re: how bad should it be?

could it be a bent axel?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 12:38 PM
  #6  
Scooby Doo's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: St Louis Missouri
Car: 92 Trans Am Convertible
Engine: 5.0L
Re: how bad should it be?

Mine is a 92, and it drives real nice.
Ride is firm, but feel completely in control.

When I purchased car it was a little scary, would hit a bump and would have to guess where it was going to land, but replaced Shocks/Struts, end links on all four corners and tires and now if feels great.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 01:52 PM
  #7  
Jaysz28's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 18
From: Fort Myers, FL
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 6.0
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: how bad should it be?

put it up in on 4 jackstands, under the axle and a-arms.

Spin each wheels to ensure it isn't a bent spindle, axle or even a broken belt from the install

trust me, I've experienced all 3, two on the same car at the same time.

Frustrating chasing your tail like that too

-jason
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 06:55 PM
  #8  
91 Ragtop's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Canal Winchester, Ohio
Car: 1991 Trans Am Convertible
Engine: 305
Transmission: 5-Speed
Re: how bad should it be?

The body flex is something I'm definately noticing on my 91 TA compared to the 92 Camaro. This is the ONLY convertible car I've ever really noticed it on. It feels like I should see it twisting sometimes. Subframe Connectors are definately on my shopping list this year.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 06:57 PM
  #9  
Iroctopless's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 4
From: Killam, AB
Car: 1989 IrocZ Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5 - 5 Speed Standard
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: how bad should it be?

Originally Posted by Scooby Doo
Mine is a 92, and it drives real nice.
Ride is firm, but feel completely in control.
Ditto here on my '89 Camaro. All stock but somewhat low and lazy miles.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AmpleUnicorn88
Brakes
32
Nov 18, 2015 11:02 AM
3rdgenkindagal
Aftermarket Vendor Review
25
Oct 21, 2015 09:32 AM
L98GTA87
TPI
18
Oct 19, 2015 10:43 PM
dimented24x7
Transmissions and Drivetrain
7
Sep 17, 2015 06:58 AM
gta892000
Electronics
1
Sep 16, 2015 12:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 PM.