Convertibles Discussed here are problems and solutions to convertible specific questions, including difficult to find part numbers and other convertible tech help.

Verts: '87 Formula & '85 IROC-Z, both by ASC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 29, 2009 | 07:06 PM
  #1  
slimwhitman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Verts: '87 Formula & '85 IROC-Z, both by ASC

Found these for sale, thought you might like to see them. I asked the owners if either car had ASC IDs on them in the door jamb...neither did. But they look to be ASC. (do you agree, okfoz?)
----------------------------------------------

http://stillwater.craigslist.org/pts/1266995624.html

<H2>85 IROC Z CONVERTIBLE - $75000 (STILLWATER OK.)

</H2>Reply to: sale-gbsgt-1266995624@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]
Date: 2009-07-12, 10:56PM MDT

1985 IROC-Z Convertible. This car was bought for Tinker Airforce Base in Oklahoma City. It has been restored to peak condition. 79,000 actual miles. Engine, Transmission, interior and exterior have all been redone in the past three years. The convertible top is two-years old. Engine is 5.7 tpi, transmission 700-4R, wheels match the color of the car. If you have any questions about the car I can give you some information but most information was archived by Tinker Airforce Base and I cannot find out what all it was used for. I do know there was only about 20 of these cars made especially for Tinker Airforce Base. I have looked up the Title on the computer and it shows that it was
tagged mostly by Tinker but it does not tell what it was used for. Either send me your phone number or e-mail address and I will get back to you.



------------------------------------------------

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Ponti...fCarsQ5fTrucks

1987 Firebird Formula

This is a 1987 firebird convertible. I'm told that it's one of only 150 firebird and Trans Am convertibles sold in 1987. I don't know why they didn't sell more. It's a nice design. It's been garage kept since I purchased it a few years ago and has only been driven on nice days or hot nights.

It runs good and steers straight. The interior is without stains, rips or tears. It's a good daily driver. It has a nice V8 sound as well. The 4-speed automatic transmission is the smoothest trans that I've ever driven. Seriously, it's wonderful! This car is also designed to drive at low RPM's. 65 mph is only 2400 rpms. It's always smooth even though it has pleanty of muscle.


The car does have a little bit of surface rust, door dings, paint blemishes, and small scratches. but it's not too bad. (see pictures) You can have it painted if you'd like, but I think it's fine just the way it is.

This is one of those cars that you can purchase, enjoy, drive and brighten your life with. If you drive it respectively, store it in a garage and keep it clean, you will greatly enjoy this vehical. In addition, in a few years, you should be able to sell it for much more than you paid.

It's not perfect, but then again, I'm not looking for premium dollar. I just need the garage space for something else.


It needs an AC belt. The car never had one when I bought it and I never had one put on. I don't know if the AC works. I mostly drive at night with the top down. The headlight motors stick. (common) The headlights open up, but they need a little bit of help. Nobody ever replaced the stereo or speakers, the speakers in back need to be replaced. It's fine for me, I keep it off most of the time. I love the sounds of summer.

To the best of my knowledge, this is an original car. Everything looks stock and the numbers probibly match, but I don't know for sure. I drive the car on nice days and always get positive looks. This is a fun car to own and drive. It gets about 26 mpg on the highway.

If you fly in, I can pick you up at a Chicago airport and take you to the car. I would also be happy to drive the car to your location for reasonable expenses. (assuming it's paid for) Call me with any questions. Steve 630-205-8259.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2009 | 07:40 PM
  #2  
quickkris2006's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 733
Likes: 1
From: jackson new jersey
Car: 1991 camaro vert
Engine: ls1 soon
Transmission: t56 soon
Axle/Gears: moser 12bolt 4.10 soon!
Re: Verts: '87 Formula & '85 IROC-Z, both by ASC

asc made the 2 seater conversion thats y they dont have the tags because they are not 2 seaters
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2009 | 08:57 PM
  #3  
slimwhitman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Re: Verts: '87 Formula & '85 IROC-Z, both by ASC

Originally Posted by quickkris2006
asc made the 2 seater conversion thats y they dont have the tags because they are not 2 seaters
WRONG.

AutoForm was the 2-seater. ASC cars also had a tag in the door jamb. The ASC tag did not track a serial number, it was just a label that said they did the conversion and that it met federal requirements.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2009 | 09:38 PM
  #4  
my82roc's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (101)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 30
From: Levittown Pa
Car: 89 Iroc Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Posi 9 bolt PBR
Re: Verts: '87 Formula & '85 IROC-Z, both by ASC

Strange how the air box on the camaro is not the normal snorkle type.Its just like the one that the firebirds used
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2009 | 10:18 PM
  #5  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Verts: '87 Formula & '85 IROC-Z, both by ASC

Thats not an 85, for multiple reasons. Its some sort of Frankenstein.

I dont see the extension pieces on the door
99% sure that windshield washer tank was not used until 87 or 88
AC lines are for a LG4/L69 car
TA airbox and filter housing
CHMSL so its absolutely NOT an 85 if they claim those parts to be original
I'm stretching... but... looks like centerbolt valve covers
My camaro history is lacking but, those taillights do not look right to me

Who knows what that thing is. Its certainly got parts from multiple years.

The Formy is nice.

Last edited by madmax; Jul 29, 2009 at 10:23 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 08:48 AM
  #6  
my82roc's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (101)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 30
From: Levittown Pa
Car: 89 Iroc Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Posi 9 bolt PBR
Re: Verts: '87 Formula & '85 IROC-Z, both by ASC

Originally Posted by madmax
Thats not an 85, for multiple reasons. Its some sort of Frankenstein.

I dont see the extension pieces on the door
99% sure that windshield washer tank was not used until 87 or 88
AC lines are for a LG4/L69 car
TA airbox and filter housing
CHMSL so its absolutely NOT an 85 if they claim those parts to be original
I'm stretching... but... looks like centerbolt valve covers
My camaro history is lacking but, those taillights do not look right to me

Who knows what that thing is. Its certainly got parts from multiple years.

The Formy is nice.

It also appears that the GFX are from a 91-92 car.The rear bumper skin is for certain
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 01:38 PM
  #7  
okfoz's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,298
Likes: 197
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: Verts: '87 Formula & '85 IROC-Z, both by ASC

They both appear to be ASC cars... I saw the Formula a few days ago...

John
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 06:14 PM
  #8  
Brennan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 1
From: Corner Brook, NL
Car: 1984 Z28 HT,2006 2500HD
Engine: 5.7L, 6.6Llbz dmax
Transmission: 700R4, 6 speed allison
Axle/Gears: worn out 3.73 posi
Re: Verts: '87 Formula & '85 IROC-Z, both by ASC

Originally Posted by my82roc
It also appears that the GFX are from a 91-92 car.The rear bumper skin is for certain
the chin is def. 91-92 and it looks to me like it has the 91-92 wheels
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 07:35 PM
  #9  
Iroctopless's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 4
From: Killam, AB
Car: 1989 IrocZ Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5 - 5 Speed Standard
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Verts: '87 Formula & '85 IROC-Z, both by ASC

Originally Posted by slimwhitman
WRONG.

AutoForm was the 2-seater. ASC cars also had a tag in the door jamb. The ASC tag did not track a serial number, it was just a label that said they did the conversion and that it met federal requirements.
Here is the tag . . .

It often goes missing from wear, age, or repanting.

Also regarding the door trim extensions, they too often go missing as the years go by.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 10:26 PM
  #10  
BlueZee28's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 6
From: O'Fallon, MO
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: Verts: '87 Formula & '85 IROC-Z, both by ASC

Surely that's a typo on the IROC-Z, $7,500 and not $75,000?
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2009 | 03:37 AM
  #11  
Chevy8588's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 972
Likes: 2
From: La Grange Park, IL
Car: 1987 Iroc Z28/ 1982 Z28
Engine: 355 TPI IP/ 305 CFI
Transmission: T-56/ 300C
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open/ 3.73 Posi
Re: Verts: '87 Formula & '85 IROC-Z, both by ASC

anybody else notice that that "85" has a speed density TPI? i dont see a MAF in the pics... thats car is a multi car bastard lol
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2009 | 08:47 AM
  #12  
okfoz's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,298
Likes: 197
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: Verts: '87 Formula & '85 IROC-Z, both by ASC

Actually The motor (at least the TPI setup) appears to be from a 1987 Trans Am, Formula or GTA... Notice the Cold air intake is of the Firebird variant.

The MAF would be located on the Right side of the car, it would not be visible in from that angle.

John
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
28
Oct 24, 2025 02:00 PM
okfoz
History / Originality
27
Oct 13, 2015 02:19 PM
bjpotter
History / Originality
17
Oct 4, 2015 07:48 PM
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
12
Oct 1, 2015 09:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 PM.