What we really need
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
What we really need
I'm in luv.
I sure wish one of the software guys could adapt a 8051 (95ish LT1 PCM) to work with a distributor. Or someone to run an optispark off of the distributor drive.
Flash PCMs are just insanely nice to work with. I've been playing with one without using the MAF, and just in MAP mode, what a neat setup.
Even if it lost the SEFI, it would still be nice. Interesting seeing what the individual cylinder trim numbers are.
Cheers
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Red Bud, Illinois
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383
Transmission: Pro-Built 700R4 2400 ACT Stall
Axle/Gears: 2.77 Borg Warner 9-Bolt
Interesting, i'd be up for the challenge had someone done such a thing.
------------------
89 IROC-Z 350 TPI
-Flowmaster Catback
-Performance Resource Chip
-700R4 (Rebuilt) Too much done to actually list
-K&N Airfilters
-Ported Plenum
-2.77 Gears (not much to brag about but eh, its there)
-MSD 8.5 mm plug wires
-Gutted cat
-!AIR
-Gutted Air Boxes
------------------
89 IROC-Z 350 TPI
-Flowmaster Catback
-Performance Resource Chip
-700R4 (Rebuilt) Too much done to actually list
-K&N Airfilters
-Ported Plenum
-2.77 Gears (not much to brag about but eh, its there)
-MSD 8.5 mm plug wires
-Gutted cat
-!AIR
-Gutted Air Boxes
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Tomcat:
Grumpy , why not just stick a twin encoder disc into your dizzy and graft the photo encoder inside ? , the PCM doesnt need to know its not mounted on the front .</font>
Grumpy , why not just stick a twin encoder disc into your dizzy and graft the photo encoder inside ? , the PCM doesnt need to know its not mounted on the front .</font>
At times, I wonder about using an addition sensor in the dissy, for the cam reference, and then using the FUEL eDist. I think MSD even makes a dissy with a synch sensor in it now.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Red Bud, Illinois
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383
Transmission: Pro-Built 700R4 2400 ACT Stall
Axle/Gears: 2.77 Borg Warner 9-Bolt
explain to me what the twin encoder disc, etc stuff does. I've seen people mention it on the mailing list but never understood what it was.
------------------
89 IROC-Z 350 TPI
-Flowmaster Catback
-Performance Resource Chip
-700R4 (Rebuilt) Too much done to actually list
-K&N Airfilters
-Ported Plenum
-2.77 Gears (not much to brag about but eh, its there)
-MSD 8.5 mm plug wires
-Gutted cat
-!AIR
-Gutted Air Boxes
------------------
89 IROC-Z 350 TPI
-Flowmaster Catback
-Performance Resource Chip
-700R4 (Rebuilt) Too much done to actually list
-K&N Airfilters
-Ported Plenum
-2.77 Gears (not much to brag about but eh, its there)
-MSD 8.5 mm plug wires
-Gutted cat
-!AIR
-Gutted Air Boxes
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by BLOWN85/TA:
Grump In a way GM already did that. They used the distributor for the cam sensor and installed a crank sensor in the timing cover. This was SFI on the Vortec 5.7 engine for the trucks.</font>
Grump In a way GM already did that. They used the distributor for the cam sensor and installed a crank sensor in the timing cover. This was SFI on the Vortec 5.7 engine for the trucks.</font>
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Street and Performance has a retrofit to adapt SEFI and the '95 PCM to an older TPI vehicle. It has already been done. Not sure about how they handled the distributor situation. But, I do remember that you needed to swap to a different distributor. This info was posted on one of the old thirdgen boards a long time ago. I downloaded the article but have lost it. Was pretty cool.
Tim
------------------
TRAXION's 1990 IROC-Z
Best Time = 12.244 @ 112.51mph (1.778 60' / 7.819@88.32mph in the 1/8)
All Natural. No Force. No Drugs. Stock Bottom End. Stock Body Panels.
Gunning for NA 11's with bigger cam, bigger stall, and bigger exhaust.
-=ICON Motorsports=-
Moderator: PROM board at thirdgen.org
Tim
------------------
TRAXION's 1990 IROC-Z
Best Time = 12.244 @ 112.51mph (1.778 60' / 7.819@88.32mph in the 1/8)
All Natural. No Force. No Drugs. Stock Bottom End. Stock Body Panels.
Gunning for NA 11's with bigger cam, bigger stall, and bigger exhaust.
-=ICON Motorsports=-
Moderator: PROM board at thirdgen.org



