Electronics Need help wiring something up? Thinking of adding an electrical component to your car? Need help troubleshooting that wiring glitch?

92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 25, 2012 | 05:53 PM
  #1  
Mudd_duck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: SC
Car: 1988 Pontiac T/A; 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: T.B.I 305; MPFI 3.1
92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

Ok, i bought a 92 camaro with the 3.1 engine (needed a fuel pump)
Replaced fuel pump, cleaned fuel rail and injectors and lines...
The ppl i bought the car from said it had a bad computer......
The car had 2 computers and 2 memcals in the car when i got it....
With either comp box hooked up i have the same issue, so i dont think its the actual computer box..
If i insert one memcal in, turn on ignition i get no code twelve and the fan kicks on as soon as the switch is on, the car WILL crank and runs(sh*tty), but runs....
If i put the other memcal in its place i get code twelve, no fan, and ?no fire/gas?....
Does anyone here have any idea as 2 what could possibly be wrong here????

Last edited by Mudd_duck; Jun 26, 2012 at 01:17 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 01:38 PM
  #2  
Mudd_duck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: SC
Car: 1988 Pontiac T/A; 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: T.B.I 305; MPFI 3.1
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

:bump: need assistance
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 07:35 PM
  #3  
Mudd_duck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: SC
Car: 1988 Pontiac T/A; 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: T.B.I 305; MPFI 3.1
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

Well, im going 2 the junkyard 2morrow and pull a computer or somethin.... maybe ill get lucky...
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 08:00 PM
  #4  
Tuned Performance's Avatar
Sponsor
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 979
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

sounds like a bad memcal, the azty is the best code for a 3.1L v6 with the 700r4 transmission. I have a few v6 memcals that would work or I could reprogram for you, let me know if you need assistance.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 08:04 PM
  #5  
Mudd_duck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: SC
Car: 1988 Pontiac T/A; 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: T.B.I 305; MPFI 3.1
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

"azty"? Is that printed on the memcal?
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 08:10 PM
  #6  
Tuned Performance's Avatar
Sponsor
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 979
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

yes, The letters on the silver sticker on the memcal is called the broad cast code.

http://www.gearhead-efi.com/BCCFind/
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 08:19 PM
  #7  
Mudd_duck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: SC
Car: 1988 Pontiac T/A; 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: T.B.I 305; MPFI 3.1
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

The one that will crank the car is axdh 0179
The other one is aujw 0976

Are either those the right #s for my car?
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 08:22 PM
  #8  
Tuned Performance's Avatar
Sponsor
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 979
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

BCC= AXDH0179 Scan id= 9994 Part number= 16160178
Release date= 09/10/90 Engine size= 3.8 Trans Type= Auto trans
ECM/PCM: ECM #16141470

Used in cars:
Oldsmobile Buick
Possibly used in:
98 TOURING SEDAN 98 REGENCY ELITE PARK AVENUE ULTRA
PARK AVENUE

Options:
With F17 TRANSAXLE, FINAL DRIVE, 2.84 RATIO
With L27 3.8L GAS 6 CYL SFI V6
With NA5 FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 08:23 PM
  #9  
Tuned Performance's Avatar
Sponsor
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 979
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

the aujw is the one that should work in your car with a 1227730 ecm
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 08:31 PM
  #10  
Mudd_duck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: SC
Car: 1988 Pontiac T/A; 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: T.B.I 305; MPFI 3.1
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

Originally Posted by tunedperformanc
the aujw is the one that should work in your car with a 1227730 ecm
Ok, but when this one is hooked up i get no fuel... If i spray start fluid in the intake itll fire over but other than that nothing....
Its like its not controling the ?injectors?
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 08:36 PM
  #11  
Tuned Performance's Avatar
Sponsor
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 979
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

you stated above the one memcal will run but bad a no communication with the ecm this should be your aujw memcal in limp home mode.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 08:42 PM
  #12  
Mudd_duck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: SC
Car: 1988 Pontiac T/A; 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: T.B.I 305; MPFI 3.1
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

Thats the one that throws code twelve but no crank,
The other has no code but will crank....
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 08:58 PM
  #13  
Tuned Performance's Avatar
Sponsor
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 979
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

maybe its a vats issue with that memcal cutting injector pulse.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 09:02 PM
  #14  
Mudd_duck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: SC
Car: 1988 Pontiac T/A; 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: T.B.I 305; MPFI 3.1
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

Im going 2 a junkyard tomorrow, is there a list or something of usable computers/memcals?
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 09:08 PM
  #15  
Tuned Performance's Avatar
Sponsor
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 979
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

any of these ecm numbers 1227730 / 16196344 / 16198262

you can see some of the bcc here, vats started in 89

http://www.3rdgenformula.com/90/promcodes.htm

http://www.3rdgenformula.com/91/promcodes.htm

http://www.3rdgenformula.com/92/promcodes.htm
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 09:12 PM
  #16  
Tuned Performance's Avatar
Sponsor
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 979
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

you can see if you are getting the vats signal from the passkey module too the ecm on the ecm pin f10 dark blue wire it should be 30hz 50-60 %
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 09:17 PM
  #17  
Mudd_duck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: SC
Car: 1988 Pontiac T/A; 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: T.B.I 305; MPFI 3.1
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

Thats awesome, thanks man, hopefully i can find something tomorrow...
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 09:23 PM
  #18  
Tuned Performance's Avatar
Sponsor
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 979
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

you might check that vats before you start buying unnecessary parts. You can check this with a vom that has the hz setting koeo or cranking.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 10:53 PM
  #19  
Mudd_duck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: SC
Car: 1988 Pontiac T/A; 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: T.B.I 305; MPFI 3.1
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

What exactly do i need 2 do to check the vats, ill try that before i go to the jy
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 11:03 PM
  #20  
Tuned Performance's Avatar
Sponsor
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 979
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

I listed the testing above use a volt ohm meter with a hz setting with the key on engine off or cranking and see if you get a signal to the ecm pin f10 dark blue wire. You can bypass the key resister bye installing the correct resister across the harness see link below, and it may fix the issue.

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/elec...stor-help.html
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2012 | 04:08 PM
  #21  
Mudd_duck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: SC
Car: 1988 Pontiac T/A; 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: T.B.I 305; MPFI 3.1
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

Ok so the junkyard was a waste of time, and as far as vats goes, i went 2 a dealership, and found out the key was a #12, 6040 ohms?
Put 3 resistors together to get 5940, that should be within tolerance...
Plugged into harness clip.
Still nothing....
Any ideas?
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2012 | 04:19 PM
  #22  
Tuned Performance's Avatar
Sponsor
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 979
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

so you are not getting a hz signal too the ecm ?
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2012 | 04:27 PM
  #23  
Mudd_duck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: SC
Car: 1988 Pontiac T/A; 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: T.B.I 305; MPFI 3.1
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

Lol still not exactly 100% on where this dark blue wire is you speak of, there are at least 3 blue wires on the ecm..... And i dont wanna mess anything up by poking around in somethin i dont know anything about, Without doing some homework...

Are there any pics or illustraition of the ecm wiring...?
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2012 | 05:05 PM
  #24  
Tuned Performance's Avatar
Sponsor
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 979
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

unplug the yellow or green connector on the ecm. this is for tpi but the input f10 is the same for vats.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2012 | 09:50 AM
  #25  
Mudd_duck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: SC
Car: 1988 Pontiac T/A; 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: T.B.I 305; MPFI 3.1
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

Ok, now that is that, i dont believe the dmm i have has a setting to measure hz... Is there anything else can be done without measuring the hz?
Or am gonna have to run out and get a new multimeter?
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2012 | 10:19 AM
  #26  
Tuned Performance's Avatar
Sponsor
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 979
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

I don't know that you can read the frequency any other way. If you get a vom with a hz setting you can see for sure if its a vats issue or not. If it is you can bypass it with a modulator or have the memcal reprogramed to remove the vats. I have reprogramed out the vats in my two vehicles.


http://www.ebay.com/itm/GM-VATS-or-P...069889&vxp=mtr
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2012 | 10:32 AM
  #27  
Mudd_duck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: SC
Car: 1988 Pontiac T/A; 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: T.B.I 305; MPFI 3.1
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

Ok... Well leaning towards it being the vats module just based on the assumption i have everything but fuel.... I probably should have mention before, the car has a push button start wired inline to the starter....
Judging by what ive read on this site, I think it was a vats issue that the previous owner and "mechanic" misdiagnosed as a computer issue..
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2012 | 10:02 PM
  #28  
Tuned Performance's Avatar
Sponsor
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 979
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: 92 rs camaro ¿computer or memcal bad?

any progress ?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frozer!!!
Camaros for Sale
35
Jan 19, 2024 04:55 PM
TheJoeY88
Electronics
19
Dec 31, 2016 07:30 PM
matthew911
Engine Swap
13
Aug 12, 2015 09:38 AM
Bradsaundry
TPI
7
Aug 12, 2015 12:34 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 AM.