DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Telltale signs.... ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 17, 2005 | 12:39 AM
  #1  
Doward's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Telltale signs.... ?

What are some tell-tale signs that I'm running out of injector?

I'm just curious...
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2005 | 01:29 AM
  #2  
3.8TransAM's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 2
From: Schererville , IN
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
Observe duty cycle.

U can do this depending on the ecm with datalogging software or failing that, using a meter with a friend shotgun wired into the inj wires.

If u have a wideband u could try adding in a larger PE fuel change and see if u get an actual increase or not(not the safest way Iw ould recommend however)

Basic math vs number of injectrs and pound hr rating of the injectors and a conservative hp figure for you car would also possibly clue you in.

later
Jeremy
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2005 | 10:20 AM
  #3  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: Telltale signs.... ?

Originally posted by Doward
What are some tell-tale signs that I'm running out of injector?
If you up the HP to more then stock, by 10% or more, IMO, you should be looking at running larger ones.

There's not math that will really account for figuring out how much fuel you'll need for Accleration Enrichment. You can use .65 (since your's is a turbo), and do the BSFC math, as a estimate.

IMO, GM paid some serious money for hiring the R+D people they have, and they probably considered alot of items *we've* not even thought of in their injector sizing. So, again, IMO, if you want to say double the HP from stock, then run double the injector size. I don't know where this *run the smallest injector possible* idealology started, but long term, biggers have always run faster, longer, with fewer problems from what I've seen.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2005 | 11:52 PM
  #4  
Doward's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
I do plan on running biggers... I'm running 22s right now, idling/etc good. Running about 10psi, last time I checked, was just wondering if there were any tell-tale signs I'm going static
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 01:28 AM
  #5  
Raiden's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: near seattle
Ok, this is something I've been asking about with no real answers. How do you figure out the % of duty cycle your running? I think this may be how to do it, but not sure????

DC=PW*(RPM/60000)*100%

Pw I have a base pulse width in ms.

So @ 3000 rpms with an injector pulse width of 14.43 look like this;

14.43 (300\60000) = .727 = ~ 73%?

12.1 ( 5000\60000) = %100...

Thank you for your help
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 06:10 AM
  #6  
RednGold86Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 1
From: Corona
Car: 92 Form, 91 Z28, 89 GTA, 86 Z28
Engine: BP383 vortech, BP383, 5.7 TPI, LG4
Transmission: 4L60e, 700R4, 700R4..
Axle/Gears: 3.27, 2.73
Raiden, yeah that's right except you have a typo: 3000 instead of 300 in the equation.



Grumpy: When you're doing your worst case AE, have you hooked up an oscilloscope to watch the injectors firing? Have you seen that you're getting up near 100%? If not approaching 100%, then it's a calibration or software issue (not a defect per say, just sw not capable of getting the DC up quickly enough or far enough). If you are hitting high DC, and needing it, and the SW is capable, then it's another point of reference for me.

TBI AE is the hardest to calibrate IMO. A snap from idle quite
often results in an intake backfire pop.

Just from some rough approximations, I'd say the factory injectors should be at about 70% duty cycle on a warm engine at peak HP. I could look up some old logs, I guess - ok, just did, a little less than 70%.

Keeping the injectors small enough to idle smoothly in the injection mode offered by the ECU is one critical point (that PW varies from type of injector). Keeping them big enough to supply fuel at Max HP worst case BSFC (cold engine - WOT - PE) is another. It's called Dynamic Range. FMU's and additional injectors extend the dynamic range but weren't considered in the original code = band aid. Sequential injection is one way to double the PW (good idle) while avoiding spraying the whole load into an open intake valve (lots of liquid fuel hits the cylinder walls and spark plug = not good for idle and emissions).

Enough rambling. Gotta go eat.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 02:52 PM
  #7  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by RednGold86Z

1) Grumpy: When you're doing your worst case AE, have you hooked up an oscilloscope to watch the injectors firing? Have you seen that you're getting up near 100%? If not approaching 100%, then it's a calibration or software issue (not a defect per say, just sw not capable of getting the DC up quickly enough or far enough). If you are hitting high DC, and needing it, and the SW is capable, then it's another point of reference for me.

2) TBI AE is the hardest to calibrate IMO. A snap from idle quite
often results in an intake backfire pop.

3) Keeping the injectors small enough to idle smoothly in the injection mode offered by the ECU is one critical point (that PW varies from type of injector). Keeping them big enough to supply fuel at Max HP worst case BSFC (cold engine - WOT - PE) is another. It's called Dynamic Range. FMU's and additional injectors extend the dynamic range but weren't considered in the original code = band aid.

Sequential injection is one way to double the PW (good idle) while avoiding spraying the whole load into an open intake valve (lots of liquid fuel hits the cylinder walls and spark plug = not good for idle and emissions).

1) Nope, I've never try to drive car, and watch a scope, at the same time, never.
I data log and look at everything later. I will from the corner of my eye watch my WB LEDs to see if they're green or red, but that's it.

There's more to it then time on.
AE is delivered thur pulse width, unlike with a carb where you can use a large pump cam, and get a shorter higher volume pump shot. This having a higher initial pump shot with the larger injectors, goes a long way to keeping a motor out of tip-in preignition.

2) I don't know if I'd totally agree with that. IMO, it's also about manifold type, and injector sizing.

3) I think that's been WAYYYYYYYY over stated. I can run 60 PPH injectors in batch fire or SEFI mode on my lil 231 with just as smooth of an idle as it had with 30 PPH injectors (stock).
SEFI is just doubling the PW, and firing 1/2 as often (though in reference to cyl seq), as executed in the C3/P4 SEFIs. There's lots of room to improve on that.
Are you sure?, or repeating theory?

Last edited by Grumpy; Jul 18, 2005 at 02:56 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 07:08 PM
  #8  
RednGold86Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 1
From: Corona
Car: 92 Form, 91 Z28, 89 GTA, 86 Z28
Engine: BP383 vortech, BP383, 5.7 TPI, LG4
Transmission: 4L60e, 700R4, 700R4..
Axle/Gears: 3.27, 2.73
I'll test the engine out emissions, and idle quality, injector pw differences, etc.. today, at several injector closing angles, and report back. Might as well (have a car on the dyno now - EURO3 calibration). Tested WOT power (only at a single RPM - 5700, and on an engine dyno) at while shooting on an open valve, last week, and saw less than a .1 N*m change which means nothing.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 08:47 PM
  #9  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
TBI AE is tricky, at least with stock code it is. Having a wet plenum and 2 large injectors above the throttle blades doesn't exactly win any throttle responce contests... but it's acceptable and crisp if time is spent working on it. Small plenum and high fuel pressure makes short time of the tuning, or at least it's done so for me.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1991camaro1996
Tech / General Engine
5
Oct 9, 2014 11:26 AM
Ozz1967
Tech / General Engine
2
Dec 5, 2010 11:15 AM
ledhead96
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
May 11, 2005 10:19 PM
DSM
History / Originality
16
Apr 27, 2004 10:52 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 AM.