DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

idle problem(cough/cough)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 29, 2003 | 09:41 PM
  #1  
11sORbust's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,399
Likes: 0
From: STL area
idle problem(cough/cough)

Here is the deal.... My engine idles at 65-70kpa@750rpm after the new mods. My idle is extremely rich. This is partly due to the ve tables. But I think the main reason is that because my kpa is soo high the f/p regulator is not hitting the lower limit(39psi). Once I start to drive, the regulator works normal(varies from part throttle 39psi to wot 43psi). Everything is new.... So should I just lean out the idle in the ve tables or find a way to give the regulator enough vacuum? Or just disconnect the vacuum to the regulator and tune for that???
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2003 | 10:15 PM
  #2  
87_TA's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,308
Likes: 0
From: ELIZABETH,PA,USA
Everybody has that problem with a cam that pulls low vacuum, which is one of the reasons you are always soo rich at idle and part throttle wich is where the most vacuum is. Aside from deceleration of course.
Just scale the VE as everybody else does, Also once you get your tune closer the vacuum should raise some as well help the problem even more.
It is nothing to scale lower VE by 20% and more after a large cam install.
One way I always thought would be good to get an awsome idle, and full use of VE, would be to use TPS sensor as map voltage supply, and lose the MAP all together being that throttle position and map are directly affected the same almost.
It would stop that pulsing of vacuum problem.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2003 | 10:36 PM
  #3  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: idle problem(cough/cough)

Originally posted by 11sORbust
Here is the deal.... My engine idles at 65-70kpa@750rpm after the new mods. My idle is extremely rich. This is partly due to the ve tables. But I think the main reason is that because my kpa is soo high the f/p regulator is not hitting the lower limit(39psi). Once I start to drive, the regulator works normal(varies from part throttle 39psi to wot 43psi). Everything is new.... So should I just lean out the idle in the ve tables or find a way to give the regulator enough vacuum? Or just disconnect the vacuum to the regulator and tune for that???
Closed Loop?.
Stock injectors?.
Doubling the HP of a stocker, running stock code with stock injectors is difficult to do. The small injectors, force large BL changes to get things close. And once you close it's still tempermental.

With a large injector, I'd say try the none referenced idea, but it'd be easy to go too lean up on top, IMO.

Tune the VE down in your idle region, and remember to leave the 80-100 K/Pa stuff alone, at the idle rpm regions.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2003 | 10:39 PM
  #4  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by 87_TA

One way I always thought would be good to get an awsome idle, and full use of VE, would be to use TPS sensor as map voltage supply, and lose the MAP all together being that throttle position and map are directly affected the same almost.
It would stop that pulsing of vacuum problem.
TRY IT! !!!
The AE stuff probably would take some tweaking.

Running the same VE values in the whole idle region is an another way.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2003 | 11:01 PM
  #5  
11sORbust's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,399
Likes: 0
From: STL area
so just "ignore" this condition and tune the ve @ idle, right.?

Btw, here is the specs

73' 400 ci block
bored .030
holley stealth ram
58mm bbk tb
71' 400ci heads (ported to hell)
cam:242/250*duration, .550/.570" lift ,114lda
matching valvesprings and "special" lifters
30lb accel injectors
1.6:1 ratio rockers
1 5/8 headers
no exhaust(cutout)

I'm sure there is more.. Today I reduced the idle ve by 25%. But I wanted to get some input on the fpr condition. So it's nice to know I can just tune around it.....

I did notice (today) that my idle is at 65-70kpa. The brakes work great though. So I guess everything is fine.!?
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2003 | 03:14 PM
  #6  
Ronny's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,880
Likes: 4
From: wisconsin
enlighten me guys! i have a speed density car, 7747, TBI of course. Is this thread regarding a MAF car? If so do they use a FPR that is vacuum referenced? low vacuum=higher fuel pressure? Is the fact that my SD car has stable FP(relatively) make it easier to tune? I know that some of us tried vafpr(me too) and chose to not use it opting instead to go larger injectors to satisfy fuel requirements. what is the threory of using a vac sensitive FPR vs static FP.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2003 | 03:44 PM
  #7  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by 11sORbust
so just "ignore" this condition and tune the ve @ idle, right.?
Exactly.

Tim
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2003 | 09:31 PM
  #8  
87_TA's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,308
Likes: 0
From: ELIZABETH,PA,USA
Originally posted by Ronny
enlighten me guys! i have a speed density car, 7747, TBI of course. Is this thread regarding a MAF car? If so do they use a FPR that is vacuum referenced? low vacuum=higher fuel pressure? Is the fact that my SD car has stable FP(relatively) make it easier to tune? I know that some of us tried vafpr(me too) and chose to not use it opting instead to go larger injectors to satisfy fuel requirements. what is the threory of using a vac sensitive FPR vs static FP.
Ronny, in a port injection car at low engine speeds, it seems if your pulse width is too short its not as smooth running as a longer PW. due to lack of port velocity and efficiency, therefor lower FP allows a longer pw which is a blessing with larger injectors.
It also allows broader range of VE as well.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2003 | 09:34 PM
  #9  
87_TA's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,308
Likes: 0
From: ELIZABETH,PA,USA
Originally posted by Grumpy
TRY IT! !!!
The AE stuff probably would take some tweaking.

Running the same VE values in the whole idle region is an another way.
I plan to Grumpy,
I will probably do so on my camaro when I get around to swapping it to EFI .
But also would like to have an ECM bench before doing so.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Infested
Tech / General Engine
3
May 22, 2018 11:56 PM
db057
Tech / General Engine
4
Aug 22, 2015 08:17 PM
zeitghaist
Tech / General Engine
4
Aug 18, 2015 07:33 AM
perZ
TPI
7
Aug 15, 2015 01:17 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 PM.