DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

feedback on my SA..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2004 | 01:12 PM
  #1  
devilfish's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
From: Sweden
feedback on my SA..

Im doing a bin as my "base" bin. Just to get me started.
I wounder if you could give me some feedback on this SA?

First I here is my setup:

1991 vette 6spd
LT1 intake
Trick Flow 23 alu heads 62cc heads
LT4 hotcamkit
Longtube headers
No EGR

I used the stock vette bin with some mods. I lowerd the cruise timing from 46 (stock) to 44 due to not having EGR.
I also took away a dip in the SA from the stock bin at 3600rpm@70-75Kpa, I guess GM made it there cause thats where the old TPI made most torque right?, and I made it more "smooth".
I also changed the low (20Kpa) from 46 (stock) to 38 to help deaccel.
On the 95 and 100Kpa I added all the PE spark advance i got and zeroed out that tabel.

My closed TPS SA is 29 at idle.
Attached Thumbnails feedback on my SA..-sa.gif  
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2004 | 06:29 PM
  #2  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: feedback on my SA..

Originally posted by devilfish
Im doing a bin as my "base" bin. Just to get me started.
I wounder if you could give me some feedback on this SA?

I lowerd the cruise timing from 46 (stock) to 44 due to not having EGR.

I also took away a dip in the SA from the stock bin at 3600rpm@70-75Kpa, I guess GM made it there cause thats where the old TPI made most torque right?, and I made it more "smooth".


I also changed the low (20Kpa) from 46 (stock) to 38 to help deaccel.

On the 95 and 100Kpa I added all the PE spark advance i got and zeroed out that tabel.

My closed TPS SA is 29 at idle.
I've not seen any real reason to run over 40d. I'll give a 1-2 MPG for longer engine life.

If you must, you must. Smooth is for you, not the engine.

OK

That's what I do.

The idle timing seems a tad high, and the 600-800 jump might cause some idle speed wandering.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2004 | 09:04 PM
  #3  
devilfish's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
From: Sweden
thanks! Thats just the kind of feedback I whanted.

Yes I thought the crusing timing whas VERY high in the stock chip ( 46 degrees ), I guess GM did that for mpg .
Please correct me if im wrong, but does more timing tend to give better throttel response?
So I should I keep it around 36-37 in those areas, and then go from there, increase it only if the engine seems to like it?

thanks for the input.

Last edited by devilfish; Dec 15, 2004 at 09:35 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 08:55 AM
  #4  
gta324's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 1
From: sweden
Car: GTA -89
Engine: Blown 415"
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: Strange 12-bolt
Depending on your idle speed you may look into the area where it goes from Closed TPS to Main spark table and make it a smooth transition.

I've found that 0 out the "Idle spark Advance/retard vs rpm error" is helpful when it comes to tune the idle, you could return to theese tables when you are done (with closed TPS SA and VE and O2 swing points) to see it helps to stablize the idle......

/N.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 09:33 AM
  #5  
jackballs529's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 313
Likes: 1
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1987 Iroc-z
Engine: 355/Edelbrkhds/lpe219cam/MiniRam/
Transmission: 700R4/3.27 9bolt
I have yet to tune spark tables. Can anyone tell me how and why the spark table have different timing in the cells that flow left to right? I understand that a RPM needs a certain timing but why do the table change in all the cells left to right. I hope I'm making myself clear.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 09:49 AM
  #6  
Dave_Jones's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 462
Likes: 1
From: Ft. Leavenworth, KS
Car: 83 TA, 89 TTA, others
Engine: ZZ4 TPI, LC2 turbo v6
Transmission: several, mostly broken
Originally posted by jackballs529
Can anyone tell me how and why the spark table have different timing in the cells that flow left to right? I understand that a RPM needs a certain timing but why do the table change in all the cells left to right. I hope I'm making myself clear.
The difference is in MAP value, which you can think of as representing engine load.

Consider the difference between pulling up a steep hill, or coasting down it. You could be at 2000 RPM in either case, but the load on the engine would be dramatically different. So, the amount of fuel & air in the cylinder is different, and requires a different amount of time to burn, which is why you have a difference in SA.

On a MAF car, it'd be LV8 (a calculated load variable) instead of MAP, but it's the same concept.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 09:59 AM
  #7  
jackballs529's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 313
Likes: 1
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1987 Iroc-z
Engine: 355/Edelbrkhds/lpe219cam/MiniRam/
Transmission: 700R4/3.27 9bolt
So the 20,30,40, etc. columns are a Load variable?
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 10:11 AM
  #8  
Dave_Jones's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 462
Likes: 1
From: Ft. Leavenworth, KS
Car: 83 TA, 89 TTA, others
Engine: ZZ4 TPI, LC2 turbo v6
Transmission: several, mostly broken
In the example above, it's Manifold Absolute Pressure, in KPa...which you can consider as reflecting engine load.

Atmospheric pressure is very close to 100 KPa at sea level. So, MAP=100, means full atmospheric pressure in the manifold, which means WOT. (for a N/A car, anyway ) Think of that as being max load.

A stockish car might idle at around 20-30 KPa, so you can think of that as being minimum load.

Make sense?

Last edited by Dave_Jones; Dec 16, 2004 at 10:18 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 10:13 AM
  #9  
jackballs529's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 313
Likes: 1
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1987 Iroc-z
Engine: 355/Edelbrkhds/lpe219cam/MiniRam/
Transmission: 700R4/3.27 9bolt
So I guess on my MAF car, more timing for less load?
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 11:06 AM
  #10  
devilfish's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
From: Sweden
Anyone else got some ides besides grumpy. I trying to learn a good way to work with the SA
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 03:54 PM
  #11  
devilfish's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
From: Sweden
Re: Re: feedback on my SA..

Originally posted by Grumpy
I've not seen any real reason to run over 40d. I'll give a 1-2 MPG for longer engine life.

If you must, you must. Smooth is for you, not the engine.

OK

That's what I do.

The idle timing seems a tad high, and the 600-800 jump might cause some idle speed wandering.
'

grumpy, you dont se any other abnormal with the tabel, its pretty much a stock vette bin.

cheers.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ed1LE
Suspension and Chassis
8
Sep 30, 2018 09:14 AM
camaroracer21
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
14
Oct 6, 2015 03:23 PM
Scorched1984
Tech / General Engine
1
Sep 15, 2015 03:42 PM
morrow
Fabrication
0
Sep 14, 2015 09:01 PM
UltRoadWarrior9
Transmissions and Drivetrain
3
Sep 2, 2015 08:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 PM.