DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

27C128 prom?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2002 | 11:56 AM
  #1  
tpi_roc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
From: Orygun
27C128 prom?

If 27C128 is the prom type for a '165 maf, Is an "EEPROM" for a '165 maf ecm still considered a 27C128 ?

I'm looking to buy some EEPROMS, and wondering what to buy and who's the best vendor


Anybody have good success with a specific brand/company? thanks
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2002 | 12:56 PM
  #2  
I8AStang's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Buy them used elctronic surplus, and an eraser would be nice. New they run about 5$ a piece for chips. I have been getting batches of 10 on ebay used and erased (27c128, 256, and 32) for 5$. I have had a problem with some of them not being erased, but 90% of them have been. erased
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2002 | 01:01 PM
  #3  
tpi_roc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
From: Orygun
Ok used...

But is it still considered a 27C128 if its EEPROM instead of PROM?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2002 | 02:37 PM
  #4  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
No. You are confused. EPROMs are eraseable via UV Light. EEPROMs are Electonically Eraseable. 27C128 refers to an EPROM ... not a EEPROM. The only EEPROM that I know that has the same requirements (pin-wise) as the 27C128 is the Atmel 29C256 ... but, its 256K so you'll have to write the program into the upper half.

Tim
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2002 | 02:54 PM
  #5  
AlexJH's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 812
Likes: 1
Engine: 5.7L V8
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by TRAXION
but, its 256K so you'll have to write the program into the upper half.
Which is very easy to do.

Don't bother with EPROMs, they're old tech. Flash is the way to go.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2002 | 02:54 PM
  #6  
tpi_roc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
From: Orygun
Ahh ok that helps a bit


So do you burn the bin twice? or 0/1 out the upper half or what do you do with the spare memory?

I'd like to go EEPROM

[edit] errr, i guess the blank space would be at the lower half?

Last edited by tpi_roc; Apr 12, 2002 at 03:22 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2002 | 02:55 PM
  #7  
tpi_roc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
From: Orygun
Thanks btw
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2002 | 07:31 PM
  #8  
AlexJH's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 812
Likes: 1
Engine: 5.7L V8
Transmission: 700R4
What I do is open a DOS windows and do a 'copy /b edited.bin + edited.bin burn.bin'

where burn.bin is the one that gets burned to the chip. This way I don't worry about offsets.

In the future I'll have two different bins that get copied together and a switch so that I can select between the two, but that's a long term plan.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2002 | 10:16 PM
  #9  
Craig Moates's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"
Originally posted by AlexJH
What I do is open a DOS windows and do a 'copy /b edited.bin + edited.bin burn.bin'

where burn.bin is the one that gets burned to the chip. This way I don't worry about offsets.

In the future I'll have two different bins that get copied together and a switch so that I can select between the two, but that's a long term plan.
What Alex said...
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2002 | 10:25 PM
  #10  
tpi_roc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
From: Orygun
Ahh so basically doubling the file size, and filling the 256k..


So just out of curriosity which of the two DOES get used? the first half of the memory or the later half?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2002 | 10:34 PM
  #11  
junkcltr's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 1
From: garage
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
Upper half is used. You can really put anything in the lower half. The lower address space is for selecting other chips in the ECM.
J
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2002 | 10:39 PM
  #12  
tpi_roc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
From: Orygun
sweet

thanks thats what i was lookin for
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2002 | 10:46 PM
  #13  
junkcltr's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 1
From: garage
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
OOOpppss, I just remembered something. The lower half is not for selecting other chips. It is completely unused by the ECM.
J
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2002 | 08:13 PM
  #14  
AlexJH's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 812
Likes: 1
Engine: 5.7L V8
Transmission: 700R4
Actually it's only 16K doubled to 32K... the 256k refers to bits, we usually talk about file sizes in bytes.

Just so you don't get worried when you download bins.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
28
Oct 24, 2025 02:00 PM
89-IROCZ-5.0TPI
TPI
10
Feb 22, 2022 09:26 PM
dusterbd
TPI
0
Sep 29, 2015 08:40 AM
BLK87Z
TBI
2
Sep 18, 2015 11:29 PM
Winchester1094
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
0
Sep 15, 2015 09:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:36 PM.