Were 3rd gens meant to be DIY tuned?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: Mantua, Ohio
Car: 86 Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: 305ci TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Were 3rd gens meant to be DIY tuned?
Just wondering if our cars ECMs were meant to be tunable, because I'll bet if GM wanted to, they could make it impossible. But then again, they might want to make it very possible intentionally so that there are more 3rd gens that are tuned and fast, thus more popular!?
Are there any cars made that are intended for you to be able to tune from the factory? I imagine there being a lot of liability problems when people mess up their cars if that were sold.
Just some boredom thoughts..
Are there any cars made that are intended for you to be able to tune from the factory? I imagine there being a lot of liability problems when people mess up their cars if that were sold.
Just some boredom thoughts..
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 2
From: Schererville , IN
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
Re: Were 3rd gens meant to be DIY tuned?
Our factory alignments are made for the slow dumb people who cant drive.
U can easily be more aggressive with it and suffer no ill consequences.
Do u need 150mph? the TPI 350 cars could do it and TTA's easily pass that mark....................
Cars are built for the general public, meaning safe, always easy to control, someone with a brain and a little ability can easily push the envelope further than the general public who are dense and of a "herd" mentality.
If u werent above average intelligence of the general population, you wouldnt be here asking things about tuning lol U would be satisifed with good enough and how it already is, not what u could do with it if u opened up your mind.
No car company wants warranty issues, hence everything is safe and conservative. Not to be mean, but the general population does tend to be stupid and/or uneducated, which also causes problems such as: "U gave me the car that made me hit the tree at 150mph!" lol
later
Jeremy
U can easily be more aggressive with it and suffer no ill consequences.
Do u need 150mph? the TPI 350 cars could do it and TTA's easily pass that mark....................
Cars are built for the general public, meaning safe, always easy to control, someone with a brain and a little ability can easily push the envelope further than the general public who are dense and of a "herd" mentality.
If u werent above average intelligence of the general population, you wouldnt be here asking things about tuning lol U would be satisifed with good enough and how it already is, not what u could do with it if u opened up your mind.
No car company wants warranty issues, hence everything is safe and conservative. Not to be mean, but the general population does tend to be stupid and/or uneducated, which also causes problems such as: "U gave me the car that made me hit the tree at 150mph!" lol
later
Jeremy
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 5
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Re: Were 3rd gens meant to be DIY tuned?
Did GM intend us to tune the ECMs? I highly doubt it.
If you think that GM was working 3-5 years ahead on the ECMs before installing them, then all the technology is based on early-mid 1980s microprocessor knowledge - which was still in it's infancy at that time. Memory space & execution speeds were the main concern at that time, not security. I know this, because I was working with micros at that time myself and there was limited knowledge.
Security against reverse engineering of the code wasn't a concern because most of the general public were just starting to learn about computers, such as the Apple II and Commodore 64. The Internet wasn't even a dream. So the vast majority of the population just didn't possess the knowledge to hack the ECM. Just a few odd *****.
But in the last 20-25 years, the number of the odd ***** has grown as well as the knowledge. Where a number of guys on this board even have fully functioning code. GM never even saw this coming.
If you think that GM was working 3-5 years ahead on the ECMs before installing them, then all the technology is based on early-mid 1980s microprocessor knowledge - which was still in it's infancy at that time. Memory space & execution speeds were the main concern at that time, not security. I know this, because I was working with micros at that time myself and there was limited knowledge.
Security against reverse engineering of the code wasn't a concern because most of the general public were just starting to learn about computers, such as the Apple II and Commodore 64. The Internet wasn't even a dream. So the vast majority of the population just didn't possess the knowledge to hack the ECM. Just a few odd *****.
But in the last 20-25 years, the number of the odd ***** has grown as well as the knowledge. Where a number of guys on this board even have fully functioning code. GM never even saw this coming.
Re: Were 3rd gens meant to be DIY tuned?
Did GM intend us to tune the ECMs? I highly doubt it.
If you think that GM was working 3-5 years ahead on the ECMs before installing them, then all the technology is based on early-mid 1980s microprocessor knowledge - which was still in it's infancy at that time. Memory space & execution speeds were the main concern at that time, not security. I know this, because I was working with micros at that time myself and there was limited knowledge.
Security against reverse engineering of the code wasn't a concern because most of the general public were just starting to learn about computers, such as the Apple II and Commodore 64. The Internet wasn't even a dream. So the vast majority of the population just didn't possess the knowledge to hack the ECM. Just a few odd *****.
But in the last 20-25 years, the number of the odd ***** has grown as well as the knowledge. Where a number of guys on this board even have fully functioning code. GM never even saw this coming.
If you think that GM was working 3-5 years ahead on the ECMs before installing them, then all the technology is based on early-mid 1980s microprocessor knowledge - which was still in it's infancy at that time. Memory space & execution speeds were the main concern at that time, not security. I know this, because I was working with micros at that time myself and there was limited knowledge.
Security against reverse engineering of the code wasn't a concern because most of the general public were just starting to learn about computers, such as the Apple II and Commodore 64. The Internet wasn't even a dream. So the vast majority of the population just didn't possess the knowledge to hack the ECM. Just a few odd *****.
But in the last 20-25 years, the number of the odd ***** has grown as well as the knowledge. Where a number of guys on this board even have fully functioning code. GM never even saw this coming.
Thanks
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: Mantua, Ohio
Car: 86 Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: 305ci TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Were 3rd gens meant to be DIY tuned?
Those are good points, at the time it must have never crossed anyones mind that ECM or PROM tuning after the factory would even take place.
The reason I ask is actually based on a conversation with a guy at work who thought there was no way Id be able to change anything about my car's computer haha.
It is correct that as for as cars' computers go, anyone on here IS more intelligent than average, simply by... reading! hmm, reading is easy
The reason I ask is actually based on a conversation with a guy at work who thought there was no way Id be able to change anything about my car's computer haha.
It is correct that as for as cars' computers go, anyone on here IS more intelligent than average, simply by... reading! hmm, reading is easy
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992rs/ss
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
14
Jan 31, 2025 05:10 PM
1992rs/ss
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
Jan 28, 2016 09:58 PM




