DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

165 to 730 swapping woes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 20, 2003 | 04:52 PM
  #1  
PLANT PROTECTION's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: La Porte, IN
Car: 1987 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: L98
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 7.625 10 bolt/3.73s
165 to 730 swapping woes

I am in the process of swapping MAF to MAP and have run into trouble. I repined the ECM following Mike's guide but I have noticed something weird. 165's D1 is a system ground and it says to put it do 730 D1. Then it says if you are using the MAF's +5v, ground, and signal wires, which I am, 165's D1 should go to 730's B6, what should I connect the 165's D1 wire to? The car wants to start, but won't. I have DTC for the est circuit and cylinder select error. I am using a 7730 memcal out of a beretta but with a fbody prom, this is ok correct? Thanks for the help.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2003 | 07:07 PM
  #2  
Grim Reaper's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 5
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Re: 165 to 730 swapping woes

Originally posted by PLANT PROTECTION
I have DTC for the est circuit and cylinder select error. I am using a 7730 memcal out of a beretta but with a fbody prom, this is ok correct? Thanks for the help.
You MUST use the memcal for a TPI car. The reason you are getting a cylinder select error is because the EST circuitry is from a V6 Memcal (Berretta).
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2003 | 08:11 PM
  #3  
3.8TransAM's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 2
From: Schererville , IN
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
dohh glenn caught it before i did plant :-) but he speaks the truth u have to have the correct memcal for the style/yr of engine u are running.

I wasnt aware u were doing the 730 swap :-) We live about a 1/2 hr apart so we should get together and go over tuning notes and features, i cant find anyone else clse to us that is willing to or has undertaken there own tuning

talk to u later
jeremy
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2003 | 10:20 PM
  #4  
PLANT PROTECTION's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: La Porte, IN
Car: 1987 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: L98
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 7.625 10 bolt/3.73s
I knew getting a memcal with my ecm was too good to be true. As for the ground, should I just splice D1 into B6?
We'll meet up sometime Jeremy. I definately consider myself a newb, I changed my PEvsRPM by as much a 20% both ways and saw no result on sunday. My best time was with an ARAP bin with stock fueling and spark.

Last edited by PLANT PROTECTION; Mar 20, 2003 at 10:55 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2003 | 08:11 AM
  #5  
Grim Reaper's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 5
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Originally posted by PLANT PROTECTION
As for the ground, should I just splice D1 into B6?
The proper wiring of the grounds (165 to 730) are as follows:

D1 ---> BD1
D3 ---> BD6
D10 --> BD7

Though they are ALL grounds you should wire it as per above and not just splice them all together. The wire size, pins and connectors can only handle so much current before you start to fry things. Splicing grounds together to share a wire can cause too much current to flow through a common wire. Follow the wiring suggested above, and you won't have any problems.

Last edited by Grim Reaper; Mar 21, 2003 at 08:44 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2003 | 05:50 PM
  #6  
PLANT PROTECTION's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: La Porte, IN
Car: 1987 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: L98
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 7.625 10 bolt/3.73s
Originally posted by Glenn91L98GTA
The proper wiring of the grounds (165 to 730) are as follows:

D1 ---> BD1
D3 ---> BD6
D10 --> BD7
This is how I currently have it wired. However, BB6, MAP ground, is empty.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2003 | 06:29 PM
  #7  
Grim Reaper's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 5
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Tie 165's D2 to 7730's BB5 & BB6. Those are sensor grounds for the CTS, MAT, TPS and MAP. Seldom will all 4 of the sensors carry the full current load simultaneously. Also, it looks cleaner when all done IMO.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2003 | 07:03 PM
  #8  
PLANT PROTECTION's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: La Porte, IN
Car: 1987 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: L98
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 7.625 10 bolt/3.73s
One last question on the memcal, would one from a 90 a4 vette work?
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2004 | 07:57 AM
  #9  
Cool Runner's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Maryland *Again*
Car: 86 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Back from the dead a year later....

PLANT PROTECTION or Anyone else who has done this swap,

I just came across the same situation, I repinned according to Mike Davis' article and found that D1 from the 165 going to both BD1 and BB6.

So have you had any problems sharing D2 with BB5 + BB6?
Does that wire get hot at all?

Last edited by Cool Runner; Mar 8, 2004 at 10:07 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2004 | 12:24 PM
  #10  
sbcman's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Don't want to chagne the topic, but how much HP can one gain by doing a swap. we are searching out some bugs on a friends camaro adn ttalked about doing this mod to eliminate the possibility of the ECM as a problem.

Heard the gains are good over teh crappy MAF system they stuck in these early cars. Only a handful of guys can run them with any luck.

Manifold density is the way to go from what I hear.:hail:
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2004 | 12:48 PM
  #11  
PLANT PROTECTION's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: La Porte, IN
Car: 1987 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: L98
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 7.625 10 bolt/3.73s
Originally posted by Cool Runner
Back from the dead a year later....

PLANT PROTECTION or Anyone else who has done this swap,

I just came across the same situation, I repinned according to Mike Davis' article and found that D1 from the 165 going to both BD1 and BB6.

So have you had any problems sharing D2 with BB5 + BB6?
Does that wire get hot at all?
I ran D1 to both BD1 and BB6 with no ill effects after a year.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2004 | 01:22 PM
  #12  
Cool Runner's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Maryland *Again*
Car: 86 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Thanks PLANT PROTECTION

I'm going to try and e-mail Mike to have him add a note to that article for future swappers.

sbcman

I'm doing the swap mainly because the 730 is more tunable.
This might introduce a few bugs so I suggest you get another 165 and get the bugs worked out of that before you attempt to swap ecms. By chance I just happen to have a working 165 I don't need anymore
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2004 | 11:19 AM
  #13  
Sonar_un's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Car: '86 T/A
Engine: 350/LT1 Intake
Transmission: 700R4 - Built
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.42
Originally posted by sbcman
Don't want to chagne the topic, but how much HP can one gain by doing a swap. we are searching out some bugs on a friends camaro adn ttalked about doing this mod to eliminate the possibility of the ECM as a problem.

Heard the gains are good over teh crappy MAF system they stuck in these early cars. Only a handful of guys can run them with any luck.

Manifold density is the way to go from what I hear.:hail:
Gaining or loosing HP is a non issue. You don't really gain or loose HP, but you coax more HP out of a current engine setup with tuning. What you are doing in swapping to a better generation of the ECM for our cars. Most new cars are using the MAF system as opposed to the Speed Density. The SD system only lasted a few years with GM vehicles. In actuality, the MAF system is more accurate.

The newer style of cars have a much better ECM to work with than us, so the MAF works out better for them. We have to work with what we got and it doens't take much to swap in a 730 ECM to our 165 MAF systems.

I am planning to do the swap to 730 here very soon, and I can't wait to be able to tune this car better once I set it up with speed density. There is no doubt that the 730 ECM has much more support from our community. Which is one of the main reasons for the swap.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Azrael91966669
DIY PROM
25
Jun 20, 2017 04:04 AM
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
2
Aug 22, 2015 06:52 PM
Hello, Michael
Engine Swap
8
Aug 20, 2015 03:19 PM
ezobens
DIY PROM
8
Aug 19, 2015 10:29 PM
355tpipickup
DFI and ECM
2
Aug 19, 2015 10:02 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:47 PM.