DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Prominator and Autoprom for dummies (like me)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 09:40 PM
  #51  
jfreeman74's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
From: Flowery Branch, GA
Car: 1985 Iroc-Z
Engine: 1 BA 305 TPI
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4 - 2800 Stall Midwest
Axle/Gears: 3.42
I have thought about going to the 165 but it seems like a real PITA to do the switchover. I haven't seen a real good procedure on how to do it. I'm also not sure that there are enough advantages to warrant doing the switch. I know it is supposed to be easier for tuning but there are people tuning the 870 so it must not be too bad.

Last edited by jfreeman74; Mar 14, 2004 at 09:42 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 10:44 PM
  #52  
MTPFI-MAF's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: Point Marion PA.
Car: 1982 CAMARO;
Engine: 1985 LB9;
Transmission: T-5/
well One problem I have found on the 870' With help from this fourm is that if the Factory Prom is labeled HLK it is a bugged prom and needs updated to a HLM ACDelco part 122740 $48.89 From Rockauto.com Second is the Very slow ALDL Baud rate makes Data logging a PITA. THIRD is the fact that the MAF Burn of Relay Is PiggyBacked to the ECM See Pic

and if it goes Bad You will spend any where form $350.00-$500.00 for a new one. This was solved in the 1986 and up models with Two Relays which are a thousand times Cheaper. Now it just depends on How into this you are if you don't Upgrade parts and arent looking for to have the fastet car around you can program the chips for the 870' But It makes sense to me to switch to a 165'. As for a good description of the Change over go here http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~davis/z28/ecm_swap/

Well that is my .02

Last edited by MTPFI-MAF; Mar 14, 2004 at 10:49 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 11:06 PM
  #53  
Craig Moates's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"
TunerCat doesn't provide a provision for verifying the upload. You just have to 'trust' it. Don't worry though, there's checksums imbedded everywhere in the transmission so success is assured unless there's a hardware issue. So yes, when you 'Program Romulator' the AutoProm is loaded as needed.

Originally posted by va454ss
Since there is a reference to me (dummy) in the title, and am using an Autoprom, I figured this would be a good place to ask this question.

I'm using TunerCat RT with the AutoProm. I pull up a bin file and make changes and save the file to a new name. With the file open, when I initialize "Program Romulator", is it burning the bin file to the chip in the AutoProm? If so, how do I verify?

BTW, I am trying this with the AutoProm not being attached to the 7060.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 11:12 PM
  #54  
jfreeman74's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
From: Flowery Branch, GA
Car: 1985 Iroc-Z
Engine: 1 BA 305 TPI
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4 - 2800 Stall Midwest
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Thanks, I may reconsider making the change. The biggest PITA part that I see is having an eprom in there that isn't for my engine. Most of the ones that I found were from a car with a 350 in it. If I could find one from a 305 would it run without a lot of tuning? I plan on doing some tuning but I don't want to start from scratch when I have never done any tuning.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 11:42 PM
  #55  
Mangus's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: In your ear. No, the other one.
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
just the 8192 baud is worth the swap to a 165 over an 870... it makes it infinitely easier to tune!

Either way, though the AutoProm supports your setup (870 or 165).
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 11:45 PM
  #56  
va454ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Originally posted by Craig Moates
TunerCat doesn't provide a provision for verifying the upload. You just have to 'trust' it. Don't worry though, there's checksums imbedded everywhere in the transmission so success is assured unless there's a hardware issue. So yes, when you 'Program Romulator' the AutoProm is loaded as needed.
Cool.

What bothers me though is that TC doesn't indicate that its synchronized unless you select "Program Romulator". Even if its synchronized, when you select "Read Romulator", it says "The file stored in the Romulator is no longer valid".
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 11:47 PM
  #57  
Mangus's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: In your ear. No, the other one.
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
this is a known issue and will soon be resolved. Don't worry too much about it, though... it has to do with the fact that TC "auto-disables" the checksum, and upon read, tries to reset the original mask value.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 11:51 PM
  #58  
va454ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Originally posted by Mangus
this is a known issue and will soon be resolved. Don't worry too much about it, though... it has to do with the fact that TC "auto-disables" the checksum, and upon read, tries to reset the original mask value.
Just curious, what's the fix gonna involve?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 11:52 PM
  #59  
Craig Moates's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"
Yeah, what Mark said. Don't let it bother you...

The fix will be a firmware update. You'll be able to download it and reflash your AutoProm to the new firmware.

By the way, and I'll tease here, the TC syncrobyte thing will be nothing compared to some of the actual functionality boost on the new firmware. I'll leave it at that, a tease.

This week...

Originally posted by va454ss
Cool.

What bothers me though is that TC doesn't indicate that its synchronized unless you select "Program Romulator". Even if its synchronized, when you select "Read Romulator", it says "The file stored in the Romulator is no longer valid".

Last edited by Craig Moates; Mar 14, 2004 at 11:54 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 12:24 AM
  #60  
jfreeman74's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
From: Flowery Branch, GA
Car: 1985 Iroc-Z
Engine: 1 BA 305 TPI
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4 - 2800 Stall Midwest
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by Mangus
just the 8192 baud is worth the swap to a 165 over an 870... it makes it infinitely easier to tune!

Either way, though the AutoProm supports your setup (870 or 165).
Does anyone know if the Prominator will support the 870? I'm sure it will support the 165.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 03:58 AM
  #61  
MTPFI-MAF's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: Point Marion PA.
Car: 1982 CAMARO;
Engine: 1985 LB9;
Transmission: T-5/
Originally posted by jfreeman74
Does anyone know if the Prominator will support the 870? I'm sure it will support the 165.
I asked that about a month ago and from what I was Told The answer is YES.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 04:35 AM
  #62  
va454ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
One other issue comes to mind also, although I haven't spent much time investigating it.

With the AutoProm, you're supposed to be able to emulate and log data simultaneously.

If I have the AutoProm online and try to bring Datamaster online, I get an error message that com port 1 is unavailable.

FYI, this is being used on a 7060.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 05:19 AM
  #63  
Craig Moates's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"
Only one program can access the COM port at a time. Therefore, only a single software program would be able to do the simultaneous datalogging and emulation. That program is TunerPro RT.

If you use TunerCat and DataMaster, then you can only do one or the other at a time.

Originally posted by va454ss
One other issue comes to mind also, although I haven't spent much time investigating it.

With the AutoProm, you're supposed to be able to emulate and log data simultaneously.

If I have the AutoProm online and try to bring Datamaster online, I get an error message that com port 1 is unavailable.

FYI, this is being used on a 7060.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 09:21 AM
  #64  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by MrBill
100 is a hobby.

1000 is an addiction

10,000...seek medical attention!

I'll remember you said that.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 12:59 PM
  #65  
va454ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
If you use TunerCat and DataMaster, then you can only do one or the other at a time. [/B][/QUOTE]

Makes sense. Just me not understanding the literature

My first attempt a chip burning was a failure. I tried loading a known good bin to the supplied chip numerous times. The truck wouldn't even start! Guess I should be patient and wait for the upcoming upgrades for the use of TunerCat with AutoProm.

I rechecked the info on the bin and checked that I had the chip positioned properly in the AutoProm and the PCM.

Any WAG's?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 01:11 PM
  #66  
Mangus's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: In your ear. No, the other one.
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
If your truck wouldn't start with the chip you burned, the TC fix will not solve your problem. They are unrelated.

You need to make sure you burned the chip correctly, including making sure your offset is correct, that your adapter (if using one) is setup correctly (jumpers), and that the chip was actually burned correctly (do a verify, or read the chip and do a compare using various tools including a hex editor, windiff, etc). Make sure the checksum was calculated when saving the bin (you can disable the checksum and see if the truck starts, if so, bad checksum).

These devices and software packages (regardless of the device or software) are not "magic". They still require knowledgable users...
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 02:58 AM
  #67  
va454ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Originally posted by Craig Moates


The fix will be a firmware update. You'll be able to download it and reflash your AutoProm to the new firmware.

By the way, and I'll tease here, the TC syncrobyte thing will be nothing compared to some of the actual functionality boost on the new firmware. I'll leave it at that, a tease.

This week...
Any news?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 05:23 AM
  #68  
Craig Moates's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"
Yes, some news:

1) Haven't been too hard after the synchrobyte thing since it doesn't impact functionality significantly, but it's on the list.
2) New firmware update is being worked, which has several new features such as variable-speed communications for faster upload/download and automatic hardware/software configuration.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tmellott89
DIY PROM
7
Oct 14, 2015 02:06 PM
HoosierinWA
Tech / General Engine
5
Oct 7, 2015 10:15 AM
MitcherNeaf
DIY PROM
3
Sep 24, 2015 09:23 PM
jayhah2
Aftermarket Product Review
29
May 22, 2003 10:13 AM
Gumby
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
Feb 14, 2003 06:58 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50 AM.